Take a full TOEFL 2026 mock and you get much more than a score. Below is a complete score report from one attempt — overall band, your best band per section across all attempts, and accuracy on every task type, with the AI grader's verdict on each Writing and Speaking response. No login required to read it.
Reviewed by the LingoLeap TOEFL Content Team · Last reviewed:
Overall
5.0
/ 6.0 · 96 of 120
Reading
5.0
High-Intermediate
Listening
4.5
High-Intermediate
Writing
5.5
Advanced
Speaking
5.0
High-Intermediate
This is the report layout you see in-product, populated with a full attempt on question set PQ26-8. This is the product's own report — the same components and stylesheet the app renders after grading, not a recreation. Click any note in the Writing or Speaking tables to read the grader's full verdict on that task.
| Task Type | Items | Correct | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complete Words | 20 | 17 | 85% |
| Daily Life | 5 | 5 | 100% |
| Academic Passage | 10 | 6 | 60% |
| Task Type | Items | Correct | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Choose Response | 15 | 12 | 80% |
| Conversation | 10 | 8 | 80% |
| Announcement | 8 | 5 | 63% |
| Academic Talk | 12 | 7 | 58% |
| Task Type | Items | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Build a Sentence | 10 | 9/10 | - |
| Write an Email | 1 | 4.5/5 | The email is highly effective: both requests are stated explicitly and the reason for the extension is developed. Register slips once — "I need you to send it today" is more direct than an email to a professor should be; "Would it be possible to send it by Friday?" keeps the request and restores the appropriate distance. Two article errors and one missing comma after an introductory clause do not interfere with meaning. |
| Academic Discussion | 1 | 4.5/5 | The response takes a clear position and engages directly with the classmate's claim rather than restating the prompt, which is what separates a 5 from a 4 on relevance. The statistics-for-biologists example is well chosen but stops at the example; one sentence explaining why it undercuts the dilution argument would close the gap. |
| Task Type | Items | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Listen and Repeat | 8 | 34/40 | Accurate reproduction on seven of eight items, with no truncated attempts. Word stress on multi-syllable academic vocabulary ("photosynthesis", "significantly") lands on the wrong syllable, which is where this task type is costing you points. |
| Interview | 4 | 14/20 | Content is relevant and on-topic in all four answers, but delivery is holding the score down: two pauses longer than three seconds mid-answer, and a final response that ends at 32 seconds of the 45 allowed. Development, not ideas, is the gap. |
A number on its own tells you where you are. These five layers tell you what to do about it — each one narrower than the last, ending at a single task type you can practise tomorrow.
Band 5.0 on the TOEFL 2026 scale, shown on a gauge alongside the 96/120 equivalent on the scale universities still publish their requirements in.
Reading, Listening, Writing and Speaking each get a band, a 0–30 traditional score, and a proficiency label on a 1–6 progress bar — so you can see at a glance which section is dragging the average down.
Reading and Listening break down to per-task-type accuracy. This is the layer that turns "my Listening is weak" into "Academic Talk is at 58% and it is 12 of my 45 Listening items".
The Writing and Speaking tables carry the grader’s written verdict on each task — expand a row to read it in full. Opening the section tab goes further, scoring the response against each rubric criterion with line-level corrections.
A second card tracks the best band and traditional score you have reached in each section across all your mock tests, with the date — so a single off day never looks like a drop in level.
The report ranks every task type by accuracy, worst first, and says why the misses happened. This is the part a raw score can never give you: four weak spots out of thirteen task types, each one small enough to fix.
The lowest-accuracy task in the attempt, and 12 of the 45 Listening items — the largest single block of lost points. Misses cluster on questions answered late in the talk, which points at note-taking and retention rather than vocabulary.
The only Reading task below 80%. Detail and inference questions were answered correctly; the misses are sentence-purpose and organisation questions — one question type, trainable directly.
Announcements are short and dense, and the required-action question usually lands in the final sentence — after the reason, when attention has already dropped.
The AI note is explicit that content was on-topic in all four answers — the score is held down by delivery: long mid-answer pauses and one response that ended 13 seconds early.
Each weak spot maps to one drill, ordered by how much overall band it can recover. Work down the list rather than across all four sections at once.
Listening is the weakest section at Band 4.5, a full band below Writing, and Academic Talk is the task dragging it down.
Reading is already at Band 5.0 with two tasks above 80%. Lifting the one weak task type is the cheapest remaining gain in the section.
Content already scores well, so a fixed answer template removes the mid-answer pauses without needing new ideas.
Writing is the strongest section at Band 5.5, and the only rubric note is a register slip on the Email task.
Get this report for your own answers
One full mock test, scored the same way — section bands, task-level accuracy, and AI rubric feedback on every Writing and Speaking response.
Four things trip people up the first time they open a TOEFL 2026 report. Here is what each number actually means.
The band (1–6 per section, averaged for the overall) is what the official 2026 report gives you. The traditional score scales each section to 0–30 and sums to 0–120 — it exists so you can compare against university requirements that still quote the old scale.
TOEFL 2026 score scale →The overall band is a plain average of four equally weighted sections. In this report a 5.0 overall conceals a 4.5 in Listening — a full band below Writing. Always read the section tiles before the headline number.
Score Calculator →Reading and Listening bands come from a lookup table normalised to a 35-point basis, not from raw percentage. That is why 80% accuracy in Reading lands on Band 5.0 while 71% in Listening lands on 4.5 — the tables differ by section.
How TOEFL 2026 scoring works →Opening a Writing or Speaking tab scores your response against each rubric criterion separately, and that split is the actionable part. A 5/5 on Communicative Purpose with a 4/5 on Social Conventions means the content is right and the register is not — a much faster fix than "write better emails".
TOEFL Writing rubrics →Scores in this report are AI-estimated practice feedback for learning reference, not an official ETS score. Band and CEFR mappings follow the official ETS TOEFL scoring guidelines. ETS TOEFL Official Site
A straight answer, because it is the question under every “which practice test is closest to the real thing” thread: here is what is known about the bands on this report, what has not been checked, and what to do with the number.
What we know
What we have not verified
What to do with it
The full account — how our adaptive routing works, how each band is produced from your responses, the Reading and Listening raw-to-band table (labelled as the estimate it is), and what ETS has actually published about multistage scoring — is on the practice test page. The method under which calibration figures will be published, with their sample size, is on how LingoLeap works. For how the real exam's AI graders work, see how the 2026 TOEFL is graded by AI.
TOEFL 2026 Mock Test
The full mock-test hub — format, timing, and how to use one in a prep cycle.
Realistic Online TOEFL Mock Test
What separates a realistic mock test from random TOEFL practice.
TOEFL Score Calculator
Turn section bands into an overall band and 120-point equivalent.
TOEFL Score Gap Planner
Convert the gaps in your report into a prioritised study timeline.
Weakness Preparation Plan
Build a plan around the weakest section your report exposes.
TOEFL 2026 Score Scale
How the 1–6 band scale maps to the old 0–120 total and to CEFR.
How LingoLeap Works
The scoring pipeline task by task, and the calibration method we will publish figures under.
How the 2026 TOEFL Is Graded by AI
SpeechRater and e-rater grade Speaking and Writing first — what that means for practice.
One full-length timed mock, then this exact report on your own answers — section bands, task-level accuracy, and AI rubric feedback on Writing and Speaking.
Start Free Mock Test