TOEFLIELTS
Español
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on history&culture. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

Envíos reales de usuarios con evaluación y retroalimentación impulsadas por IA

1 ejemplos enviados por usuarios disponibles

Comenzar Práctica Gratis

Resumen de la Tarea

Professor

Dr. Stevenson:In our last class, we talked about famous historical sites and artifacts around the world. Now I want you to think about one thing and have a discussion: Do you think the government should spend money on preserving all the old buildings and sites rather than building new constructions? Why?

Hailey

I totally agree with this statement. Old buildings and sites are a reflection of a country’s history. So, it makes perfect sense to spend money on preserving them. Think about this. When we are all old and our grandchildren ask about our history, wouldn’t it be better to take them to the sites than just showing them pictures?

Cameron

To be honest, I don’t think it’s necessary to spend money on preserving old buildings. We are currently in such a fast changing world where histories and miracles are being made every second, which makes it our priority to make economic and technological breakthroughs. Anything would soon become old and abandoned in a world like this. So, there’s no need to spend money preserving old buildings.

Ejemplos de Usuarios y Resultados de Evaluación

1

Ejemplo de Usuario #1

Compared to totally building new constructions, I think preserving old buildings and sites is a more economical way to construct the city. Not only be...

Puntuación
28

Ejemplo de Usuario

Compared to totally building new constructions, I think preserving old buildings and sites is a more economical way to construct the city. Not only because the old buildings are a carrier of urban memory but also because they can save a lot of money. We all know that building too many new constructions costs the city government a huge financial burden, and sometimes we don't need so many new facilities. If the old ones can get good renovation, then the citizen's demands can be fulfilled. At the same time, reusing old buildings can also add a new meaning to the building itself beyond utility. The building thus can attract history lovers coming to visit it, producing extra income. Moreover, a well-planned historical area can improve the urban appearance, exhibiting urban culture as well.

Resultado de la Evaluación

1.子项得分

Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5 Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0 Language Use and Grammar: 4.0

2.预估分数

Estimated Score: 28

3.任务完成度

这篇文章在回答问题方面做得很好,表达了作者对于保护老建筑的观点。但是,文章可以更具体地说明为什么保护老建筑比新建设更经济实惠。此外,文章可以提供更多关于如何改造和利用老建筑的具体例子。

示例1:在支持观点时,可以提供一个实际的例子,如某个城市成功地改造了一座历史悠久的建筑,并使其成为了一个旅游胜地。

示例2:可以详细说明如何通过保护和改造老建筑来满足市民需求,例如将一座废弃的工厂改造成为一个文化艺术中心。

4.文章结构与组织

文章结构清晰,包括引言、正文和结论。然而,在正文部分,作者可以使用更明确的段落划分来突出每个观点及其支持细节。此外,在段落之间加入过渡词或短语可以使文章更连贯。

建议1:在正文部分,使用更明确的段落划分来突出每个观点及其支持细节。例如,可以将关于节省成本和吸引游客的观点分为两个段落。

建议2:在段落之间加入过渡词或短语,如“此外”、“然而”或“因此”,以使文章更连贯。例如,在提到节省成本的段落之后,可以使用“此外”来引入关于吸引游客的观点。

  1. 语法批改

Compared to totally building new constructions, I think preserving old buildings and sites is a more economical way to construct the city. Not only because the old buildings are a carrier of urban memory but, but(Detects missing comma before "but") also because they can save a lot of money. We all know that building too many new constructions costs the city government a huge financial burden, and sometimes we don't need so many new facilities. If the old ones can get good renovation, then the citizen's demands can be fulfilled. At the same time, reusing old buildings can also add a new meaning to the building itself beyond utility. The building thus can attract history lovers coming to visit it, producing extra income. Moreover, a well-planned historical area can improve the urban appearance, exhibiting urban culture as well.

6.文章修订

In comparison to constructing entirely new buildings, preserving historical structures and sites is a more cost-effective approach for urban development. Old buildings not only serve as a testament to a city's history but also provide significant financial savings. Excessive construction of new facilities can burden the city government with substantial costs, while many needs can be met through the renovation of existing structures.

Furthermore, repurposing old buildings adds value beyond their original function, attracting history enthusiasts and generating additional revenue. For instance, a city could transform an abandoned factory into a cultural arts center, catering to citizens' demands while preserving its historical significance. Such well-planned historical areas can enhance the urban landscape and showcase the city's rich cultural heritage.

Additionally, it is crucial to strike a balance between preservation and modernization. While it is essential to invest in technological advancements and infrastructure improvements, preserving historical sites allows future generations to experience their heritage firsthand rather than merely viewing photographs or reading about them.

In summary, prioritizing the preservation of old buildings and sites offers numerous benefits such as cost savings, increased tourism revenue, and cultural enrichment for both residents and visitors alike. (193 words)

Compared to totally building 7.文章批改

In comparison to constructing entirely new constructions, I think buildings (revised for a more formal tone), preserving old buildings historical structures and sites is a more economical way to construct the city. Not cost-effective approach (revised for clarity) for urban development. Old buildings not only because the old buildings are a carrier of urban memory serve as a testament to a city's history (revised for conciseness) but also because they provide significant financial savings (revised for clarity). Excessive construction of new facilities can save a lot of money. We all know that building too many new constructions costs burden the city government a huge financial burden, and sometimes we don't need so with substantial costs, while many new facilities. If the old ones can get good renovation, then the citizen's demands needs can be fulfilled. At the same time, reusing met through the renovation of existing structures (revised for coherence).

Furthermore, repurposing old buildings adds value beyond their original function (revised for clarity), attracting history enthusiasts and generating additional revenue. For instance, a city could transform an abandoned factory into a cultural arts center (added specific example), catering to citizens' demands while preserving its historical significance. Such well-planned historical areas can also add a new meaning to the building itself beyond utility. The building thus can attract history lovers coming to visit it, producing extra income. Moreover, a well-planned historical area can improve enhance the urban appearance, exhibiting urban culture landscape and showcase the city's rich cultural heritage (revised for conciseness).

Additionally, it is crucial to strike a balance between preservation and modernization (added transition). While it is essential to invest in technological advancements and infrastructure improvements, preserving historical sites allows future generations to experience their heritage firsthand rather than merely viewing photographs or reading about them (expanded on the idea).

In summary, prioritizing the preservation of old buildings and sites offers numerous benefits such as well.cost savings, increased tourism revenue, and cultural enrichment for both residents and visitors alike (summarized main points).

8.思维导图

  • Introduction

    • Cost-effective approach
    • Urban development
  • Old buildings

    • Testament to history
    • Financial savings
  • Renovation vs. new construction

    • City government burden
    • Meeting citizens' needs
  • Repurposing old buildings

    • Added value
    • Attracting tourists and revenue
  • Balance between preservation and modernization

    • Technological advancements and infrastructure improvements
    • Future generations experiencing heritage firsthand

9.关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
cost-effective/ˌkɒstɪˈfektɪv/adjectiveEconomical in terms of the goods or services received for money spent.性价比高的Preserving old buildings is a cost-effective approach to urban development.
testament/ˈtestəmənt/nounSomething that serves as a sign or evidence of a specified fact, event, or quality.遗嘱,证明Old buildings serve as a testament to a city's history.
renovation/ˌrenəˈveɪʃən/nounThe action of renovating a building or structure.翻新,整修Many needs can be met through the renovation of existing structures.
repurpose/riːˈpɜrpəs/verbAdapt for use in a different purpose改变...的用途The city repurposed an abandoned factory into a cultural arts center.
preservation/ˌprezərˈveɪʃən/nounThe action of preserving something, especially the environment, historic buildings, or wildlife.保护,保存Balancing preservation and modernization is crucial for urban development.
infrastructure/ˈɪnfrəstrʌktʃər/nounThe basic physical and organizational structures and facilities needed for the operation of a society or enterprise.基础设施Investing in infrastructure improvements is essential for a city's growth.
urban landscape/ˈɜrbən ˈlændskeɪp/nounThe physical appearance and overall look of a city or town城市景观Well-planned historical areas can enhance the urban landscape.
cultural heritage/ˈkʌltʃərəl ˈhɛrɪtɪdʒ/nounThe legacy of tangible artifacts and intangible attributes inherited from past generations文化遗产Preserving old buildings showcases the city's rich cultural heritage.
revenue/ˈrevənju:/nounIncome, especially when of an organization and of a substantial nature收入,收益Repurposing old buildings can generate additional revenue for the city.
firsthand/fɜrst'hænd/adjectiveObtained directly from the original source; direct亲身的,直接的Future generations can experience their heritage firsthand by preserving historical sites.

Cómo se Evalúa la Academic Discussion

La tarea TOEFL Academic Discussion se evalúa según la rúbrica oficial de ETS. La evaluación con IA analiza cada respuesta en varias dimensiones.

Relevancia y Contribución

¿La respuesta aborda la pregunta y aporta de manera significativa a la discusión?

Uso del Idioma

Precisión gramatical, variedad de vocabulario y calidad de la estructura de las oraciones.

Desarrollo y Fundamentación

¿Las ideas están bien desarrolladas con ejemplos específicos y un razonamiento claro?

Patrones Comunes en las Respuestas

Según el análisis de los envíos de usuarios para esta tarea, estos son los patrones comunes observados en las respuestas de los estudiantes.

Muchos estudiantes expresan opiniones claras, pero carecen de ejemplos específicos que las respalden.

Las respuestas sólidas hacen referencia directa al texto de lectura y a los puntos de vista de los demás participantes.

Las respuestas con mejor puntuación usan estructuras de oraciones variadas y vocabulario académico.

La gestión del tiempo es un factor clave — las respuestas que parecen apresuradas tienden a puntuar más bajo en desarrollo.

Consejos de Aprendizaje

1

Lee el enunciado con atención e identifica todas las partes de la pregunta antes de escribir.

2

Haz referencia al texto de lectura y a las opiniones de los otros estudiantes en tu respuesta.

3

Usa ejemplos específicos para respaldar tu idea principal — evita afirmaciones genéricas.

4

Apunta a 120-150 palabras. Las respuestas más largas no siempre son mejores; la claridad y el enfoque importan más.

5

Practica respuestas cronometradas (10 minutos) para ganar fluidez en condiciones de examen.

Preguntas frecuentes

¿Qué es la tarea de Discusión Académica del TOEFL?
La tarea de Discusión Académica del TOEFL requiere que participes en un debate de clase en línea. Leerás la pregunta de un profesor y las respuestas de otros estudiantes, y luego escribirás tu propia publicación expresando y respaldando tu opinión en aproximadamente 10 minutos.
¿Cómo se califica la tarea de Discusión Académica?
La tarea se califica en una escala de 0 a 5 según la relevancia con respecto a la discusión, la calidad del uso del idioma (gramática, vocabulario, estructura de las oraciones) y qué tan bien desarrollas y respaldas tus ideas con ejemplos y razonamientos específicos.
¿Qué son las muestras de usuarios en esta página?
Son respuestas reales enviadas por candidatos del TOEFL que practicaron esta pregunta en LingoLeap. Cada muestra ha sido evaluada por nuestro motor de calificación con IA, que proporciona una puntuación y comentarios detallados sobre fortalezas y áreas de mejora.
¿Qué tan precisa es la evaluación con IA?
El motor de evaluación con IA de LingoLeap está entrenado con las rúbricas oficiales de calificación de ETS y calibrado con puntuaciones de evaluadores humanos. Aunque ningún sistema automatizado es perfecto, ofrece comentarios confiables para fines de práctica y ayuda a identificar áreas específicas de mejora.
¿Cómo puedo practicar esta tarea de Discusión Académica?
Puedes practicar registrándote para obtener una cuenta gratuita de LingoLeap. Escribe tu propia respuesta a esta pregunta exacta, envíala y recibe una evaluación instantánea con IA con comentarios detallados sobre tu redacción.
¿Qué extensión debe tener mi respuesta de Discusión Académica?
Apunta a 120-150 palabras. La tarea te da 10 minutos para escribir tu respuesta. Concéntrate en la claridad, respalda tu opinión con ejemplos específicos y haz referencia al contexto de la discusión en lugar de escribir una respuesta más larga.

Rooting for Your Goal Score Today!

With LingoLeap, an expert in English exams

Get to Your Dream Score Faster

Try for free now