TOEFLIELTS
日本語
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: For individuals who want to give to only one of those types of charities, international or local, which is the better choice? Why?

AIによる評価とフィードバック付きの実際のユーザー投稿

1件のユーザー投稿サンプルがあります

無料練習を始める

タスク概要

For individuals who want to give to only one of those types of charities, international or local, which is the better choice? Why?

ユーザーサンプルと評価結果

1

ユーザーサンプル #1

The choice between giving to local charities or international charities is a controversial topic. From my perspective, I will opt for local charities,...

ユーザーサンプル

The choice between giving to local charities or international charities is a controversial topic. From my perspective, I will opt for local charities, and there are two reasons. Firstly, local charities make it easier to locate the community’s issues. Local charities also have an immediate impact on the community; they offer tangible benefits. For example, there are some poverty dwellers in the community; they are always starving. Thus, local charities will provide free meals for them. The contribution can affect them quickly. Secondly, supporting local charities can have a visible impact, and local charities also realize the community’s needs; as a result, it is noticeable for the community’s improvement. For instance, there is a community shortens a place to relax and exercise. The local charities know it, and they will utilize their funds to build a new park for the residents.

評価結果

1. Sub Scores:

Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.0 Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 3.5 Language Use and Grammar: 4.0

2. Estimated Scores:

Estimated Score: 24

3. Task completeness:

The essay does a decent job of addressing the specific requirements of the task. The writer clearly states their preference for local charities and provides two reasons to support their viewpoint. However, the essay could benefit from more elaboration on each point, as well as providing more specific examples or details to strengthen the argument.

Suggestions for improvement:

  • Elaborate on each reason with more details or explanations.

  • Provide more specific examples or evidence to support your viewpoint.

Examples:

  1. Instead of simply stating that local charities provide free meals for poverty dwellers, you could explain how these charities work closely with food banks and soup kitchens to ensure that those in need have access to nutritious meals.

  2. When discussing the impact of local charities on community improvement, you could mention specific projects they have funded, such as after-school programs or healthcare initiatives, which directly benefit community members.

4. Essay structure and organization:

The essay has a clear structure with an introduction, body, and conclusion. However, it could be improved by organizing each paragraph around a single point with supporting details and using clearer transitions between ideas and paragraphs.

Suggestions for improvement:

  • Focus each paragraph on one main point with supporting details.

  • Use clear transitions between ideas and paragraphs.

Examples:

  1. In the first body paragraph, begin by stating that local charities can quickly address community issues due to their proximity and understanding of local needs. Then provide supporting details such as how they collaborate with other organizations or government agencies to implement effective solutions.

  2. To improve transitions between paragraphs, use phrases like "In addition" or "Furthermore" at the beginning of new paragraphs to indicate that you are building upon your previous point. For example, "Furthermore, supporting local charities can have a visible impact on the community as they are well-aware of the community's needs and can allocate their resources effectively."

5. Grammar

The choice between giving to local charities or international charities is a controversial topic. From my perspective, I will opt for local charities, and there are two reasons. Firstly, local charities make it easier to locate the community’s issues. Local charities also have an immediate impact on the community; they offer tangible benefits. For example, there are some poverty dwellers in the community; they are always starving. Thus, local charities will provide free meals for them. The contribution can affect them quickly. Secondly, supporting local charities can have a visible impact, and local charities also realize the community’s needs; as a result, it is noticeable for the community’s improvement. For instance, there is a community shortensshortens,(This rule identifies whether commas are missing in a sentence.) a place to relax and exercise. The local charities know it, and they will utilize their funds to build a new park for the residents.

Display title: 6 Revised Essay

The decision to contribute to either local or international charities is a subject of ongoing debate. In my opinion, supporting local charities is the better choice for two primary reasons. First, local organizations possess a deeper understanding of the community's specific needs and can address them more effectively. By focusing on immediate concerns, such as providing meals for impoverished individuals, local charities can deliver tangible benefits that directly impact the community. Second, the results of supporting local charities are often more visible and easier to measure. These organizations are acutely aware of their community's requirements and can allocate resources accordingly to make noticeable improvements. For example, if a neighborhood lacks recreational spaces, a local charity may use its funds to construct a new park for residents to enjoy. This direct impact on the community makes local charities an appealing option for those looking to make a difference in their immediate surroundings. (156 words)

The choice between giving to local charities decision to contribute to either local or international charities is a controversial topic. From subject of ongoing debate (revised for clarity and formality). In my perspective, I will opt for local charities, and there opinion, supporting local charities is the better choice for two primary reasons (revised for conciseness). First, local organizations possess a deeper understanding of the community's specific needs (revised for clarity) and can address them more effectively. By focusing on immediate concerns, such as providing meals for impoverished individuals (revised for specificity), local charities can deliver tangible benefits that directly impact the community (revised for clarity). Second, the results of supporting local charities are two reasons. Firstly, local charities often more visible and easier to measure (revised for clarity). These organizations are acutely aware of their community's requirements (revised for formality) and can allocate resources accordingly to make it easier to locate the community’s issues. Local charities also have an immediate noticeable improvements (revised for clarity). For example, if a neighborhood lacks recreational spaces, a local charity may use its funds to construct a new park for residents to enjoy (revised for specificity). This direct impact on the community; they offer tangible benefits. For example, there are some poverty dwellers community makes local charities an appealing option for those looking to make a difference in the community; they are always starving. Thus, local charities will provide free meals for them. The contribution can affect them quickly. Secondly, supporting local charities can have a visible impact, and local charities also realize the community’s needs; as a result, it is noticeable for the community’s improvement. For instance, there is a community shortens a place to relax and exercise. The local charities know it, and they will utilize their funds to build a new park for the residents.immediate surroundings (revised for clarity and flow).

8 Mind Map

  1. Introduction

    • Debate on local vs international charities
    • Preference for local charities
  2. Local organizations' understanding

    • Knowledge of community needs
    • Addressing specific issues effectively
  3. Immediate concerns

    • Providing meals for impoverished individuals
    • Tangible benefits for the community
  4. Visibility and measurability of results

    • Awareness of community requirements
    • Resource allocation for improvements
  5. Example: neighborhood recreational spaces

    • Local charity constructing a park
    • Direct impact on residents' lives
  6. Appeal of local charities

    • Making a difference in immediate surroundings
  7. Conclusion

    • Supporting local charities as the better choice

9 Key Words

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionEnglish TranslationSample Sentence
Ongoing/ˈɒnˌɡəʊɪŋ/adjectiveContinuing; still in progressOngoingThe ongoing debate about local and international charities has yet to reach a consensus.
Impoverished/ɪmˈpɒvərɪʃt/adjectivePoor; lacking resources or meansImpoverishedLocal charities provide meals for impoverished individuals in the community.
Tangible/ˈtændʒəbəl/adjectiveClear and definite; able to be touched or felt physicallyTangibleThe tangible benefits of supporting local charities directly impact the community.
Allocate/ˈæləkeɪt/verbDistribute (resources or duties) for a particular purposeAllocateLocal charities can allocate resources to address specific community needs.
Recreational/ˌrekriˈeɪʃənəl/adjectiveRelating to or denoting activity done for enjoyment when one is not workingRecreationalThe neighborhood lacked recreational spaces for residents to enjoy.
Acutely/əˈkjuːtli/adverbIn a way that shows a perceptive understanding or insightAcutelyThese organizations are acutely aware of their community's requirements.
Measurable/ˈmeʒərəbəl/adjectiveAble to be measured or assessedMeasurableThe results of supporting local charities are often more visible and measurable.
Immediate/ɪˈmiːdiət/adjectiveOccurring or done at once; instantImmediateBy focusing on immediate concerns, local charities can deliver benefits that directly impact the community.
Surroundings/səˈraʊndɪŋz/noun (plural)The objects, buildings, natural features, etc., that are around a person or thingSurroundingsSupporting local charities allows people to make a difference in their immediate surroundings.

6 Revised Essay

The decision to contribute to either local or international charities is an ongoing debate. In my opinion, supporting local charities is the better choice for two primary reasons. First, local organizations possess a deeper understanding of the community's specific needs and can address them more effectively. By focusing on immediate concerns, such as providing meals for impoverished individuals, local charities can deliver tangible benefits that directly impact the community. Second, the results of supporting local charities are often more visible and easier to measure. These organizations are acutely aware of their community's requirements and can allocate resources accordingly to make noticeable improvements. For example, if a neighborhood lacks recreational spaces, a local charity may use its funds to construct a new park for residents to enjoy. This direct impact on the community makes local charities an appealing option for those looking to make a difference in their immediate surroundings.

アカデミック・ディスカッションの採点方法

TOEFLアカデミック・ディスカッションのタスクは、ETS公式の採点基準に基づいて評価されます。AI評価は各回答を複数の観点から分析します。

関連性と貢献度

設問に的確に答え、ディスカッションに意味のある貢献をしているか?

言語使用

文法の正確さ、語彙の幅、文構造の質。

展開と裏付け

具体例と明確な論理によってアイデアが十分に展開されているか?

回答に見られる共通パターン

このタスクに寄せられたユーザー投稿の分析に基づき、受験者の回答に見られる共通パターンを紹介します。

多くの受験者は明確な意見を述べるものの、具体的な裏付け例が不足している。

高評価の回答は、リーディングパッセージや他の参加者の意見に直接言及している。

高得点の回答は、多様な文構造とアカデミックな語彙を使用している。

時間配分は重要な要素であり、急いで書かれた印象の回答は展開の評価が低くなる傾向がある。

学習のヒント

1

書き始める前に設問文を注意深く読み、質問のすべての要素を把握する。

2

回答の中でリーディングパッセージや他の受験者の意見に言及する。

3

主張を裏付けるために具体例を使い、一般論は避ける。

4

120~150語を目安にする。長い回答が必ずしも良いわけではなく、明確さと焦点の方が重要。

5

本番同様の条件で流暢さを養うため、時間を計って(10分間)回答する練習をする。

よくある質問

TOEFLのAcademic Discussionタスクとは何ですか?
TOEFLのAcademic Discussionタスクでは、オンラインの授業ディスカッションに参加することが求められます。教授の質問と他の学生の回答を読んだ上で、約10分以内に自分の意見を述べ、それを裏付ける投稿を作成します。
Academic Discussionタスクはどのように採点されますか?
このタスクは0〜5点の尺度で採点され、ディスカッションとの関連性、言語使用の質(文法、語彙、文構造)、そして具体的な例と論理的な根拠を用いてどれだけ考えを展開・裏付けできているかが評価基準となります。
このページに表示されているユーザーサンプルとは何ですか?
これらは、LingoLeap上でこの問題を練習した実際のTOEFL受験者から提出された回答です。各サンプルは当社のAI採点エンジンによって評価されており、スコアと、強みや改善点に関する詳細なフィードバックが提供されます。
AI評価の精度はどの程度ですか?
LingoLeapのAI評価エンジンは、ETSの公式採点基準をもとにトレーニングされ、人間の採点者のスコアと照合して調整されています。自動採点システムに完璧なものはありませんが、練習用として信頼できるフィードバックを提供し、具体的な改善点を特定するのに役立ちます。
このAcademic Discussionタスクをどうやって練習できますか?
無料のLingoLeapアカウントに登録することで練習できます。まさにこの質問に対する自分の回答を書いて提出すると、文章に関する詳細なフィードバック付きのAI評価をすぐに受け取ることができます。
Academic Discussionの回答はどのくらいの長さにすべきですか?
120〜150語を目安にしてください。このタスクでは回答を書くための時間が10分与えられます。より長い回答を書くことよりも、明確さ、具体的な例による意見の裏付け、ディスカッションの文脈への言及を重視してください。

Rooting for Your Goal Score Today!

With LingoLeap, an expert in English exams

Get to Your Dream Score Faster

Try for free now