TOEFLIELTS
Português
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on scientific discoveries. Write a post responding to the professor’s question. In your response you should: • express and support your opinion • make a contribution to the discussion An effective response will contain at least 100 words. You will have 10 minutes to write it.

Envios reais de usuários com avaliação e feedback baseados em IA

1 exemplos enviados por usuários disponíveis

Iniciar Prática Gratuita

Visão Geral da Tarefa

Dr. Gupta

This week's course materials will focus on scientific discoveries. While scientific researchers usually prefer to share what they learn with other scientists, many businesses and governments keep certain scientific discoveries secret. Some people believe that all scientific discoveries should be shared freely among scientists all around the world and that governments and businesses should not keep any discoveries secret. What do you believe and why?

Kelly

I don't think all discoveries should be shared. Businesses, for example, oUen spend a lot of money on scientific research in order to make a discovery that can lead to profit. Even if that discovery benefits everyone, the business has a right to keep the discovery secret so that it can develop a profitable product from the research.

Paul

Sharing knowledge is crucially important to most scientists. Scientists usually publish the details of their discoveries in scientific journals, which means that everyone can see what the scientists have accomplished. Being recognized as the person who made a discovery is the biggest reward for any scientist. When scientists keep their discoveries secret, they lose that recognition. That is very unsatisfying

Exemplos de Usuários e Resultados da Avaliação

1

Exemplo de Usuário #1

Echoing Paul, I contend that transparency and open sharing are crucial for the advancement of science. The open collaboration of different scientist...

Pontuação
28

Exemplo de Usuário

Echoing Paul, I contend that transparency and open sharing are crucial for the advancement of science. The open collaboration of different scientists could not only accelerate innovation but also create a marketplace of ideas that can bring commercial opportunities. GitHub, where developers and companies share their novel code and algorithms, exemplifies this. GitHub fosters a dynamic collaborative environment, and this openness attracts engineers who enhance and refine these discoveries, sometimes even developing a robust plugin ecosystem. Moreover, collaborative efforts can draw the attention of product managers eager to apply innovative technologies in practical scenarios, leading to commercial gains. Critics might argue that sharing scientific discoveries could infringe on the company’s commercial rights. However, this viewpoint overlooks that open collaboration could serve as the catalyst for commercial success, by attracting contributions that could enhance the values and applications of these discoveries. In conclusion, I restate that the open sharing of scientific discoveries could not only enhance science development but also achieve commercial success.

Resultado da Avaliação

1. 子项得分

Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 5 Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.5 Language Use and Grammar: 4.5

2. 预估分数

28. 3 任务完成度

整体来说,这篇文章很好地回答了问题,并且表达了作者的观点。但是,为了更好地完成任务,可以考虑在论述中加入更多具体的例子来支持观点。此外,在讨论中可以提及一些反对意见以及对这些反对意见的回应,这样可以使文章更加全面。

Example 1: Instead of just mentioning GitHub, you could provide a specific example of a project or discovery that was shared on the platform and led to commercial success.

Example 2: You could discuss a counterargument, such as the potential risk of intellectual property theft when sharing scientific discoveries, and provide a rebuttal to this argument.

4. 文章结构与组织

文章的结构和组织方面已经做得很好,有明确的引言、主体和结论。每个段落都集中讨论了一个特定的观点,并提供了支持细节。然而,在段落之间增加一些过渡词或短语可以使文章更加流畅。

Example 1: In the second paragraph, you could add a transition phrase like "For instance" before mentioning GitHub to smoothly introduce the example.

Example 2: Before discussing the counterargument in the third paragraph, you could use a transition like "On the other hand" to signal a shift in perspective.

5. 语法批改

Echoing Paul, I contend that transparency and open sharing are crucial for the advancement of science.

The open collaboration of different scientists could not only accelerate innovation but also create a marketplace of ideas that can bring commercial opportunities. GitHub, where developers and companies share their novel code and algorithms, exemplifies this. GitHub fosters a dynamic collaborative environment, and this openness attracts engineers who enhance and refine these discoveries, sometimes even developing a robust plugin ecosystem. Moreover, collaborative efforts can draw the attention of product managers eager to apply innovative technologies in practical scenarios, leading to commercial gains.

Critics might argue that sharing scientific discoveries could infringe on the company’s commercial rights. However, this viewpoint overlooks that open collaboration could serve as the catalyst for commercial success, by attracting contributions that could enhance the values and applications of these discoveries.

In conclusion, I restate that the open sharing of scientific discoveries could not only enhance science development but also achieve commercial success.

Section Title: The Importance of Sharing Scientific Discoveries

I concur with Paul that transparency and open sharing are essential for the progress of science.

Open collaboration among scientists can not only expedite innovation but also establish a marketplace of ideas, potentially leading to commercial opportunities. A prime example is GitHub, where developers and companies share their innovative code and algorithms. This platform fosters a dynamic collaborative environment, attracting engineers who contribute to the enhancement and refinement of these discoveries, sometimes even developing a robust plugin ecosystem. Furthermore, such collaborative efforts can capture the interest of product managers keen on applying groundbreaking technologies in practical scenarios, ultimately resulting in commercial gains.

Detractors may argue that divulging scientific discoveries could infringe on a company's commercial rights. However, this perspective fails to consider that open collaboration could act as a catalyst for commercial success by attracting contributions that enhance the value and applications of these discoveries.

Therefore, it is crucial to recognize that openly sharing scientific discoveries can not only foster scientific advancement but also contribute to achieving commercial success. By embracing this approach, we can create an environment where innovation thrives and benefits all parties involved. (194 words)

Echoing Paul, Section Title: The Importance of Sharing Scientific Discoveries (Changed "7 文章批改" to a more relevant and descriptive title)

I contend concur with Paul (Replaced "Echoing" with "I concur with" for a more natural tone) that transparency and open sharing are crucial for the advancement essential for the progress of science.

The open Open collaboration of among scientists (Changed "of different scientists could scientists" to "among scientists" for conciseness) can not only accelerate expedite innovation (Replaced "accelerate" with "expedite" for better word choice) but also create establish a marketplace of ideas that can bring ideas, potentially leading to commercial opportunities. A prime example is GitHub, where developers and companies share their novel innovative code and algorithms, exemplifies this. GitHub algorithms. This platform fosters a dynamic collaborative environment, and this openness attracts attracting engineers who enhance and refine contribute to the enhancement and refinement of these discoveries, sometimes even developing a robust plugin ecosystem. Moreover, Furthermore, such collaborative efforts can draw the attention capture the interest of product managers eager to apply innovative keen on applying groundbreaking technologies in practical scenarios, leading to ultimately resulting in commercial gains.

Critics might Detractors may argue that sharing divulging scientific discoveries could infringe on the company’s a company's commercial rights. However, this viewpoint overlooks perspective fails to consider that open collaboration could serve act as the a catalyst for commercial success, success by attracting contributions that could enhance the values value and applications of these discoveries.

In Therefore, it is crucial to recognize (Changed "In conclusion, I restate that the open that" to "Therefore, it is crucial to recognize" for better flow) that openly sharing of scientific discoveries could can not only enhance science development foster scientific advancement but also achieve commercial success.contribute to achieving commercial success. By embracing this approach, we can create an environment where innovation thrives and benefits all parties involved.

8 思维导图


- The Importance of Sharing Scientific Discoveries
    - Transparency and open sharing
        - Essential for scientific progress
    - Open collaboration
        - Expedite innovation
        - Marketplace of ideas
            - Commercial opportunities
            - Example: GitHub
                - Share code and algorithms
                - Dynamic collaborative environment
                - Attract engineers and contributions
                - Plugin ecosystem development
                - Interest from product managers
                    - Practical applications of technologies 
                    - Commercial gains 
    - Counterargument: Infringement on commercial rights 
        - Rebuttal: Open collaboration as a catalyst for success 
            - Enhance value and applications of discoveries 
    - Conclusion: Embrace open sharing 
        - Foster scientific advancement 
        - Achieve commercial success 
        - Create an environment where innovation thrives and benefits all parties involved.

9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
concur/kənˈkɜr/verbagree; be of the same opinion同意,一致意见I concur with Paul that transparency and open sharing are essential for the progress of science.
expedite/ˈɛkspədaɪt/verbmake (an action or process) happen sooner加快,促进Open collaboration among scientists can not only expedite innovation but also establish a marketplace of ideas.
marketplace/ˈmɑrkɪtpleɪs/noun/a place where people buy and sell goods市场,交易场所A marketplace of ideas, potentially leading to commercial opportunities.
collaborative/kəˈlæbərətɪv/adjective/involving two or more people working together/合作的,协作的This platform fosters a dynamic collaborative environment.
ecosystem/ˈikoʊsɪstəm/noun/a system formed by the interaction of a community of organisms with their environment生态系统Sometimes even developing a robust plugin ecosystem.
detractors/dɪˈtræktərz/noun/people who criticize something or someone批评者,诋毁者Detractors may argue that divulging scientific discoveries could infringe on a company's commercial rights.
divulging/daɪˈvʌldʒɪŋ/verb/make known (private or sensitive information)/泄露,透露Divulging scientific discoveries could infringe on a company's commercial rights.
catalyst/ˈkætəlɪst/noun/a person or thing that precipitates an event/催化剂,促进因素Open collaboration could act as a catalyst for commercial success by attracting contributions that enhance the value and applications of these discoveries.
thrive/θraɪv/verb/grow or develop well or vigorously/繁荣,兴旺Create an environment where innovation thrives and benefits all parties involved.

Como a Academic Discussion É Avaliada

A tarefa TOEFL Academic Discussion é avaliada com base na rubrica oficial de avaliação da ETS. A avaliação por IA analisa cada resposta em várias dimensões.

Relevância e Contribuição

A resposta aborda a questão e contribui de forma significativa para a discussão?

Uso da Língua

Precisão gramatical, variedade de vocabulário e qualidade da estrutura das frases.

Desenvolvimento e Fundamentação

As ideias estão bem desenvolvidas com exemplos específicos e raciocínio claro?

Padrões Comuns nas Respostas

Com base na análise de envios de usuários para esta tarefa, aqui estão os padrões comuns observados nas respostas dos estudantes.

Muitos estudantes apresentam opiniões claras, mas carecem de exemplos específicos de apoio.

Respostas fortes fazem referência direta ao texto de leitura e aos pontos de vista de outros participantes.

Respostas com pontuações mais altas usam estruturas de frases variadas e vocabulário acadêmico.

O gerenciamento do tempo é um fator-chave — respostas que parecem apressadas tendem a pontuar mais baixo em desenvolvimento.

Dicas de Aprendizado

1

Leia o enunciado com atenção e identifique todas as partes da questão antes de escrever.

2

Faça referência ao texto de leitura e às opiniões dos outros estudantes em sua resposta.

3

Use exemplos específicos para apoiar seu ponto principal — evite afirmações genéricas.

4

Busque entre 120 e 150 palavras. Respostas mais longas nem sempre são melhores; clareza e foco importam mais.

5

Pratique respostas cronometradas (10 minutos) para desenvolver fluência nas condições de prova.

Perguntas frequentes

O que é a tarefa TOEFL Academic Discussion?
A tarefa TOEFL Academic Discussion exige que você contribua para uma discussão online em sala de aula. Você lerá a pergunta de um professor e as respostas de outros alunos, e depois escreverá sua própria postagem expressando e defendendo sua opinião em cerca de 10 minutos.
Como a tarefa Academic Discussion é avaliada?
A tarefa é avaliada em uma escala de 0 a 5 com base na relevância em relação à discussão, na qualidade do uso da língua (gramática, vocabulário, estrutura das frases) e em quão bem você desenvolve e sustenta suas ideias com exemplos específicos e raciocínio.
O que são as amostras de usuários nesta página?
Essas são respostas reais enviadas por candidatos do TOEFL que praticaram esta pergunta no LingoLeap. Cada amostra foi avaliada pelo nosso mecanismo de pontuação por IA, que fornece uma nota e feedback detalhado sobre pontos fortes e áreas de melhoria.
Quão precisa é a avaliação por IA?
O mecanismo de avaliação por IA da LingoLeap é treinado com base nas rubricas oficiais de pontuação do ETS e calibrado em relação às notas de avaliadores humanos. Embora nenhum sistema automatizado seja perfeito, ele fornece feedback confiável para fins de prática e ajuda a identificar áreas específicas de melhoria.
Como posso praticar esta tarefa Academic Discussion?
Você pode praticar criando uma conta gratuita no LingoLeap. Escreva sua própria resposta a esta pergunta exata, envie-a e receba uma avaliação instantânea por IA com feedback detalhado sobre sua redação.
Qual deve ser o tamanho da minha resposta Academic Discussion?
Busque entre 120 e 150 palavras. A tarefa dá a você 10 minutos para escrever sua resposta. Concentre-se na clareza, sustente sua opinião com exemplos específicos e faça referência ao contexto da discussão em vez de escrever uma resposta mais longa.

Conquiste sua nota ideal no TOEFL hoje!

Com a LingoLeap, especialista em exames de inglês

Alcance sua pontuação dos sonhos mais rápido

Experimente grátis agora