TOEFLIELTS
日本語
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on consumer behavior. Write a post responding to the professor`s question.

AIによる評価とフィードバック付きの実際のユーザー投稿

1件のユーザー投稿サンプルがあります

無料練習を始める

タスク概要

Doctor Achebe

Let's continue talking about consumer behavior. We have been discussing different ways people go about choosing what products to buy, and there are many potential sources of information and advice for consumers. In your opinion, which is the better strategy for making purchasing decisions, relying on advice from friends and family, or depending on information from online sources? Why?

Claire

Asking friends and family members for product recommendations might seem like an easier option, but it might take too much time to get all the information you need. An Internet search would be much more efficient. There are many consumer magazines available online that compile lots of data to compare the advantages and disadvantages of one product versus another.

Paul

The last time l bought a computer, I just watched a few videos online to make a decision, and now I regret that. My friends could have advised me better because they know my preferences and the kind of features that I am interested in. Consumers should get advice from the people around them to find the most suitable products.

ユーザーサンプルと評価結果

1

ユーザーサンプル #1

I strongly sympathize with Paul's idea that asking friends or relatives who have the experience is more reliable when struggling which to buy. They re...

スコア
25

ユーザーサンプル

I strongly sympathize with Paul's idea that asking friends or relatives who have the experience is more reliable when struggling which to buy. They reason for my choice is straightforward. The friends or family members who had the experinece could help you identify the goods for you since they already encountered that product before. After using for a while, they could provide you a general description with both the advantages and drawbacks of the product which could enrich the aspect when you are judging it. Take myself as an example, I am the kind of person who would like to hearing and getting the information from a diverse areas, especially friends and family members. Before my purchase, I will double check with this group o people to see whether Is it a wise decision to buy it. On the contrary, It is really a bad idea to watch videos or zines online which attract you to buy some products. A great portion of them are inferior goods which would not sell well offline. Additionally, there are millions of fake news with fake informations and even potential frauds online which remind my avoid buying products online.

評価結果

1.子项得分

Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5 Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0 Language Use and Grammar: 3.5

2.预估分数

25. 3.任务完成度

整体而言,这篇文章回答了教授的问题,并表达了作者的观点。然而,有一些地方可以改进。首先,在提供观点时,可以更具体地说明为什么朋友和家人的建议更可靠。其次,尽管文章提到了在线信息可能存在的问题,但可以进一步讨论在线资源如何在某些情况下仍然有用。

示例1:在讨论朋友和家人建议的可靠性时,可以提到他们对我们的需求和喜好有更深入的了解,因此他们的建议可能更符合我们的需求。 示例2:在谈到在线资源时,可以指出一些权威和值得信赖的网站或评论平台可能会提供有价值且客观的信息。

4.文章结构与组织

文章结构基本清晰,包括引言、正文和结论。然而,在组织上还有改进空间。首先,在正文中讨论不同观点时,可以使用主题句来明确每段落的焦点。其次,在段落之间加入过渡词或短语,使文章更连贯。

示例1:在讨论朋友和家人建议的段落开头,可以使用主题句如“朋友和家人的建议往往更可靠,因为他们了解我们的需求和喜好。” 示例2:在从朋友和家人的建议过渡到在线资源时,可以使用过渡词如“然而”或“尽管如此”,例如:“然而,在某些情况下,在线资源也可能提供有价值的信息。”

5.语法批改

I strongly sympathize with Paul's idea that asking friends or relatives who have the experience is more reliable when struggling which to buy. TheyThe(Detects potentially wrong usage of "they") reason for my choice is straightforward. The friends or family members who had the experineceexperience(misspelling) could help you identify the goods for you since they already encountered that product before. After using for a while, they could provide you a general description with both the advantages and drawbacks of the productproduct,(This rule identifies whether commas are missing in a sentence.) which could enrich the aspect when you are judging it. Take myself as an example, I am the kind of person who would like to hearing and getting the information from a diverse areasa diverse area(Agreement: 'a' + plural word), especially friends and family members. Before my purchase, I will double checkdouble-check(missing hyphen in 'double check/click/cross/park') with this group oto(o (to)) people to see whether Is it a wise decision to buy it. On the contrary, It is really a bad idea to watch videos or zines online which attract you to buy some products. A great portion of them are inferior goods which would not sell well offline. Additionally, there are millions of fake news with fake informationsinformation(legal term: informations) and even potential frauds online which remind my avoidto avoid(This rule identifies whether the preposition 'to' is missing in a sentence.) buying products online.

6.文章修订

I firmly agree with Paul's perspective that seeking advice from friends or relatives who have experience with a product is a more reliable approach when deciding on a purchase. The rationale behind my choice is simple: friends and family members who have used the product can provide valuable insights into its advantages and drawbacks, as they are familiar with our preferences and needs.

For instance, I am the type of person who appreciates gathering information from diverse sources, particularly from those close to me. Before making a purchase, I consult with this group of people to determine whether it is a wise decision. In contrast, relying solely on online videos or magazines may lead to purchasing inferior products that would not sell well offline. Moreover, the internet is rife with misinformation and potential scams, which further supports my preference for seeking advice from trusted individuals.

However, it is essential to acknowledge that in some cases, reputable online resources can offer valuable and objective information. Therefore, striking a balance between personal recommendations and trustworthy online sources may be the most effective strategy for making informed purchasing decisions. (187 words)

7.文章批改

I strongly sympathize firmly agree (Changed "strongly sympathize" to "firmly agree" for a more assertive tone) with Paul's idea perspective that asking seeking advice from friends or relatives who have the experience is with a product is a more reliable when approach (Changed "when struggling which to buy. They reason for buy" to "when deciding on a purchase" for clarity) when deciding on a purchase. The rationale behind my choice is straightforward. The simple: friends or and family members who had the experinece could help you identify the goods for you since they already encountered that have used the product before. After using for a while, they could can provide you a valuable insights (Changed "a general description with both the advantages and drawbacks of the product which could enrich the aspect when you drawbacks" to "valuable insights" for conciseness) into its advantages and drawbacks, as they are judging it. Take myself as an example, familiar with our preferences and needs.

For instance, I am the kind type of person who would like to hearing and getting the appreciates gathering information from a diverse areas, especially friends and family members. sources, particularly from those close to me. Before my making a purchase, I will double check consult with this group o of people to determine whether it is a wise decision (Changed "to see whether Is it a wise decision to buy it. On the contrary, It is really a bad idea to watch it" to "to determine whether it is a wise decision" for clarity). In contrast, relying solely on online videos or zines online which attract you to buy some products. A great portion of them are magazines may lead to purchasing inferior goods which products that would not sell well offline. Additionally, there are millions of fake offline (Clarified the point about inferior products). Moreover, the internet is rife with misinformation and potential scams (Changed "fake news with fake informations and even potential frauds online which remind my avoid buying products online.online" to "misinformation and potential scams" for clarity), which further supports my preference for seeking advice from trusted individuals.

However, it is essential to acknowledge that in some cases, reputable online resources can offer valuable and objective information (Added this sentence to provide balance in the discussion). Therefore, striking a balance between personal recommendations and trustworthy online sources may be the most effective strategy for making informed purchasing decisions (Rephrased the conclusion for better flow).

8.思维导图

  • Introduction

    • Agree with Paul's perspective
    • Friends and family vs. online sources
  • Friends and Family

    • Reliable approach
    • Familiar with preferences and needs
    • Valuable insights
  • Personal Experience

    • Gathering information from diverse sources
    • Consulting before making a purchase
  • Online Sources Limitations

    • Inferior products
    • Misinformation and scams
  • Balanced Approach (Added Point)

    • Reputable online resources
    • Striking a balance between personal recommendations and trustworthy online sources

9.关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionChinese TranslationSample Sentence
perspective/pərˈspektɪv/nounA particular attitude or way of considering something观点Paul's perspective on seeking advice from friends is quite convincing.
reliable/rɪˈlaɪəbl/adjectiveAble to be trusted or depended on可靠的The information provided by friends is often more reliable than online sources.
preferences/ˈprɛfərəns/nounA greater liking for one alternative over another偏好Our friends know our preferences, which makes their advice more valuable.
insights/ˈɪnˌsaɪts/nounAn accurate understanding of something洞察力Their insights into the product helped me make an informed decision.
consult/kənˈsʌlt/verbTo seek information or advice from someone咨询Before making a purchase, I always consult with my friends and family.
misinformation/ˌmɪsɪnfərˈmeɪʃən/nounFalse or inaccurate information错误信息The internet is rife with misinformation, which can lead to poor purchasing decisions.
scams/skæmz/nounFraudulent schemes or dishonest plans骗局Potential scams are another reason to be cautious when relying on online sources for product advice.
reputable/ˈrɛpjətəbl/adjectiveHaving a good reputation; well thought of有声望的Reputable online resources can still provide valuable and objective information.
striking/ˈstraɪkɪŋ/verbTo find the right balance between two things找到平衡Striking a balance between personal recommendations and online sources is essential.
informed/ɪnˈfɔrmd/adjectiveHaving the knowledge needed to make an educated decision明智的By consulting with friends and using reputable online sources, we can make informed purchasing decisions.

アカデミック・ディスカッションの採点方法

TOEFLアカデミック・ディスカッションのタスクは、ETS公式の採点基準に基づいて評価されます。AI評価は各回答を複数の観点から分析します。

関連性と貢献度

設問に的確に答え、ディスカッションに意味のある貢献をしているか?

言語使用

文法の正確さ、語彙の幅、文構造の質。

展開と裏付け

具体例と明確な論理によってアイデアが十分に展開されているか?

回答に見られる共通パターン

このタスクに寄せられたユーザー投稿の分析に基づき、受験者の回答に見られる共通パターンを紹介します。

多くの受験者は明確な意見を述べるものの、具体的な裏付け例が不足している。

高評価の回答は、リーディングパッセージや他の参加者の意見に直接言及している。

高得点の回答は、多様な文構造とアカデミックな語彙を使用している。

時間配分は重要な要素であり、急いで書かれた印象の回答は展開の評価が低くなる傾向がある。

学習のヒント

1

書き始める前に設問文を注意深く読み、質問のすべての要素を把握する。

2

回答の中でリーディングパッセージや他の受験者の意見に言及する。

3

主張を裏付けるために具体例を使い、一般論は避ける。

4

120~150語を目安にする。長い回答が必ずしも良いわけではなく、明確さと焦点の方が重要。

5

本番同様の条件で流暢さを養うため、時間を計って(10分間)回答する練習をする。

よくある質問

TOEFLのAcademic Discussionタスクとは何ですか?
TOEFLのAcademic Discussionタスクでは、オンラインの授業ディスカッションに参加することが求められます。教授の質問と他の学生の回答を読んだ上で、約10分以内に自分の意見を述べ、それを裏付ける投稿を作成します。
Academic Discussionタスクはどのように採点されますか?
このタスクは0〜5点の尺度で採点され、ディスカッションとの関連性、言語使用の質(文法、語彙、文構造)、そして具体的な例と論理的な根拠を用いてどれだけ考えを展開・裏付けできているかが評価基準となります。
このページに表示されているユーザーサンプルとは何ですか?
これらは、LingoLeap上でこの問題を練習した実際のTOEFL受験者から提出された回答です。各サンプルは当社のAI採点エンジンによって評価されており、スコアと、強みや改善点に関する詳細なフィードバックが提供されます。
AI評価の精度はどの程度ですか?
LingoLeapのAI評価エンジンは、ETSの公式採点基準をもとにトレーニングされ、人間の採点者のスコアと照合して調整されています。自動採点システムに完璧なものはありませんが、練習用として信頼できるフィードバックを提供し、具体的な改善点を特定するのに役立ちます。
このAcademic Discussionタスクをどうやって練習できますか?
無料のLingoLeapアカウントに登録することで練習できます。まさにこの質問に対する自分の回答を書いて提出すると、文章に関する詳細なフィードバック付きのAI評価をすぐに受け取ることができます。
Academic Discussionの回答はどのくらいの長さにすべきですか?
120〜150語を目安にしてください。このタスクでは回答を書くための時間が10分与えられます。より長い回答を書くことよりも、明確さ、具体的な例による意見の裏付け、ディスカッションの文脈への言及を重視してください。

Rooting for Your Goal Score Today!

With LingoLeap, an expert in English exams

Get to Your Dream Score Faster

Try for free now