TOEFLIELTS
日本語
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on Children Development. Writea post responding to the professor's question.

AIによる評価とフィードバック付きの実際のユーザー投稿

1件のユーザー投稿サンプルがあります

無料練習を始める

タスク概要

Professor

Dr.Achebe As of this semester,i have embarked on a study to explore thevarious factors influencing children's cognition.It's becomingincreasingly evident that a child's surroundings can significantlyimpact their development.In light of this, the question arises:should parents allow their children to watch online videoswhether for entertainment or educational purposes? Please sharevour insights on this matter, considering the potential effects on achild's cognitive growth.

Student A

Paul We should not allow young children, especially those under twoyears old, to watch videos. It's crucial for their development toengage in real-life communication with others during this criticaperiod. Watching videos doesn't provide the opportunity formeaningful interaction Even for older children, it's essential toprioritize physical activity over extended screen time.Instead ofsitting still in front of screens, they should be encouraged to stayactive to support their overall well-being.

Student B

Kelly agree that very young children shouldn't be exposed to videosHowever,I believe that older children can benefit from watchingcertain videosespecially those that showcase animals or provideunique insights not easily encountered in everyday life. Thesevideos can be educational and expand their horizons by offering awindow into experiences they might not otherwise have access to

ユーザーサンプルと評価結果

1

ユーザーサンプル #1

I believe Paul is true when he says It’s crucial for young kids to participate in real communication in the critical period. As for me, I would prefer...

スコア
25

ユーザーサンプル

I believe Paul is true when he says It’s crucial for young kids to participate in real communication in the critical period. As for me, I would prefer to engage in some actitivities with my friends. With time elapsing , my communication skills have been improved so much. On the contrast, videos can not practice kids’ communication shills. My brother Sam, is a case in point. He loves learning knowledge from online videos. So, he sits beside screens to watch various popular science program. I can not deny that he really gains lots of knowledge and he gets excellent grades at school. But, he still doesn’t have any friends, because he doesn’t know how to communicate with others and this problem troubled him so much. In this way, I consider parents should limit children’s time to watch online videos and encourage their students to join in real-life communication.

評価結果

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0

  • Language Use and Grammar: 3.5

2. 预估分数

25. 3 任务完成度

这篇文章基本上满足了任务要求,对问题提出了明确的观点,并且给出了一定的论据。但是,有一些地方可以改进。首先,在支持观点时,可以提供更具体的例子或者数据来增强说服力。其次,在语言使用和语法方面,有些句子表达不够准确,需要进行修改。

改进建议示例:

  1. 在支持观点时,可以加入更多具体的例子。例如:“研究表明,过多观看在线视频可能导致儿童注意力不集中和沟通能力下降。”

  2. 修改不准确的表达。例如:“On the contrast” 应该改为 “On the contrary”。

4. 文章结构与组织

文章结构基本清晰,包括引言、主体和结论。每段都集中讨论一个特定的观点,并提供支持细节。然而,在段落之间的过渡方面还有待加强。

改进建议:

  1. 在段落之间添加过渡性词语或句子,使文章更连贯。例如,在第二段和第三段之间,可以加入:“然而,这并不意味着在线视频完全没有价值。”

  2. 在文章结尾部分总结观点,并提出建议。例如:“综上所述,虽然在线视频可能对儿童的沟通能力产生负面影响,但在适当的控制下,它们仍然可以作为教育工具。因此,家长应该限制孩子观看在线视频的时间,并鼓励他们参与现实生活中的交流。”

5. 语法批改

I believe Paul is true when he says It’s crucial for young kids to participate in real communication in the critical period. As for me, I would prefer to engage in some actitivitiesactivities(misspelling) with my friends. With time elapsing ,,(Use of whitespace before comma and before/after parentheses) my communication skills have been improved so much. On the contrast, videos can not practice kids’ communication shills. My brotherbrother,(This rule identifies whether commas are missing in a sentence.) Sam, is a case in point. He loves learning knowledge from online videos. So, he sits beside screens to watch various popular science program. I can not deny that he really gains lots of knowledge and, and(comma between independent clauses) he gets excellent grades at school. But, he still doesn’t have any friends, because he doesn’t know how to communicate with others and this problem troubled him so much. In this way, I consider parents should limit children’s time to watch online videos and encourage their students to join in real-life communication.

Title: 6 文章修订

In agreement with Paul, I believe that it is essential for young children to engage in real-life communication during their critical developmental years. Personally, I have experienced the benefits of participating in activities with my peers, which has significantly improved my communication skills over time. Conversely, relying solely on videos for learning can hinder a child's ability to interact effectively with others. My brother Sam serves as an example; while he has gained extensive knowledge and excels academically through watching educational videos, he struggles to form friendships due to his underdeveloped communication skills. Consequently, I advocate for parents to limit their children's exposure to online videos and instead encourage participation in real-life interactions to foster well-rounded development. (120 words)

In agreement with Paul (clarifies the subject), I believe Paul that it is true when he says It’s crucial essential (more formal than "crucial") for young kids to participate in real communication in the critical period. As for me, I would prefer children to engage in some actitivities real-life communication (clearer phrasing) during their critical developmental years. Personally, I have experienced the benefits of participating in activities with my friends. With time elapsing peers (rephrased for clarity), which has significantly improved my communication skills have been improved so much. On over time. Conversely (more formal than "on the contrast, contrast"), relying solely on videos for learning can not practice kids’ communication shills. hinder a child's ability to interact effectively with others. My brother Sam, is a case in point. He loves learning knowledge from online videos. So, Sam serves as an example; while he sits beside screens to watch various popular science program. I can not deny that he really gains lots of has gained extensive knowledge and excels academically through watching educational videos, he gets excellent grades at school. But, he still doesn’t have any friends, because he doesn’t know how struggles to communicate with others and this problem troubled him so much. In this way, form friendships due to his underdeveloped communication skills. Consequently (more formal than "so"), I consider advocate for parents should to limit children’s time their children's exposure to watch online videos and instead encourage their students to join participation in real-life communication.interactions to foster well-rounded development.

Title: 8 思维导图


1. Introduction
   - Importance of real-life communication
   - Personal experience

2. Benefits of real-life interactions
   - Improved communication skills
   - Peer activities

3. Drawbacks of relying on videos
   - Hindered social interaction
   - Underdeveloped communication skills

4. Personal example: Sam
   - Academic success from videos
   - Struggles with friendships

5. Recommendation for parents
   - Limit online video exposure
   - Encourage real-life interactions for well-rounded development 

Title: 9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
developmental/ˌdɛvəˈlɒpməntəl/adjectiverelating to the development of someone发展的During their critical developmental years, children need real-life communication.
engage/ɪnˈɡeɪdʒ/verbto participate or become involved in参与Children should engage in real-life communication activities.
hinder/ˈhɪndər/verbto make it difficult for someone to do something or for something to happen | 阻碍 | Relying solely on videos can hinder a child's ability to interact effectively with others.
underdeveloped/ˌʌndər'dev(ə)ləpt/ | adjective | not fully developed | 不发达的 | He struggles to form friendships due to his underdeveloped communication skills.
advocate/ˈædvəkət/verbto publicly support or recommend a particular cause or policy | 提倡 | I advocate for parents to limit their children's exposure to online videos.
exposure/ɪkˈspoʊʒər/nounthe state of being exposed to something暴露Limiting children's exposure to online videos can help them develop better communication skills.
interaction/ˌɪntərˈækʃən/nounthe act of communicating with others互动Real-life interactions are essential for well-rounded development.
foster/ˈfɒstər/verbto encourage the development of something培养Encourage participation in real-life interactions to foster well-rounded development.
well-rounded/welˈraʊndɪd/adjectivehaving a variety of abilities and interests | 全面发展的 | Participating in real-life interactions helps children become well-rounded individuals.
academically/əˌkædəˈmɪkli/ | adverb | in a way that relates to education and scholarship | 学术上 | Sam excels academically through watching educational videos.

アカデミック・ディスカッションの採点方法

TOEFLアカデミック・ディスカッションのタスクは、ETS公式の採点基準に基づいて評価されます。AI評価は各回答を複数の観点から分析します。

関連性と貢献度

設問に的確に答え、ディスカッションに意味のある貢献をしているか?

言語使用

文法の正確さ、語彙の幅、文構造の質。

展開と裏付け

具体例と明確な論理によってアイデアが十分に展開されているか?

回答に見られる共通パターン

このタスクに寄せられたユーザー投稿の分析に基づき、受験者の回答に見られる共通パターンを紹介します。

多くの受験者は明確な意見を述べるものの、具体的な裏付け例が不足している。

高評価の回答は、リーディングパッセージや他の参加者の意見に直接言及している。

高得点の回答は、多様な文構造とアカデミックな語彙を使用している。

時間配分は重要な要素であり、急いで書かれた印象の回答は展開の評価が低くなる傾向がある。

学習のヒント

1

書き始める前に設問文を注意深く読み、質問のすべての要素を把握する。

2

回答の中でリーディングパッセージや他の受験者の意見に言及する。

3

主張を裏付けるために具体例を使い、一般論は避ける。

4

120~150語を目安にする。長い回答が必ずしも良いわけではなく、明確さと焦点の方が重要。

5

本番同様の条件で流暢さを養うため、時間を計って(10分間)回答する練習をする。

よくある質問

TOEFLのAcademic Discussionタスクとは何ですか?
TOEFLのAcademic Discussionタスクでは、オンラインの授業ディスカッションに参加することが求められます。教授の質問と他の学生の回答を読んだ上で、約10分以内に自分の意見を述べ、それを裏付ける投稿を作成します。
Academic Discussionタスクはどのように採点されますか?
このタスクは0〜5点の尺度で採点され、ディスカッションとの関連性、言語使用の質(文法、語彙、文構造)、そして具体的な例と論理的な根拠を用いてどれだけ考えを展開・裏付けできているかが評価基準となります。
このページに表示されているユーザーサンプルとは何ですか?
これらは、LingoLeap上でこの問題を練習した実際のTOEFL受験者から提出された回答です。各サンプルは当社のAI採点エンジンによって評価されており、スコアと、強みや改善点に関する詳細なフィードバックが提供されます。
AI評価の精度はどの程度ですか?
LingoLeapのAI評価エンジンは、ETSの公式採点基準をもとにトレーニングされ、人間の採点者のスコアと照合して調整されています。自動採点システムに完璧なものはありませんが、練習用として信頼できるフィードバックを提供し、具体的な改善点を特定するのに役立ちます。
このAcademic Discussionタスクをどうやって練習できますか?
無料のLingoLeapアカウントに登録することで練習できます。まさにこの質問に対する自分の回答を書いて提出すると、文章に関する詳細なフィードバック付きのAI評価をすぐに受け取ることができます。
Academic Discussionの回答はどのくらいの長さにすべきですか?
120〜150語を目安にしてください。このタスクでは回答を書くための時間が10分与えられます。より長い回答を書くことよりも、明確さ、具体的な例による意見の裏付け、ディスカッションの文脈への言及を重視してください。

Rooting for Your Goal Score Today!

With LingoLeap, an expert in English exams

Get to Your Dream Score Faster

Try for free now