TOEFLIELTS
한국어
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on environmental science. Write a post responding to the professor's question.

AI 기반 평가와 피드백이 포함된 실제 사용자 제출 답안

사용자 제출 예시 1개 이용 가능

무료 연습 시작하기

과제 개요

Professor

This week, we'll be discussing ways to address air pollution. One idea is introducing environmental taxes on air travel. Such taxes, also referred to as ecological taxes or green taxes, are extra charges that get added to the price of airplane tickets. Money collected from these taxes could be invested in environmentally friendly technologies or in promoting other, cleaner modes of transportation. Do you think there should be an environmental tax on air travel? Why or why not?

Andrew

We should impose environmental taxes on air travel, These taxes might encourage people to find cheaper, more eco- friendly ways to get places. In my country, many people use planes to fly a short distance because flights are relatively cheap, when they could just as easily take a less polluting form of transportation.

Claire

Additional taxes on air travel will do little to solve the problem of air pollution. Airplane tickets would become more expensive, punishing passengers without incentivizing airlines to become more environmentally friendly. The airlines should pay the price to protect the environment, not their customers.

사용자 예시 및 평가 결과

1

사용자 예시 #1

Both Andrew and Claire shed light on the practice of taxation on air travel, and I believe there should be an environmental tax on air travel. While i...

점수
28

사용자 예시

Both Andrew and Claire shed light on the practice of taxation on air travel, and I believe there should be an environmental tax on air travel. While it might increase the price which consumers need to pay, the benefits appear in other ways. First, for the airplane companies, the increased taxes on air can be put into invent new technologies and mechanics to reduce the air pollution, reducing the potential further costs for handling the problems brought by the pollution. What’s more, it is beneficial for the social public since it directly decreases the waste gas output, which might damage an individual's lung health. Furthermore, being aware of the significance of environmental protection, people play a crucial role in the protection. In this way, the air-travel taxes would act as a catalyst for this positive change.

평가 결과

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 5

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.5

  • Language Use and Grammar: 4.5

2. 预估分数

  • 28

3. 任务完成度

这篇文章在任务完成度方面表现良好,成功回答了教授的问题,并提出了自己的观点。然而,为了进一步提高文章质量,可以尝试在支持观点时给出更具体的例子和详细信息。此外,在讨论环保税收对航空公司和社会公众的影响时,可以更深入地探讨这些影响。

改进示例1:

  • 在讨论环保税收对航空公司的影响时,可以举例说明某些航空公司已经开始采用更环保的技术,并预测未来可能出现的技术发展趋势。

改进示例2:

  • 在讨论环保税收对社会公众的影响时,可以引用一些研究数据来证明空气污染对人们健康造成的危害,并解释为什么减少废气排放是必要的。

4. 文章结构与组织

文章结构清晰,包括引言、正文和结论。各段落都集中讨论了一个特定的观点,并提供了支持细节。然而,为了使文章更加流畅,可以在段落之间添加一些过渡词或短语。

改进建议1:

  • 在引言部分,可以使用过渡词汇如“首先”、“其次”等来引导读者进入正文部分。

改进建议2:

  • 在正文部分,当从一个观点转向另一个观点时,可以使用过渡词汇如“此外”、“然而”等来帮助读者更好地理解文章的逻辑结构。

5. 语法批改

Both Andrew and Claire shed light on the practice of taxation on air travel, and I believe there should be an environmental tax on air travel. While it might increase the price which consumers need to pay, the benefits appear in other ways. First, for the airplane companies, the increased taxes on air can be put into invent new technologies and mechanics to reduce the air pollution, reducing the potential further costs for handling the problems brought by the pollution. What’s more, it is beneficial for the social public since it directly decreases the waste gas output, which might damage an individual's lung health. Furthermore, being aware of the significance of environmental protection, people play a crucial role in the protection. In this way, the air-travel taxes would act as a catalyst for this positive change.

Title: 6 文章修订

Both Andrew and Claire present valid perspectives on the implementation of environmental taxes on air travel, and I am inclined to support the introduction of such taxes. Although this may result in higher costs for consumers, the advantages manifest in other areas. Primarily, the revenue generated from these taxes can be allocated towards the development of innovative technologies and mechanisms aimed at mitigating air pollution. This investment could potentially offset future expenses associated with addressing pollution-related issues. Additionally, imposing these taxes would benefit society as a whole by reducing harmful emissions that adversely impact individual health. Moreover, as public awareness of environmental conservation grows, individuals play an increasingly vital role in promoting sustainable practices. Consequently, environmental taxes on air travel could serve as a catalyst for fostering positive change within society. (134 words)

Both Andrew and Claire shed light present valid perspectives (revised for clarity and formality) on the practice implementation of taxation environmental taxes on air travel, and I believe there should be an environmental tax on air travel. While it might increase am inclined to support (revised for clarity and formality) the price which consumers need to pay, introduction of such taxes. Although this may result in higher costs for consumers, the benefits appear advantages manifest (revised for clarity) in other ways. First, areas. Primarily, the revenue generated from these taxes can be allocated towards (revised for clarity) the airplane companies, the increased development of innovative technologies and mechanisms aimed at mitigating air pollution. This investment could potentially offset future expenses associated with addressing pollution-related issues. Additionally, imposing these taxes would benefit society as a whole by reducing harmful emissions that adversely impact individual health (revised for clarity). Moreover, as public awareness of environmental conservation grows, individuals play an increasingly vital role (revised for clarity) in promoting sustainable practices. Consequently, environmental taxes on air can be put into invent new technologies and mechanics to reduce the air pollution, reducing the potential further costs for handling the problems brought by the pollution. What’s more, it is beneficial for the social public since it directly decreases the waste gas output, which might damage an individual's lung health. Furthermore, being aware of the significance of environmental protection, people play a crucial role in the protection. In this way, the air-travel taxes would act travel could serve as a catalyst for this fostering positive change.change within society (revised for clarity).

Title: 8 思维导图


- Environmental taxes on air travel
    - Higher costs for consumers
    - Advantages
        - Revenue generation
            - Development of innovative technologies
            - Mitigating air pollution
        - Offset future expenses
            - Addressing pollution-related issues
        - Societal benefits
            - Reducing harmful emissions
            - Improved individual health
    - Public awareness of environmental conservation
        - Individuals promoting sustainable practices
    - Catalyst for positive change within society

Title: 9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
implementation/ɪmˌplɛmənˈteɪʃən/nounThe process of putting a decision or plan into effect; execution.实施The implementation of environmental taxes on air travel is a controversial issue.
allocate/ˈæləˌkeɪt/verbDistribute (resources or duties) for a particular purpose.分配The revenue generated from these taxes can be allocated towards the development of innovative technologies.
mitigation/mɪtɪˈgeɪʃən/nounThe action of reducing the severity, seriousness, or painfulness of something.减轻These mechanisms are aimed at mitigating air pollution.
offset/ˈoʊfˌsɛt/verb/noun The amount or distance by which something is out of line.抵消This investment could potentially offset future expenses associated with addressing pollution-related issues.
emissions/ɪˈmɪʃənz/nounThe production and discharge of something, especially gas or radiation.排放物Imposing these taxes would benefit society by reducing harmful emissions.
adversely/ædˈvɜrsli/adverbIn a way that prevents success or development; harmfully or unfavorably.不利地Harmful emissions adversely impact individual health.
conservation/ˌkɒnsərˈveɪʃən/nounThe action of conserving something, in particular, preservation, protection, or restoration of nature.保护Public awareness of environmental conservation is growing.
sustainable/səˈsteɪnəbəl/adjectiveCapable of being maintained at a steady level without exhausting natural resources or causing damage.可持续的Individuals play an increasingly vital role in promoting sustainable practices.
catalyst/ˈkætəlɪst/noun/noun A substance that increases the rate of a chemical reaction without itself undergoing any change.催化剂Environmental taxes on air travel could serve as a catalyst for fostering positive change within society.

Academic Discussion 채점 방식

TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제는 ETS 공식 채점 기준에 따라 평가됩니다. AI 평가는 여러 측면에서 각 답안을 분석합니다.

관련성 및 기여도

답안이 질문에 답하고 토론에 의미 있게 기여하는가?

언어 사용

문법 정확성, 어휘 범위, 문장 구조의 질.

전개 및 근거

구체적인 예시와 명확한 논리로 아이디어가 잘 전개되었는가?

답안에서 나타나는 공통 패턴

이 과제에 대한 사용자 제출 답안을 분석한 결과, 학생 답안에서 관찰된 공통 패턴은 다음과 같습니다.

많은 학생이 명확한 의견을 제시하지만 구체적인 뒷받침 예시가 부족합니다.

높은 점수를 받은 답안은 리딩 지문과 다른 참여자의 의견을 직접 인용합니다.

점수가 높은 답안은 다양한 문장 구조와 학술적 어휘를 사용합니다.

시간 관리는 핵심 요소입니다 — 서두른 느낌을 주는 답안은 전개 항목에서 낮은 점수를 받는 경향이 있습니다.

학습 팁

1

글을 쓰기 전에 프롬프트를 꼼꼼히 읽고 질문의 모든 부분을 파악하세요.

2

답안에서 리딩 지문과 다른 학생들의 의견을 언급하세요.

3

핵심 주장을 뒷받침할 구체적인 예시를 사용하고, 일반적인 진술은 피하세요.

4

120~150단어를 목표로 하세요. 답안이 길다고 항상 좋은 것은 아니며, 명료함과 초점이 더 중요합니다.

5

시험 조건에서 유창하게 답하기 위해 시간을 정해(10분) 연습하세요.

자주 묻는 질문

TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제란 무엇인가요?
TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제는 온라인 수업 토론에 참여하는 것을 요구합니다. 교수의 질문과 다른 학생들의 답변을 읽은 후, 약 10분 안에 자신의 의견을 표현하고 뒷받침하는 글을 작성하게 됩니다.
Academic Discussion 과제는 어떻게 채점되나요?
이 과제는 토론과의 관련성, 언어 사용의 질(문법, 어휘, 문장 구조), 그리고 구체적인 예시와 근거를 통해 아이디어를 얼마나 잘 전개하고 뒷받침하는지를 기준으로 0~5점 척도로 채점됩니다.
이 페이지의 사용자 샘플은 무엇인가요?
LingoLeap에서 이 문제를 연습한 실제 TOEFL 응시자들이 제출한 답변입니다. 각 샘플은 저희 AI 채점 엔진에 의해 평가되었으며, 점수와 함께 강점 및 개선이 필요한 부분에 대한 상세한 피드백을 제공합니다.
AI 평가는 얼마나 정확한가요?
LingoLeap의 AI 평가 엔진은 공식 ETS 채점 기준으로 학습되었으며, 실제 채점자의 점수와 비교하여 보정되었습니다. 완벽한 자동 채점 시스템은 없지만, 연습 목적으로 신뢰할 수 있는 피드백을 제공하며 구체적인 개선 영역을 파악하는 데 도움이 됩니다.
이 Academic Discussion 과제를 어떻게 연습할 수 있나요?
무료 LingoLeap 계정에 가입하여 연습할 수 있습니다. 바로 이 질문에 대한 답변을 직접 작성하여 제출하면, 글쓰기에 대한 상세한 피드백과 함께 즉시 AI 평가를 받을 수 있습니다.
Academic Discussion 답변은 얼마나 길게 써야 하나요?
120~150단어를 목표로 하세요. 이 과제는 답변을 작성할 10분의 시간을 제공합니다. 더 긴 답변을 쓰기보다는 명확성, 구체적인 예시로 의견을 뒷받침하는 것, 토론 맥락을 참조하는 것에 집중하세요.

Rooting for Your Goal Score Today!

With LingoLeap, an expert in English exams

Get to Your Dream Score Faster

Try for free now