TOEFLIELTS
Français
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on history&culture. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

Vraies réponses d'utilisateurs avec évaluation et retour propulsés par l'IA

1 exemples soumis par des utilisateurs disponibles

Commencer l'Entraînement Gratuit

Aperçu de la Tâche

Professor

Dr. Stevenson:In our last class, we talked about famous historical sites and artifacts around the world. Now I want you to think about one thing and have a discussion: Do you think the government should spend money on preserving all the old buildings and sites rather than building new constructions? Why?

Hailey

I totally agree with this statement. Old buildings and sites are a reflection of a country’s history. So, it makes perfect sense to spend money on preserving them. Think about this. When we are all old and our grandchildren ask about our history, wouldn’t it be better to take them to the sites than just showing them pictures?

Cameron

To be honest, I don’t think it’s necessary to spend money on preserving old buildings. We are currently in such a fast changing world where histories and miracles are being made every second, which makes it our priority to make economic and technological breakthroughs. Anything would soon become old and abandoned in a world like this. So, there’s no need to spend money preserving old buildings.

Exemples d'Utilisateurs et Résultats d'Évaluation

1

Exemple d'Utilisateur #1

Compared to totally building new constructions, I think preserving old buildings and sites is a more economical way to construct the city. Not only be...

Score
28

Exemple d'Utilisateur

Compared to totally building new constructions, I think preserving old buildings and sites is a more economical way to construct the city. Not only because the old buildings are a carrier of urban memory but also because they can save a lot of money. We all know that building too many new constructions costs the city government a huge financial burden, and sometimes we don't need so many new facilities. If the old ones can get good renovation, then the citizen's demands can be fulfilled. At the same time, reusing old buildings can also add a new meaning to the building itself beyond utility. The building thus can attract history lovers coming to visit it, producing extra income. Moreover, a well-planned historical area can improve the urban appearance, exhibiting urban culture as well.

Résultat de l'Évaluation

1.子项得分

Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5 Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0 Language Use and Grammar: 4.0

2.预估分数

Estimated Score: 28

3.任务完成度

这篇文章在回答问题方面做得很好,表达了作者对于保护老建筑的观点。但是,文章可以更具体地说明为什么保护老建筑比新建设更经济实惠。此外,文章可以提供更多关于如何改造和利用老建筑的具体例子。

示例1:在支持观点时,可以提供一个实际的例子,如某个城市成功地改造了一座历史悠久的建筑,并使其成为了一个旅游胜地。

示例2:可以详细说明如何通过保护和改造老建筑来满足市民需求,例如将一座废弃的工厂改造成为一个文化艺术中心。

4.文章结构与组织

文章结构清晰,包括引言、正文和结论。然而,在正文部分,作者可以使用更明确的段落划分来突出每个观点及其支持细节。此外,在段落之间加入过渡词或短语可以使文章更连贯。

建议1:在正文部分,使用更明确的段落划分来突出每个观点及其支持细节。例如,可以将关于节省成本和吸引游客的观点分为两个段落。

建议2:在段落之间加入过渡词或短语,如“此外”、“然而”或“因此”,以使文章更连贯。例如,在提到节省成本的段落之后,可以使用“此外”来引入关于吸引游客的观点。

  1. 语法批改

Compared to totally building new constructions, I think preserving old buildings and sites is a more economical way to construct the city. Not only because the old buildings are a carrier of urban memory but, but(Detects missing comma before "but") also because they can save a lot of money. We all know that building too many new constructions costs the city government a huge financial burden, and sometimes we don't need so many new facilities. If the old ones can get good renovation, then the citizen's demands can be fulfilled. At the same time, reusing old buildings can also add a new meaning to the building itself beyond utility. The building thus can attract history lovers coming to visit it, producing extra income. Moreover, a well-planned historical area can improve the urban appearance, exhibiting urban culture as well.

6.文章修订

In comparison to constructing entirely new buildings, preserving historical structures and sites is a more cost-effective approach for urban development. Old buildings not only serve as a testament to a city's history but also provide significant financial savings. Excessive construction of new facilities can burden the city government with substantial costs, while many needs can be met through the renovation of existing structures.

Furthermore, repurposing old buildings adds value beyond their original function, attracting history enthusiasts and generating additional revenue. For instance, a city could transform an abandoned factory into a cultural arts center, catering to citizens' demands while preserving its historical significance. Such well-planned historical areas can enhance the urban landscape and showcase the city's rich cultural heritage.

Additionally, it is crucial to strike a balance between preservation and modernization. While it is essential to invest in technological advancements and infrastructure improvements, preserving historical sites allows future generations to experience their heritage firsthand rather than merely viewing photographs or reading about them.

In summary, prioritizing the preservation of old buildings and sites offers numerous benefits such as cost savings, increased tourism revenue, and cultural enrichment for both residents and visitors alike. (193 words)

Compared to totally building 7.文章批改

In comparison to constructing entirely new constructions, I think buildings (revised for a more formal tone), preserving old buildings historical structures and sites is a more economical way to construct the city. Not cost-effective approach (revised for clarity) for urban development. Old buildings not only because the old buildings are a carrier of urban memory serve as a testament to a city's history (revised for conciseness) but also because they provide significant financial savings (revised for clarity). Excessive construction of new facilities can save a lot of money. We all know that building too many new constructions costs burden the city government a huge financial burden, and sometimes we don't need so with substantial costs, while many new facilities. If the old ones can get good renovation, then the citizen's demands needs can be fulfilled. At the same time, reusing met through the renovation of existing structures (revised for coherence).

Furthermore, repurposing old buildings adds value beyond their original function (revised for clarity), attracting history enthusiasts and generating additional revenue. For instance, a city could transform an abandoned factory into a cultural arts center (added specific example), catering to citizens' demands while preserving its historical significance. Such well-planned historical areas can also add a new meaning to the building itself beyond utility. The building thus can attract history lovers coming to visit it, producing extra income. Moreover, a well-planned historical area can improve enhance the urban appearance, exhibiting urban culture landscape and showcase the city's rich cultural heritage (revised for conciseness).

Additionally, it is crucial to strike a balance between preservation and modernization (added transition). While it is essential to invest in technological advancements and infrastructure improvements, preserving historical sites allows future generations to experience their heritage firsthand rather than merely viewing photographs or reading about them (expanded on the idea).

In summary, prioritizing the preservation of old buildings and sites offers numerous benefits such as well.cost savings, increased tourism revenue, and cultural enrichment for both residents and visitors alike (summarized main points).

8.思维导图

  • Introduction

    • Cost-effective approach
    • Urban development
  • Old buildings

    • Testament to history
    • Financial savings
  • Renovation vs. new construction

    • City government burden
    • Meeting citizens' needs
  • Repurposing old buildings

    • Added value
    • Attracting tourists and revenue
  • Balance between preservation and modernization

    • Technological advancements and infrastructure improvements
    • Future generations experiencing heritage firsthand

9.关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
cost-effective/ˌkɒstɪˈfektɪv/adjectiveEconomical in terms of the goods or services received for money spent.性价比高的Preserving old buildings is a cost-effective approach to urban development.
testament/ˈtestəmənt/nounSomething that serves as a sign or evidence of a specified fact, event, or quality.遗嘱,证明Old buildings serve as a testament to a city's history.
renovation/ˌrenəˈveɪʃən/nounThe action of renovating a building or structure.翻新,整修Many needs can be met through the renovation of existing structures.
repurpose/riːˈpɜrpəs/verbAdapt for use in a different purpose改变...的用途The city repurposed an abandoned factory into a cultural arts center.
preservation/ˌprezərˈveɪʃən/nounThe action of preserving something, especially the environment, historic buildings, or wildlife.保护,保存Balancing preservation and modernization is crucial for urban development.
infrastructure/ˈɪnfrəstrʌktʃər/nounThe basic physical and organizational structures and facilities needed for the operation of a society or enterprise.基础设施Investing in infrastructure improvements is essential for a city's growth.
urban landscape/ˈɜrbən ˈlændskeɪp/nounThe physical appearance and overall look of a city or town城市景观Well-planned historical areas can enhance the urban landscape.
cultural heritage/ˈkʌltʃərəl ˈhɛrɪtɪdʒ/nounThe legacy of tangible artifacts and intangible attributes inherited from past generations文化遗产Preserving old buildings showcases the city's rich cultural heritage.
revenue/ˈrevənju:/nounIncome, especially when of an organization and of a substantial nature收入,收益Repurposing old buildings can generate additional revenue for the city.
firsthand/fɜrst'hænd/adjectiveObtained directly from the original source; direct亲身的,直接的Future generations can experience their heritage firsthand by preserving historical sites.

Comment la Discussion Académique est Évaluée

La tâche TOEFL Discussion Académique est évaluée selon le barème officiel de l'ETS. L'évaluation par IA analyse chaque réponse selon plusieurs dimensions.

Pertinence et Contribution

La réponse traite-t-elle la question et contribue-t-elle de façon pertinente à la discussion ?

Utilisation de la Langue

Précision grammaticale, richesse du vocabulaire et qualité de la structure des phrases.

Développement et Argumentation

Les idées sont-elles bien développées avec des exemples précis et un raisonnement clair ?

Tendances Communes dans les Réponses

D'après l'analyse des réponses soumises par les utilisateurs pour cette tâche, voici les tendances courantes observées dans les réponses des étudiants.

De nombreux étudiants expriment des opinions claires mais manquent d'exemples précis à l'appui.

Les réponses solides font directement référence au texte de lecture et aux points de vue des autres participants.

Les réponses les mieux notées utilisent des structures de phrases variées et un vocabulaire académique.

La gestion du temps est un facteur clé — les réponses qui semblent précipitées ont tendance à obtenir un score plus faible en développement.

Conseils d'Apprentissage

1

Lisez attentivement la consigne et identifiez toutes les parties de la question avant d'écrire.

2

Faites référence au texte de lecture et aux opinions des autres étudiants dans votre réponse.

3

Utilisez des exemples précis pour appuyer votre idée principale — évitez les affirmations génériques.

4

Visez 120 à 150 mots. Une réponse plus longue n'est pas toujours meilleure ; la clarté et la précision comptent davantage.

5

Entraînez-vous à répondre en temps limité (10 minutes) pour gagner en aisance dans les conditions de l'examen.

Questions fréquentes

Qu'est-ce que la tâche TOEFL Academic Discussion ?
La tâche TOEFL Academic Discussion vous demande de contribuer à une discussion de classe en ligne. Vous lirez la question d'un professeur ainsi que les réponses d'autres étudiants, puis vous rédigerez votre propre contribution exprimant et justifiant votre opinion en environ 10 minutes.
Comment la tâche Academic Discussion est-elle notée ?
La tâche est notée sur une échelle de 0 à 5 en fonction de la pertinence par rapport à la discussion, de la qualité de l'usage de la langue (grammaire, vocabulaire, structure des phrases), et de la manière dont vous développez et étayez vos idées à l'aide d'exemples précis et d'un raisonnement solide.
Que sont les exemples d'utilisateurs sur cette page ?
Il s'agit de véritables réponses soumises par des candidats au TOEFL qui se sont entraînés sur cette question sur LingoLeap. Chaque exemple a été évalué par notre moteur de notation par IA, qui fournit une note ainsi qu'un retour détaillé sur les points forts et les axes d'amélioration.
Quelle est la fiabilité de l'évaluation par IA ?
Le moteur d'évaluation par IA de LingoLeap est entraîné sur les grilles de notation officielles de l'ETS et calibré par rapport aux notes attribuées par des correcteurs humains. Bien qu'aucun système automatisé ne soit parfait, il fournit un retour fiable à des fins d'entraînement et aide à identifier des axes d'amélioration précis.
Comment puis-je m'entraîner à cette tâche Academic Discussion ?
Vous pouvez vous entraîner en créant un compte LingoLeap gratuit. Rédigez votre propre réponse à cette question précise, soumettez-la, et recevez une évaluation par IA instantanée accompagnée d'un retour détaillé sur votre rédaction.
Quelle longueur ma réponse Academic Discussion doit-elle avoir ?
Visez 120 à 150 mots. La tâche vous laisse 10 minutes pour rédiger votre réponse. Concentrez-vous sur la clarté, appuyez votre opinion avec des exemples précis, et faites référence au contexte de la discussion plutôt que d'écrire une réponse plus longue.

Atteignez votre score cible dès aujourd'hui !

Avec LingoLeap, l'expert en préparation aux examens d'anglais

Préparez-vous efficacement et atteignez votre score idéal au TOEFL plus rapidement

Essayez gratuitement maintenant