TOEFLIELTS
Deutsch
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on social media. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

Echte Nutzereinsendungen mit KI-gestützter Bewertung und Feedback

1 nutzereingereichte Beispiele verfügbar

Kostenlos üben starten

Aufgabenübersicht

Professor

Today's topic is an important one, as social media has undoubtedly had a significant impact on the way we consume and engage with news and information. With the abundance of content available on social media platforms, the question arises: is social media replacing the need for TV news?

Student A

I don't think social media can replace TV news. There is too much fake news on social media, making it hard to trust as a reliable source of information. TV news is typically more fact-checked and edited, which ensures greater accuracy. While TV news may not be perfect, I believe it's still an important and necessary source of information for many people.

Student B

In my opinion, social media is likely to replace TV news as the primary source of news for many people in the future. One of the main reasons for this shift is the speed at which news can be disseminated on social media platforms. In contrast to traditional TV news, which is often bound by strict schedules and broadcast times, social media allows users to access news and information in real-time. So breaking news and events are often reported first on social media, making it a go-to source for those seeking up-to-date information.

Nutzerbeispiele & Bewertungsergebnisse

1

Nutzerbeispiel #1

Admittedly, TV news is fact-checked and edited, but it is a fact that some TV reports are too subjective, which misleads the audiences to make the rig...

Punktzahl
25

Nutzerbeispiel

Admittedly, TV news is fact-checked and edited, but it is a fact that some TV reports are too subjective, which misleads the audiences to make the right judgment. I have seen a completely different results of the 2020 US presidential election by CNN News and Fox News, which is definitely due to the subjectivity of different programs. In my view, social media is a better news source, because it allows us to feed personalized recommendations depending on our searching preference and browsing history. For example, my friend Jack is a big fan of table tennis and he spends a lot of time keeping informed of the recent table tennis competitions on TikTok, so the application continuously recommends contents about table tennis to him every day.

Bewertungsergebnis

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0

  • Language Use and Grammar: 4.0

2. 预估分数

25. 3 任务完成度

整体来说,你的文章回答了教授的问题,并表达了自己的观点。但是,为了更好地完成任务,你可以尝试以下几点改进:

  1. 更具体地解释为什么社交媒体是一个更好的新闻来源,例如提供更多关于社交媒体如何帮助用户获取实时信息的细节。

  2. 在讨论中加入一些对学生A和学生B观点的回应,以便更好地参与讨论。

示例1(改进): In my view, social media is a better news source because it allows us to access real-time information, which is crucial during emergencies or rapidly changing situations. For example, during natural disasters, people can receive instant updates on their smartphones through social media platforms.

示例2(改进): While I agree with Student A that TV news is more fact-checked, I believe that the speed and convenience of social media outweigh this advantage. As Student B mentioned, breaking news often appears first on social media platforms, allowing users to stay informed even when they are away from their TVs.

4. 文章结构与组织

文章的结构和组织方面表现良好,但仍有改进空间。以下是一些建议:

  1. 在开头部分简要介绍你将要讨论的观点,以便读者更好地了解文章的结构。

  2. 在正文部分使用更明确的过渡词或短语,以便读者更容易理解你的观点。

示例1(改进): In this post, I will argue that social media is a better news source than TV news due to its personalized recommendations and real-time updates.

示例2(改进): Furthermore, social media platforms offer a more diverse range of perspectives compared to traditional TV news, which may be biased towards certain viewpoints.

5. 语法批改

Admittedly, TV news is fact-checked and edited, but it is a fact that some TV reports are too subjective, which misleads the audiences to make the right judgment. I have seen a completely different results of the 2020 US presidential election by CNN News and Fox News, which is definitely due to the subjectivity of different programs. In my view, social media is a better news source, because it allows us to feed personalized (Two consecutive spaces)recommendations depending on our searching preference and browsing history. For example, my friend Jack is a big fan of table tennis and, and(comma between independent clauses) he spends a lot of time keeping informed of the recent table tennis competitions on TikTok, so the application continuously recommends contents about table tennis to him every day.

Section Title: 6 Article Revision

While it is true that TV news undergoes fact-checking and editing, it cannot be denied that some reports can be highly subjective, potentially leading audiences to form misguided judgments. For instance, the contrasting coverage of the 2020 US presidential election by CNN News and Fox News clearly demonstrated the influence of differing perspectives. In my opinion, social media serves as a superior news source due to its ability to provide personalized recommendations based on individual preferences and browsing history. Take my friend Jack, an avid table tennis enthusiast; he frequently stays updated on recent competitions through TikTok. Consequently, the platform consistently curates content related to table tennis for him daily. (115 words)

Admittedly, While it is true that TV news is fact-checked undergoes fact-checking and edited, but editing (reason: clarifying the original point), it is a fact cannot be denied that some TV reports are too subjective, which misleads can be highly subjective (reason: stronger phrasing to emphasize the issue), potentially leading audiences to make form misguided judgments (reason: clearer explanation of the right judgment. I have seen a completely different results problem). For instance, the contrasting coverage of the 2020 US presidential election by CNN News and Fox News, which is definitely News clearly demonstrated the influence of differing perspectives (reason: providing a specific example to support the argument). In my opinion, social media serves as a superior news source due to the subjectivity of different programs. In my view, social media is a better news source, because it allows us its ability to feed personalized provide personalized recommendations depending based on our searching preference individual preferences and browsing history. For example, history (reason: stating a clear reason for preferring social media). Take my friend Jack is a big fan of Jack, an avid table tennis and enthusiast; he spends a lot of time keeping informed of frequently stays updated on recent competitions through TikTok (reason: introducing an example with more context). Consequently, the recent platform consistently curates content related to table tennis competitions on TikTok, so for him daily (reason: connecting the application continuously recommends contents example back to the main point about table tennis to him every day.personalized recommendations).

Display title: 8 思维导图


1. Essay Structure
   1.1 Introduction
       1.1.1 TV news fact-checking and editing
       1.1.2 Subjectivity in reporting
   1.2 Contrasting Coverage Example
       1.2.1 2020 US presidential election
       1.2.2 CNN News vs Fox News
   1.3 Social Media as a News Source
       1.3.1 Personalized recommendations
       1.3.2 Browsing history influence
   1.4 Personal Experience Example
       1.4.1 Jack, table tennis enthusiast
       1.4.2 TikTok for staying updated on competitions

Display title: 9 关键词

| Word           | Phonetic Symbol | Part of Speech | English definition                                  | Simplified Chinese translation | Sample sentence                                                                 |
|----------------|-----------------|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| subjective     | /səbˈdʒɛktɪv/    | adjective      | based on personal feelings, tastes, or opinions     | 主观的                          | The coverage of the event was highly subjective and biased towards one side      |
| contrasting    | /ˈkɒntrɑːstɪŋ/   | adjective      | strikingly different; showing a great difference    | 对比鲜明的                      | The contrasting opinions of the two news channels led to confusion among viewers |
| personalized   |/ˈpɜrsənəlaɪzd/   | adjective      |/made or done specially for a particular person      |/个性化的                        |/The personalized recommendations on social media helped me find relevant news    |
| preferences    |/prɪˈfɛrəns/      | noun           |/a greater liking for one alternative over another  |/偏好                            |/Social media platforms consider user preferences when curating content           |
| browsing       |/ˈbraʊzɪŋ/        | verb           |/to look through or glance at casually              |/浏览                            |/The platform analyzed my browsing history to suggest news articles               |
| enthusiast     |/ɪnˈθuziæst/      | noun           |/a person who is highly interested in a particular activity or subject  |/爱好者                          |/Jack is an avid table tennis enthusiast who follows the sport closely            |
| consistently   |/kənˈsɪstəntli/   | adverb         |/in a way that does not vary; constantly            |/始终如一地                        |/The platform consistently provided him with table tennis-related content         |
| curate         | /ˈkjʊreɪt/       | verb           | to select, organize, and present                   | 策划,组织                       | The social media platform curated content based on my interests                  |
| competitions   | /kɒmpəˈtɪʃənz/   | noun           | events in which people compete against each other  | 比赛                             | Jack stays updated on recent table tennis competitions through TikTok            |

Section Title: 6 Article Revision

While it is true that TV news undergoes fact-checking and editing, it cannot be denied that some reports can be highly subjective, potentially leading audiences to form misguided judgments. For instance, the contrasting coverage of the 2020 US presidential election by CNN News and Fox News clearly demonstrated the influence of differing perspectives. In my opinion, social media serves as a superior news source due to its ability to provide personalized recommendations based on individual preferences and browsing history. Take my friend Jack, an avid table tennis enthusiast; he frequently stays updated on recent competitions through TikTok. Consequently, the platform consistently curates content related to table tennis for him daily.

Wie die Academic Discussion bewertet wird

Die TOEFL Academic Discussion-Aufgabe wird anhand des offiziellen ETS-Bewertungsrasters bewertet. Die KI-Bewertung analysiert jede Antwort anhand mehrerer Dimensionen.

Relevanz & Beitrag

Geht die Antwort auf die Frage ein und leistet sie einen sinnvollen Beitrag zur Diskussion?

Sprachgebrauch

Grammatikalische Genauigkeit, Wortschatzbreite und Qualität des Satzbaus.

Ausarbeitung & Begründung

Sind die Ideen mit konkreten Beispielen und klarer Argumentation gut ausgearbeitet?

Häufige Muster in den Antworten

Basierend auf der Analyse von Nutzereinsendungen zu dieser Aufgabe sind hier häufige Muster in den Antworten der Lernenden.

Viele Lernende äußern eine klare Meinung, liefern aber keine konkreten Beispiele zur Unterstützung.

Starke Antworten beziehen sich direkt auf den Lesetext und die Standpunkte der anderen Sprecher.

Höher bewertete Antworten nutzen abwechslungsreiche Satzstrukturen und akademischen Wortschatz.

Zeitmanagement ist entscheidend – wirkt eine Antwort gehetzt, fällt die Bewertung der Ausarbeitung meist niedriger aus.

Lerntipps

1

Lies die Aufgabenstellung sorgfältig und erfasse alle Teile der Frage, bevor du zu schreiben beginnst.

2

Beziehe dich in deiner Antwort auf den Lesetext und die Meinungen der anderen Studierenden.

3

Nutze konkrete Beispiele, um deinen Hauptpunkt zu untermauern – vermeide allgemeine Aussagen.

4

Ziele auf 120–150 Wörter. Längere Antworten sind nicht automatisch besser; Klarheit und Fokus zählen mehr.

5

Übe zeitlich begrenzte Antworten (10 Minuten), um unter Prüfungsbedingungen Sicherheit zu gewinnen.

Häufig gestellte Fragen

Was ist die TOEFL Academic Discussion-Aufgabe?
Bei der TOEFL Academic Discussion-Aufgabe musst du dich an einer Online-Klassendiskussion beteiligen. Du liest die Frage eines Professors sowie die Antworten anderer Studierender und schreibst dann in etwa 10 Minuten deinen eigenen Beitrag, in dem du deine Meinung äußerst und begründest.
Wie wird die Academic Discussion-Aufgabe bewertet?
Die Aufgabe wird auf einer Skala von 0 bis 5 bewertet, basierend auf der Relevanz für die Diskussion, der Qualität der Sprachverwendung (Grammatik, Wortschatz, Satzbau) und wie gut du deine Ideen mit konkreten Beispielen und Argumenten entwickelst und stützt.
Was sind die Nutzerbeispiele auf dieser Seite?
Dies sind echte Antworten, die von TOEFL-Prüflingen eingereicht wurden, die diese Frage auf LingoLeap geübt haben. Jedes Beispiel wurde von unserer KI-Bewertungs-Engine ausgewertet, die eine Punktzahl sowie detailliertes Feedback zu Stärken und Verbesserungsbereichen liefert.
Wie genau ist die KI-Bewertung?
Die KI-Bewertungs-Engine von LingoLeap wurde anhand offizieller ETS-Bewertungskriterien trainiert und anhand menschlicher Prüferbewertungen kalibriert. Kein automatisiertes System ist perfekt, aber sie liefert zuverlässiges Feedback zu Übungszwecken und hilft dabei, konkrete Verbesserungsbereiche zu erkennen.
Wie kann ich diese Academic Discussion-Aufgabe üben?
Du kannst üben, indem du dich für ein kostenloses LingoLeap-Konto anmeldest. Schreibe deine eigene Antwort auf genau diese Frage, reiche sie ein und erhalte sofortiges KI-Feedback mit detaillierten Anmerkungen zu deinem Text.
Wie lang sollte meine Academic Discussion-Antwort sein?
Strebe 120–150 Wörter an. Für die Aufgabe hast du 10 Minuten Zeit. Konzentriere dich auf Klarheit, stütze deine Meinung mit konkreten Beispielen und beziehe dich auf den Diskussionskontext, anstatt eine längere Antwort zu schreiben.

Erreich deinen Wunsch-Score – wir sind an deiner Seite!

Mit LingoLeap, deinem Experten für TOEFL und andere Englischprüfungen

Schneller zu deinem Traumscore

Jetzt kostenlos ausprobieren