TOEFLIELTS
Deutsch
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on scientific discoveries. Write a post responding to the professor’s question. In your response you should: • express and support your opinion • make a contribution to the discussion An effective response will contain at least 100 words. You will have 10 minutes to write it.

Echte Nutzereinsendungen mit KI-gestützter Bewertung und Feedback

1 nutzereingereichte Beispiele verfügbar

Kostenlos üben starten

Aufgabenübersicht

Dr. Gupta

This week's course materials will focus on scientific discoveries. While scientific researchers usually prefer to share what they learn with other scientists, many businesses and governments keep certain scientific discoveries secret. Some people believe that all scientific discoveries should be shared freely among scientists all around the world and that governments and businesses should not keep any discoveries secret. What do you believe and why?

Kelly

I don't think all discoveries should be shared. Businesses, for example, oUen spend a lot of money on scientific research in order to make a discovery that can lead to profit. Even if that discovery benefits everyone, the business has a right to keep the discovery secret so that it can develop a profitable product from the research.

Paul

Sharing knowledge is crucially important to most scientists. Scientists usually publish the details of their discoveries in scientific journals, which means that everyone can see what the scientists have accomplished. Being recognized as the person who made a discovery is the biggest reward for any scientist. When scientists keep their discoveries secret, they lose that recognition. That is very unsatisfying

Nutzerbeispiele & Bewertungsergebnisse

1

Nutzerbeispiel #1

Echoing Paul, I contend that transparency and open sharing are crucial for the advancement of science. The open collaboration of different scientist...

Punktzahl
28

Nutzerbeispiel

Echoing Paul, I contend that transparency and open sharing are crucial for the advancement of science. The open collaboration of different scientists could not only accelerate innovation but also create a marketplace of ideas that can bring commercial opportunities. GitHub, where developers and companies share their novel code and algorithms, exemplifies this. GitHub fosters a dynamic collaborative environment, and this openness attracts engineers who enhance and refine these discoveries, sometimes even developing a robust plugin ecosystem. Moreover, collaborative efforts can draw the attention of product managers eager to apply innovative technologies in practical scenarios, leading to commercial gains. Critics might argue that sharing scientific discoveries could infringe on the company’s commercial rights. However, this viewpoint overlooks that open collaboration could serve as the catalyst for commercial success, by attracting contributions that could enhance the values and applications of these discoveries. In conclusion, I restate that the open sharing of scientific discoveries could not only enhance science development but also achieve commercial success.

Bewertungsergebnis

1. 子项得分

Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 5 Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.5 Language Use and Grammar: 4.5

2. 预估分数

28. 3 任务完成度

整体来说,这篇文章很好地回答了问题,并且表达了作者的观点。但是,为了更好地完成任务,可以考虑在论述中加入更多具体的例子来支持观点。此外,在讨论中可以提及一些反对意见以及对这些反对意见的回应,这样可以使文章更加全面。

Example 1: Instead of just mentioning GitHub, you could provide a specific example of a project or discovery that was shared on the platform and led to commercial success.

Example 2: You could discuss a counterargument, such as the potential risk of intellectual property theft when sharing scientific discoveries, and provide a rebuttal to this argument.

4. 文章结构与组织

文章的结构和组织方面已经做得很好,有明确的引言、主体和结论。每个段落都集中讨论了一个特定的观点,并提供了支持细节。然而,在段落之间增加一些过渡词或短语可以使文章更加流畅。

Example 1: In the second paragraph, you could add a transition phrase like "For instance" before mentioning GitHub to smoothly introduce the example.

Example 2: Before discussing the counterargument in the third paragraph, you could use a transition like "On the other hand" to signal a shift in perspective.

5. 语法批改

Echoing Paul, I contend that transparency and open sharing are crucial for the advancement of science.

The open collaboration of different scientists could not only accelerate innovation but also create a marketplace of ideas that can bring commercial opportunities. GitHub, where developers and companies share their novel code and algorithms, exemplifies this. GitHub fosters a dynamic collaborative environment, and this openness attracts engineers who enhance and refine these discoveries, sometimes even developing a robust plugin ecosystem. Moreover, collaborative efforts can draw the attention of product managers eager to apply innovative technologies in practical scenarios, leading to commercial gains.

Critics might argue that sharing scientific discoveries could infringe on the company’s commercial rights. However, this viewpoint overlooks that open collaboration could serve as the catalyst for commercial success, by attracting contributions that could enhance the values and applications of these discoveries.

In conclusion, I restate that the open sharing of scientific discoveries could not only enhance science development but also achieve commercial success.

Section Title: The Importance of Sharing Scientific Discoveries

I concur with Paul that transparency and open sharing are essential for the progress of science.

Open collaboration among scientists can not only expedite innovation but also establish a marketplace of ideas, potentially leading to commercial opportunities. A prime example is GitHub, where developers and companies share their innovative code and algorithms. This platform fosters a dynamic collaborative environment, attracting engineers who contribute to the enhancement and refinement of these discoveries, sometimes even developing a robust plugin ecosystem. Furthermore, such collaborative efforts can capture the interest of product managers keen on applying groundbreaking technologies in practical scenarios, ultimately resulting in commercial gains.

Detractors may argue that divulging scientific discoveries could infringe on a company's commercial rights. However, this perspective fails to consider that open collaboration could act as a catalyst for commercial success by attracting contributions that enhance the value and applications of these discoveries.

Therefore, it is crucial to recognize that openly sharing scientific discoveries can not only foster scientific advancement but also contribute to achieving commercial success. By embracing this approach, we can create an environment where innovation thrives and benefits all parties involved. (194 words)

Echoing Paul, Section Title: The Importance of Sharing Scientific Discoveries (Changed "7 文章批改" to a more relevant and descriptive title)

I contend concur with Paul (Replaced "Echoing" with "I concur with" for a more natural tone) that transparency and open sharing are crucial for the advancement essential for the progress of science.

The open Open collaboration of among scientists (Changed "of different scientists could scientists" to "among scientists" for conciseness) can not only accelerate expedite innovation (Replaced "accelerate" with "expedite" for better word choice) but also create establish a marketplace of ideas that can bring ideas, potentially leading to commercial opportunities. A prime example is GitHub, where developers and companies share their novel innovative code and algorithms, exemplifies this. GitHub algorithms. This platform fosters a dynamic collaborative environment, and this openness attracts attracting engineers who enhance and refine contribute to the enhancement and refinement of these discoveries, sometimes even developing a robust plugin ecosystem. Moreover, Furthermore, such collaborative efforts can draw the attention capture the interest of product managers eager to apply innovative keen on applying groundbreaking technologies in practical scenarios, leading to ultimately resulting in commercial gains.

Critics might Detractors may argue that sharing divulging scientific discoveries could infringe on the company’s a company's commercial rights. However, this viewpoint overlooks perspective fails to consider that open collaboration could serve act as the a catalyst for commercial success, success by attracting contributions that could enhance the values value and applications of these discoveries.

In Therefore, it is crucial to recognize (Changed "In conclusion, I restate that the open that" to "Therefore, it is crucial to recognize" for better flow) that openly sharing of scientific discoveries could can not only enhance science development foster scientific advancement but also achieve commercial success.contribute to achieving commercial success. By embracing this approach, we can create an environment where innovation thrives and benefits all parties involved.

8 思维导图


- The Importance of Sharing Scientific Discoveries
    - Transparency and open sharing
        - Essential for scientific progress
    - Open collaboration
        - Expedite innovation
        - Marketplace of ideas
            - Commercial opportunities
            - Example: GitHub
                - Share code and algorithms
                - Dynamic collaborative environment
                - Attract engineers and contributions
                - Plugin ecosystem development
                - Interest from product managers
                    - Practical applications of technologies 
                    - Commercial gains 
    - Counterargument: Infringement on commercial rights 
        - Rebuttal: Open collaboration as a catalyst for success 
            - Enhance value and applications of discoveries 
    - Conclusion: Embrace open sharing 
        - Foster scientific advancement 
        - Achieve commercial success 
        - Create an environment where innovation thrives and benefits all parties involved.

9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
concur/kənˈkɜr/verbagree; be of the same opinion同意,一致意见I concur with Paul that transparency and open sharing are essential for the progress of science.
expedite/ˈɛkspədaɪt/verbmake (an action or process) happen sooner加快,促进Open collaboration among scientists can not only expedite innovation but also establish a marketplace of ideas.
marketplace/ˈmɑrkɪtpleɪs/noun/a place where people buy and sell goods市场,交易场所A marketplace of ideas, potentially leading to commercial opportunities.
collaborative/kəˈlæbərətɪv/adjective/involving two or more people working together/合作的,协作的This platform fosters a dynamic collaborative environment.
ecosystem/ˈikoʊsɪstəm/noun/a system formed by the interaction of a community of organisms with their environment生态系统Sometimes even developing a robust plugin ecosystem.
detractors/dɪˈtræktərz/noun/people who criticize something or someone批评者,诋毁者Detractors may argue that divulging scientific discoveries could infringe on a company's commercial rights.
divulging/daɪˈvʌldʒɪŋ/verb/make known (private or sensitive information)/泄露,透露Divulging scientific discoveries could infringe on a company's commercial rights.
catalyst/ˈkætəlɪst/noun/a person or thing that precipitates an event/催化剂,促进因素Open collaboration could act as a catalyst for commercial success by attracting contributions that enhance the value and applications of these discoveries.
thrive/θraɪv/verb/grow or develop well or vigorously/繁荣,兴旺Create an environment where innovation thrives and benefits all parties involved.

Wie die Academic Discussion bewertet wird

Die TOEFL Academic Discussion-Aufgabe wird anhand des offiziellen ETS-Bewertungsrasters bewertet. Die KI-Bewertung analysiert jede Antwort anhand mehrerer Dimensionen.

Relevanz & Beitrag

Geht die Antwort auf die Frage ein und leistet sie einen sinnvollen Beitrag zur Diskussion?

Sprachgebrauch

Grammatikalische Genauigkeit, Wortschatzbreite und Qualität des Satzbaus.

Ausarbeitung & Begründung

Sind die Ideen mit konkreten Beispielen und klarer Argumentation gut ausgearbeitet?

Häufige Muster in den Antworten

Basierend auf der Analyse von Nutzereinsendungen zu dieser Aufgabe sind hier häufige Muster in den Antworten der Lernenden.

Viele Lernende äußern eine klare Meinung, liefern aber keine konkreten Beispiele zur Unterstützung.

Starke Antworten beziehen sich direkt auf den Lesetext und die Standpunkte der anderen Sprecher.

Höher bewertete Antworten nutzen abwechslungsreiche Satzstrukturen und akademischen Wortschatz.

Zeitmanagement ist entscheidend – wirkt eine Antwort gehetzt, fällt die Bewertung der Ausarbeitung meist niedriger aus.

Lerntipps

1

Lies die Aufgabenstellung sorgfältig und erfasse alle Teile der Frage, bevor du zu schreiben beginnst.

2

Beziehe dich in deiner Antwort auf den Lesetext und die Meinungen der anderen Studierenden.

3

Nutze konkrete Beispiele, um deinen Hauptpunkt zu untermauern – vermeide allgemeine Aussagen.

4

Ziele auf 120–150 Wörter. Längere Antworten sind nicht automatisch besser; Klarheit und Fokus zählen mehr.

5

Übe zeitlich begrenzte Antworten (10 Minuten), um unter Prüfungsbedingungen Sicherheit zu gewinnen.

Häufig gestellte Fragen

Was ist die TOEFL Academic Discussion-Aufgabe?
Bei der TOEFL Academic Discussion-Aufgabe musst du dich an einer Online-Klassendiskussion beteiligen. Du liest die Frage eines Professors sowie die Antworten anderer Studierender und schreibst dann in etwa 10 Minuten deinen eigenen Beitrag, in dem du deine Meinung äußerst und begründest.
Wie wird die Academic Discussion-Aufgabe bewertet?
Die Aufgabe wird auf einer Skala von 0 bis 5 bewertet, basierend auf der Relevanz für die Diskussion, der Qualität der Sprachverwendung (Grammatik, Wortschatz, Satzbau) und wie gut du deine Ideen mit konkreten Beispielen und Argumenten entwickelst und stützt.
Was sind die Nutzerbeispiele auf dieser Seite?
Dies sind echte Antworten, die von TOEFL-Prüflingen eingereicht wurden, die diese Frage auf LingoLeap geübt haben. Jedes Beispiel wurde von unserer KI-Bewertungs-Engine ausgewertet, die eine Punktzahl sowie detailliertes Feedback zu Stärken und Verbesserungsbereichen liefert.
Wie genau ist die KI-Bewertung?
Die KI-Bewertungs-Engine von LingoLeap wurde anhand offizieller ETS-Bewertungskriterien trainiert und anhand menschlicher Prüferbewertungen kalibriert. Kein automatisiertes System ist perfekt, aber sie liefert zuverlässiges Feedback zu Übungszwecken und hilft dabei, konkrete Verbesserungsbereiche zu erkennen.
Wie kann ich diese Academic Discussion-Aufgabe üben?
Du kannst üben, indem du dich für ein kostenloses LingoLeap-Konto anmeldest. Schreibe deine eigene Antwort auf genau diese Frage, reiche sie ein und erhalte sofortiges KI-Feedback mit detaillierten Anmerkungen zu deinem Text.
Wie lang sollte meine Academic Discussion-Antwort sein?
Strebe 120–150 Wörter an. Für die Aufgabe hast du 10 Minuten Zeit. Konzentriere dich auf Klarheit, stütze deine Meinung mit konkreten Beispielen und beziehe dich auf den Diskussionskontext, anstatt eine längere Antwort zu schreiben.

Erreich deinen Wunsch-Score – wir sind an deiner Seite!

Mit LingoLeap, deinem Experten für TOEFL und andere Englischprüfungen

Schneller zu deinem Traumscore

Jetzt kostenlos ausprobieren