All Samples

TOEFL TPO 7 Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on education. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

真實考生作答範例,搭配 AI 評分與回饋

目前有 381 篇考生投稿範例

開始免費練習

題型概述

Doctor Achebe

Companies now make computer games designed to help very young children learn. The games are advertised for use by children aged 2 to 8 years and often involve basic math and reading skills, presented in a fun, game-like style. Some people say that this results in children spending too much time looking at computer screens. Do you think it’s a good idea for very young children to play educational computer games? Why or why not?

Andrew

I think it’s completely inappropriate for children as young as 2 years old to play what are essentially video games. Even if the games are educational, the same skills can be taught in traditional ways—by reading books to children, for example. And it would be beneficial to interact with their parents in this way.

Kelly

Considering how important computers are to human societies these days, I think it actually makes sense to allow very young children to explore them. And if the computer games that children play also give them early access to subject matter that will later be taught in school, all the better.

考生範例與評分結果

考生範例

While Kelly makes a compelling case for introducing young children to educational computer games, I believe the potential risks associated with excessive screen time outweigh the benefits. As Andrew points out, traditional teaching methods can effectively impart the same knowledge without exposing children to potential addiction. In my view, reliance on computer games for educational purposes may not only foster screen dependency but also negatively impact children's physical and mental well-being. For example, prolonged screen exposure can harm a child's eyesight and reduce opportunities for social interaction with peers, both of which are crucial aspects of healthy childhood development.

評分結果

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0

  • Language Use and Grammar: 4.5

2. 预估分数

  • 28

3. 任务完成度

整体来说,这篇文章较好地回答了问题,表达了对于年幼儿童使用教育电脑游戏的看法。然而,文章可以在以下方面进行改进:

  1. 提供更多具体的例子和细节来支持观点。

  2. 对Kelly和Andrew的观点进行更深入的讨论和比较。

示例1:为了支持自己的观点,可以添加一些研究数据或案例来说明过多使用电脑游戏对孩子的身心健康产生的负面影响。 示例2:可以进一步讨论Kelly提到的计算机在现代社会中的重要性,并解释为什么在这个问题上仍然选择支持Andrew的观点。

4. 文章结构与组织

文章结构清晰,包括引言、正文和结论。每段都集中讨论一个特定观点并提供支持细节。然而,在以下方面还有改进空间:

  1. 在段落之间增加更明确的过渡词或短语。

  2. 在正文部分进一步拓展和讨论观点。

示例1:在引言和正文之间,可以添加过渡词如“然而”或“尽管如此”,使文章更连贯。 示例2:在正文部分,可以分别列举和讨论过多使用电脑游戏对孩子身心健康的具体影响,以增强文章的逻辑性。

5. 语法批改

While Kelly makes a compelling case for introducing young children to educational computer games, I believe the potential risks associated with excessive screen time outweigh the benefits. As Andrew points out, traditional teaching methods can effectively impart the same knowledge without exposing children to potential addiction. In my view, reliance on computer games for educational purposes may not only foster screen dependency but also negatively impact children's physical and mental well-being. For example, prolonged screen exposure can harm a child's eyesight and reduce opportunities for social interaction with peers, both of which are crucial aspects of healthy childhood development.

Section Title: 6 文章修订

Although Kelly presents a persuasive argument for exposing young children to educational computer games, I contend that the potential hazards linked to excessive screen time surpass the advantages. As Andrew highlights, conventional teaching approaches can efficiently convey the same information without subjecting children to possible addiction. In my opinion, depending on computer games for educational purposes might not only cultivate screen dependency but also adversely affect children's physical and mental well-being. For instance, extended screen exposure can damage a child's vision and diminish opportunities for social engagement with peers, both of which are essential components of wholesome childhood development. (103 words)

While Revised essay: Section Title: 7 文章批改

Although Kelly makes presents a compelling case persuasive argument (revised for introducing better word choice) for exposing young children to educational computer games, I believe contend that the potential risks associated with hazards (revised for better word choice) linked to excessive screen time outweigh surpass (revised for better word choice) the benefits. advantages. As Andrew points out, traditional highlights, conventional teaching methods approaches (revised for better word choice) can effectively impart efficiently convey the same knowledge information without exposing subjecting children to potential possible addiction. In my view, reliance opinion, depending on computer games for educational purposes may might not only foster cultivate screen dependency (revised for better word choice) but also negatively impact adversely affect children's physical and mental well-being. For example, prolonged instance, extended screen exposure can harm damage a child's eyesight vision (revised for better word choice) and reduce diminish opportunities for social interaction engagement with peers, peers (revised for better word choice), both of which are crucial aspects essential components of healthy wholesome childhood development.

8 思维导图


- Introduction
  - Kelly's argument
  - Counterargument

- Potential hazards
  - Excessive screen time
  - Addiction

- Conventional teaching approaches
  - Efficiency
  - No screen dependency

- Physical and mental well-being
  - Vision damage
  - Social engagement reduction

- Conclusion
  - Wholesome childhood development importance 

9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish definitionSimplified Chinese translationSample sentences
persuasive/pərˈsweɪsɪv/adjectiveable to cause people to believe or do something有说服力的Kelly presents a persuasive argument for exposing young children to educational computer games.
contention/kənˈtenʃən/nouna belief or opinion that you express, especially in an argument主张,观点I contend that the potential hazards linked to excessive screen time surpass the advantages.
conventional/kənˈvenʃənəl/adjectivetraditional or usual常规的,传统的Conventional teaching approaches can efficiently convey the same information.
addiction/əˈdɪkʃən/noun/the state of being unable to stop using or doing something/上瘾/subjecting children to possible addiction.
dependency/dɪˈpendənsi//noun/reliance on someone or something else for support/依赖/depending on computer games for educational purposes might cultivate screen dependency.
adversely/ædˈvɜrsli//adverb/in a harmful or negative way/不利地/adversely affect children's physical and mental well-being.
extended/ɪkˈstendɪd//adjective/lasting longer than usual or expected/延长的/extended screen exposure can damage a child's vision.
engagement/ɪnˈgeɪdʒmənt/nounthe act of being involved with others in a social way参与,交往Extended screen exposure can diminish opportunities for social engagement with peers.
wholesome/ˈhoʊlsəm/adjectivegood for you, and likely to improve your life either physically or morally有益的,健康的Both vision protection and social engagement are essential components of wholesome childhood development.

Section Title: 6 文章修订

尽管Kelly为让幼儿接触教育电脑游戏提出了有说服力的论点,但我认为过度屏幕时间所带来的潜在危害超过了优势。正如Andrew所强调的,传统教学方法可以有效地传达相同的信息,而不会让孩子们沉迷于屏幕。在我看来,依赖电脑游戏进行教育不仅可能培养孩子对屏幕的依赖,还可能对孩子的身心健康产生不利影响。例如,长时间的屏幕接触可能损害孩子的视力,并减少与同龄人进行社交互动的机会,而这两者都是健康童年发展的重要组成部分。

學術討論如何評分

TOEFL學術討論題型依據官方 ETS 評分標準進行評分,AI 評分系統會從多個面向分析每篇回答。

切題度與貢獻度

回答是否切合題目,並對討論做出有意義的貢獻?

語言運用

文法準確度、詞彙廣度,以及句子結構的品質。

論述發展與支持

論點是否透過具體例子和清楚的推理獲得充分發展?

回答中的常見模式

根據對本題考生投稿的分析,以下是考生回答中常見的模式。

許多考生提出了明確的觀點,卻缺乏具體的佐證例子。

高分回答通常會直接引用閱讀文章內容,並回應其他發言者的觀點。

得分較高的回答會運用多樣的句型結構與學術詞彙。

時間管理是關鍵因素——顯得倉促完成的回答,在論述發展方面通常得分較低。

學習訣竅

1

動筆前仔細閱讀題目,確認問題的每個部分都已理解。

2

在回答中引用閱讀文章內容,並回應其他考生的觀點。

3

用具體例子支持你的主要論點——避免空泛籠統的說法。

4

字數以 120-150 字為目標。篇幅較長不代表較好,清晰與聚焦更為重要。

5

練習限時作答(10 分鐘),培養在考試情境下的流暢度。

常見問題

什麼是TOEFL學術討論任務?
TOEFL學術討論任務要求你參與線上課堂討論。你需要閱讀教授的問題和其他學生的回覆,然後在約10分鐘內寫出自己的貼文,表達並支持你的觀點。
學術討論任務如何評分?
此任務依0-5分評分,評分依據包括與討論的相關性、語言運用品質(文法、詞彙、句子結構),以及你如何用具體例子和推理來發展並支持自己的觀點。
此頁面上的用戶範例是什麼?
這些是TOEFL考生在LingoLeap上練習這道題目時提交的真實回答。每個範例都經過我們的AI評分引擎評估,提供分數以及關於優勢與待加強領域的詳細回饋。
AI評估的準確度如何?
LingoLeap的AI評估引擎以ETS官方評分標準訓練而成,並與人工評分員的評分校準。雖然沒有自動化系統是完美的,但它能為練習提供可靠的回饋,並協助找出具體的加強方向。
我要如何練習這道學術討論題目?
你可以註冊免費的LingoLeap帳號來練習。針對這道確切的題目寫出你自己的回答,送出後即可立即獲得附有詳細回饋的AI評估。
我的學術討論回答應該多長?
目標字數為120-150字。此任務給你10分鐘的時間撰寫回答。請專注於表達清晰、用具體例子支持你的觀點,並引用討論脈絡,而非一味追求更長的篇幅。

今天就為您的目標分數加油!

與 LingoLeap,英語考試專家一起

更快達到您的理想分數

立即免費試用