TOEFLIELTS
Nederlands
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on history&culture. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

Echte inzendingen van gebruikers met AI-gestuurde beoordeling en feedback

1 door gebruikers ingediende voorbeelden beschikbaar

Start Gratis Oefenen

Overzicht van de Taak

Professor

Dr. Stevenson:In our last class, we talked about famous historical sites and artifacts around the world. Now I want you to think about one thing and have a discussion: Do you think the government should spend money on preserving all the old buildings and sites rather than building new constructions? Why?

Hailey

I totally agree with this statement. Old buildings and sites are a reflection of a country’s history. So, it makes perfect sense to spend money on preserving them. Think about this. When we are all old and our grandchildren ask about our history, wouldn’t it be better to take them to the sites than just showing them pictures?

Cameron

To be honest, I don’t think it’s necessary to spend money on preserving old buildings. We are currently in such a fast changing world where histories and miracles are being made every second, which makes it our priority to make economic and technological breakthroughs. Anything would soon become old and abandoned in a world like this. So, there’s no need to spend money preserving old buildings.

Gebruikersvoorbeelden & Beoordelingsresultaten

1

Gebruikersvoorbeeld #1

Compared to totally building new constructions, I think preserving old buildings and sites is a more economical way to construct the city. Not only be...

Score
28

Gebruikersvoorbeeld

Compared to totally building new constructions, I think preserving old buildings and sites is a more economical way to construct the city. Not only because the old buildings are a carrier of urban memory but also because they can save a lot of money. We all know that building too many new constructions costs the city government a huge financial burden, and sometimes we don't need so many new facilities. If the old ones can get good renovation, then the citizen's demands can be fulfilled. At the same time, reusing old buildings can also add a new meaning to the building itself beyond utility. The building thus can attract history lovers coming to visit it, producing extra income. Moreover, a well-planned historical area can improve the urban appearance, exhibiting urban culture as well.

Beoordelingsresultaat

1.子项得分

Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5 Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0 Language Use and Grammar: 4.0

2.预估分数

Estimated Score: 28

3.任务完成度

这篇文章在回答问题方面做得很好,表达了作者对于保护老建筑的观点。但是,文章可以更具体地说明为什么保护老建筑比新建设更经济实惠。此外,文章可以提供更多关于如何改造和利用老建筑的具体例子。

示例1:在支持观点时,可以提供一个实际的例子,如某个城市成功地改造了一座历史悠久的建筑,并使其成为了一个旅游胜地。

示例2:可以详细说明如何通过保护和改造老建筑来满足市民需求,例如将一座废弃的工厂改造成为一个文化艺术中心。

4.文章结构与组织

文章结构清晰,包括引言、正文和结论。然而,在正文部分,作者可以使用更明确的段落划分来突出每个观点及其支持细节。此外,在段落之间加入过渡词或短语可以使文章更连贯。

建议1:在正文部分,使用更明确的段落划分来突出每个观点及其支持细节。例如,可以将关于节省成本和吸引游客的观点分为两个段落。

建议2:在段落之间加入过渡词或短语,如“此外”、“然而”或“因此”,以使文章更连贯。例如,在提到节省成本的段落之后,可以使用“此外”来引入关于吸引游客的观点。

  1. 语法批改

Compared to totally building new constructions, I think preserving old buildings and sites is a more economical way to construct the city. Not only because the old buildings are a carrier of urban memory but, but(Detects missing comma before "but") also because they can save a lot of money. We all know that building too many new constructions costs the city government a huge financial burden, and sometimes we don't need so many new facilities. If the old ones can get good renovation, then the citizen's demands can be fulfilled. At the same time, reusing old buildings can also add a new meaning to the building itself beyond utility. The building thus can attract history lovers coming to visit it, producing extra income. Moreover, a well-planned historical area can improve the urban appearance, exhibiting urban culture as well.

6.文章修订

In comparison to constructing entirely new buildings, preserving historical structures and sites is a more cost-effective approach for urban development. Old buildings not only serve as a testament to a city's history but also provide significant financial savings. Excessive construction of new facilities can burden the city government with substantial costs, while many needs can be met through the renovation of existing structures.

Furthermore, repurposing old buildings adds value beyond their original function, attracting history enthusiasts and generating additional revenue. For instance, a city could transform an abandoned factory into a cultural arts center, catering to citizens' demands while preserving its historical significance. Such well-planned historical areas can enhance the urban landscape and showcase the city's rich cultural heritage.

Additionally, it is crucial to strike a balance between preservation and modernization. While it is essential to invest in technological advancements and infrastructure improvements, preserving historical sites allows future generations to experience their heritage firsthand rather than merely viewing photographs or reading about them.

In summary, prioritizing the preservation of old buildings and sites offers numerous benefits such as cost savings, increased tourism revenue, and cultural enrichment for both residents and visitors alike. (193 words)

Compared to totally building 7.文章批改

In comparison to constructing entirely new constructions, I think buildings (revised for a more formal tone), preserving old buildings historical structures and sites is a more economical way to construct the city. Not cost-effective approach (revised for clarity) for urban development. Old buildings not only because the old buildings are a carrier of urban memory serve as a testament to a city's history (revised for conciseness) but also because they provide significant financial savings (revised for clarity). Excessive construction of new facilities can save a lot of money. We all know that building too many new constructions costs burden the city government a huge financial burden, and sometimes we don't need so with substantial costs, while many new facilities. If the old ones can get good renovation, then the citizen's demands needs can be fulfilled. At the same time, reusing met through the renovation of existing structures (revised for coherence).

Furthermore, repurposing old buildings adds value beyond their original function (revised for clarity), attracting history enthusiasts and generating additional revenue. For instance, a city could transform an abandoned factory into a cultural arts center (added specific example), catering to citizens' demands while preserving its historical significance. Such well-planned historical areas can also add a new meaning to the building itself beyond utility. The building thus can attract history lovers coming to visit it, producing extra income. Moreover, a well-planned historical area can improve enhance the urban appearance, exhibiting urban culture landscape and showcase the city's rich cultural heritage (revised for conciseness).

Additionally, it is crucial to strike a balance between preservation and modernization (added transition). While it is essential to invest in technological advancements and infrastructure improvements, preserving historical sites allows future generations to experience their heritage firsthand rather than merely viewing photographs or reading about them (expanded on the idea).

In summary, prioritizing the preservation of old buildings and sites offers numerous benefits such as well.cost savings, increased tourism revenue, and cultural enrichment for both residents and visitors alike (summarized main points).

8.思维导图

  • Introduction

    • Cost-effective approach
    • Urban development
  • Old buildings

    • Testament to history
    • Financial savings
  • Renovation vs. new construction

    • City government burden
    • Meeting citizens' needs
  • Repurposing old buildings

    • Added value
    • Attracting tourists and revenue
  • Balance between preservation and modernization

    • Technological advancements and infrastructure improvements
    • Future generations experiencing heritage firsthand

9.关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
cost-effective/ˌkɒstɪˈfektɪv/adjectiveEconomical in terms of the goods or services received for money spent.性价比高的Preserving old buildings is a cost-effective approach to urban development.
testament/ˈtestəmənt/nounSomething that serves as a sign or evidence of a specified fact, event, or quality.遗嘱,证明Old buildings serve as a testament to a city's history.
renovation/ˌrenəˈveɪʃən/nounThe action of renovating a building or structure.翻新,整修Many needs can be met through the renovation of existing structures.
repurpose/riːˈpɜrpəs/verbAdapt for use in a different purpose改变...的用途The city repurposed an abandoned factory into a cultural arts center.
preservation/ˌprezərˈveɪʃən/nounThe action of preserving something, especially the environment, historic buildings, or wildlife.保护,保存Balancing preservation and modernization is crucial for urban development.
infrastructure/ˈɪnfrəstrʌktʃər/nounThe basic physical and organizational structures and facilities needed for the operation of a society or enterprise.基础设施Investing in infrastructure improvements is essential for a city's growth.
urban landscape/ˈɜrbən ˈlændskeɪp/nounThe physical appearance and overall look of a city or town城市景观Well-planned historical areas can enhance the urban landscape.
cultural heritage/ˈkʌltʃərəl ˈhɛrɪtɪdʒ/nounThe legacy of tangible artifacts and intangible attributes inherited from past generations文化遗产Preserving old buildings showcases the city's rich cultural heritage.
revenue/ˈrevənju:/nounIncome, especially when of an organization and of a substantial nature收入,收益Repurposing old buildings can generate additional revenue for the city.
firsthand/fɜrst'hænd/adjectiveObtained directly from the original source; direct亲身的,直接的Future generations can experience their heritage firsthand by preserving historical sites.

Hoe Academic Discussion Wordt Beoordeeld

De TOEFL Academic Discussion-taak wordt beoordeeld aan de hand van de officiële ETS-beoordelingsrubriek. AI-beoordeling analyseert elk antwoord op meerdere dimensies.

Relevantie & Bijdrage

Gaat het antwoord in op de vraag en levert het een zinvolle bijdrage aan de discussie?

Taalgebruik

Grammaticale nauwkeurigheid, woordenschat en kwaliteit van de zinsbouw.

Uitwerking & Onderbouwing

Zijn de ideeën goed uitgewerkt met specifieke voorbeelden en duidelijke redenering?

Veelvoorkomende Patronen in Antwoorden

Op basis van analyse van gebruikersinzendingen voor deze taak, hier zijn veelvoorkomende patronen die zijn waargenomen in antwoorden van studenten.

Veel studenten geven een duidelijke mening, maar missen specifieke onderbouwende voorbeelden.

Sterke antwoorden verwijzen direct naar de leestekst en de standpunten van andere deelnemers.

Hoger scorende antwoorden gebruiken gevarieerde zinsstructuren en academisch vocabulaire.

Timemanagement is een belangrijke factor — antwoorden die gehaast aanvoelen scoren doorgaans lager op uitwerking.

Leertips

1

Lees de opdracht zorgvuldig en identificeer alle onderdelen van de vraag voordat je begint te schrijven.

2

Verwijs in je antwoord naar de leestekst en de meningen van de andere studenten.

3

Gebruik specifieke voorbeelden om je hoofdpunt te onderbouwen — vermijd algemene uitspraken.

4

Streef naar 120-150 woorden. Langere antwoorden zijn niet altijd beter; duidelijkheid en focus zijn belangrijker.

5

Oefen met getimede antwoorden (10 minuten) om vlotheid op te bouwen onder examenomstandigheden.

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat is de TOEFL Academic Discussion-taak?
Bij de TOEFL Academic Discussion-taak moet je bijdragen aan een online klassikale discussie. Je leest de vraag van een professor en de reacties van andere studenten, en schrijft vervolgens binnen ongeveer 10 minuten je eigen bijdrage waarin je jouw mening verwoordt en onderbouwt.
Hoe wordt de Academic Discussion-taak beoordeeld?
De taak wordt beoordeeld op een schaal van 0-5, gebaseerd op de relevantie voor de discussie, de kwaliteit van het taalgebruik (grammatica, woordenschat, zinsbouw) en hoe goed je jouw ideeën ontwikkelt en onderbouwt met concrete voorbeelden en redenering.
Wat zijn de gebruikersvoorbeelden op deze pagina?
Dit zijn echte antwoorden die zijn ingediend door TOEFL-kandidaten die deze vraag hebben geoefend op LingoLeap. Elk voorbeeld is beoordeeld door onze AI-beoordelingsengine, die een score geeft en gedetailleerde feedback over sterke punten en verbeterpunten.
Hoe nauwkeurig is de AI-beoordeling?
De AI-beoordelingsengine van LingoLeap is getraind op officiële ETS-beoordelingsrubrieken en gekalibreerd aan de hand van scores van menselijke beoordelaars. Hoewel geen enkel geautomatiseerd systeem perfect is, biedt het betrouwbare feedback voor oefendoeleinden en helpt het specifieke verbeterpunten te identificeren.
Hoe kan ik deze Academic Discussion-taak oefenen?
Je kunt oefenen door je aan te melden voor een gratis LingoLeap-account. Schrijf je eigen antwoord op precies deze vraag, dien het in en ontvang direct AI-feedback met gedetailleerd commentaar op je tekst.
Hoe lang moet mijn Academic Discussion-antwoord zijn?
Streef naar 120-150 woorden. De taak geeft je 10 minuten om je antwoord te schrijven. Focus op duidelijkheid, onderbouw je mening met concrete voorbeelden en verwijs naar de discussiecontext in plaats van een langer antwoord te schrijven.

Behaal vandaag nog je doelscore!

Met LingoLeap, dé expert in Engelse taalexamens

Bereik je droombeoordeling sneller

Probeer nu gratis