TOEFLIELTS
العربية
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on education. Write a post responding to the professor’s question. In your response, you should do the following: express and support your personal opinion; make a contribution to the discussion in your own words. An effective response will contain at least 100 words.

إجابات حقيقية من المستخدمين مع تقييم وملاحظات مدعومة بالذكاء الاصطناعي

يتوفر 1 نموذج مُقدَّم من المستخدمين

ابدأ التدريب المجاني

نظرة عامة على المهمة

Professor

This week, I want you to discuss assessment criteria. Some schoolteachers give high grades(marks) only to those students who perform well on their homework assignments and tests. Other teachers, however, may give high grades to students who have worked very hard on their assignments but have not performed so well. Which approach do you think is better: Giving grades based only on performance, or grading students not just on performance but also on their effort?

Student A

I think grades should be based on performance only. It's a matter of fairness. I'd be really upset if another student got nearly the same grade that I did when I turned in work that was almost perfect and the other student's work had incorrect answers or unclear ideas. It wouldn't matter to me if they worked harder.

Student B

Sure, evaluation should mainly be based upon the student’s performance, but hard work should count for something. A student who works hard, even when the final grade isn't the highest in the class, builds character, which will benefit the student later in life when they go to university or apply for a job.

نماذج المستخدمين ونتائج التقييم

1

نموذج مستخدم #1

While I can see Kelly’s point that it is fair to evaluate students’grades merely by their performance, I agree with Paul’s perspective that both perfo...

الدرجة
27

نموذج مستخدم

While I can see Kelly’s point that it is fair to evaluate students’grades merely by their performance, I agree with Paul’s perspective that both performance and hard work should be considered. As mentioned by Paul, taking the effort as an assessment criteria would stimulate students to study hard and build essential character. For instance, if a student is informed that working hard to write the final essay will get his score improved, he would take every effort to read more research reports, do experiments carefully or review his work again and again before finally hands in; however, if performance is the first and foremost, it is likely that he just have an essay done, which is seemly not bad, to gain a higher score. Apart from what Paul has raised, I added that it is actually fairer to consider efforts equally. As far as we know, some students are not good at taking exams, which is probably due to their tremendous fear of tests or some other unpredictable conditions like losing sleep or getting sick. In fact, under these circumstances, fairness can be ensured only if everyday’s hard work is considered; on the contrary, these occasions would affect students’grades severely if teachers just pay attention to their ultimate performance. Therefore, evaluation should be based upon the student’s performance as well as hard work.

نتيجة التقييم

1.子项得分

Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5 Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0 Language Use and Grammar: 4.0

2.预估分数

Estimated Score: 27

3.任务完成度

整体来说,这篇文章较好地完成了任务要求。然而,有一些建议可以帮助改进文章。首先,在表达观点时,可以提供更具体的例子来支持你的观点。其次,在论述中尽量避免使用过于口语化的表达。

Example 1: Instead of "he would take every effort to read more research reports, do experiments carefully or review his work again and again before finally hands in", you can write "the student would diligently read research reports, conduct experiments meticulously, and revise their work multiple times before submission."

Example 2: Instead of "it is likely that he just have an essay done, which is seemly not bad, to gain a higher score", you can write "the student might only aim to complete the essay with minimal effort, which could still result in a decent grade."

4.文章结构与组织

从结构和组织方面来看,这篇文章基本上遵循了引言、正文和结论的结构。但是,可以在段落之间加入更明确的过渡词以增强逻辑性。此外,建议在引言部分简要介绍两种观点,并在结论部分总结自己的立场。

Example 1: Add a transition phrase at the beginning of the second paragraph: "Firstly, as Paul mentioned, taking effort into account as an assessment criterion would encourage students to study diligently and build essential character traits."

Example 2: Improve the introduction and conclusion: Introduction: "In this discussion, I will explore both Kelly's perspective that grades should be based solely on performance and Paul's viewpoint that both performance and effort should be considered." Conclusion: "In conclusion, I believe that a fair evaluation system should take into account both a student's performance and their hard work, as it encourages personal growth and accounts for individual differences."

  1. 语法批改

While I can see Kelly’s point that it is fair to evaluate students’grades merely by their performance, I agree with Paul’s perspective that both performance and hard work should be considered. As mentioned by Paul, taking the effort as an assessment criteria would stimulate students to study hard and build essential character. For instance, if a student is informed that working hard to write the final essay will get his score improved, he would take every effort to read more research reports, do experiments carefully or review his work again and again before finally hands in; however, if performance is the first and foremost, it is likely that he just have an essay done, which is seemly not bad, to gain a higher score. Apart from what Paul has raised, I added that it is actually fairer to consider efforts equally. As far as we know, some students are not good at taking exams, which is probably due to their tremendous fear of tests or some other unpredictable conditions like losing sleep or getting sick. In fact, under these circumstances, fairness can be ensured only if everydayevery day(everyday (every day))’s hard work is considered; on the contrary, these occasions would affect students’grades severely if teachers just pay attention to their ultimate performance. Therefore, evaluation should be based upon the student’s performance as well as hard work.

6.文章修订

While I understand Kelly's argument that evaluating students' grades solely on performance seems fair, I concur with Paul's perspective that both performance and effort should be considered. As Paul mentioned, incorporating effort as an assessment criterion encourages students to study diligently and develop essential character traits. For example, if a student knows that their hard work on a final essay will improve their score, they will likely invest time in thoroughly researching the topic, conducting meticulous experiments, and revising their work multiple times before submission. Conversely, if only performance is prioritized, a student may complete the essay with minimal effort while still achieving a decent grade.

Moreover, considering effort in grading can actually promote fairness. Some students may struggle with exam-taking due to anxiety or other unforeseen circumstances such as illness or sleep deprivation. In these cases, acknowledging their consistent hard work can ensure fairness; otherwise, their grades might be severely impacted by focusing solely on exam performance. Therefore, a comprehensive evaluation system should take into account both a student's performance and their dedication to learning. (177 words)

7.文章批改

While I can see Kelly’s point understand Kelly's argument (clarified the subject) that it is fair to evaluate students’grades merely by their performance, evaluating students' grades solely on performance seems fair, I agree concur with Paul’s Paul's perspective (used a more formal word) that both performance and hard work effort should be considered. As mentioned by Paul, taking the Paul mentioned, incorporating effort as an assessment criteria would stimulate criterion (rephrased for clarity) encourages students to study diligently (used a more advanced vocabulary) and develop essential character traits. For example, if a student knows that their hard and build essential character. For instance, if a student is informed that working hard to write the work on a final essay will get his score improved, he would take every effort to read more research reports, do improve their score, they will likely invest time in thoroughly researching the topic, conducting meticulous experiments carefully or review his (used more advanced vocabulary), and revising their work again and again multiple times before finally hands in; however, submission (rephrased for clarity). Conversely, if only performance is prioritized (rephrased for clarity), a student may complete the first and foremost, it is likely that he just have an essay done, which is seemly not bad, to gain a higher score. Apart from what Paul has raised, I added that it is with minimal effort while still achieving a decent grade.

Moreover, considering effort in grading can actually fairer to consider efforts equally. As far as we know, some promote fairness (rephrased for clarity). Some students are not good at taking exams, which is probably may struggle with exam-taking due to their tremendous fear of tests anxiety or some other unpredictable conditions like losing unforeseen circumstances such as illness or sleep or getting sick. deprivation (added examples). In fact, under these circumstances, fairness can be ensured only if everyday’s cases, acknowledging their consistent hard work is considered; can ensure fairness; otherwise, their grades might be severely impacted by focusing solely on the contrary, these occasions would affect students’grades severely if teachers just pay attention exam performance (rephrased for clarity). Therefore, a comprehensive evaluation system should take into account both a student's performance and their dedication to their ultimate performance. Therefore, evaluation should be based upon the student’s performance as well as hard work.learning (used more formal language).

8.思维导图

  • Introduction

    • Kelly's argument: performance-based grading
    • Paul's perspective: performance and effort considered
  • Performance and Effort

    • Encourages diligent study
    • Develops essential character traits
  • Examples

    • Final essay improvement with hard work
    • Minimal effort when only performance is prioritized
  • Fairness in Grading

    • Struggles with exam-taking (anxiety, illness, sleep deprivation)
    • Acknowledging consistent hard work ensures fairness
  • Conclusion

    • Comprehensive evaluation system: performance and dedication to learning

9.关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
concur/kənˈkɜr/verbto agree同意I concur with your assessment of the situation.
diligently/ˈdɪlɪdʒəntli/adverbin a careful and thorough manner勤奋地She diligently studied for the exam.
incorporate/ɪnˈkɔrpəreɪt/verbto include something as part of something larger合并The new plan incorporates their suggestions.
criterion/kraɪˈtɪriən/noun- a standard by which something can be judged- 标准- The main criterion for selecting candidates is their experience in similar roles.
meticulous/məˈtikjələs/adjective- very careful and with great attention to detail- 一丝不苟的- He is meticulous in his research.
prioritize/praɪˈɔrəˌtaɪz/verb- to treat something as more important than others- 优先考虑- It's important to prioritize your tasks for the day.
unforeseen/ˌʌnfərˈsin/adjective- not expected or anticipated- 未预见到的- The project was delayed due to unforeseen circumstances.
comprehensive/ˌkɒmprɪˈhensɪv/adjective- including all or nearly all elements or aspects- 全面的- The book provides a comprehensive overview of the subject.
dedication/ˌdɛdɪˈkeɪʃən/noun-the quality of being committed to a task or purpose- 奉献精神-Her dedication to her job is admirable.

كيف يتم تقييم النقاش الأكاديمي

يتم تقييم مهمة النقاش الأكاديمي في TOEFL بناءً على معايير التقييم الرسمية من ETS. يحلل تقييم الذكاء الاصطناعي كل إجابة عبر عدة أبعاد.

الصلة والمساهمة

هل تعالج الإجابة السؤال وتُقدّم مساهمة ذات معنى في النقاش؟

استخدام اللغة

دقة القواعد، وتنوّع المفردات، وجودة بنية الجمل.

التطوير والدعم

هل تم تطوير الأفكار بشكل جيد باستخدام أمثلة محددة وتعليل واضح؟

الأنماط الشائعة في الإجابات

استنادًا إلى تحليل نماذج المستخدمين لهذه المهمة، إليك الأنماط الشائعة الملاحظة في إجابات الطلاب.

يقدّم كثير من الطلاب آراءً واضحة لكنهم يفتقرون إلى أمثلة داعمة محددة.

تشير الإجابات القوية مباشرةً إلى نص القراءة ووجهات نظر المتحدثين الآخرين.

تستخدم الإجابات ذات الدرجات الأعلى بنى جُمَلية متنوعة ومفردات أكاديمية.

إدارة الوقت عامل أساسي — الإجابات التي تبدو متسرعة تحصل غالبًا على درجة أقل في التطوير.

نصائح للتعلم

1

اقرأ السؤال بعناية وحدّد جميع أجزائه قبل البدء بالكتابة.

2

أشر في إجابتك إلى نص القراءة وآراء الطلاب الآخرين.

3

استخدم أمثلة محددة لدعم فكرتك الرئيسية — تجنّب العبارات العامة.

4

استهدف 120-150 كلمة. الإجابة الأطول ليست دائمًا أفضل؛ فالوضوح والتركيز أهم.

5

تدرّب على إجابات محددة الوقت (10 دقائق) لبناء الطلاقة في ظروف الاختبار.

الأسئلة الشائعة

ما هي مهمة المناقشة الأكاديمية في TOEFL؟
تتطلب مهمة المناقشة الأكاديمية في TOEFL منك المشاركة في نقاش صفي عبر الإنترنت. ستقرأ سؤال الأستاذ وردود الطلاب الآخرين، ثم تكتب مشاركتك الخاصة للتعبير عن رأيك ودعمه خلال حوالي 10 دقائق.
كيف يتم تقييم مهمة المناقشة الأكاديمية؟
يُقيَّم هذا التمرين على مقياس من 0 إلى 5 بناءً على مدى ارتباط الإجابة بالنقاش، وجودة استخدام اللغة (القواعد والمفردات وبنية الجملة)، ومدى قدرتك على تطوير أفكارك ودعمها بأمثلة وتحليل منطقي محدد.
ما هي عينات المستخدمين الموجودة في هذه الصفحة؟
هذه إجابات حقيقية قدّمها متقدمون لاختبار TOEFL تدربوا على هذا السؤال عبر LingoLeap. تم تقييم كل عينة بواسطة محرك التصحيح بالذكاء الاصطناعي لدينا، والذي يقدّم درجة وملاحظات مفصّلة حول نقاط القوة ومجالات التحسين.
ما مدى دقة تقييم الذكاء الاصطناعي؟
تم تدريب محرك التقييم بالذكاء الاصطناعي في LingoLeap على معايير التصحيح الرسمية لـETS، وتمت معايرته مقارنة بدرجات المصححين البشريين. ورغم أن أي نظام آلي ليس مثاليًا تمامًا، فإنه يوفر ملاحظات موثوقة لأغراض التدريب ويساعد في تحديد مجالات محددة للتحسين.
كيف يمكنني التدرب على مهمة المناقشة الأكاديمية هذه؟
يمكنك التدرب من خلال إنشاء حساب مجاني على LingoLeap. اكتب إجابتك الخاصة على هذا السؤال بالتحديد، ثم أرسلها لتحصل على تقييم فوري بالذكاء الاصطناعي مع ملاحظات مفصّلة حول كتابتك.
ما الطول المناسب لإجابة المناقشة الأكاديمية؟
استهدف كتابة ما بين 120 و150 كلمة. تمنحك المهمة 10 دقائق لكتابة إجابتك. ركّز على الوضوح، ودعم رأيك بأمثلة محددة، والإشارة إلى سياق النقاش بدلاً من كتابة إجابة أطول.

نشجعك على تحقيق هدفك في TOEFL اليوم!

مع LingoLeap، خبيرك في اختبارات اللغة الإنجليزية

حقق درجتك المثالية في TOEFL بشكل أسرع

جرّبه مجاناً الآن