TOEFLIELTS
العربية
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on marketing. Write a post reponding to the professor's question. In your respose, you should du the following. Express and support your opinion. Make a contribution to the discussion in your own words. An effectivge response will contain at least 100 words.

إجابات حقيقية من المستخدمين مع تقييم وملاحظات مدعومة بالذكاء الاصطناعي

يتوفر 1 نموذج مُقدَّم من المستخدمين

ابدأ التدريب المجاني

نظرة عامة على المهمة

Professor

Let's continue talking about consumer behavior. We have been discussing different ways people go about choosing producfts to buy, and there are many potential sources of information and advice for consumerws. In your opinoin, which is better strategy for making purchasing desicions, relying on advice from friends and family, or depending on information from onl;ine sources? Why?

Claire

Asking friends and family memebers for product recommendations ,ight seem like an easier option, but it might take too much tiome to get all the information you need. An internet search would be much more efficient. There are many consumer magazines available online that compile lots of datqa to compare the advantages and disadvantages of one product versus another.

Paul

The last tiome I bought a computer, I just watched a few videos opnline to make a decision, and now I regret that. My friends could have advised me better because they know my preferences and the kind of features that I am interested in. Consumerws should get advice from the people around them to find the most suitable products.

نماذج المستخدمين ونتائج التقييم

1

نموذج مستخدم #1

In response to the professor's thought-provoking question. I firmly believe that relying on advice from friends and family. First, I concur with Paul'...

الدرجة
25

نموذج مستخدم

In response to the professor's thought-provoking question. I firmly believe that relying on advice from friends and family. First, I concur with Paul's viewpoint that getting advice from friends is better. Family membvers and friends are the closest people to me, so they know me the best. They know mt demand and my using habits, so they can give me the most usful suggestion according to my situation. Furthermore, I would like to emphasize that getting advice from friends and family members is actually more time-saving. While Claires's argument regarding the potential positive effects on searching information online hold merit, it overlooks the fact that internet information need to be selected. Although searching information from internet is really quick, selecting informatioin can cost lots of time. Besides, internet information may not always right, some of them may be advertisement.

نتيجة التقييم

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0

  • Language Use and Grammar: 3.5

2. 预估分数

25. 3 任务完成度

总体来说,这篇文章回答了教授的问题,并表达了作者的观点。然而,文章在语法和用词方面存在一些错误,需要改进。此外,作者可以更详细地阐述观点和论据。

改进建议:

  1. 修改语法错误和拼写错误。

  2. 提供更多具体的例子来支持观点。

示例:

  1. "In response to the professor's thought-provoking question, I firmly believe that relying on advice from friends and family is a better strategy for making purchasing decisions."

  2. "Furthermore, friends and family members can provide personalized recommendations based on their knowledge of my preferences, which can save time compared to sifting through numerous online reviews."

4. 文章结构与组织

文章的结构基本清晰,包括引言、主体和结论。然而,在段落之间缺乏明确的过渡,导致文章在逻辑上略显混乱。建议在段落之间添加过渡句子,并确保每个段落都集中讨论一个特定的观点。

改进建议:

  1. 在段落之间添加过渡句子。

  2. 确保每个段落都集中讨论一个特定的观点。

示例:

  1. "While Claire's argument regarding the potential positive effects of searching information online holds merit, it overlooks the fact that internet information needs to be selected carefully. In contrast, friends and family members can provide more reliable advice."

  2. "In conclusion, although online sources can offer a wealth of information, I believe that advice from friends and family is more valuable due to their understanding of my preferences and the trustworthiness of their recommendations."

5. 语法批改

In response to the professor's thought-provoking question. I firmly believe that relying on advice from friends and family. First, I concur with Paul's viewpoint that getting advice from friends is better. Family membversmembers(misspelling) and friends are the closest people to me, so they know me the best. They know mtCT(misspelling) demand and my using habits, so they can give me the most usfuluseful(misspelling) suggestion according to my situation. Furthermore, I would like to emphasize that getting advice from friends and family members is actually more time-saving. While ClairesClaire's(misspelling)'s argument regarding the potential positive effects on searching information online hold merit, it overlooks the fact that internet information need to be selected. Although searching information from internet is really quick, selecting informatioininformation(misspelling) can cost lots of time. Besides, internet information may not always right, some of them may be advertisement.

Title: 6 文章修订

In response to the professor's intriguing inquiry, I firmly believe that seeking advice from friends and family is a superior strategy for making purchasing decisions. Firstly, I concur with Paul's perspective that obtaining guidance from our loved ones is more advantageous. Friends and family members have a deep understanding of our needs and preferences, enabling them to provide tailored recommendations based on our specific circumstances. Additionally, I would like to emphasize that consulting with friends and family can actually be more time-efficient. While Claire's argument regarding the potential benefits of online research holds merit, it fails to consider the time-consuming process of filtering through vast amounts of information. Although accessing data online is undoubtedly swift, discerning its relevance and accuracy can be quite laborious. Furthermore, not all online information is reliable; some sources may be biased or influenced by advertising interests. (144 words)

In response to the professor's thought-provoking question. intriguing inquiry[changed "thought-provoking question" to "intriguing inquiry" for better word choice and flow], I firmly believe that relying seeking advice from friends and family is a superior strategy[rephrased "relying on advice from friends and family. First, family" for clarity] for making purchasing decisions. Firstly, I concur with Paul's viewpoint that getting perspective that obtaining guidance from our loved ones is more advantageous[rephrased "getting advice from friends is better. Family membvers and friends are the closest people to me, so they know me the best. They better" for clarity and emphasis]. Friends and family members have a deep understanding of our needs and preferences, enabling them to provide tailored recommendations based on our specific circumstances[rephrased "They know mt demand and my using habits, so they can give me the most usful suggestion according to my situation. Furthermore, situation" for grammar correction and clarity]. Additionally, I would like to emphasize that getting advice from consulting with friends and family members is can actually be more time-saving. time-efficient[changed "time-saving" to "time-efficient" for better word choice]. While Claires's Claire's argument regarding the potential positive effects on searching information benefits of online hold research holds merit, it fails to consider the time-consuming process of filtering through vast amounts of information[rephrased "it overlooks the fact that internet information need to be selected. selected" for clarity]. Although searching information from internet is really quick, selecting accessing data online is undoubtedly swift, discerning its relevance and accuracy can be quite laborious[rephrased "selecting informatioin can cost lots of time. Besides, internet time" for better word choice]. Furthermore, not all online information is reliable; some sources may be biased or influenced by advertising interests[rephrased "internet information may not always right, some of them may be advertisement.advertisement" for grammar correction and clarity].

Title: 8 思维导图


1. Introduction
   - Thesis statement: Seeking advice from friends and family is a superior strategy for making purchasing decisions.

2. Body
   - Point 1: Friends and family have a deep understanding of our needs and preferences.
     - Tailored recommendations based on specific circumstances.
   - Point 2: Consulting with friends and family can be more time-efficient.
     - Filtering through vast amounts of online information can be laborious.
   - Point 3: Online information may not always be reliable.
     - Biased sources or influenced by advertising interests.

3. Conclusion
   - Reiterate thesis statement and main points of the essay.

Title: 9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
intriguing/ɪnˈtriːɡɪŋ/adjectiveArousing one's curiosity or interest; fascinating引人入胜的The professor's intriguing inquiry sparked a lively debate among the students.
tailored/ˈteɪlərd/adjectiveMade or adapted for a particular purpose, user, or need定制的The software offers tailored solutions for different industries.
time-efficient/taɪm ɪˈfɪʃənt/adjectiveAchieving maximum productivity with minimum wasted effort/time.时间效率高的Consulting with friends and family can actually be more time-efficient than doing online research.
laborious/ləˈbɔːriəs/adjectiveRequiring considerable effort and time费力的Filtering through vast amounts of information can be quite laborious.
discerning/dɪˈsɜːrnɪŋ/verbPerceive or recognize (something)辨别Discerning the relevance and accuracy of online information can be challenging.
biased/ˈbaɪəst/adjectiveUnfairly prejudiced for or against someone or something有偏见的Some online reviews may be biased, making it difficult to trust their accuracy.
advertising/ˈædvərtaɪzɪŋ/nounThe activity or profession of producing advertisements广告Advertising interests may influence the reliability of certain online sources.
merit/ˈmɛrɪt/nounThe quality of being particularly good or worthy优点Claire's argument regarding the potential benefits of online research holds merit.
concur/kənˈkɜr/verbAgree; Be of the same opinion同意I concur with Paul's perspective that obtaining guidance from our loved ones is more advantageous.
preferences/prəˈfərəns, ˈpref(ə)rəns/nounA greater liking for one alternative over another or others偏好Friends and family members have a deep understanding of our needs and preferences.

كيف يتم تقييم النقاش الأكاديمي

يتم تقييم مهمة النقاش الأكاديمي في TOEFL بناءً على معايير التقييم الرسمية من ETS. يحلل تقييم الذكاء الاصطناعي كل إجابة عبر عدة أبعاد.

الصلة والمساهمة

هل تعالج الإجابة السؤال وتُقدّم مساهمة ذات معنى في النقاش؟

استخدام اللغة

دقة القواعد، وتنوّع المفردات، وجودة بنية الجمل.

التطوير والدعم

هل تم تطوير الأفكار بشكل جيد باستخدام أمثلة محددة وتعليل واضح؟

الأنماط الشائعة في الإجابات

استنادًا إلى تحليل نماذج المستخدمين لهذه المهمة، إليك الأنماط الشائعة الملاحظة في إجابات الطلاب.

يقدّم كثير من الطلاب آراءً واضحة لكنهم يفتقرون إلى أمثلة داعمة محددة.

تشير الإجابات القوية مباشرةً إلى نص القراءة ووجهات نظر المتحدثين الآخرين.

تستخدم الإجابات ذات الدرجات الأعلى بنى جُمَلية متنوعة ومفردات أكاديمية.

إدارة الوقت عامل أساسي — الإجابات التي تبدو متسرعة تحصل غالبًا على درجة أقل في التطوير.

نصائح للتعلم

1

اقرأ السؤال بعناية وحدّد جميع أجزائه قبل البدء بالكتابة.

2

أشر في إجابتك إلى نص القراءة وآراء الطلاب الآخرين.

3

استخدم أمثلة محددة لدعم فكرتك الرئيسية — تجنّب العبارات العامة.

4

استهدف 120-150 كلمة. الإجابة الأطول ليست دائمًا أفضل؛ فالوضوح والتركيز أهم.

5

تدرّب على إجابات محددة الوقت (10 دقائق) لبناء الطلاقة في ظروف الاختبار.

الأسئلة الشائعة

ما هي مهمة المناقشة الأكاديمية في TOEFL؟
تتطلب مهمة المناقشة الأكاديمية في TOEFL منك المشاركة في نقاش صفي عبر الإنترنت. ستقرأ سؤال الأستاذ وردود الطلاب الآخرين، ثم تكتب مشاركتك الخاصة للتعبير عن رأيك ودعمه خلال حوالي 10 دقائق.
كيف يتم تقييم مهمة المناقشة الأكاديمية؟
يُقيَّم هذا التمرين على مقياس من 0 إلى 5 بناءً على مدى ارتباط الإجابة بالنقاش، وجودة استخدام اللغة (القواعد والمفردات وبنية الجملة)، ومدى قدرتك على تطوير أفكارك ودعمها بأمثلة وتحليل منطقي محدد.
ما هي عينات المستخدمين الموجودة في هذه الصفحة؟
هذه إجابات حقيقية قدّمها متقدمون لاختبار TOEFL تدربوا على هذا السؤال عبر LingoLeap. تم تقييم كل عينة بواسطة محرك التصحيح بالذكاء الاصطناعي لدينا، والذي يقدّم درجة وملاحظات مفصّلة حول نقاط القوة ومجالات التحسين.
ما مدى دقة تقييم الذكاء الاصطناعي؟
تم تدريب محرك التقييم بالذكاء الاصطناعي في LingoLeap على معايير التصحيح الرسمية لـETS، وتمت معايرته مقارنة بدرجات المصححين البشريين. ورغم أن أي نظام آلي ليس مثاليًا تمامًا، فإنه يوفر ملاحظات موثوقة لأغراض التدريب ويساعد في تحديد مجالات محددة للتحسين.
كيف يمكنني التدرب على مهمة المناقشة الأكاديمية هذه؟
يمكنك التدرب من خلال إنشاء حساب مجاني على LingoLeap. اكتب إجابتك الخاصة على هذا السؤال بالتحديد، ثم أرسلها لتحصل على تقييم فوري بالذكاء الاصطناعي مع ملاحظات مفصّلة حول كتابتك.
ما الطول المناسب لإجابة المناقشة الأكاديمية؟
استهدف كتابة ما بين 120 و150 كلمة. تمنحك المهمة 10 دقائق لكتابة إجابتك. ركّز على الوضوح، ودعم رأيك بأمثلة محددة، والإشارة إلى سياق النقاش بدلاً من كتابة إجابة أطول.

نشجعك على تحقيق هدفك في TOEFL اليوم!

مع LingoLeap، خبيرك في اختبارات اللغة الإنجليزية

حقق درجتك المثالية في TOEFL بشكل أسرع

جرّبه مجاناً الآن