TOEFLIELTS
한국어
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on social media. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

AI 기반 평가와 피드백이 포함된 실제 사용자 제출 답안

사용자 제출 예시 1개 이용 가능

무료 연습 시작하기

과제 개요

Professor

Today's topic is an important one, as social media has undoubtedly had a significant impact on the way we consume and engage with news and information. With the abundance of content available on social media platforms, the question arises: is social media replacing the need for TV news?

Student A

I don't think social media can replace TV news. There is too much fake news on social media, making it hard to trust as a reliable source of information. TV news is typically more fact-checked and edited, which ensures greater accuracy. While TV news may not be perfect, I believe it's still an important and necessary source of information for many people.

Student B

In my opinion, social media is likely to replace TV news as the primary source of news for many people in the future. One of the main reasons for this shift is the speed at which news can be disseminated on social media platforms. In contrast to traditional TV news, which is often bound by strict schedules and broadcast times, social media allows users to access news and information in real-time. So breaking news and events are often reported first on social media, making it a go-to source for those seeking up-to-date information.

사용자 예시 및 평가 결과

1

사용자 예시 #1

Admittedly, TV news is fact-checked and edited, but it is a fact that some TV reports are too subjective, which misleads the audiences to make the rig...

점수
25

사용자 예시

Admittedly, TV news is fact-checked and edited, but it is a fact that some TV reports are too subjective, which misleads the audiences to make the right judgment. I have seen a completely different results of the 2020 US presidential election by CNN News and Fox News, which is definitely due to the subjectivity of different programs. In my view, social media is a better news source, because it allows us to feed personalized recommendations depending on our searching preference and browsing history. For example, my friend Jack is a big fan of table tennis and he spends a lot of time keeping informed of the recent table tennis competitions on TikTok, so the application continuously recommends contents about table tennis to him every day.

평가 결과

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0

  • Language Use and Grammar: 4.0

2. 预估分数

25. 3 任务完成度

整体来说,你的文章回答了教授的问题,并表达了自己的观点。但是,为了更好地完成任务,你可以尝试以下几点改进:

  1. 更具体地解释为什么社交媒体是一个更好的新闻来源,例如提供更多关于社交媒体如何帮助用户获取实时信息的细节。

  2. 在讨论中加入一些对学生A和学生B观点的回应,以便更好地参与讨论。

示例1(改进): In my view, social media is a better news source because it allows us to access real-time information, which is crucial during emergencies or rapidly changing situations. For example, during natural disasters, people can receive instant updates on their smartphones through social media platforms.

示例2(改进): While I agree with Student A that TV news is more fact-checked, I believe that the speed and convenience of social media outweigh this advantage. As Student B mentioned, breaking news often appears first on social media platforms, allowing users to stay informed even when they are away from their TVs.

4. 文章结构与组织

文章的结构和组织方面表现良好,但仍有改进空间。以下是一些建议:

  1. 在开头部分简要介绍你将要讨论的观点,以便读者更好地了解文章的结构。

  2. 在正文部分使用更明确的过渡词或短语,以便读者更容易理解你的观点。

示例1(改进): In this post, I will argue that social media is a better news source than TV news due to its personalized recommendations and real-time updates.

示例2(改进): Furthermore, social media platforms offer a more diverse range of perspectives compared to traditional TV news, which may be biased towards certain viewpoints.

5. 语法批改

Admittedly, TV news is fact-checked and edited, but it is a fact that some TV reports are too subjective, which misleads the audiences to make the right judgment. I have seen a completely different results of the 2020 US presidential election by CNN News and Fox News, which is definitely due to the subjectivity of different programs. In my view, social media is a better news source, because it allows us to feed personalized (Two consecutive spaces)recommendations depending on our searching preference and browsing history. For example, my friend Jack is a big fan of table tennis and, and(comma between independent clauses) he spends a lot of time keeping informed of the recent table tennis competitions on TikTok, so the application continuously recommends contents about table tennis to him every day.

Section Title: 6 Article Revision

While it is true that TV news undergoes fact-checking and editing, it cannot be denied that some reports can be highly subjective, potentially leading audiences to form misguided judgments. For instance, the contrasting coverage of the 2020 US presidential election by CNN News and Fox News clearly demonstrated the influence of differing perspectives. In my opinion, social media serves as a superior news source due to its ability to provide personalized recommendations based on individual preferences and browsing history. Take my friend Jack, an avid table tennis enthusiast; he frequently stays updated on recent competitions through TikTok. Consequently, the platform consistently curates content related to table tennis for him daily. (115 words)

Admittedly, While it is true that TV news is fact-checked undergoes fact-checking and edited, but editing (reason: clarifying the original point), it is a fact cannot be denied that some TV reports are too subjective, which misleads can be highly subjective (reason: stronger phrasing to emphasize the issue), potentially leading audiences to make form misguided judgments (reason: clearer explanation of the right judgment. I have seen a completely different results problem). For instance, the contrasting coverage of the 2020 US presidential election by CNN News and Fox News, which is definitely News clearly demonstrated the influence of differing perspectives (reason: providing a specific example to support the argument). In my opinion, social media serves as a superior news source due to the subjectivity of different programs. In my view, social media is a better news source, because it allows us its ability to feed personalized provide personalized recommendations depending based on our searching preference individual preferences and browsing history. For example, history (reason: stating a clear reason for preferring social media). Take my friend Jack is a big fan of Jack, an avid table tennis and enthusiast; he spends a lot of time keeping informed of frequently stays updated on recent competitions through TikTok (reason: introducing an example with more context). Consequently, the recent platform consistently curates content related to table tennis competitions on TikTok, so for him daily (reason: connecting the application continuously recommends contents example back to the main point about table tennis to him every day.personalized recommendations).

Display title: 8 思维导图


1. Essay Structure
   1.1 Introduction
       1.1.1 TV news fact-checking and editing
       1.1.2 Subjectivity in reporting
   1.2 Contrasting Coverage Example
       1.2.1 2020 US presidential election
       1.2.2 CNN News vs Fox News
   1.3 Social Media as a News Source
       1.3.1 Personalized recommendations
       1.3.2 Browsing history influence
   1.4 Personal Experience Example
       1.4.1 Jack, table tennis enthusiast
       1.4.2 TikTok for staying updated on competitions

Display title: 9 关键词

| Word           | Phonetic Symbol | Part of Speech | English definition                                  | Simplified Chinese translation | Sample sentence                                                                 |
|----------------|-----------------|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| subjective     | /səbˈdʒɛktɪv/    | adjective      | based on personal feelings, tastes, or opinions     | 主观的                          | The coverage of the event was highly subjective and biased towards one side      |
| contrasting    | /ˈkɒntrɑːstɪŋ/   | adjective      | strikingly different; showing a great difference    | 对比鲜明的                      | The contrasting opinions of the two news channels led to confusion among viewers |
| personalized   |/ˈpɜrsənəlaɪzd/   | adjective      |/made or done specially for a particular person      |/个性化的                        |/The personalized recommendations on social media helped me find relevant news    |
| preferences    |/prɪˈfɛrəns/      | noun           |/a greater liking for one alternative over another  |/偏好                            |/Social media platforms consider user preferences when curating content           |
| browsing       |/ˈbraʊzɪŋ/        | verb           |/to look through or glance at casually              |/浏览                            |/The platform analyzed my browsing history to suggest news articles               |
| enthusiast     |/ɪnˈθuziæst/      | noun           |/a person who is highly interested in a particular activity or subject  |/爱好者                          |/Jack is an avid table tennis enthusiast who follows the sport closely            |
| consistently   |/kənˈsɪstəntli/   | adverb         |/in a way that does not vary; constantly            |/始终如一地                        |/The platform consistently provided him with table tennis-related content         |
| curate         | /ˈkjʊreɪt/       | verb           | to select, organize, and present                   | 策划,组织                       | The social media platform curated content based on my interests                  |
| competitions   | /kɒmpəˈtɪʃənz/   | noun           | events in which people compete against each other  | 比赛                             | Jack stays updated on recent table tennis competitions through TikTok            |

Section Title: 6 Article Revision

While it is true that TV news undergoes fact-checking and editing, it cannot be denied that some reports can be highly subjective, potentially leading audiences to form misguided judgments. For instance, the contrasting coverage of the 2020 US presidential election by CNN News and Fox News clearly demonstrated the influence of differing perspectives. In my opinion, social media serves as a superior news source due to its ability to provide personalized recommendations based on individual preferences and browsing history. Take my friend Jack, an avid table tennis enthusiast; he frequently stays updated on recent competitions through TikTok. Consequently, the platform consistently curates content related to table tennis for him daily.

Academic Discussion 채점 방식

TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제는 ETS 공식 채점 기준에 따라 평가됩니다. AI 평가는 여러 측면에서 각 답안을 분석합니다.

관련성 및 기여도

답안이 질문에 답하고 토론에 의미 있게 기여하는가?

언어 사용

문법 정확성, 어휘 범위, 문장 구조의 질.

전개 및 근거

구체적인 예시와 명확한 논리로 아이디어가 잘 전개되었는가?

답안에서 나타나는 공통 패턴

이 과제에 대한 사용자 제출 답안을 분석한 결과, 학생 답안에서 관찰된 공통 패턴은 다음과 같습니다.

많은 학생이 명확한 의견을 제시하지만 구체적인 뒷받침 예시가 부족합니다.

높은 점수를 받은 답안은 리딩 지문과 다른 참여자의 의견을 직접 인용합니다.

점수가 높은 답안은 다양한 문장 구조와 학술적 어휘를 사용합니다.

시간 관리는 핵심 요소입니다 — 서두른 느낌을 주는 답안은 전개 항목에서 낮은 점수를 받는 경향이 있습니다.

학습 팁

1

글을 쓰기 전에 프롬프트를 꼼꼼히 읽고 질문의 모든 부분을 파악하세요.

2

답안에서 리딩 지문과 다른 학생들의 의견을 언급하세요.

3

핵심 주장을 뒷받침할 구체적인 예시를 사용하고, 일반적인 진술은 피하세요.

4

120~150단어를 목표로 하세요. 답안이 길다고 항상 좋은 것은 아니며, 명료함과 초점이 더 중요합니다.

5

시험 조건에서 유창하게 답하기 위해 시간을 정해(10분) 연습하세요.

자주 묻는 질문

TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제란 무엇인가요?
TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제는 온라인 수업 토론에 참여하는 것을 요구합니다. 교수의 질문과 다른 학생들의 답변을 읽은 후, 약 10분 안에 자신의 의견을 표현하고 뒷받침하는 글을 작성하게 됩니다.
Academic Discussion 과제는 어떻게 채점되나요?
이 과제는 토론과의 관련성, 언어 사용의 질(문법, 어휘, 문장 구조), 그리고 구체적인 예시와 근거를 통해 아이디어를 얼마나 잘 전개하고 뒷받침하는지를 기준으로 0~5점 척도로 채점됩니다.
이 페이지의 사용자 샘플은 무엇인가요?
LingoLeap에서 이 문제를 연습한 실제 TOEFL 응시자들이 제출한 답변입니다. 각 샘플은 저희 AI 채점 엔진에 의해 평가되었으며, 점수와 함께 강점 및 개선이 필요한 부분에 대한 상세한 피드백을 제공합니다.
AI 평가는 얼마나 정확한가요?
LingoLeap의 AI 평가 엔진은 공식 ETS 채점 기준으로 학습되었으며, 실제 채점자의 점수와 비교하여 보정되었습니다. 완벽한 자동 채점 시스템은 없지만, 연습 목적으로 신뢰할 수 있는 피드백을 제공하며 구체적인 개선 영역을 파악하는 데 도움이 됩니다.
이 Academic Discussion 과제를 어떻게 연습할 수 있나요?
무료 LingoLeap 계정에 가입하여 연습할 수 있습니다. 바로 이 질문에 대한 답변을 직접 작성하여 제출하면, 글쓰기에 대한 상세한 피드백과 함께 즉시 AI 평가를 받을 수 있습니다.
Academic Discussion 답변은 얼마나 길게 써야 하나요?
120~150단어를 목표로 하세요. 이 과제는 답변을 작성할 10분의 시간을 제공합니다. 더 긴 답변을 쓰기보다는 명확성, 구체적인 예시로 의견을 뒷받침하는 것, 토론 맥락을 참조하는 것에 집중하세요.

Rooting for Your Goal Score Today!

With LingoLeap, an expert in English exams

Get to Your Dream Score Faster

Try for free now