TOEFLIELTS
日本語
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on sociology. Write a post responding to the professor's question. In your response you should do the following express and support your opinion. Make a contribution to the discussion in your own words An effective response will contain at least 100 words

AIによる評価とフィードバック付きの実際のユーザー投稿

1件のユーザー投稿サンプルがあります

無料練習を始める

タスク概要

Professor

In the next few weeks, we will be discussing various initiatives to help protect the environment. According to one initiative, plastic, which is extremely harmful for the environment, should be banned entirely. However, many products we use every day are made of plastic: food and drink containers, shopping bags furniture, and even cars. Do you agree that the use of plastic should be banned? Why or why not?

Amy

In my opinion, it would be impossible to convince people to stop buying and using plastic products. Plastic is a cheap, durable material, and as Dr. Achebe noted, we use plastic in an abundance of items. I understand the negative impact of plastic on the environment, but we need to find a different solution than a complete ban.

Rory

I believe it's possible to convince people to use at least lessplastic. There are environmentally friendly alternatives to manyplastic products. For example, instead of plastic shopping bags, I use reusable bags made of fabric. People just need to be educated, and many of them will be happy to use less plastic.

ユーザーサンプルと評価結果

1

ユーザーサンプル #1

In response to the professor, I agree on this statement and concur with Rory's viewpoint, whose instance is that people can use at least less plastic....

スコア
27

ユーザーサンプル

In response to the professor, I agree on this statement and concur with Rory's viewpoint, whose instance is that people can use at least less plastic. I have three primary points for my reason. Firstly, using plastic incurs many disadvantages, including polluting the environment and nature unable to recycle appropriately. Most importantly, a significant portion of the population does not pay attention to recycling plastic. Many people casually throw plastic on the street and pile it up, which harms the environment. Secondly, many other attractive choices can replace plastic, such as using glass drinks and bringing your shopping bag when you go out. Finally, With the rapid development of technology, finding the most suitable alternative to plastic products is within reach, while protecting the environment cannot wait any longer. In essence, the use of plastic should be banned to ensure a better quality of life for all inhabitants while preserving our planet for future generations.

評価結果

1.子项得分 Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5 Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0 Language Use and Grammar: 4.0

2.预估分数

27. 3.任务完成度

这篇文章基本上完成了任务要求,但仍有改进的空间。首先,在表达观点时,可以更具体地说明为什么禁止使用塑料是一个好主意。例如,可以提到塑料对海洋生物的影响以及其他环境问题。此外,尽管文章提到了一些替代塑料的方法,但可以更详细地讨论这些方法以及它们如何帮助减少塑料使用。

例1:在讨论禁止使用塑料的原因时,可以添加:“海洋生物经常误食塑料垃圾,导致其死亡。” 例2:在讨论替代方案时,可以添加:“另一个可行的替代品是生物降解材料,如玉米淀粉制成的包装材料。”

4.文章结构与组织 文章结构清晰,包括引言、正文和结论。然而,在段落之间的过渡方面还有改进空间。为了使文章更连贯,请确保在段落之间使用过渡词或短语来引导读者。

例1:在第一段和第二段之间,可以添加过渡词:“首先,使用塑料带来许多弊端,包括污染环境和难以回收。其次,有许多其他有吸引力的选择可以替代塑料。” 例2:在最后一段中,在总结观点时,可以使用过渡词:“综上所述,为了确保所有居民的生活质量并为子孙后代保护我们的星球,应禁止使用塑料。”

5.语法批改

In response to the professor, I agree on this statement and concur with Rory's viewpoint, whose instance is that people can use at least less plastic. I have three primary points for my reason. Firstly, using plastic incurs many disadvantages, including polluting the environment and nature unable to recycle appropriately. Most importantly, a significant portion of the population does not pay attention to recycling plastic. Many people casually throw plastic on the street and pile it up, which harms the environment. Secondly, many other attractive choices can replace plastic, such as using glass drinks and bringing your shopping bag when you go out. Finally, With the rapid development of technology, finding the most suitable alternative to plastic products is within reach, while protecting the environment cannot wait any longer. In essence, the use of plastic should be banned to ensure a better quality of life for all inhabitants while preserving our planet for future generations.

6.文章修订

In response to the professor's question, I concur with Rory's perspective that people can be encouraged to use less plastic. I have three primary reasons for my stance.

Firstly, the utilization of plastic entails numerous disadvantages, such as environmental pollution and challenges in recycling. Most notably, a significant portion of the population neglects proper recycling practices. Many individuals casually discard plastic waste on streets and in landfills, exacerbating environmental issues.

Secondly, there are numerous appealing alternatives to plastic products that can effectively reduce our reliance on them. For instance, glass containers can replace plastic bottles for beverages, and reusable fabric bags can substitute single-use plastic bags during shopping trips.

Lastly, with the rapid advancement of technology, discovering suitable replacements for plastic products is within reach. Meanwhile, addressing environmental concerns cannot be postponed any longer. Therefore, it is imperative to reduce our dependence on plastics and adopt eco-friendly alternatives.

In summary, banning the use of plastic is essential for ensuring a better quality of life for all inhabitants while preserving our planet for future generations. (175 words)

7.文章批改

In response to the professor, professor's question, I agree on this statement and concur (revised for a more formal tone) with Rory's viewpoint, whose instance is perspective that people can be encouraged (changed to passive voice for formality) to use at least less plastic. I have three primary points reasons for my reason. stance.

Firstly, using plastic incurs many the utilization (revised for a more advanced vocabulary) of plastic entails (revised for a more advanced vocabulary) numerous disadvantages, including polluting the environment and nature unable to recycle appropriately. such as environmental pollution and challenges in recycling. Most importantly, notably, a significant portion of the population does not pay attention to neglects (revised for a more formal tone) proper recycling plastic. practices. Many people individuals casually throw plastic discard (revised for a more formal tone) plastic waste on the street and pile it up, which harms the environment. streets and in landfills, exacerbating (revised for a more advanced vocabulary) environmental issues.

Secondly, many other attractive choices there are numerous appealing alternatives to plastic products that can effectively reduce our reliance on them. For instance, glass containers can replace plastic, such as using glass drinks and bringing your plastic bottles for beverages, and reusable fabric bags can substitute single-use plastic bags during shopping bag when you go out. ¶ Finally, With trips.

Lastly, with the rapid development advancement of technology, finding the most discovering suitable alternative to replacements (changed to plural form for consistency) for plastic products is within reach, while protecting the environment reach. Meanwhile, addressing environmental concerns cannot wait be postponed any longer. Therefore, it is imperative (revised for a more advanced vocabulary) to reduce our dependence on plastics and adopt eco-friendly alternatives.

In essence, summary, banning the use of plastic should be banned to ensure is essential for ensuring a better quality of life for all inhabitants while preserving our planet for future generations.

8.思维导图

  • Introduction

    • Concur with Rory
    • Encourage less plastic use
  • Reason 1: Disadvantages of plastic

    • Environmental pollution
    • Challenges in recycling
  • Reason 2: Appealing alternatives

    • Glass containers for beverages
    • Reusable fabric bags for shopping
  • Reason 3: Technological advancements

    • Discovering suitable replacements
    • Addressing environmental concerns urgently
  • Summary:

    • Banning plastic use is essential

9.关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionChinese TranslationSample Sentence
concur/kənˈkɜr/verbTo agree or have the same opinion同意I concur with your assessment of the situation.
utilization/ˌjuːtɪlaɪˈzeɪʃən/nounThe act of using something effectively利用The project aims to increase the utilization of renewable energy sources.
entails/ɪnˈteɪlz/verbTo involve something as a necessary part or result牵涉,需要Taking on this responsibility entails a lot of hard work and dedication.
exacerbate/ɪgˈzæsərbeɪt/verbTo make a problem, bad situation, or negative feeling worse加重,恶化The proposed factory would only exacerbate the pollution problem in the area.
appealing/əˈpiːlɪŋ/adjectiveAttractive or interesting吸引人的The idea of a vacation is very appealing to me right now.
reliance/rɪˈlaɪəns/nounDependence on someone or something依赖Our reliance on fossil fuels must be reduced for a sustainable future.
advancements/ədˈvænsmənts/nounProgress or improvements进步,发展Technological advancements have revolutionized the way we communicate.
replacements/rɪˈpleɪsmənts/nounThings that take the place of others替代品The company is researching new materials as potential replacements for plastics.
imperative/ɪmˈperətɪv/adjectiveExtremely important and needing to be done or dealt with immediately至关重要的It is imperative that we address climate change as soon as possible.

アカデミック・ディスカッションの採点方法

TOEFLアカデミック・ディスカッションのタスクは、ETS公式の採点基準に基づいて評価されます。AI評価は各回答を複数の観点から分析します。

関連性と貢献度

設問に的確に答え、ディスカッションに意味のある貢献をしているか?

言語使用

文法の正確さ、語彙の幅、文構造の質。

展開と裏付け

具体例と明確な論理によってアイデアが十分に展開されているか?

回答に見られる共通パターン

このタスクに寄せられたユーザー投稿の分析に基づき、受験者の回答に見られる共通パターンを紹介します。

多くの受験者は明確な意見を述べるものの、具体的な裏付け例が不足している。

高評価の回答は、リーディングパッセージや他の参加者の意見に直接言及している。

高得点の回答は、多様な文構造とアカデミックな語彙を使用している。

時間配分は重要な要素であり、急いで書かれた印象の回答は展開の評価が低くなる傾向がある。

学習のヒント

1

書き始める前に設問文を注意深く読み、質問のすべての要素を把握する。

2

回答の中でリーディングパッセージや他の受験者の意見に言及する。

3

主張を裏付けるために具体例を使い、一般論は避ける。

4

120~150語を目安にする。長い回答が必ずしも良いわけではなく、明確さと焦点の方が重要。

5

本番同様の条件で流暢さを養うため、時間を計って(10分間)回答する練習をする。

よくある質問

TOEFLのAcademic Discussionタスクとは何ですか?
TOEFLのAcademic Discussionタスクでは、オンラインの授業ディスカッションに参加することが求められます。教授の質問と他の学生の回答を読んだ上で、約10分以内に自分の意見を述べ、それを裏付ける投稿を作成します。
Academic Discussionタスクはどのように採点されますか?
このタスクは0〜5点の尺度で採点され、ディスカッションとの関連性、言語使用の質(文法、語彙、文構造)、そして具体的な例と論理的な根拠を用いてどれだけ考えを展開・裏付けできているかが評価基準となります。
このページに表示されているユーザーサンプルとは何ですか?
これらは、LingoLeap上でこの問題を練習した実際のTOEFL受験者から提出された回答です。各サンプルは当社のAI採点エンジンによって評価されており、スコアと、強みや改善点に関する詳細なフィードバックが提供されます。
AI評価の精度はどの程度ですか?
LingoLeapのAI評価エンジンは、ETSの公式採点基準をもとにトレーニングされ、人間の採点者のスコアと照合して調整されています。自動採点システムに完璧なものはありませんが、練習用として信頼できるフィードバックを提供し、具体的な改善点を特定するのに役立ちます。
このAcademic Discussionタスクをどうやって練習できますか?
無料のLingoLeapアカウントに登録することで練習できます。まさにこの質問に対する自分の回答を書いて提出すると、文章に関する詳細なフィードバック付きのAI評価をすぐに受け取ることができます。
Academic Discussionの回答はどのくらいの長さにすべきですか?
120〜150語を目安にしてください。このタスクでは回答を書くための時間が10分与えられます。より長い回答を書くことよりも、明確さ、具体的な例による意見の裏付け、ディスカッションの文脈への言及を重視してください。

Rooting for Your Goal Score Today!

With LingoLeap, an expert in English exams

Get to Your Dream Score Faster

Try for free now