TOEFLIELTS
한국어
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on history&culture. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

AI 기반 평가와 피드백이 포함된 실제 사용자 제출 답안

사용자 제출 예시 1개 이용 가능

무료 연습 시작하기

과제 개요

Professor

Dr. Stevenson:In our last class, we talked about famous historical sites and artifacts around the world. Now I want you to think about one thing and have a discussion: Do you think the government should spend money on preserving all the old buildings and sites rather than building new constructions? Why?

Hailey

I totally agree with this statement. Old buildings and sites are a reflection of a country’s history. So, it makes perfect sense to spend money on preserving them. Think about this. When we are all old and our grandchildren ask about our history, wouldn’t it be better to take them to the sites than just showing them pictures?

Cameron

To be honest, I don’t think it’s necessary to spend money on preserving old buildings. We are currently in such a fast changing world where histories and miracles are being made every second, which makes it our priority to make economic and technological breakthroughs. Anything would soon become old and abandoned in a world like this. So, there’s no need to spend money preserving old buildings.

사용자 예시 및 평가 결과

1

사용자 예시 #1

Compared to totally building new constructions, I think preserving old buildings and sites is a more economical way to construct the city. Not only be...

점수
28

사용자 예시

Compared to totally building new constructions, I think preserving old buildings and sites is a more economical way to construct the city. Not only because the old buildings are a carrier of urban memory but also because they can save a lot of money. We all know that building too many new constructions costs the city government a huge financial burden, and sometimes we don't need so many new facilities. If the old ones can get good renovation, then the citizen's demands can be fulfilled. At the same time, reusing old buildings can also add a new meaning to the building itself beyond utility. The building thus can attract history lovers coming to visit it, producing extra income. Moreover, a well-planned historical area can improve the urban appearance, exhibiting urban culture as well.

평가 결과

1.子项得分

Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5 Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0 Language Use and Grammar: 4.0

2.预估分数

Estimated Score: 28

3.任务完成度

这篇文章在回答问题方面做得很好,表达了作者对于保护老建筑的观点。但是,文章可以更具体地说明为什么保护老建筑比新建设更经济实惠。此外,文章可以提供更多关于如何改造和利用老建筑的具体例子。

示例1:在支持观点时,可以提供一个实际的例子,如某个城市成功地改造了一座历史悠久的建筑,并使其成为了一个旅游胜地。

示例2:可以详细说明如何通过保护和改造老建筑来满足市民需求,例如将一座废弃的工厂改造成为一个文化艺术中心。

4.文章结构与组织

文章结构清晰,包括引言、正文和结论。然而,在正文部分,作者可以使用更明确的段落划分来突出每个观点及其支持细节。此外,在段落之间加入过渡词或短语可以使文章更连贯。

建议1:在正文部分,使用更明确的段落划分来突出每个观点及其支持细节。例如,可以将关于节省成本和吸引游客的观点分为两个段落。

建议2:在段落之间加入过渡词或短语,如“此外”、“然而”或“因此”,以使文章更连贯。例如,在提到节省成本的段落之后,可以使用“此外”来引入关于吸引游客的观点。

  1. 语法批改

Compared to totally building new constructions, I think preserving old buildings and sites is a more economical way to construct the city. Not only because the old buildings are a carrier of urban memory but, but(Detects missing comma before "but") also because they can save a lot of money. We all know that building too many new constructions costs the city government a huge financial burden, and sometimes we don't need so many new facilities. If the old ones can get good renovation, then the citizen's demands can be fulfilled. At the same time, reusing old buildings can also add a new meaning to the building itself beyond utility. The building thus can attract history lovers coming to visit it, producing extra income. Moreover, a well-planned historical area can improve the urban appearance, exhibiting urban culture as well.

6.文章修订

In comparison to constructing entirely new buildings, preserving historical structures and sites is a more cost-effective approach for urban development. Old buildings not only serve as a testament to a city's history but also provide significant financial savings. Excessive construction of new facilities can burden the city government with substantial costs, while many needs can be met through the renovation of existing structures.

Furthermore, repurposing old buildings adds value beyond their original function, attracting history enthusiasts and generating additional revenue. For instance, a city could transform an abandoned factory into a cultural arts center, catering to citizens' demands while preserving its historical significance. Such well-planned historical areas can enhance the urban landscape and showcase the city's rich cultural heritage.

Additionally, it is crucial to strike a balance between preservation and modernization. While it is essential to invest in technological advancements and infrastructure improvements, preserving historical sites allows future generations to experience their heritage firsthand rather than merely viewing photographs or reading about them.

In summary, prioritizing the preservation of old buildings and sites offers numerous benefits such as cost savings, increased tourism revenue, and cultural enrichment for both residents and visitors alike. (193 words)

Compared to totally building 7.文章批改

In comparison to constructing entirely new constructions, I think buildings (revised for a more formal tone), preserving old buildings historical structures and sites is a more economical way to construct the city. Not cost-effective approach (revised for clarity) for urban development. Old buildings not only because the old buildings are a carrier of urban memory serve as a testament to a city's history (revised for conciseness) but also because they provide significant financial savings (revised for clarity). Excessive construction of new facilities can save a lot of money. We all know that building too many new constructions costs burden the city government a huge financial burden, and sometimes we don't need so with substantial costs, while many new facilities. If the old ones can get good renovation, then the citizen's demands needs can be fulfilled. At the same time, reusing met through the renovation of existing structures (revised for coherence).

Furthermore, repurposing old buildings adds value beyond their original function (revised for clarity), attracting history enthusiasts and generating additional revenue. For instance, a city could transform an abandoned factory into a cultural arts center (added specific example), catering to citizens' demands while preserving its historical significance. Such well-planned historical areas can also add a new meaning to the building itself beyond utility. The building thus can attract history lovers coming to visit it, producing extra income. Moreover, a well-planned historical area can improve enhance the urban appearance, exhibiting urban culture landscape and showcase the city's rich cultural heritage (revised for conciseness).

Additionally, it is crucial to strike a balance between preservation and modernization (added transition). While it is essential to invest in technological advancements and infrastructure improvements, preserving historical sites allows future generations to experience their heritage firsthand rather than merely viewing photographs or reading about them (expanded on the idea).

In summary, prioritizing the preservation of old buildings and sites offers numerous benefits such as well.cost savings, increased tourism revenue, and cultural enrichment for both residents and visitors alike (summarized main points).

8.思维导图

  • Introduction

    • Cost-effective approach
    • Urban development
  • Old buildings

    • Testament to history
    • Financial savings
  • Renovation vs. new construction

    • City government burden
    • Meeting citizens' needs
  • Repurposing old buildings

    • Added value
    • Attracting tourists and revenue
  • Balance between preservation and modernization

    • Technological advancements and infrastructure improvements
    • Future generations experiencing heritage firsthand

9.关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
cost-effective/ˌkɒstɪˈfektɪv/adjectiveEconomical in terms of the goods or services received for money spent.性价比高的Preserving old buildings is a cost-effective approach to urban development.
testament/ˈtestəmənt/nounSomething that serves as a sign or evidence of a specified fact, event, or quality.遗嘱,证明Old buildings serve as a testament to a city's history.
renovation/ˌrenəˈveɪʃən/nounThe action of renovating a building or structure.翻新,整修Many needs can be met through the renovation of existing structures.
repurpose/riːˈpɜrpəs/verbAdapt for use in a different purpose改变...的用途The city repurposed an abandoned factory into a cultural arts center.
preservation/ˌprezərˈveɪʃən/nounThe action of preserving something, especially the environment, historic buildings, or wildlife.保护,保存Balancing preservation and modernization is crucial for urban development.
infrastructure/ˈɪnfrəstrʌktʃər/nounThe basic physical and organizational structures and facilities needed for the operation of a society or enterprise.基础设施Investing in infrastructure improvements is essential for a city's growth.
urban landscape/ˈɜrbən ˈlændskeɪp/nounThe physical appearance and overall look of a city or town城市景观Well-planned historical areas can enhance the urban landscape.
cultural heritage/ˈkʌltʃərəl ˈhɛrɪtɪdʒ/nounThe legacy of tangible artifacts and intangible attributes inherited from past generations文化遗产Preserving old buildings showcases the city's rich cultural heritage.
revenue/ˈrevənju:/nounIncome, especially when of an organization and of a substantial nature收入,收益Repurposing old buildings can generate additional revenue for the city.
firsthand/fɜrst'hænd/adjectiveObtained directly from the original source; direct亲身的,直接的Future generations can experience their heritage firsthand by preserving historical sites.

Academic Discussion 채점 방식

TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제는 ETS 공식 채점 기준에 따라 평가됩니다. AI 평가는 여러 측면에서 각 답안을 분석합니다.

관련성 및 기여도

답안이 질문에 답하고 토론에 의미 있게 기여하는가?

언어 사용

문법 정확성, 어휘 범위, 문장 구조의 질.

전개 및 근거

구체적인 예시와 명확한 논리로 아이디어가 잘 전개되었는가?

답안에서 나타나는 공통 패턴

이 과제에 대한 사용자 제출 답안을 분석한 결과, 학생 답안에서 관찰된 공통 패턴은 다음과 같습니다.

많은 학생이 명확한 의견을 제시하지만 구체적인 뒷받침 예시가 부족합니다.

높은 점수를 받은 답안은 리딩 지문과 다른 참여자의 의견을 직접 인용합니다.

점수가 높은 답안은 다양한 문장 구조와 학술적 어휘를 사용합니다.

시간 관리는 핵심 요소입니다 — 서두른 느낌을 주는 답안은 전개 항목에서 낮은 점수를 받는 경향이 있습니다.

학습 팁

1

글을 쓰기 전에 프롬프트를 꼼꼼히 읽고 질문의 모든 부분을 파악하세요.

2

답안에서 리딩 지문과 다른 학생들의 의견을 언급하세요.

3

핵심 주장을 뒷받침할 구체적인 예시를 사용하고, 일반적인 진술은 피하세요.

4

120~150단어를 목표로 하세요. 답안이 길다고 항상 좋은 것은 아니며, 명료함과 초점이 더 중요합니다.

5

시험 조건에서 유창하게 답하기 위해 시간을 정해(10분) 연습하세요.

자주 묻는 질문

TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제란 무엇인가요?
TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제는 온라인 수업 토론에 참여하는 것을 요구합니다. 교수의 질문과 다른 학생들의 답변을 읽은 후, 약 10분 안에 자신의 의견을 표현하고 뒷받침하는 글을 작성하게 됩니다.
Academic Discussion 과제는 어떻게 채점되나요?
이 과제는 토론과의 관련성, 언어 사용의 질(문법, 어휘, 문장 구조), 그리고 구체적인 예시와 근거를 통해 아이디어를 얼마나 잘 전개하고 뒷받침하는지를 기준으로 0~5점 척도로 채점됩니다.
이 페이지의 사용자 샘플은 무엇인가요?
LingoLeap에서 이 문제를 연습한 실제 TOEFL 응시자들이 제출한 답변입니다. 각 샘플은 저희 AI 채점 엔진에 의해 평가되었으며, 점수와 함께 강점 및 개선이 필요한 부분에 대한 상세한 피드백을 제공합니다.
AI 평가는 얼마나 정확한가요?
LingoLeap의 AI 평가 엔진은 공식 ETS 채점 기준으로 학습되었으며, 실제 채점자의 점수와 비교하여 보정되었습니다. 완벽한 자동 채점 시스템은 없지만, 연습 목적으로 신뢰할 수 있는 피드백을 제공하며 구체적인 개선 영역을 파악하는 데 도움이 됩니다.
이 Academic Discussion 과제를 어떻게 연습할 수 있나요?
무료 LingoLeap 계정에 가입하여 연습할 수 있습니다. 바로 이 질문에 대한 답변을 직접 작성하여 제출하면, 글쓰기에 대한 상세한 피드백과 함께 즉시 AI 평가를 받을 수 있습니다.
Academic Discussion 답변은 얼마나 길게 써야 하나요?
120~150단어를 목표로 하세요. 이 과제는 답변을 작성할 10분의 시간을 제공합니다. 더 긴 답변을 쓰기보다는 명확성, 구체적인 예시로 의견을 뒷받침하는 것, 토론 맥락을 참조하는 것에 집중하세요.

Rooting for Your Goal Score Today!

With LingoLeap, an expert in English exams

Get to Your Dream Score Faster

Try for free now