TOEFLIELTS
Italiano
☰
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on Business. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

Risposte reali degli utenti con valutazione e feedback basati sull'IA

102 esempi inviati dagli utenti disponibili

Inizia la Pratica Gratuita

Panoramica dell'Esercizio

Professor

This week in class we are learning about different methods of advertising and their effectiveness. One advertising strategy that companies often use is to ask celebrities, famous entertainers or sports figures to promote their products. However some experts believe that it is more effective to have ordinary people talk about the product. Which of these two advertising strategies do you think is better?

Paul

I like the "ordinary people" approach. People are more interested in a product when they see people like themselves using the product. I think this is even true for clothing advertisements, which traditionally use famous models. People get a better idea of whether they like the clothes when they sell kinds of different people wearing them, and not just models

Claire

I think the use of celebrities is really effective. The first thing an advertisement must do is grab viewers' attention. When a famous actor or sports figure appears in your advertisement, viewers first notice the celebrity, "what's this? I really like that person." they think. Then, once you have the viewers, you can provide information about your product.

Esempi degli Utenti e Risultati della Valutazione

Practise TOEFL writing questions like this one →

Opens the writing question list in the LingoLeap app, not this exact question. Practising needs a free account. AI scoring uses credits, except 3 free scores a day on Practice Test 1 (PQ26-1) questions.

1

Esempio Utente #1

I’m inclined to agree with Paul’s perspective. I believe that the ordinary people’s real feedback will be more attractive than celebrities. This is du...

Punteggio
25

Esempio Utente

I’m inclined to agree with Paul’s perspective. I believe that the ordinary people’s real feedback will be more attractive than celebrities. This is due to the ordinary individuals always indicates that they have consumed and actually used this product, so their feedback seems like more reliable. For instance, I usually ask my friends for the recommadtion of food, not only for they know my taste but also they must have tried it before. Potentially I trust them and think their recommendation is reliable. Although Claire argues that celebrities’ advertisement will be more effective, I still believe the recommodation by ordinary people will be more easily to accept. Such as in the social media, there are many ordinary look people become influencers,people will trust them and buy the product they recommond. But for the celebrities, eveybody knows they are paid to make this advertisement. In conclusion, ordinary people advertisment is more effictivly.

Risultato della Valutazione

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0

  • Language Use and Grammar: 3.5

2. 预估分数

25. 3 任务完成度

这篇文章在回答问题方面做得很好,表达了对普通人广告的支持,并给出了一些例子。但是,有一些建议可以帮助改进文章。首先,在提供观点时,可以尝试使用更具说服力的论据。其次,注意避免使用不准确或不清楚的表达方式。最后,请务必检查并改正语法错误。

示例1:将 "Potentially I trust them and think their recommendation is reliable." 改为 "I trust their recommendations because they have personal experience with the product." 示例2:将 "ordinary people advertisment is more effictivly." 改为 "advertisements featuring ordinary people are more effective."

4. 文章结构与组织

整体而言,文章结构清晰,包括引言、正文和结论。然而,在组织方面还有一些改进空间。首先,在引言部分可以更明确地陈述自己的观点。其次,在正文部分尝试使用主题句来引导每段的主要观点,并在段落中提供更多支持细节。最后,请注意在段落之间使用过渡词或短语,以便更好地连接各个观点。

示例1:在引言中明确表达观点,例如 "In my opinion, using ordinary people in advertisements is a more effective strategy than using celebrities." 示例2:在正文段落中使用主题句,如 "One reason why ordinary people are more effective in advertisements is that they provide relatable and trustworthy recommendations."

5. 语法批改

I’m inclined to agree with Paul’s perspective. I believe that the ordinary people’s real feedback will be more attractive than celebrities. This is due to the ordinary individuals always indicates that they have consumed and actually used this product, so their feedback seems like more reliable. For instance, I usually ask my friends for the recommadtionrecommendation(misspelling) of food, not only for they (Two consecutive spaces)know my taste but, but(comma between independent clauses) also they must have tried it before. PotentiallyPotentially,(This rule identifies whether commas are missing in a sentence.) I trust them and think their recommendation is reliable. Although Claire argues that celebrities’ advertisement will be more effective, I still believe the recommodationaccommodation(misspelling) by ordinary people will be more easily to accept. Such as in the social media, there are many ordinary look people become influencers,people, people(Use of whitespace before comma and before/after parentheses) will trust them and buy the product they recommondrecommend(misspelling). But for the celebrities, eveybodyeverybody(misspelling) knows they are paid to make this advertisement. In conclusion, ordinary people advertismentadvertisement(misspelling) is more effictivlyeffectively(misspelling).

Title: 6 文章修订

I concur with Paul's viewpoint that utilizing ordinary people in advertising campaigns can be more effective than relying on celebrities. The authenticity of real-life experiences and feedback from everyday individuals resonates with potential consumers, as it implies that the product has been genuinely tried and tested. For example, I often seek recommendations for food from my friends, not only because they understand my preferences but also because they have personally experienced the product. Consequently, I find their suggestions to be trustworthy and reliable.

While Claire contends that celebrity endorsements capture the audience's attention more effectively, I maintain that recommendations from ordinary people are easier to accept and relate to. In today's social media landscape, numerous everyday individuals have become influencers, gaining the trust of their followers who are more likely to purchase products they endorse. Conversely, it is common knowledge that celebrities are often paid to promote products, which may cast doubt on the sincerity of their endorsements.

In essence, advertisements featuring ordinary people can prove to be more impactful due to their relatability and perceived authenticity compared to celebrity-driven campaigns. (184 words)

I’m I concur with Paul's viewpoint (Changed "I'm inclined to agree with Paul’s perspective. I believe that the ordinary people’s real Paul's perspective" to "I concur with Paul's viewpoint" for a more natural tone) that utilizing ordinary people in advertising campaigns can be more effective than relying on celebrities. The authenticity of real-life experiences and feedback will be more attractive than celebrities. This from everyday individuals resonates with potential consumers, as it implies that the product has been genuinely tried and tested (Rephrased "This is due to the ordinary individuals always indicates that they have consumed and actually used this product, so their feedback seems like more reliable. reliable" for clarity). For instance, I usually ask example, I often seek recommendations for food from my friends for the recommadtion of food, friends, not only for they know because they understand my taste preferences but also because they must have tried it before. Potentially I trust them and think their recommendation is personally experienced the product (Corrected "recommadtion" to "recommendations" and rephrased the sentence for clarity). Consequently, I find their suggestions to be trustworthy and reliable.

Although While Claire contends that celebrity endorsements capture the audience's attention more effectively, I maintain that recommendations from ordinary people are easier to accept and relate to (Rephrased "Although Claire argues that celebrities’ advertisement will be more effective, I still believe the recommodation by ordinary people will be more easily to accept. Such as in the accept" for a smoother flow). In today's social media, there media landscape, numerous everyday individuals have become influencers, gaining the trust of their followers who are many ordinary look people become influencers,people will trust them and buy the product more likely to purchase products they recommond. But for the celebrities, eveybody knows they endorse (Corrected "recommond" to "endorse" and rephrased the sentence for clarity). Conversely, it is common knowledge that celebrities are often paid to make this advertisement. promote products, which may cast doubt on the sincerity of their endorsements.

In conclusion, essence, advertisements featuring ordinary people advertisment is more effictivly.can prove to be more impactful due to their relatability and perceived authenticity compared to celebrity-driven campaigns (Corrected "effictivly" to "impactful" and rephrased the conclusion for a stronger ending).

Title: 8 思维导图


1. Introduction
   - Paul's viewpoint
   - Ordinary people vs. celebrities in advertising

2. Authenticity
   - Real-life experiences and feedback
   - Genuinely tried and tested products

3. Personal Recommendations
   - Trustworthiness and reliability
   - Friends' suggestions

4. Relatability
   - Easier to accept and relate to ordinary people's recommendations

5. Social Media Influencers
   - Everyday individuals gaining trust of followers

6. Celebrity Endorsements
   - Paid promotions and sincerity doubts

7. Impactfulness
   - Ordinary people advertisements more impactful

8. Conclusion
   - Relatability and authenticity of ordinary people in advertising campaigns 

Title: 9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
concur/kənˈkɜr/verbagree; be of the same opinion同意I concur with Paul's viewpoint on using ordinary people in advertising campaigns.
authenticity/ɔːθenˈtɪsəti/nounthe quality of being genuine or true真实性The authenticity of real-life experiences resonates with potential consumers.
recommendations/ˌrekəmenˈdeɪʃənz/nounsuggestions or proposals as to the best course of action推荐I often seek recommendations for food from my friends.
trustworthy_ /ˈtrʌstwɜrði/adjectiveable to be relied on as honest or truthful值得信赖的I find their suggestions to be trustworthy and reliable.
endorsements_ /ɪnˈdɔrsmənts/nounan act of giving one's public approval or support to someone or something背书Claire contends that celebrity endorsements capture the audience's attention more effectively.
influencers_ /ˈɪnfluənsərz/nouna person who is able to influence potential buyers of a product or service by promoting it影响者In today's social media landscape, numerous everyday individuals have become influencers.
sincerity_ /sɪnˈserəti/nounthe quality of being free from pretense, deceit, or hypocrisy真诚The sincerity of celebrity endorsements may be doubted due to paid promotions.
impactful_ /ˈɪmpæktfəl/adjectivehaving a major impact or effect有影响力的Advertisements featuring ordinary people can prove to be more impactful.
relatability_ /rɪˌleɪtəˈbɪləti/nounthe ability to identify with, understand, and feel sympathy for someone or something可理解性Ordinary people in advertisements have higher relatability compared to celebrities.
Practise TOEFL writing questions like this one →

Opens the writing question list in the LingoLeap app, not this exact question. Practising needs a free account. AI scoring uses credits, except 3 free scores a day on Practice Test 1 (PQ26-1) questions.

Come Viene Valutata l'Academic Discussion

L'esercizio TOEFL Academic Discussion viene valutato in base alla griglia di valutazione ufficiale ETS. La valutazione IA analizza ogni risposta secondo più dimensioni.

Pertinenza e Contributo

La risposta affronta la domanda e contribuisce in modo significativo alla discussione?

Uso della Lingua

Correttezza grammaticale, varietà lessicale e qualità della struttura delle frasi.

Sviluppo e Argomentazione

Le idee sono ben sviluppate con esempi specifici e un ragionamento chiaro?

Schemi Comuni nelle Risposte

In base all'analisi delle risposte degli utenti per questo esercizio, ecco gli schemi comuni osservati nelle risposte degli studenti.

Molti studenti esprimono opinioni chiare ma mancano di esempi specifici a supporto.

Le risposte migliori fanno riferimento diretto al testo di lettura e ai punti di vista degli altri partecipanti.

Le risposte con punteggi più alti usano strutture di frase variate e un lessico accademico.

La gestione del tempo è un fattore chiave — le risposte che sembrano affrettate tendono a ottenere un punteggio più basso nello sviluppo.

Consigli per lo Studio

1

Leggi attentamente la traccia e individua tutte le parti della domanda prima di scrivere.

2

Fai riferimento al testo di lettura e alle opinioni degli altri studenti nella tua risposta.

3

Usa esempi specifici per sostenere la tua idea principale — evita affermazioni generiche.

4

Punta a 120-150 parole. Le risposte più lunghe non sono sempre migliori; chiarezza e concentrazione contano di più.

5

Esercitati con risposte a tempo (10 minuti) per acquisire scioltezza nelle condizioni d'esame.

Domande frequenti

Che cos'è il task TOEFL Academic Discussion?
Il task TOEFL Academic Discussion richiede di contribuire a una discussione online in aula. Leggerai la domanda di un professore e le risposte di altri studenti, poi scriverai il tuo intervento esprimendo e sostenendo la tua opinione in circa 10 minuti.
Come viene valutato il task Academic Discussion?
Il task viene valutato su una scala da 0 a 5 in base alla pertinenza rispetto alla discussione, alla qualità dell'uso della lingua (grammatica, vocabolario, struttura delle frasi) e a quanto bene sviluppi e sostieni le tue idee con esempi specifici e argomentazioni.
Cosa sono gli esempi degli utenti in questa pagina?
Si tratta di risposte reali inviate da candidati TOEFL che si sono esercitati su questa domanda su LingoLeap. Ogni esempio è stato valutato dal nostro motore di valutazione basato sull'IA, che fornisce un punteggio e un feedback dettagliato su punti di forza e aree di miglioramento.
Quanto è accurata la valutazione dell'IA?
Il motore di valutazione IA di LingoLeap è addestrato sulle griglie di valutazione ufficiali ETS e calibrato rispetto ai punteggi di valutatori umani. Anche se nessun sistema automatico è perfetto, fornisce un feedback affidabile a scopo di esercitazione e aiuta a individuare aree specifiche di miglioramento.
Come posso esercitarmi su questo task Academic Discussion?
Puoi esercitarti registrando un account LingoLeap gratuito. Scrivi la tua risposta a questa esatta domanda, invia e ricevi una valutazione IA istantanea con feedback dettagliato sulla tua scrittura.
Quanto dovrebbe essere lunga la mia risposta Academic Discussion?
Punta a 120-150 parole. Il task ti dà 10 minuti per scrivere la risposta. Concentrati sulla chiarezza, sostieni la tua opinione con esempi specifici e fai riferimento al contesto della discussione invece di scrivere una risposta più lunga.

Raggiungi il Punteggio che Desideri!

Con LingoLeap, il tuo esperto nella preparazione agli esami di inglese

Ottieni il Punteggio dei Tuoi Sogni in Meno Tempo

Provalo gratis ora