TOEFLIELTS
Nederlands
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Consider the advantages of each. Would it generally be better for a new university graduate to begin working for a large, established company, or for a small start-up company? Why?

Echte inzendingen van gebruikers met AI-gestuurde beoordeling en feedback

1 door gebruikers ingediende voorbeelden beschikbaar

Start Gratis Oefenen

Overzicht van de Taak

Professor

When students are preparing to graduate from university, they need to make decisions about what kind of company they want to work for. They might consider large, older companies with an established reputation, or possibly new start-up companies, which tend to be small but very focused on the future. Consider the advantages of each. Would it generally be better for a new university graduate to begin working for a large, established company, or for a small start-up company? Why?

Student A

l think in general, the established company is the better choice. Because they're already well-known, these companies have a certain amount of respect in the business community, so it would look good to have that job experience on your resume. That advantage alone would be a great start for a recent graduate.

Student B

they're already well-known, these companies have a certain amount of respect in the business community, so it would look good to have that job experience on your resume. That advantage alone would be a great start for a recent graduate.

Gebruikersvoorbeelden & Beoordelingsresultaten

1

Gebruikersvoorbeeld #1

In my opinion, I wholeheartedly concur with Andrew's stance that taking position at a small start-up company provides more excitement. Moreover, I wou...

Score
23

Gebruikersvoorbeeld

In my opinion, I wholeheartedly concur with Andrew's stance that taking position at a small start-up company provides more excitement. Moreover, I would like to emphasize that small corporation could offer more opportunities for promotion as well. Drawing from personal experience, I once worked for a prestiguous company where I worked really hard for 3 years to get promoted. Nevertheless, after 3 years' suffer, I was still a junior worker. And fortunately, things changed after I shifted to a small company, my capability was valued by the leader and I got promoted several times. While Keslly argued that working experience of the established company look pretty on resume, but it is essential to recognize it is the skills you truly learned from the experience matter. Consequently, I firmly believe working for a small company serves as an effective means for young people to grow up.

Beoordelingsresultaat

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.0

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 3.5

  • Language Use and Grammar: 3.5

2. 预估分数

23. 3 任务完成度

整体来说,这篇文章回答了题目的问题,并提出了对于新毕业生来说,选择小公司的优势。然而,文章中有一些部分可以改进。首先,在论述观点时,可以更具体地举例说明为什么在小公司工作能带来更多的晋升机会。其次,在语言使用方面,需要注意一些语法错误和表达不清晰的地方。

改进建议:

  1. 在论述观点时,尝试给出具体的例子或数据支持。

  2. 注意检查语法错误,并确保表达清晰。

示例:

  1. "While working at a small company, I was given more responsibilities and was able to showcase my skills, which led to my promotion within just one year."

  2. "In contrast, working for a large company may limit an individual's growth due to the rigid hierarchy and slow decision-making processes."

4. 文章结构与组织

这篇文章的结构基本上是清晰的,包括了引言、正文和结论。然而,在组织方面还有一些可以改进的地方。首先,在正文部分,可以尝试将每个段落聚焦在一个具体的观点上,并提供详细的支持细节。其次,在段落之间使用明确的过渡词或短语,以帮助读者更好地理解文章的逻辑。

改进建议:

  1. 在正文部分,尝试将每个段落聚焦在一个具体的观点上,并提供详细的支持细节。

  2. 在段落之间使用明确的过渡词或短语。

示例:

  1. "One of the main advantages of working for a small start-up company is the opportunity for rapid career growth and promotion."

  2. "On the other hand, large established companies often provide a more stable work environment and better benefits."

5. 语法批改

In my opinion, I wholeheartedly concur with Andrew's stance that taking position at a small start-up company provides more excitement. Moreover, I would like to emphasize that small corporation could offer more opportunities for promotion as well. Drawing from personal experience, I once worked for a prestiguousprestigious(misspelling) company where I worked really hard for 3 years to get promoted. Nevertheless, after 3 years' suffer, I was still a junior worker. And fortunately, things changed after I shifted to a small company, my capability was valued by the leader and I got promoted several times. While KesllyKelly(misspelling) argued that working experience of the established company look pretty on resume, but it is essential to recognize it is the skills you truly learned from the experience matter. Consequently, I firmly believe working for a small company serves as an effective means for young people to grow up. (Whitespace repetition (bad formatting))

Section Title: 6 文章修订

Revised Essay:

In my opinion, I wholeheartedly concur with the notion that pursuing a career at a small start-up company offers a more exhilarating experience. Furthermore, I would like to emphasize that such companies may present greater opportunities for career advancement. Drawing from personal experience, I once worked for a prestigious organization where, despite my diligent efforts over three years, I remained in a junior position. Fortunately, after transitioning to a smaller company, my abilities were recognized and valued by the leadership team, leading to multiple promotions. While it is true that having experience with an established company may appear impressive on one's resume, it is crucial to acknowledge that the skills genuinely acquired during those experiences are what truly matter. Consequently, I firmly believe that working for a smaller company serves as an effective means for young professionals to develop and thrive in their careers. (150 words)

In my opinion, I wholeheartedly concur (agree) with Andrew's stance the notion (stance) that pursuing a career (taking position position) at a small start-up company provides offers a more excitement. Moreover, exhilarating (exciting) experience. Furthermore, I would like to emphasize that small corporation could offer more such companies may present (offer) greater opportunities for promotion as well. career advancement (promotion). Drawing from personal experience, I once worked for a prestiguous company where I prestigious (prestiguous) organization where, despite my diligent efforts (worked really hard for 3 years to get promoted. Nevertheless, after 3 years' suffer, hard) over three years, I was still remained in a junior worker. And fortunately, things changed position. Fortunately, after I shifted transitioning to (shifting to) a small smaller company, my capability was abilities were recognized and valued by the leader and I got promoted several times. leadership team (leader), leading to multiple promotions. While Keslly argued it is true that working having experience of the with an established company look pretty may appear impressive on one's resume, but it is essential crucial to recognize it is acknowledge that the skills you genuinely acquired during those experiences are what truly learned from the experience matter. Consequently, I firmly believe that working for a small smaller company serves as an effective means for young people professionals to develop and thrive in their careers (grow up.up).

8 思维导图


1. Introduction
   - Agree with the idea of working at a small start-up company
   - Greater opportunities for career advancement

2. Personal Experience
   - Worked at a prestigious organization
   - Diligent efforts but remained in a junior position

3. Transition to a Smaller Company
   - Abilities recognized and valued by the leadership team
   - Multiple promotions

4. Established Company Experience
   - Impressive on resume
   - Skills genuinely acquired are more important

5. Conclusion
   - Working for a smaller company is effective for young professionals' development and career growth

9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
wholeheartedly/ˌhoʊlˈhɑr.tɪd.li/adverbcompletely and sincerely全心全意地I wholeheartedly concur with the notion that pursuing a career at a small start-up company offers a more exhilarating experience.
exhilarating/ɪgˈzɪl.ə.reɪ.t̬ɪŋ/adjectivemaking you feel very excited and happy令人兴奋的Pursuing a career at a small start-up company offers a more exhilarating experience.
diligent/ˈdɪl·ə·dʒənt/adjectivecareful and using effort勤奋的Despite my diligent efforts over three years, I remained in a junior position.
transition/trænˈzɪʃ.ən/nouna change from one form or type to another过渡After transitioning to a smaller company, my abilities were recognized and valued by the leadership team.
prestigious/preˈstiʒ·əs/adjectiverespected and admired有声望的I once worked for a prestigious organization where, despite my diligent efforts over three years, I remained in a junior position.
acknowledge/əkˈnɑl·ɪdʒ/verbto accept or admit the existence of承认It is crucial to acknowledge that the skills genuinely acquired during those experiences are what truly matter.
genuinely/ˈdʒen·yu·ən·li/adverb_truly or sincerely_真诚地_The skills genuinely acquired during those experiences are what truly matter.
thrive/θraɪv/_verb_to grow, develop, or be successful_繁荣,兴旺_I firmly believe that working for a smaller company serves as an effective means for young professionals to develop and thrive in their careers.
career advancement/kəˈrɪr ədˈvæns.mənt/_noun_progress in one's job or occupation_职业发展_I would like to emphasize that such companies may present greater opportunities for career advancement.

Hoe Academic Discussion Wordt Beoordeeld

De TOEFL Academic Discussion-taak wordt beoordeeld aan de hand van de officiële ETS-beoordelingsrubriek. AI-beoordeling analyseert elk antwoord op meerdere dimensies.

Relevantie & Bijdrage

Gaat het antwoord in op de vraag en levert het een zinvolle bijdrage aan de discussie?

Taalgebruik

Grammaticale nauwkeurigheid, woordenschat en kwaliteit van de zinsbouw.

Uitwerking & Onderbouwing

Zijn de ideeën goed uitgewerkt met specifieke voorbeelden en duidelijke redenering?

Veelvoorkomende Patronen in Antwoorden

Op basis van analyse van gebruikersinzendingen voor deze taak, hier zijn veelvoorkomende patronen die zijn waargenomen in antwoorden van studenten.

Veel studenten geven een duidelijke mening, maar missen specifieke onderbouwende voorbeelden.

Sterke antwoorden verwijzen direct naar de leestekst en de standpunten van andere deelnemers.

Hoger scorende antwoorden gebruiken gevarieerde zinsstructuren en academisch vocabulaire.

Timemanagement is een belangrijke factor — antwoorden die gehaast aanvoelen scoren doorgaans lager op uitwerking.

Leertips

1

Lees de opdracht zorgvuldig en identificeer alle onderdelen van de vraag voordat je begint te schrijven.

2

Verwijs in je antwoord naar de leestekst en de meningen van de andere studenten.

3

Gebruik specifieke voorbeelden om je hoofdpunt te onderbouwen — vermijd algemene uitspraken.

4

Streef naar 120-150 woorden. Langere antwoorden zijn niet altijd beter; duidelijkheid en focus zijn belangrijker.

5

Oefen met getimede antwoorden (10 minuten) om vlotheid op te bouwen onder examenomstandigheden.

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat is de TOEFL Academic Discussion-taak?
Bij de TOEFL Academic Discussion-taak moet je bijdragen aan een online klassikale discussie. Je leest de vraag van een professor en de reacties van andere studenten, en schrijft vervolgens binnen ongeveer 10 minuten je eigen bijdrage waarin je jouw mening verwoordt en onderbouwt.
Hoe wordt de Academic Discussion-taak beoordeeld?
De taak wordt beoordeeld op een schaal van 0-5, gebaseerd op de relevantie voor de discussie, de kwaliteit van het taalgebruik (grammatica, woordenschat, zinsbouw) en hoe goed je jouw ideeën ontwikkelt en onderbouwt met concrete voorbeelden en redenering.
Wat zijn de gebruikersvoorbeelden op deze pagina?
Dit zijn echte antwoorden die zijn ingediend door TOEFL-kandidaten die deze vraag hebben geoefend op LingoLeap. Elk voorbeeld is beoordeeld door onze AI-beoordelingsengine, die een score geeft en gedetailleerde feedback over sterke punten en verbeterpunten.
Hoe nauwkeurig is de AI-beoordeling?
De AI-beoordelingsengine van LingoLeap is getraind op officiële ETS-beoordelingsrubrieken en gekalibreerd aan de hand van scores van menselijke beoordelaars. Hoewel geen enkel geautomatiseerd systeem perfect is, biedt het betrouwbare feedback voor oefendoeleinden en helpt het specifieke verbeterpunten te identificeren.
Hoe kan ik deze Academic Discussion-taak oefenen?
Je kunt oefenen door je aan te melden voor een gratis LingoLeap-account. Schrijf je eigen antwoord op precies deze vraag, dien het in en ontvang direct AI-feedback met gedetailleerd commentaar op je tekst.
Hoe lang moet mijn Academic Discussion-antwoord zijn?
Streef naar 120-150 woorden. De taak geeft je 10 minuten om je antwoord te schrijven. Focus op duidelijkheid, onderbouw je mening met concrete voorbeelden en verwijs naar de discussiecontext in plaats van een langer antwoord te schrijven.

Behaal vandaag nog je doelscore!

Met LingoLeap, dé expert in Engelse taalexamens

Bereik je droombeoordeling sneller

Probeer nu gratis