TOEFLIELTS
한국어
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Instructions Your professor is teaching a class on economics. Write a post responding to the professor's question.

AI 기반 평가와 피드백이 포함된 실제 사용자 제출 답안

사용자 제출 예시 1개 이용 가능

무료 연습 시작하기

과제 개요

Dr. Achebe

In class this week, we are looking at how markets work, particularly in regard to energy costs. Petroleum, also known simply as oil, is one of the most important international commodities. When the global market price of oil goes up, fuels such as gasoline (petrol) also become more expensive. Many people think governments should step in to protect consumers from increases in fuel prices. What is your view? Do you think governments should actively keep fuel prices low for consumers?

Kelly

I think it's a good government policy. Most people have to drive or use public transportation, like a bus, to get to work. When the price of gasoline goes up, it costs them more to get to work. People don't have a choice about whether to go to work or not, so they should be protected from price increases.

Andrew

I think the government keeping gas prices low is a bad policy. The biggest problem we face now is global climate change. The more expensive gasoline is, the less people will drive, and thus they will contribute fewer greenhouse gases to the air. Lowering the cost of gas just makes the problem worse.

사용자 예시 및 평가 결과

1

사용자 예시 #1

I think government should not keep prices in a low price. First, The using of gasoline will produce lots of green house gases. If the price of the gas...

점수
17

사용자 예시

I think government should not keep prices in a low price. First, The using of gasoline will produce lots of green house gases. If the price of the gasoline is high, people will drive electronic car or public, which will reduce the production of greenhouse gases.

평가 결과

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 2.5

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 2.0

  • Language Use and Grammar: 3.0

2. 预估分数

17. 3 任务完成度

这篇文章在任务完成度方面有待提高。首先,文章的字数不足100字,没有达到要求。其次,文章中的观点和论据较为简单,需要更多的细节和例子来支持。建议同学在写作时尽量多展开一些观点,并给出具体的例子来支持。

改进示例1: Instead of "If the price of the gasoline is high, people will drive electronic car or public, which will reduce the production of greenhouse gases.", you can write "If the price of gasoline is high, people might be more inclined to use electric cars or public transportation, thus reducing greenhouse gas emissions."

改进示例2: You can add another supporting point, such as "Additionally, artificially keeping fuel prices low might discourage investment in alternative energy sources, hindering the development of cleaner technologies."

4. 文章结构与组织

从文章结构和组织方面来看,这篇文章还有很大的提升空间。首先,文章缺乏明确的引言、主体和结论部分。其次,在段落之间缺乏明确的过渡。建议同学在写作时注意使用恰当的过渡词汇,并将观点和论据进行合理安排。

改进示例1: You can start your essay with an introduction, such as "In response to the professor's question, I believe that governments should not actively keep fuel prices low for consumers due to environmental concerns."

改进示例2: For a better transition between ideas, you can write "On one hand, high gasoline prices encourage people to use more environmentally friendly transportation options. On the other hand, keeping fuel prices low might have negative consequences on the development of alternative energy sources."

5. 语法批改

I think government should not keep prices in a low price. First, The using of gasoline will produce lots of green house gases. If the price of the gasoline is high, people will drive electronic car or public, which will reduce the production of greenhouse gases.

Title: 6 文章修订

In my opinion, governments should not actively intervene to maintain low fuel prices. Primarily, the consumption of gasoline contributes significantly to greenhouse gas emissions. By keeping fuel prices high, individuals may be encouraged to opt for alternative transportation methods, such as electric vehicles or public transit systems. This shift in behavior could ultimately lead to a reduction in greenhouse gas production and promote a more sustainable future. (70 words)

I think government In my opinion, governments should not keep actively intervene (revised for clarity and formality) to maintain low fuel prices in a low price. First, The using (rephrased for clarity). Primarily, the consumption of gasoline will produce lots of green house gases. If contributes significantly (added "significantly" for emphasis) to greenhouse gas emissions. By keeping fuel prices high, individuals may be encouraged (changed "will" to "may be" for a more cautious tone) to opt for alternative transportation methods (rephrased for clarity), such as electric vehicles or public transit systems. This shift in behavior could ultimately lead to a reduction in greenhouse gas production and promote a more sustainable future (added "and promote a more sustainable future" to emphasize the price of the gasoline is high, people will drive electronic car or public, which will reduce the production of greenhouse gases.positive outcome).

8 思维导图


- Introduction
    - Governments and fuel prices
    - Personal opinion: against intervention

- Argument 1: Environmental impact
    - Greenhouse gas emissions
    - High fuel prices encourage alternative transportation

- Argument 2: Sustainable future
    - Electric vehicles and public transit systems
    - Reduction in greenhouse gas production

- Conclusion
    - Importance of promoting sustainability over low fuel prices

9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
intervene/ˌɪntərˈviːn/verbto become involved in a situation to improve it干预Governments should not actively intervene to maintain low fuel prices.
consumption/kənˈsʌm(p)ʃ(ə)n/nounthe act of using resources or energy消费The consumption of gasoline contributes significantly to greenhouse gas emissions.
greenhouse gas/ˈɡriːnhaʊs ɡas/noungases that trap heat in the atmosphere温室气体By keeping fuel prices high, we can reduce greenhouse gas production.
emissions/ɪˈmɪʃ(ə)nz/nounsubstances released into the air │排放物 │The consumption of gasoline contributes significantly to greenhouse gas emissions.
alternative/ɔːlˈtəːnətɪv/adjectiveavailable as another possibility or choice │替代的 │Individuals may be encouraged to opt for alternative transportation methods.
transportation/ˌtrænspɔːrˈteɪʃ(ə)n/nounthe act of moving people or goods from one place to another│交通运输 │High fuel prices encourage the use of more sustainable transportation methods.
electric vehicles/ɪˈlɛktrɪk ˈviːək(ə)lz/nounvehicles powered by electricity │电动汽车 │People may choose electric vehicles instead of gasoline-powered cars.
public transit/ˈpʌblɪk ˈtrænzɪt/nouna system of buses, trains, etc. for public use │公共交通 │More people might use public transit systems if fuel prices are high.
sustainable/səˈsteɪnəb(ə)l/adjectiveable to be maintained at a certain level │可持续的 │This shift in behavior could promote a more sustainable future.
reduction/rɪˈdʌkʃ(ə)n/nounthe act of making something smaller or less │减少 │A reduction in greenhouse gas production is essential for our planet's health.

Academic Discussion 채점 방식

TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제는 ETS 공식 채점 기준에 따라 평가됩니다. AI 평가는 여러 측면에서 각 답안을 분석합니다.

관련성 및 기여도

답안이 질문에 답하고 토론에 의미 있게 기여하는가?

언어 사용

문법 정확성, 어휘 범위, 문장 구조의 질.

전개 및 근거

구체적인 예시와 명확한 논리로 아이디어가 잘 전개되었는가?

답안에서 나타나는 공통 패턴

이 과제에 대한 사용자 제출 답안을 분석한 결과, 학생 답안에서 관찰된 공통 패턴은 다음과 같습니다.

많은 학생이 명확한 의견을 제시하지만 구체적인 뒷받침 예시가 부족합니다.

높은 점수를 받은 답안은 리딩 지문과 다른 참여자의 의견을 직접 인용합니다.

점수가 높은 답안은 다양한 문장 구조와 학술적 어휘를 사용합니다.

시간 관리는 핵심 요소입니다 — 서두른 느낌을 주는 답안은 전개 항목에서 낮은 점수를 받는 경향이 있습니다.

학습 팁

1

글을 쓰기 전에 프롬프트를 꼼꼼히 읽고 질문의 모든 부분을 파악하세요.

2

답안에서 리딩 지문과 다른 학생들의 의견을 언급하세요.

3

핵심 주장을 뒷받침할 구체적인 예시를 사용하고, 일반적인 진술은 피하세요.

4

120~150단어를 목표로 하세요. 답안이 길다고 항상 좋은 것은 아니며, 명료함과 초점이 더 중요합니다.

5

시험 조건에서 유창하게 답하기 위해 시간을 정해(10분) 연습하세요.

자주 묻는 질문

TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제란 무엇인가요?
TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제는 온라인 수업 토론에 참여하는 것을 요구합니다. 교수의 질문과 다른 학생들의 답변을 읽은 후, 약 10분 안에 자신의 의견을 표현하고 뒷받침하는 글을 작성하게 됩니다.
Academic Discussion 과제는 어떻게 채점되나요?
이 과제는 토론과의 관련성, 언어 사용의 질(문법, 어휘, 문장 구조), 그리고 구체적인 예시와 근거를 통해 아이디어를 얼마나 잘 전개하고 뒷받침하는지를 기준으로 0~5점 척도로 채점됩니다.
이 페이지의 사용자 샘플은 무엇인가요?
LingoLeap에서 이 문제를 연습한 실제 TOEFL 응시자들이 제출한 답변입니다. 각 샘플은 저희 AI 채점 엔진에 의해 평가되었으며, 점수와 함께 강점 및 개선이 필요한 부분에 대한 상세한 피드백을 제공합니다.
AI 평가는 얼마나 정확한가요?
LingoLeap의 AI 평가 엔진은 공식 ETS 채점 기준으로 학습되었으며, 실제 채점자의 점수와 비교하여 보정되었습니다. 완벽한 자동 채점 시스템은 없지만, 연습 목적으로 신뢰할 수 있는 피드백을 제공하며 구체적인 개선 영역을 파악하는 데 도움이 됩니다.
이 Academic Discussion 과제를 어떻게 연습할 수 있나요?
무료 LingoLeap 계정에 가입하여 연습할 수 있습니다. 바로 이 질문에 대한 답변을 직접 작성하여 제출하면, 글쓰기에 대한 상세한 피드백과 함께 즉시 AI 평가를 받을 수 있습니다.
Academic Discussion 답변은 얼마나 길게 써야 하나요?
120~150단어를 목표로 하세요. 이 과제는 답변을 작성할 10분의 시간을 제공합니다. 더 긴 답변을 쓰기보다는 명확성, 구체적인 예시로 의견을 뒷받침하는 것, 토론 맥락을 참조하는 것에 집중하세요.

Rooting for Your Goal Score Today!

With LingoLeap, an expert in English exams

Get to Your Dream Score Faster

Try for free now