TOEFLIELTS
日本語
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Consider the advantages of each. Would it generally be better for a new university graduate to begin working for a large, established company, or for a small start-up company? Why?

AIによる評価とフィードバック付きの実際のユーザー投稿

1件のユーザー投稿サンプルがあります

無料練習を始める

タスク概要

Professor

When students are preparing to graduate from university, they need to make decisions about what kind of company they want to work for. They might consider large, older companies with an established reputation, or possibly new start-up companies, which tend to be small but very focused on the future. Consider the advantages of each. Would it generally be better for a new university graduate to begin working for a large, established company, or for a small start-up company? Why?

Student A

l think in general, the established company is the better choice. Because they're already well-known, these companies have a certain amount of respect in the business community, so it would look good to have that job experience on your resume. That advantage alone would be a great start for a recent graduate.

Student B

they're already well-known, these companies have a certain amount of respect in the business community, so it would look good to have that job experience on your resume. That advantage alone would be a great start for a recent graduate.

ユーザーサンプルと評価結果

1

ユーザーサンプル #1

In my opinion, I wholeheartedly concur with Andrew's stance that taking position at a small start-up company provides more excitement. Moreover, I wou...

スコア
23

ユーザーサンプル

In my opinion, I wholeheartedly concur with Andrew's stance that taking position at a small start-up company provides more excitement. Moreover, I would like to emphasize that small corporation could offer more opportunities for promotion as well. Drawing from personal experience, I once worked for a prestiguous company where I worked really hard for 3 years to get promoted. Nevertheless, after 3 years' suffer, I was still a junior worker. And fortunately, things changed after I shifted to a small company, my capability was valued by the leader and I got promoted several times. While Keslly argued that working experience of the established company look pretty on resume, but it is essential to recognize it is the skills you truly learned from the experience matter. Consequently, I firmly believe working for a small company serves as an effective means for young people to grow up.

評価結果

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.0

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 3.5

  • Language Use and Grammar: 3.5

2. 预估分数

23. 3 任务完成度

整体来说,这篇文章回答了题目的问题,并提出了对于新毕业生来说,选择小公司的优势。然而,文章中有一些部分可以改进。首先,在论述观点时,可以更具体地举例说明为什么在小公司工作能带来更多的晋升机会。其次,在语言使用方面,需要注意一些语法错误和表达不清晰的地方。

改进建议:

  1. 在论述观点时,尝试给出具体的例子或数据支持。

  2. 注意检查语法错误,并确保表达清晰。

示例:

  1. "While working at a small company, I was given more responsibilities and was able to showcase my skills, which led to my promotion within just one year."

  2. "In contrast, working for a large company may limit an individual's growth due to the rigid hierarchy and slow decision-making processes."

4. 文章结构与组织

这篇文章的结构基本上是清晰的,包括了引言、正文和结论。然而,在组织方面还有一些可以改进的地方。首先,在正文部分,可以尝试将每个段落聚焦在一个具体的观点上,并提供详细的支持细节。其次,在段落之间使用明确的过渡词或短语,以帮助读者更好地理解文章的逻辑。

改进建议:

  1. 在正文部分,尝试将每个段落聚焦在一个具体的观点上,并提供详细的支持细节。

  2. 在段落之间使用明确的过渡词或短语。

示例:

  1. "One of the main advantages of working for a small start-up company is the opportunity for rapid career growth and promotion."

  2. "On the other hand, large established companies often provide a more stable work environment and better benefits."

5. 语法批改

In my opinion, I wholeheartedly concur with Andrew's stance that taking position at a small start-up company provides more excitement. Moreover, I would like to emphasize that small corporation could offer more opportunities for promotion as well. Drawing from personal experience, I once worked for a prestiguousprestigious(misspelling) company where I worked really hard for 3 years to get promoted. Nevertheless, after 3 years' suffer, I was still a junior worker. And fortunately, things changed after I shifted to a small company, my capability was valued by the leader and I got promoted several times. While KesllyKelly(misspelling) argued that working experience of the established company look pretty on resume, but it is essential to recognize it is the skills you truly learned from the experience matter. Consequently, I firmly believe working for a small company serves as an effective means for young people to grow up. (Whitespace repetition (bad formatting))

Section Title: 6 文章修订

Revised Essay:

In my opinion, I wholeheartedly concur with the notion that pursuing a career at a small start-up company offers a more exhilarating experience. Furthermore, I would like to emphasize that such companies may present greater opportunities for career advancement. Drawing from personal experience, I once worked for a prestigious organization where, despite my diligent efforts over three years, I remained in a junior position. Fortunately, after transitioning to a smaller company, my abilities were recognized and valued by the leadership team, leading to multiple promotions. While it is true that having experience with an established company may appear impressive on one's resume, it is crucial to acknowledge that the skills genuinely acquired during those experiences are what truly matter. Consequently, I firmly believe that working for a smaller company serves as an effective means for young professionals to develop and thrive in their careers. (150 words)

In my opinion, I wholeheartedly concur (agree) with Andrew's stance the notion (stance) that pursuing a career (taking position position) at a small start-up company provides offers a more excitement. Moreover, exhilarating (exciting) experience. Furthermore, I would like to emphasize that small corporation could offer more such companies may present (offer) greater opportunities for promotion as well. career advancement (promotion). Drawing from personal experience, I once worked for a prestiguous company where I prestigious (prestiguous) organization where, despite my diligent efforts (worked really hard for 3 years to get promoted. Nevertheless, after 3 years' suffer, hard) over three years, I was still remained in a junior worker. And fortunately, things changed position. Fortunately, after I shifted transitioning to (shifting to) a small smaller company, my capability was abilities were recognized and valued by the leader and I got promoted several times. leadership team (leader), leading to multiple promotions. While Keslly argued it is true that working having experience of the with an established company look pretty may appear impressive on one's resume, but it is essential crucial to recognize it is acknowledge that the skills you genuinely acquired during those experiences are what truly learned from the experience matter. Consequently, I firmly believe that working for a small smaller company serves as an effective means for young people professionals to develop and thrive in their careers (grow up.up).

8 思维导图


1. Introduction
   - Agree with the idea of working at a small start-up company
   - Greater opportunities for career advancement

2. Personal Experience
   - Worked at a prestigious organization
   - Diligent efforts but remained in a junior position

3. Transition to a Smaller Company
   - Abilities recognized and valued by the leadership team
   - Multiple promotions

4. Established Company Experience
   - Impressive on resume
   - Skills genuinely acquired are more important

5. Conclusion
   - Working for a smaller company is effective for young professionals' development and career growth

9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
wholeheartedly/ˌhoʊlˈhɑr.tɪd.li/adverbcompletely and sincerely全心全意地I wholeheartedly concur with the notion that pursuing a career at a small start-up company offers a more exhilarating experience.
exhilarating/ɪgˈzɪl.ə.reɪ.t̬ɪŋ/adjectivemaking you feel very excited and happy令人兴奋的Pursuing a career at a small start-up company offers a more exhilarating experience.
diligent/ˈdɪl·ə·dʒənt/adjectivecareful and using effort勤奋的Despite my diligent efforts over three years, I remained in a junior position.
transition/trænˈzɪʃ.ən/nouna change from one form or type to another过渡After transitioning to a smaller company, my abilities were recognized and valued by the leadership team.
prestigious/preˈstiʒ·əs/adjectiverespected and admired有声望的I once worked for a prestigious organization where, despite my diligent efforts over three years, I remained in a junior position.
acknowledge/əkˈnɑl·ɪdʒ/verbto accept or admit the existence of承认It is crucial to acknowledge that the skills genuinely acquired during those experiences are what truly matter.
genuinely/ˈdʒen·yu·ən·li/adverb_truly or sincerely_真诚地_The skills genuinely acquired during those experiences are what truly matter.
thrive/θraɪv/_verb_to grow, develop, or be successful_繁荣,兴旺_I firmly believe that working for a smaller company serves as an effective means for young professionals to develop and thrive in their careers.
career advancement/kəˈrɪr ədˈvæns.mənt/_noun_progress in one's job or occupation_职业发展_I would like to emphasize that such companies may present greater opportunities for career advancement.

アカデミック・ディスカッションの採点方法

TOEFLアカデミック・ディスカッションのタスクは、ETS公式の採点基準に基づいて評価されます。AI評価は各回答を複数の観点から分析します。

関連性と貢献度

設問に的確に答え、ディスカッションに意味のある貢献をしているか?

言語使用

文法の正確さ、語彙の幅、文構造の質。

展開と裏付け

具体例と明確な論理によってアイデアが十分に展開されているか?

回答に見られる共通パターン

このタスクに寄せられたユーザー投稿の分析に基づき、受験者の回答に見られる共通パターンを紹介します。

多くの受験者は明確な意見を述べるものの、具体的な裏付け例が不足している。

高評価の回答は、リーディングパッセージや他の参加者の意見に直接言及している。

高得点の回答は、多様な文構造とアカデミックな語彙を使用している。

時間配分は重要な要素であり、急いで書かれた印象の回答は展開の評価が低くなる傾向がある。

学習のヒント

1

書き始める前に設問文を注意深く読み、質問のすべての要素を把握する。

2

回答の中でリーディングパッセージや他の受験者の意見に言及する。

3

主張を裏付けるために具体例を使い、一般論は避ける。

4

120~150語を目安にする。長い回答が必ずしも良いわけではなく、明確さと焦点の方が重要。

5

本番同様の条件で流暢さを養うため、時間を計って(10分間)回答する練習をする。

よくある質問

TOEFLのAcademic Discussionタスクとは何ですか?
TOEFLのAcademic Discussionタスクでは、オンラインの授業ディスカッションに参加することが求められます。教授の質問と他の学生の回答を読んだ上で、約10分以内に自分の意見を述べ、それを裏付ける投稿を作成します。
Academic Discussionタスクはどのように採点されますか?
このタスクは0〜5点の尺度で採点され、ディスカッションとの関連性、言語使用の質(文法、語彙、文構造)、そして具体的な例と論理的な根拠を用いてどれだけ考えを展開・裏付けできているかが評価基準となります。
このページに表示されているユーザーサンプルとは何ですか?
これらは、LingoLeap上でこの問題を練習した実際のTOEFL受験者から提出された回答です。各サンプルは当社のAI採点エンジンによって評価されており、スコアと、強みや改善点に関する詳細なフィードバックが提供されます。
AI評価の精度はどの程度ですか?
LingoLeapのAI評価エンジンは、ETSの公式採点基準をもとにトレーニングされ、人間の採点者のスコアと照合して調整されています。自動採点システムに完璧なものはありませんが、練習用として信頼できるフィードバックを提供し、具体的な改善点を特定するのに役立ちます。
このAcademic Discussionタスクをどうやって練習できますか?
無料のLingoLeapアカウントに登録することで練習できます。まさにこの質問に対する自分の回答を書いて提出すると、文章に関する詳細なフィードバック付きのAI評価をすぐに受け取ることができます。
Academic Discussionの回答はどのくらいの長さにすべきですか?
120〜150語を目安にしてください。このタスクでは回答を書くための時間が10分与えられます。より長い回答を書くことよりも、明確さ、具体的な例による意見の裏付け、ディスカッションの文脈への言及を重視してください。

Rooting for Your Goal Score Today!

With LingoLeap, an expert in English exams

Get to Your Dream Score Faster

Try for free now