TOEFLIELTS
Tiếng Việt
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on sociology. Write a post responding to the professor's question. In your response you should do the following. · Express and support your opinion. · Make a contribution to the discussion in your own words. An effective response will contain at least 100 words.

Bài nộp thực tế của người dùng với đánh giá và phản hồi bằng AI

Có 14 bài mẫu do người dùng gửi

Bắt Đầu Luyện Tập Miễn Phí

Tổng Quan Dạng Bài

Professor

We've been discussing employee working arrangements- whether employees should report to an office or work at home. Some businesses require all employees to work in the office. Others choose not to have a physical office and have all employees work from home. In industries where remote work is possible, what is the most important factor for employers to consider when deciding where employees should work, and why?

Student A

I don't think businesses should allow their employees to work from home, because creating a sense of community and camaraderie among employees is so important for the success of a business, especially if it's a small business.

Student B

I think the most important thing to consider is the bottom line keeping company expenses down. For example, requiring all employees to work from home might be the best option from an economic standpoint.

Bài Mẫu Của Người Dùng & Kết Quả Đánh Giá

1

Bài Mẫu Của Người Dùng #1

In my opinion, working from home is of vital importance for companies, since it allows companies to handle all kinds of emergencies while maintaining ...

Điểm Số
26

Bài Mẫu Của Người Dùng

In my opinion, working from home is of vital importance for companies, since it allows companies to handle all kinds of emergencies while maintaining regular work. To be more specific, emergencies such as volcanic and hurricane may affect the traffic, causing employees not able to go to their companies. But if employees can work from home, they do not need worry about any negative situations outside and complete their work successfully. For instance, the pandemic, COVID-19, caused horrifying illness and death. In order to prevent infection, citizens chose to work from home, which is not so difference from working in the office, since employees can get the salaries on time and companies can run smoothly. Still, some may claim that it is better to work in the office due to the sense of community and camaraderie. However, communication software such as Wechat or Facebook can achieve the same purpose.

Kết Quả Đánh Giá

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0

  • Language Use and Grammar: 4.0

2. 预估分数

26. 3 任务完成度

这篇文章在回答问题时基本上涵盖了相关观点,但在论述过程中,可以更多地关注论证自己观点的有效性。例如,在提到员工在家工作的优势时,可以进一步阐述如何降低公司成本。此外,在提到社交软件如微信和Facebook时,可以给出具体的例子来说明它们如何帮助员工保持联系和团队精神。

改进示例1: In addition to handling emergencies, working from home can also help companies save on office expenses, such as rent and utilities, which in turn contributes to the company's overall financial stability.

改进示例2: For instance, companies can use communication tools like Slack or Microsoft Teams to create virtual team rooms where employees can collaborate on projects, share ideas, and maintain a sense of camaraderie despite working remotely.

4. 文章结构与组织

文章的结构和组织方面还有待提高。虽然有引言、主体和结论,但是段落之间的过渡并不明显。建议使用更清晰的过渡词或短语来引导读者理解文章的逻辑顺序。

改进示例1: To begin with, working from home is essential for companies as it allows them to handle emergencies while maintaining regular work. (然后继续阐述这一观点)

改进示例2: On the other hand, some may argue that working in the office is better due to the sense of community and camaraderie. However, I believe that communication software such as Wechat or Facebook can achieve the same purpose. (然后继续解释为什么这些软件可以实现相同的目的)

5. 语法批改

In my opinion, working from home is of vital importance for companies, since it allows companies to handle all kinds of emergencies while maintaining regular work. To be more specific, emergencies such as volcanic and hurricane may affect the traffic, causing employees not able to go to their companies. But if employees can work from home, they do not need worryneed to worry(Use 'to' before the base form of a verb) about any negative situations outside and complete their work successfully. For instance, the pandemic, COVID-19, caused horrifying illness and death. In order to prevent infection, citizens chose to work from home, which is not so difference from working in the office, since employees can get the salaries on time and companies can run smoothly. Still, some may claim that it is better to work in the office due to the sense of community and camaraderie. However, communication software such as WechatWeChat(WeChat) or Facebook can achieve the same purpose.

Section Title: 6 Article Revision

In my opinion, the ability to work from home is crucial for companies, as it enables them to adapt to various emergencies while maintaining operational efficiency. Specifically, unforeseen events such as volcanic eruptions or hurricanes can disrupt transportation, making it difficult for employees to reach their workplaces. By allowing remote work, employees can circumvent these external challenges and continue to perform their duties effectively. For example, during the COVID-19 pandemic, working from home became a viable alternative that ensured both timely salary payments and smooth business operations. While some argue that in-office work fosters a sense of community and camaraderie, I believe that modern communication tools like WeChat or Facebook can effectively bridge this gap and facilitate team cohesion in a remote work setting. (129 words)

In my opinion, the ability to work from home is crucial (changed "of vital importance" to "crucial" for a more natural tone) for companies, as it enables them to adapt (changed "handle" to "adapt" for better word choice) to various emergencies while maintaining operational efficiency (changed "regular work" to "operational efficiency" for clarity). Specifically, unforeseen events (added "unforeseen events" for clarity) such as volcanic eruptions or hurricanes can disrupt transportation (changed "affect the traffic" to "disrupt transportation"), making it difficult for employees to reach their workplaces. By allowing remote work, employees can circumvent these external challenges and continue to perform their duties effectively. For example, during the COVID-19 pandemic, working from home is of vital importance for companies, since it allows companies to handle all kinds of emergencies while maintaining regular work. To be more specific, emergencies such as volcanic became a viable alternative that ensured both timely salary payments and hurricane may affect the traffic, causing employees not able to go to their companies. But if employees can smooth business operations. While some argue that in-office work from home, they do not need worry about any negative situations outside and complete their work successfully. For instance, the pandemic, COVID-19, caused horrifying illness and death. In order to prevent infection, citizens chose to work from home, which is not so difference from working in the office, since employees can get the salaries on time and companies can run smoothly. Still, some may claim that it is better to work in the office due to the fosters a sense of community and camaraderie. However, camaraderie, I believe that modern communication software such as Wechat tools like WeChat or Facebook can achieve effectively bridge this gap and facilitate team cohesion in a remote work setting (rephrased the same purpose.last sentence for better flow and clarity).

8 思维导图


- 主题: 远程工作的重要性
  - 子主题1: 应对紧急情况
    - 火山喷发
    - 飓风
  - 子主题2: 维持运营效率
    - COVID-19大流行期间的远程工作
    - 及时支付薪水
    - 顺利进行业务操作
  - 子主题3: 团队凝聚力与沟通工具
    - WeChat和Facebook等现代通讯工具
    - 在远程工作环境中促进团队凝聚力和相互支持

9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
crucial/ˈkruːʃəl/adjectiveextremely important or necessary至关重要的;必不可少的;决定性的;关键性的。The ability to work from home is crucial for companies.
unforeseen/ˌʌnfɔːrˈsiːn/adjectivenot anticipated or predicted; unexpected.意料之外的;未预见到的。Unforeseen events such as volcanic eruptions can disrupt transportation.
operational efficiency/ɒpə'reɪʃənəl/ /ɪˌfɪʃənˈsi/nounthe ability to accomplish tasks with minimal time, effort, and resources.运营效率。Companies can maintain operational efficiency by allowing remote work.
circumvent/ˌsɜrkəmˈvɛnt/verbto find a way around (an obstacle).绕过;避开。Employees can circumvent external challenges by working from home.
viable/ˈvaɪəbəl/adjectivecapable of working successfully; feasible.可行的;能成功的。Working from home became a viable alternative during the COVID-19 pandemic.
camaraderie/kæməˈrɑdəri/nounmutual trust and friendship among people who spend a lot of time together.同志之情;友情。In-office work fosters a sense of camaraderie among employees.
cohesion/koʊˈhiʒən/nounthe action or fact of forming a united whole.凝聚力;团结一致。Modern communication tools can facilitate team cohesion in a remote work setting.
WeChat/wi:tʃæt/nounA Chinese multi-purpose messaging, social media and mobile payment app.微信。WeChat is an effective communication tool for remote workers.
Facebook/ˈfeɪsbʊk/nounA popular social networking website that allows users to create profiles, upload photos and videos, send messages and keep in touch with friends, family and colleagues.脸书。Facebook can help bridge the gap between remote workers and foster team cohesion.
remote work/rɪˈmoʊt/ /wɜrk/nounA work arrangement in which employees do not commute to a central place of work.远程工作。Allowing remote work enables companies to adapt to various emergencies.
2

Bài Mẫu Của Người Dùng #2

In my opinion, I am inclined to approve of the statement of Amy when she contends that it will be too costly to build spaceships and develop related t...

Điểm Số
25

Bài Mẫu Của Người Dùng

In my opinion, I am inclined to approve of the statement of Amy when she contends that it will be too costly to build spaceships and develop related technologies. In addition to Amy's reasoning, I believe that funding space exploration carries a high level of risk. To be specifc, space exploration is a high-risk field where the success is not guaranteed, and government investment may encourter failuers, meaning that the money and energy put into this program would waste in the end. There are many examples that some countries nearly put all of their effort on the space exploration and created many rockets sent to the moon, but some of the rockets were fail to launch and broke down in the middle of the flight, meaning that all the efforts were ruined. Therefore, I am in the line with the opinion that governments should not fund space exploration.

Kết Quả Đánh Giá

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0

  • Language Use and Grammar: 4.0

2. 预估分数

25. 3 任务完成度

从任务完成度的角度来看,这篇文章基本上满足了题目要求,阐述了作者对于政府是否应该资助太空探索的观点,并给出了一定的理由。但是,文章可以在以下方面进行改进:

  1. 在支持观点时,可以提供更多具体的例子和详细信息。

  2. 可以对其他人的观点进行一定程度的讨论和反驳。

示例1(改进):在支持观点时,可以提到一些具体国家或项目的失败案例,以增强论据的说服力。 示例2(改进):可以针对Rory所提到的科学发现和技术进步带来的潜在好处进行讨论,并给出反驳意见。

4. 文章结构与组织

从文章结构与组织方面来看,这篇文章具有清晰的结构,包括引言、正文和结尾。每个段落都集中讨论了一个特定观点及其支持细节。然而,在以下方面仍有改进空间:

  1. 在段落之间增加过渡词或短语,使文章更连贯。

  2. 在正文部分,可以将对Amy和Rory观点的讨论分成两个段落,使文章结构更清晰。

示例1(改进):在引言部分,可以使用过渡词汇如“首先”、“其次”来引出正文段落的主题。 示例2(改进):在正文部分,可以先讨论并支持Amy的观点,然后用一个新段落讨论Rory的观点并给出反驳意见。

5. 语法批改

In my opinion, I am inclined to approve of the statement of Amy when she contends that it will be too costly to build spaceships and develop related technologies. In addition to Amy's reasoning, I believe that funding space exploration carries a high level of risk. To be specifcspecific(misspelling), space exploration is a high-risk field where the success is not guaranteed, and government investment may encourterencounter(misspelling) failuersfailures(misspelling), meaning that the money and energy put into this program would waste in the end. There are many examples that some countries nearly put all of their effort on the space exploration and created many rockets sent to the moon, but some of the rockets were fail to launch and broke down in the middle of the flight, meaning that all the efforts were ruined. Therefore, I am in the line with the opinion that governments should not fund space exploration.

Section Title: 6 文章修订

In my opinion, I concur with Amy's assertion that the construction of spaceships and the development of related technologies are prohibitively expensive. Beyond Amy's rationale, I contend that funding space exploration entails a significant degree of risk. Specifically, space exploration is an inherently high-risk endeavor with no guaranteed success, and government investments may ultimately result in failures, rendering the resources allocated to such programs futile. Numerous instances exist where countries have dedicated substantial efforts to space exploration, launching rockets towards the moon; however, some of these rockets failed to launch or malfunctioned mid-flight, nullifying all prior efforts. Consequently, I maintain that governments should refrain from financing space exploration. (112 words)

In my opinion, I am inclined to approve concur (revised for clarity and conciseness) with Amy's assertion that the construction of the statement of Amy when she contends that it will be too costly to build spaceships and develop the development of related technologies. In addition to technologies are prohibitively expensive (rephrased for a more natural tone). Beyond Amy's reasoning, rationale, I believe contend that funding space exploration carries entails a high level significant degree of risk. To be specifc, risk (rephrased for clarity). Specifically, space exploration is an inherently high-risk endeavor (revised for a high-risk field where the success is not guaranteed, more natural tone) with no guaranteed success, and government investment investments may encourter failuers, meaning that ultimately result in failures, rendering the money resources allocated to such programs futile (rephrased for clarity and energy put into this program would waste in conciseness). Numerous instances exist where countries have dedicated substantial efforts to space exploration, launching rockets towards the end. There are many examples that some countries nearly put all of their effort on the space exploration and created many rockets sent to the moon, but moon; however, some of the these rockets were fail failed to launch or malfunctioned mid-flight, nullifying all prior efforts (rephrased for clarity and broke down in the middle of the flight, meaning that all the efforts were ruined. Therefore, conciseness). Consequently, I am in the line with the opinion maintain that governments should not fund refrain from financing space exploration.exploration (revised for a more natural tone).

Title: 8 思维导图


1. 空间探索成本高昂
   a. 建造飞船
   b. 发展相关技术

2. 高风险投资
   a. 无保证的成功
   b. 政府投资可能失败

3. 失败案例
   a. 发射火箭失败
   b. 中途故障导致努力白费

4. 结论:政府应避免资助空间探索

Title: 9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
concur/kənˈkɜr/verbagree; be of the same opinion同意I concur with Amy's assertion that the construction of spaceships is expensive.
prohibitively/prəˈhɪbɪtɪvli/adverbto an extent that prevents something from being done禁止性地The development of related technologies is prohibitively expensive.
rationale/ˌræʃəˈnæl/nounthe fundamental reason or reasons serving to account for something基本原理Beyond Amy's rationale, I contend that funding space exploration entails risk.
endeavor/ɛnˈdɛvər/nouna serious attempt or effort努力Space exploration is an inherently high-risk endeavor with no guaranteed success.
futile/ˈfjutl/adjectiveincapable of producing any useful result; pointless无用的Government investments may ultimately result in failures, rendering resources futile.
substantial/səbˈstænʃəl/adjectiveof considerable importance, size, or worth大量的Countries have dedicated substantial efforts to space exploration.
malfunction/mælˈfʌŋkʃən/verbfail to function normally or satisfactorily故障Some rockets failed to launch or malfunctioned mid-flight, nullifying efforts.
nullify/ˈnʌlɪfaɪ/verbmake legally null and void; invalidate使无效The malfunctioning rockets nullified all prior efforts in space exploration.
refrain/rɪˈfreɪn/verb_stop oneself from doing something_避免_I maintain that governments should refrain from financing space exploration.

Section Title: 6 文章修订

In my opinion, I concur with Amy's assertion that the construction of spaceships and the development of related technologies are prohibitively expensive. Beyond Amy's rationale, I contend that funding space exploration entails a significant degree of risk. Specifically, space exploration is an inherently high-risk endeavor with no guaranteed success, and government investments may ultimately result in failures, rendering the resources allocated to such programs futile. Numerous instances exist where countries have dedicated substantial efforts to space exploration, launching rockets towards the moon; however, some of these rockets failed to launch or malfunctioned mid-flight, nullifying all prior efforts. Consequently, I maintain that governments should refrain from financing space exploration.

3

Bài Mẫu Của Người Dùng #3

Amy presents a compelling case in favor of the opinion that cashless society would bring positive outcomes. Admittedly, for many, shifting away from c...

Điểm Số
26

Bài Mẫu Của Người Dùng

Amy presents a compelling case in favor of the opinion that cashless society would bring positive outcomes. Admittedly, for many, shifting away from cash potentially do benefit specific demographics by alleviating the inconvenience in taking wallet. However, I am inclined to think decrease in using cash is quite an annoyance. In my view, considering the elders, who are hardly adapted to digital payments, digital revolution must be daunting to them. This phenomenon is easy to understand as, for example, according to a recent survey conducted by Monash University, eighty percent of the elders are struggled with mobile payment apps, lamenting the simplicity of the days when cash was king. For most of them, the tangible act of counting out notes and coins provided a clarity that swiping a card does not match. In other words, it is essential to recognize that for some people in society, the change on shifting away from cash represents a challenging to a new world. Therefore, I firmly believe that decrease in cash is partially negative.

Kết Quả Đánh Giá

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0

  • Language Use and Grammar: 4.0

2. 预估分数

26. 3 任务完成度

这篇文章在任务完成方面做得相当不错。你明确表达了自己的观点,并提供了一些支持论据。然而,为了更好地回应教授的问题,你可以尝试在论述中加入更多具体的例子和细节,以便让读者更容易理解你的观点。此外,尽量使用更多不同的词汇和句式结构,以增强文章的语言表达能力。

改进示例1: Instead of "In my view, considering the elders, who are hardly adapted to digital payments, digital revolution must be daunting to them.", you could write "In my view, the elderly population, who often struggle with adapting to digital payments, may find the shift towards a cashless society quite daunting."

改进示例2: Instead of "Therefore, I firmly believe that decrease in cash is partially negative.", you could write "Therefore, I firmly believe that the decrease in cash usage has some negative consequences for certain segments of society."

4. 文章结构与组织

文章的结构和组织方面基本上是清晰的,包括引言、正文和结论。每段都集中讨论了一个特定的观点,并提供了支持细节。然而,在段落之间加入更明确的过渡词或短语可以使文章更连贯。此外,尝试在正文部分使用主题句来引导读者理解每段的核心观点。

改进示例1: Add a transition phrase at the beginning of the second paragraph: "While Amy's argument has merit, I believe that the decrease in cash usage also has some negative aspects."

改进示例2: Use a topic sentence for the second paragraph: "One significant drawback of a cashless society is the difficulty it poses for the elderly population, who may struggle with adapting to digital payments."

5. 语法批改

Amy presents a compelling case in favor of the opinion that cashless society would bring positive outcomes. Admittedly, for many, shifting away from cash potentially do benefit specific demographics by alleviating the inconvenience inof(This rule identifies wrong preposition usage.) taking walleta wallet(This rule identifies whether the article 'a' is missing in a sentence.). However, I am inclined to think decrease in using cash is quite an annoyance. In my view, considering the elders, who are hardly adapted to digital payments, digital revolution must be daunting to them. This phenomenon is easy to understand as, for example, according to a recent survey conducted by Monash University, eighty percent of the elders are struggled with mobile payment apps, lamenting the simplicity of the days when cash was king. For most of them, the tangible act of counting out notes and coins provided a clarity that swiping a card does not match. In other words, it is essential to recognize that for some people in society, the change onof(This rule identifies wrong preposition usage.) shifting away from cash represents a challenging to a new world. Therefore, I firmly believe that decrease in cash is partially negative.

Section Title: 6 Article Revision

While Amy's argument for a cashless society highlights the convenience it offers, particularly in reducing the need to carry a wallet, I believe that the decrease in cash usage has its drawbacks. One significant concern is the impact on older individuals who may struggle to adapt to digital payment methods. A recent survey conducted by Monash University revealed that 80% of elderly participants found it challenging to use mobile payment apps, longing for the simplicity of cash transactions. The tangible act of counting notes and coins provided clarity that card swiping or app usage cannot replicate. In this regard, it is crucial to acknowledge that transitioning away from cash can be a daunting experience for some members of society. Consequently, I maintain that the decline in cash usage has negative implications for certain demographics. (139 words)

Amy presents While Amy's argument for a cashless society [provides a compelling case in favor of the opinion that cashless society would bring positive outcomes. Admittedly, for many, shifting away from cash potentially do benefit specific demographics by alleviating outcomes] highlights the convenience it offers, particularly in reducing the need to carry a wallet [alleviating the inconvenience in taking wallet. However, wallet], I am inclined to think believe that the decrease in cash usage [decrease in using cash is quite an annoyance. In my view, considering cash] has its drawbacks. One significant concern is the impact on older individuals who may struggle to adapt to digital payment methods [considering the elders, who are hardly adapted to digital payments, digital revolution must be daunting to them. This phenomenon is easy to understand as, for example, according to a payments]. A recent survey conducted by Monash University, eighty University revealed that 80% of elderly participants found it challenging to use mobile payment apps [eighty percent of the elders are struggled with mobile payment apps, lamenting apps], longing for the simplicity of cash transactions [lamenting the simplicity of the days when cash was king. For most of them, the king]. The tangible act of counting notes and coins provided clarity that card swiping or app usage cannot replicate [the tangible act of counting out notes and coins provided a clarity that swiping a card does not match. match]. In other words, this regard, it is crucial to acknowledge that transitioning away from cash can be a daunting experience for some members of society [it is essential to recognize that for some people in society, the change on shifting away from cash represents a challenging to a new world. Therefore, world]. Consequently, I maintain that the decline in cash usage has negative implications for certain demographics [I firmly believe that decrease in cash is partially negative.negative].

8 思维导图


- Cashless Society
    - Convenience
        - Reducing wallet need
    - Drawbacks
        - Impact on older individuals
            - Struggle to adapt to digital payment methods
                - Monash University survey: 80% of elderly participants found it challenging to use mobile payment apps
                - Longing for simplicity of cash transactions
                - Tangible act of counting notes and coins provides clarity
            - Card swiping or app usage cannot replicate the clarity of cash transactions
        - Daunting experience for some members of society
        - Negative implications for certain demographics

9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish definitionSimplified Chinese translationSample sentences
Cashless/ˈkæʃləs/adjectiveRelating to a system where people use electronic methods to pay无现金的A cashless society offers more convenience.
Convenience/kənˈviːniəns/nounThe state of being able to proceed with something with little effort or difficulty方便The convenience of digital payments has reduced the need for carrying a wallet.
Drawback/ˈdrɔːbæk/noun/a disadvantage or problem that makes something a less attractive idea/缺点/The main drawback of a cashless society is its impact on older individuals.
Adapt/əˈdæpt//verb/to change your ideas or behaviour so that you can deal with a new situation/适应/Older individuals may struggle to adapt to digital payment methods.
Tangible/ˈtændʒəbl/adjectiveClear enough or definite enough to be easily seen, noticed, or measured有形的The tangible act of counting notes and coins provides clarity.
Clarity/ˈklærəti/noun/the quality of being clear and easy to understand, or (of a sound, especially a musical note) the quality of being pure and well-formed/清晰度/The clarity of cash transactions is preferred by some members of society.
Daunting/ˈdɔːntɪŋ/adjectiveMaking you feel slightly frightened or worried about your ability to achieve something令人生畏的Transitioning away from cash can be a daunting experience for some members of society.
Implication/ˌɪmplɪˈkeɪʃən/noun/an occasion when you seem to suggest something without saying it directly/含义/The decline in cash usage has negative implications for certain demographics.
Demographic/ˌdeməˈɡræfɪk/nounA particular sector of a population人口统计学的The elderly demographic may face challenges in adapting to a cashless society.

Cách Chấm Điểm Academic Discussion

Dạng bài TOEFL Academic Discussion được chấm dựa trên thang điểm chính thức của ETS. AI phân tích mỗi câu trả lời trên nhiều khía cạnh.

Tính Liên Quan & Đóng Góp

Câu trả lời có giải quyết câu hỏi và đóng góp có ý nghĩa cho cuộc thảo luận không?

Sử Dụng Ngôn Ngữ

Độ chính xác ngữ pháp, phạm vi từ vựng và chất lượng cấu trúc câu.

Phát Triển Ý & Lập Luận

Các ý tưởng có được phát triển tốt với ví dụ cụ thể và lập luận rõ ràng không?

Các Mẫu Hình Thường Gặp Trong Câu Trả Lời

Dựa trên phân tích các bài nộp của người dùng cho dạng bài này, đây là những mẫu hình thường gặp trong câu trả lời của thí sinh.

Nhiều thí sinh đưa ra quan điểm rõ ràng nhưng thiếu ví dụ cụ thể để hỗ trợ.

Các câu trả lời tốt thường tham chiếu trực tiếp đến đoạn văn đọc và quan điểm của những người tham gia khác.

Các câu trả lời đạt điểm cao thường sử dụng cấu trúc câu đa dạng và từ vựng học thuật.

Quản lý thời gian là yếu tố then chốt — những câu trả lời có vẻ vội vàng thường bị điểm thấp hơn ở phần phát triển ý.

Mẹo Học Tập

1

Đọc kỹ đề bài và xác định tất cả các phần của câu hỏi trước khi viết.

2

Tham chiếu đến đoạn văn đọc và ý kiến của các thí sinh khác trong câu trả lời của bạn.

3

Dùng ví dụ cụ thể để hỗ trợ luận điểm chính — tránh những câu nói chung chung.

4

Hướng đến khoảng 120-150 từ. Câu trả lời dài hơn không phải lúc nào cũng tốt hơn; sự rõ ràng và tập trung quan trọng hơn.

5

Luyện trả lời có giới hạn thời gian (10 phút) để tạo sự trôi chảy trong điều kiện thi thật.

Câu hỏi thường gặp

Nhiệm vụ TOEFL Academic Discussion là gì?
Nhiệm vụ TOEFL Academic Discussion yêu cầu bạn đóng góp vào một cuộc thảo luận lớp học trực tuyến. Bạn sẽ đọc câu hỏi của giáo sư và các câu trả lời của những sinh viên khác, sau đó viết bài của riêng mình để trình bày và bảo vệ quan điểm trong khoảng 10 phút.
Nhiệm vụ Academic Discussion được chấm điểm như thế nào?
Nhiệm vụ này được chấm theo thang điểm từ 0-5 dựa trên mức độ liên quan đến chủ đề thảo luận, chất lượng sử dụng ngôn ngữ (ngữ pháp, từ vựng, cấu trúc câu), và mức độ bạn phát triển và hỗ trợ ý tưởng của mình bằng các ví dụ cụ thể và lập luận.
Các mẫu bài của người dùng trên trang này là gì?
Đây là những câu trả lời thực tế được gửi bởi các thí sinh TOEFL đã luyện tập câu hỏi này trên LingoLeap. Mỗi bài mẫu đã được đánh giá bởi công cụ chấm điểm AI của chúng tôi, cung cấp điểm số và phản hồi chi tiết về điểm mạnh cũng như những phần cần cải thiện.
Đánh giá của AI chính xác đến mức nào?
Công cụ đánh giá AI của LingoLeap được huấn luyện dựa trên tiêu chí chấm điểm chính thức của ETS và được hiệu chỉnh theo điểm số của giám khảo con người. Mặc dù không có hệ thống tự động nào là hoàn hảo, nó cung cấp phản hồi đáng tin cậy cho mục đích luyện tập và giúp xác định những phần cụ thể cần cải thiện.
Làm thế nào để tôi luyện tập nhiệm vụ Academic Discussion này?
Bạn có thể luyện tập bằng cách đăng ký một tài khoản LingoLeap miễn phí. Viết câu trả lời của riêng bạn cho đúng câu hỏi này, gửi bài, và nhận đánh giá AI tức thì cùng phản hồi chi tiết về bài viết của bạn.
Câu trả lời Academic Discussion của tôi nên dài bao nhiêu?
Hãy đặt mục tiêu khoảng 120-150 từ. Nhiệm vụ này cho bạn 10 phút để viết câu trả lời. Hãy tập trung vào sự rõ ràng, hỗ trợ quan điểm của bạn bằng các ví dụ cụ thể, và tham chiếu đến bối cảnh thảo luận thay vì viết một câu trả lời dài hơn.

Chinh Phục Điểm TOEFL Mục Tiêu Ngay Hôm Nay!

Cùng LingoLeap – Chuyên Gia Luyện Thi Tiếng Anh

Đạt Điểm Mơ Ước Nhanh Hơn Bao Giờ Hết

Dùng thử miễn phí ngay