All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on marketing. Write a post reponding to the professor's question. In your respose, you should du the following. Express and support your opinion. Make a contribution to the discussion in your own words. An effectivge response will contain at least 100 words.

Real user submissions with AI-powered evaluation and feedback

1 user-submitted samples available

Start Free Practice

Task Overview

Professor

Let's continue talking about consumer behavior. We have been discussing different ways people go about choosing producfts to buy, and there are many potential sources of information and advice for consumerws. In your opinoin, which is better strategy for making purchasing desicions, relying on advice from friends and family, or depending on information from onl;ine sources? Why?

Claire

Asking friends and family memebers for product recommendations ,ight seem like an easier option, but it might take too much tiome to get all the information you need. An internet search would be much more efficient. There are many consumer magazines available online that compile lots of datqa to compare the advantages and disadvantages of one product versus another.

Paul

The last tiome I bought a computer, I just watched a few videos opnline to make a decision, and now I regret that. My friends could have advised me better because they know my preferences and the kind of features that I am interested in. Consumerws should get advice from the people around them to find the most suitable products.

User Samples & Evaluation Results

User Sample

In response to the professor's thought-provoking question. I firmly believe that relying on advice from friends and family. First, I concur with Paul's viewpoint that getting advice from friends is better. Family membvers and friends are the closest people to me, so they know me the best. They know mt demand and my using habits, so they can give me the most usful suggestion according to my situation. Furthermore, I would like to emphasize that getting advice from friends and family members is actually more time-saving. While Claires's argument regarding the potential positive effects on searching information online hold merit, it overlooks the fact that internet information need to be selected. Although searching information from internet is really quick, selecting informatioin can cost lots of time. Besides, internet information may not always right, some of them may be advertisement.

Evaluation Result

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0

  • Language Use and Grammar: 3.5

2. 预估分数

25. 3 任务完成度

总体来说,这篇文章回答了教授的问题,并表达了作者的观点。然而,文章在语法和用词方面存在一些错误,需要改进。此外,作者可以更详细地阐述观点和论据。

改进建议:

  1. 修改语法错误和拼写错误。

  2. 提供更多具体的例子来支持观点。

示例:

  1. "In response to the professor's thought-provoking question, I firmly believe that relying on advice from friends and family is a better strategy for making purchasing decisions."

  2. "Furthermore, friends and family members can provide personalized recommendations based on their knowledge of my preferences, which can save time compared to sifting through numerous online reviews."

4. 文章结构与组织

文章的结构基本清晰,包括引言、主体和结论。然而,在段落之间缺乏明确的过渡,导致文章在逻辑上略显混乱。建议在段落之间添加过渡句子,并确保每个段落都集中讨论一个特定的观点。

改进建议:

  1. 在段落之间添加过渡句子。

  2. 确保每个段落都集中讨论一个特定的观点。

示例:

  1. "While Claire's argument regarding the potential positive effects of searching information online holds merit, it overlooks the fact that internet information needs to be selected carefully. In contrast, friends and family members can provide more reliable advice."

  2. "In conclusion, although online sources can offer a wealth of information, I believe that advice from friends and family is more valuable due to their understanding of my preferences and the trustworthiness of their recommendations."

5. 语法批改

In response to the professor's thought-provoking question. I firmly believe that relying on advice from friends and family. First, I concur with Paul's viewpoint that getting advice from friends is better. Family membversmembers(misspelling) and friends are the closest people to me, so they know me the best. They know mtCT(misspelling) demand and my using habits, so they can give me the most usfuluseful(misspelling) suggestion according to my situation. Furthermore, I would like to emphasize that getting advice from friends and family members is actually more time-saving. While ClairesClaire's(misspelling)'s argument regarding the potential positive effects on searching information online hold merit, it overlooks the fact that internet information need to be selected. Although searching information from internet is really quick, selecting informatioininformation(misspelling) can cost lots of time. Besides, internet information may not always right, some of them may be advertisement.

Title: 6 文章修订

In response to the professor's intriguing inquiry, I firmly believe that seeking advice from friends and family is a superior strategy for making purchasing decisions. Firstly, I concur with Paul's perspective that obtaining guidance from our loved ones is more advantageous. Friends and family members have a deep understanding of our needs and preferences, enabling them to provide tailored recommendations based on our specific circumstances. Additionally, I would like to emphasize that consulting with friends and family can actually be more time-efficient. While Claire's argument regarding the potential benefits of online research holds merit, it fails to consider the time-consuming process of filtering through vast amounts of information. Although accessing data online is undoubtedly swift, discerning its relevance and accuracy can be quite laborious. Furthermore, not all online information is reliable; some sources may be biased or influenced by advertising interests. (144 words)

In response to the professor's thought-provoking question. intriguing inquiry[changed "thought-provoking question" to "intriguing inquiry" for better word choice and flow], I firmly believe that relying seeking advice from friends and family is a superior strategy[rephrased "relying on advice from friends and family. First, family" for clarity] for making purchasing decisions. Firstly, I concur with Paul's viewpoint that getting perspective that obtaining guidance from our loved ones is more advantageous[rephrased "getting advice from friends is better. Family membvers and friends are the closest people to me, so they know me the best. They better" for clarity and emphasis]. Friends and family members have a deep understanding of our needs and preferences, enabling them to provide tailored recommendations based on our specific circumstances[rephrased "They know mt demand and my using habits, so they can give me the most usful suggestion according to my situation. Furthermore, situation" for grammar correction and clarity]. Additionally, I would like to emphasize that getting advice from consulting with friends and family members is can actually be more time-saving. time-efficient[changed "time-saving" to "time-efficient" for better word choice]. While Claires's Claire's argument regarding the potential positive effects on searching information benefits of online hold research holds merit, it fails to consider the time-consuming process of filtering through vast amounts of information[rephrased "it overlooks the fact that internet information need to be selected. selected" for clarity]. Although searching information from internet is really quick, selecting accessing data online is undoubtedly swift, discerning its relevance and accuracy can be quite laborious[rephrased "selecting informatioin can cost lots of time. Besides, internet time" for better word choice]. Furthermore, not all online information is reliable; some sources may be biased or influenced by advertising interests[rephrased "internet information may not always right, some of them may be advertisement.advertisement" for grammar correction and clarity].

Title: 8 思维导图


1. Introduction
   - Thesis statement: Seeking advice from friends and family is a superior strategy for making purchasing decisions.

2. Body
   - Point 1: Friends and family have a deep understanding of our needs and preferences.
     - Tailored recommendations based on specific circumstances.
   - Point 2: Consulting with friends and family can be more time-efficient.
     - Filtering through vast amounts of online information can be laborious.
   - Point 3: Online information may not always be reliable.
     - Biased sources or influenced by advertising interests.

3. Conclusion
   - Reiterate thesis statement and main points of the essay.

Title: 9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
intriguing/ɪnˈtriːɡɪŋ/adjectiveArousing one's curiosity or interest; fascinating引人入胜的The professor's intriguing inquiry sparked a lively debate among the students.
tailored/ˈteɪlərd/adjectiveMade or adapted for a particular purpose, user, or need定制的The software offers tailored solutions for different industries.
time-efficient/taɪm ɪˈfɪʃənt/adjectiveAchieving maximum productivity with minimum wasted effort/time.时间效率高的Consulting with friends and family can actually be more time-efficient than doing online research.
laborious/ləˈbɔːriəs/adjectiveRequiring considerable effort and time费力的Filtering through vast amounts of information can be quite laborious.
discerning/dɪˈsɜːrnɪŋ/verbPerceive or recognize (something)辨别Discerning the relevance and accuracy of online information can be challenging.
biased/ˈbaɪəst/adjectiveUnfairly prejudiced for or against someone or something有偏见的Some online reviews may be biased, making it difficult to trust their accuracy.
advertising/ˈædvərtaɪzɪŋ/nounThe activity or profession of producing advertisements广告Advertising interests may influence the reliability of certain online sources.
merit/ˈmɛrɪt/nounThe quality of being particularly good or worthy优点Claire's argument regarding the potential benefits of online research holds merit.
concur/kənˈkɜr/verbAgree; Be of the same opinion同意I concur with Paul's perspective that obtaining guidance from our loved ones is more advantageous.
preferences/prəˈfərəns, ˈpref(ə)rəns/nounA greater liking for one alternative over another or others偏好Friends and family members have a deep understanding of our needs and preferences.

How Academic Discussion Is Scored

The TOEFL Academic Discussion task is evaluated based on the official ETS scoring rubric. AI evaluation analyzes each response across multiple dimensions.

Relevance & Contribution

Does the response address the question and contribute meaningfully to the discussion?

Language Use

Grammar accuracy, vocabulary range, and sentence structure quality.

Development & Support

Are ideas well-developed with specific examples and clear reasoning?

Common Patterns Across Responses

Based on analysis of user submissions for this task, here are common patterns observed in student responses.

Many students provide clear opinions but lack specific supporting examples.

Strong responses directly reference the reading passage and other speakers' viewpoints.

Higher-scoring responses use varied sentence structures and academic vocabulary.

Time management is a key factor — responses that feel rushed tend to score lower on development.

Learning Tips

1

Read the prompt carefully and identify all parts of the question before writing.

2

Reference the reading passage and the other students' opinions in your response.

3

Use specific examples to support your main point — avoid generic statements.

4

Aim for 120-150 words. Longer responses are not always better; clarity and focus matter more.

5

Practice timed responses (10 minutes) to build fluency under exam conditions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the TOEFL Academic Discussion task?
The TOEFL Academic Discussion task requires you to contribute to an online classroom discussion. You'll read a professor's question and other students' responses, then write your own post expressing and supporting your opinion in about 10 minutes.
How is the Academic Discussion task scored?
The task is scored on a scale of 0-5 based on relevance to the discussion, quality of language use (grammar, vocabulary, sentence structure), and how well you develop and support your ideas with specific examples and reasoning.
What are the user samples on this page?
These are real responses submitted by TOEFL test-takers who practiced this question on LingoLeap. Each sample has been evaluated by our AI scoring engine, which provides a score and detailed feedback on strengths and areas for improvement.
How accurate is the AI evaluation?
LingoLeap's AI evaluation engine is trained on official ETS scoring rubrics and calibrated against human rater scores. While no automated system is perfect, it provides reliable feedback for practice purposes and helps identify specific areas for improvement.
How can I practice this Academic Discussion task?
You can practice by signing up for a free LingoLeap account. Write your own response to this exact question, submit it, and receive instant AI evaluation with detailed feedback on your writing.
How long should my Academic Discussion response be?
Aim for 120-150 words. The task gives you 10 minutes to write your response. Focus on clarity, supporting your opinion with specific examples, and referencing the discussion context rather than writing a longer response.

Rooting for Your Goal Score Today!

With LingoLeap, an expert in English exams

Get to Your Dream Score Faster

Try for free now