TOEFLIELTS
한국어
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on public activity. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

AI 기반 평가와 피드백이 포함된 실제 사용자 제출 답안

사용자 제출 예시 1개 이용 가능

무료 연습 시작하기

과제 개요

Doctor Achebe

As we have been discussing in class, deciding where to donate money is an important consideration when supporting charitable causes. Some prefer local charities where the impact may be more visible, while others favor international ones tackling issues on a broader scale. With this in mind, when donating money to charity, what factors do you take into account when choosing between local and international organizations?

Andrew

I prefer to give to local charities rather than international ones. Local organizations where I live allow me to witness firsthand the impact my contributions make. The visible difference - even a small amount - motivates me to keep supporting groups creating visible change close to home.

Claire

I believe supporting international charities is most impactful. Though local charities do good work, global issues like climate change and poverty affect millions more people. International groups have the scale and resources to drive systematic change on these pressing problems in ways smaller organizations simply can't. Donating to major international charities can thus create widespread, meaningful impact.

사용자 예시 및 평가 결과

1

사용자 예시 #1

In response to Dr. Achebe’s intriguing query, I appreciate Andrew’s opinion that the result of donations is more visible in the local charities. Howev...

점수
25

사용자 예시

In response to Dr. Achebe’s intriguing query, I appreciate Andrew’s opinion that the result of donations is more visible in the local charities. However, the visible information is not always convincing, they may cheat the donators. Consequently, I find myself resonating more with Claire’s perspective. As Claire mentioned, international charities are more impactful and have more resources than local ones. With international influence, the charities are able to help about the global issues, such as climate change or nature disasters in the other countries. Besides, there are usually quite a few professionals in the members of international charities, who have the ability to carry out the charity plan systematically and efficiently without wasting. Therefore, donating to them makes this action more meaningful for me. Furthermore, the international charities are usually more convincing than the local charities. Usually, to attract more donations, international charities would public how they use the funds on the internet or the newspapers. However, the local charities seldom have such professional procedure of pubic their information, which make me worry that if they are truly helping people with my donation. For instance, about 10 yeas ago, I donated to a charity organized near the city I lived, wishing to offer my help to more people. However, just 3 months after donating, I found in news that the charity was just using their funds to their own investment, instead of helpful activities.

평가 결과

1. 子项得分

Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5 Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0 Language Use and Grammar: 4.0

2. 预估分数

25. 3 任务完成度

总体来说,这篇文章较好地完成了任务要求,表达了作者对于捐赠给国际慈善机构的支持。但是,有一些方面可以改进。首先,在提到本地慈善机构可能存在欺诈行为时,可以给出更具体的例子或数据来支持观点。其次,在讨论国际慈善机构的优势时,可以提供更多详细的信息和实例来说明它们如何解决全球问题。

Example 1: Instead of "the visible information is not always convincing, they may cheat the donators.", you could write "There have been cases where local charities misused the funds they received, such as the XYZ Charity scandal in 2010, where a significant portion of donations was used for personal gains."

Example 2: Instead of "With international influence, the charities are able to help about the global issues, such as climate change or nature disasters in the other countries.", you could write "International charities like UNICEF or Oxfam have implemented large-scale projects addressing global issues like climate change by supporting renewable energy initiatives and providing disaster relief to affected countries."

4. 文章结构与组织

文章结构基本合理,包括引言、正文和结论。然而,在组织上还有一些可以改进的地方。首先,引言部分可以更明确地表达作者的观点,以便读者一开始就能了解文章的主题。其次,在正文部分,可以使用更清晰的过渡词或短语来连接不同观点和段落。

Example 1: Instead of "In response to Dr. Achebe’s intriguing query, I appreciate Andrew’s opinion that the result of donations is more visible in the local charities.", you could write "In response to Dr. Achebe's question, although I understand Andrew's preference for local charities due to their visible impact, I personally believe that international charities offer more significant benefits."

Example 2: Instead of "As Claire mentioned, international charities are more impactful and have more resources than local ones.", you could write "As Claire mentioned, one major advantage of international charities is their greater impact and resources. For instance, they can address global issues like climate change more effectively."

5. 语法批改

In response to Dr. Achebe’s intriguing query, I appreciate Andrew’s opinion that the result of donations is more visible in the local charities. However, the visible information is not always convincing, they may cheat the donators. Consequently, I find myself resonating more with Claire’s perspective. As Claire mentioned, international charities are more impactful and have more resources than local ones. With international influence, the charities are able to help about the global issues, such as climate change or nature disasters in the other countries. Besides, there are usually quite a few professionals in the members of international charities, who have the ability to carry out the charity plan systematically and efficiently without wasting. Therefore, donating to them makes this action more meaningful for me. Furthermore, the international charities are usually more convincing than the local charities. Usually, to attract more donations, international charities would public how they use the funds on the internet or the newspapers. However, the local charities seldom have such professional procedure of pubicpublic(pubic (public) education etc.) their information, which make me worry that if they are truly helping people with my donation. For instance, about 10 yeas ago, I donated to a charity organized near the city I lived, wishing to offer my help to more people. However, just 3 months after donating, I found in news that the charity was just using their funds to their own investment, instead of helpful activities.

Title: 6 文章修订

In response to Dr. Achebe's thought-provoking question, I acknowledge Andrew's viewpoint that the impact of donations is more tangible in local charities. However, visibility alone does not guarantee the authenticity of a charity, as some may deceive donors. Consequently, I find myself aligning more with Claire's perspective.

As Claire highlighted, international charities tend to be more influential and resourceful than their local counterparts. Their global reach enables them to address pressing issues such as climate change or natural disasters in other countries. Moreover, international charities often consist of numerous professionals who can execute charitable plans systematically and efficiently, minimizing waste. Therefore, donating to these organizations holds greater significance for me.

Additionally, international charities generally appear more credible than local ones. To attract donations, they often disclose their fund usage through online platforms or newspapers. In contrast, local charities rarely follow such transparent procedures, raising concerns about the legitimacy of their operations and the proper allocation of donations. For example, about ten years ago, I contributed to a charity near my city with the intention of helping others. However, just three months later, I discovered through news reports that the organization had misused funds for personal investments rather than charitable endeavors. (203 words)

In response to Dr. Achebe’s intriguing query, I appreciate Andrew’s opinion Achebe's thought-provoking question (revised for a more natural tone), I acknowledge Andrew's viewpoint that the result impact of donations is more visible tangible (changed "visible" to "tangible" for better clarity) in the local charities. However, the visible information is visibility alone does not always convincing, they guarantee the authenticity of a charity, as some may cheat the donators. deceive donors (rephrased for clarity and smoother flow). Consequently, I find myself resonating aligning more with Claire’s Claire's perspective.

As Claire mentioned, highlighted (changed "mentioned" to "highlighted" for better emphasis), international charities are more impactful and have more resources tend to be more influential and resourceful (rephrased for better flow) than local ones. With international influence, the charities are able to help about the their local counterparts. Their global issues, reach enables them to address pressing issues such as climate change or nature natural disasters in the other countries. Besides, there are usually quite a few Moreover, international charities often consist of numerous professionals in the members of international charities, who have the ability to carry out the charity plan can execute charitable plans systematically and efficiently without wasting. efficiently, minimizing waste (rephrased for smoother flow). Therefore, donating to them makes this action more meaningful these organizations holds greater significance for me.

Furthermore, the Additionally, international charities are usually more convincing generally appear more credible than the local charities. Usually, to local ones (rephrased for clarity). To attract more donations, international charities would public how they use the funds on the internet often disclose their fund usage through online platforms or the newspapers. However, the local charities seldom have In contrast, local charities rarely follow such professional procedure of pubic transparent procedures, raising concerns about the legitimacy of their information, which make me worry that if they are truly helping people with my donation. operations and the proper allocation of donations (rephrased for better flow). For instance, example, about 10 yeas ten years ago, I donated contributed to a charity organized near the my city I lived, wishing to offer my help to more people. with the intention of helping others. However, just 3 three months after donating, I found in later, I discovered through news reports that the charity was just using their organization had misused funds to their own investment, instead of helpful activities.for personal investments rather than charitable endeavors (revised sentence structure for smoother flow).

Title: 8 思维导图


1. Introduction
   - Dr. Achebe's question
   - Andrew's viewpoint: local charities
   - Claire's perspective: international charities

2. International Charities Advantages
   - Influence and resources
   - Global reach (climate change, natural disasters)
   - Professionalism and efficiency

3. Credibility of International Charities
   - Transparency in fund usage
   - Comparison with local charities

4. Personal Experience
   - Donation to a local charity
   - Misuse of funds

5. Conclusion
   - Aligning with Claire's perspective on international charities

Title: 9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
tangibleˈtæn.dʒə.bəladjectiveclear enough or definite enough to be easily seen or noticed可触摸的,明确的The impact of donations is more tangible in local charities.
authenticityɔːˌθenˈtɪsətinounthe quality of being genuine or true真实性,可靠性Visibility alone does not guarantee the authenticity of a charity.
influentialˌɪn.fluˈenʃəladjectivehaving a lot of influence on someone or something有影响力的International charities tend to be more influential than their local counterparts.
resourceful-riˈsɔrsfəladjectiveskilled at solving problems and making decisions on your own足智多谋的International charities are often more resourceful than local ones.
systematicallysɪstəˈmætɪkliadverbaccording to an organized plan or method有系统地,有条理地Professionals in international charities can execute charitable plans systematically and efficiently.
credibility-krədəˈbɪlətinounthe quality that someone or something has that makes people believe or trust them可信度,信誉International charities generally appear more credible than local ones.
transparency-trænsˈpærənsinounthe characteristic of being easy to see through, understand, or recognize透明度,公开性To attract donations, international charities often disclose their fund usage with transparency.
legitimacy-lɪˈdʒɪtəməsi--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Academic Discussion 채점 방식

TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제는 ETS 공식 채점 기준에 따라 평가됩니다. AI 평가는 여러 측면에서 각 답안을 분석합니다.

관련성 및 기여도

답안이 질문에 답하고 토론에 의미 있게 기여하는가?

언어 사용

문법 정확성, 어휘 범위, 문장 구조의 질.

전개 및 근거

구체적인 예시와 명확한 논리로 아이디어가 잘 전개되었는가?

답안에서 나타나는 공통 패턴

이 과제에 대한 사용자 제출 답안을 분석한 결과, 학생 답안에서 관찰된 공통 패턴은 다음과 같습니다.

많은 학생이 명확한 의견을 제시하지만 구체적인 뒷받침 예시가 부족합니다.

높은 점수를 받은 답안은 리딩 지문과 다른 참여자의 의견을 직접 인용합니다.

점수가 높은 답안은 다양한 문장 구조와 학술적 어휘를 사용합니다.

시간 관리는 핵심 요소입니다 — 서두른 느낌을 주는 답안은 전개 항목에서 낮은 점수를 받는 경향이 있습니다.

학습 팁

1

글을 쓰기 전에 프롬프트를 꼼꼼히 읽고 질문의 모든 부분을 파악하세요.

2

답안에서 리딩 지문과 다른 학생들의 의견을 언급하세요.

3

핵심 주장을 뒷받침할 구체적인 예시를 사용하고, 일반적인 진술은 피하세요.

4

120~150단어를 목표로 하세요. 답안이 길다고 항상 좋은 것은 아니며, 명료함과 초점이 더 중요합니다.

5

시험 조건에서 유창하게 답하기 위해 시간을 정해(10분) 연습하세요.

자주 묻는 질문

TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제란 무엇인가요?
TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제는 온라인 수업 토론에 참여하는 것을 요구합니다. 교수의 질문과 다른 학생들의 답변을 읽은 후, 약 10분 안에 자신의 의견을 표현하고 뒷받침하는 글을 작성하게 됩니다.
Academic Discussion 과제는 어떻게 채점되나요?
이 과제는 토론과의 관련성, 언어 사용의 질(문법, 어휘, 문장 구조), 그리고 구체적인 예시와 근거를 통해 아이디어를 얼마나 잘 전개하고 뒷받침하는지를 기준으로 0~5점 척도로 채점됩니다.
이 페이지의 사용자 샘플은 무엇인가요?
LingoLeap에서 이 문제를 연습한 실제 TOEFL 응시자들이 제출한 답변입니다. 각 샘플은 저희 AI 채점 엔진에 의해 평가되었으며, 점수와 함께 강점 및 개선이 필요한 부분에 대한 상세한 피드백을 제공합니다.
AI 평가는 얼마나 정확한가요?
LingoLeap의 AI 평가 엔진은 공식 ETS 채점 기준으로 학습되었으며, 실제 채점자의 점수와 비교하여 보정되었습니다. 완벽한 자동 채점 시스템은 없지만, 연습 목적으로 신뢰할 수 있는 피드백을 제공하며 구체적인 개선 영역을 파악하는 데 도움이 됩니다.
이 Academic Discussion 과제를 어떻게 연습할 수 있나요?
무료 LingoLeap 계정에 가입하여 연습할 수 있습니다. 바로 이 질문에 대한 답변을 직접 작성하여 제출하면, 글쓰기에 대한 상세한 피드백과 함께 즉시 AI 평가를 받을 수 있습니다.
Academic Discussion 답변은 얼마나 길게 써야 하나요?
120~150단어를 목표로 하세요. 이 과제는 답변을 작성할 10분의 시간을 제공합니다. 더 긴 답변을 쓰기보다는 명확성, 구체적인 예시로 의견을 뒷받침하는 것, 토론 맥락을 참조하는 것에 집중하세요.

Rooting for Your Goal Score Today!

With LingoLeap, an expert in English exams

Get to Your Dream Score Faster

Try for free now