TOEFLIELTS
Italiano
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on education. Write a post responding to the professor's question.

Risposte reali degli utenti con valutazione e feedback basati sull'IA

19 esempi inviati dagli utenti disponibili

Inizia la Pratica Gratuita

Panoramica dell'Esercizio

Professor

This week, we'll examine issues in education reform. For example, some educators think that by focusing mainly on foundational knowledge in subjects like reading, math, and science, schools are not fully preparing students for success in the workplace. These educators argue that soft skills-non-academic skills such as being empathetic or having a strong work ethic - should be part of the curriculum, with classroom time dedicated to developing these skills. Do you agree? Why or why not?

Student A

Soft skills are important, but I don't agree with using classroom time to work on them. I'm not sure how teachers would measure students' progress in developing these skills. If students' progress can't be measured on something being taught, l'm not sure if there's any point to teaching it.

Student B

I agree. While students need a strong foundation in academic subjects, soft skills are important because they affect how well students do their work. If classroom time is set aside for these skills, students will take them seriously and their academic work will benefit. Teachers could design lessons so that students learn about a skill and then do role-playing activities with classmates.

Esempi degli Utenti e Risultati della Valutazione

1

Esempio Utente #1

I agree with the argument that school courses should incorporate some soft skills like empathetic, responsibility and so on. Admittedly, the student A...

Punteggio
25

Esempio Utente

I agree with the argument that school courses should incorporate some soft skills like empathetic, responsibility and so on. Admittedly, the student A's concern regarding the measurement of these soft skills is valid to some extent. Nevertheless, I believe there are some effective methods that can reassure A' confuse. To be more specific, teachers can device a method to evaluate students behavior by a multi-aspect system. By using such a system, not only the teacher can give a scores to each students' behaviors, but also all the students can take part in this marking process, undoutedly ensure it's fairness. For instance, every students and teachers can own a paper that already printed every students name. If one student help another like help other students schoolwork or sent someone to hospital in a emergent situation, these student who provide aids can earn one point and writen down on the papers by other witnesses. Finally, all the points can be culculated by the teacher and then teacher will totall and deep understand what kinds of soft skills the student have learned now.

Risultato della Valutazione

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0

  • Language Use and Grammar: 3.5

2. 预估分数

25. 3 任务完成度

整体来说,这篇文章回答了教授的问题,并表达了对软技能在课堂中的重要性的看法。然而,文章在一些方面还有待改进。首先,在支持观点时,可以提供更多具体的例子和论据。其次,在语言使用和语法方面,需要注意避免错误和不清晰的表达。

改进建议示例:

  1. 在论述软技能对学生的重要性时,可以提供更多实际案例或研究结果来支持观点。 例如:根据一项研究,拥有良好沟通能力和团队协作精神的员工在职场中更容易获得成功。

  2. 修改语言错误和不清晰的表达。 例如:原文:“Finally, all the points can be culculated by the teacher and then teacher will totall and deep understand what kinds of soft skills the student have learned now.” 修改后:“Finally, the teacher can calculate all the points to gain a comprehensive understanding of the soft skills each student has acquired.”

4. 文章结构与组织

文章在结构上基本符合要求,包括引言、正文和结论。但在组织上,可以更加清晰地划分段落,每个段落专注于一个具体的观点,并提供相应的支持细节。此外,文章在段落之间的过渡也需要改进。

改进建议示例:

  1. 在正文部分,可以将不同的观点和论据分成不同的段落。 例如:第一个段落讨论软技能在教育中的重要性;第二个段落讨论如何评估和教授这些技能;第三个段落给出具体实施方案。

  2. 使用过渡词或短语来连接不同的观点和段落。 例如:在讨论如何评估软技能时,可以使用“Furthermore”或“In addition”来引入新的观点。

5. 语法批改

I agree with the argument that school courses should incorporate some soft skills like empathetic, responsibility and so on. Admittedly, the student A's concern regarding the measurement of these soft skills is valid to some extent. Nevertheless, I believe there are some effective methods that can reassure A'(Unpaired braces, brackets, quotation marks and similar symbols) confuse. To be more specific, teachers can devicedeice(missing verb after 'will/can/could/would') a method to evaluate students behavior by a multi-aspect system. By using such a system, not only the teacher can give a scoresa score(Agreement: 'a' + plural word) to each students' behaviors, but also all the students can take part in this marking process, undoutedlyundoubtedly(misspelling) ensure it'sits(its vs. it's) fairness. For instance, every studentsstudent('every/each' + SINGULAR) and teachers can own a paper that already printed every studentsstudent's(Possessive apostrophe error) name. If one student help another like help other students schoolwork or sent someone to (Two consecutive spaces)hospital in aan(Use of 'a' vs. 'an') emergent situation, these studentthis student('this' vs. 'these') who provide aids can earn one point and writenwritten(misspelling) down on the papers by other witnesses. Finally, all the points can be culculatedcalculated(misspelling) by the teacher and then teacher will totalltotal(misspelling) and deep understand what kinds of soft skills the student have learned now.

Title: 6 文章修订

I concur with the notion that educational curricula should encompass soft skills such as empathy, responsibility, and the like. While Student A raises a valid concern regarding the assessment of these intangible abilities, I maintain that there are viable methods to address this issue. Specifically, educators can employ a multi-faceted evaluation system that involves both teachers and students in assessing one another's behavior. This collaborative approach not only allows for a fair and comprehensive assessment but also encourages active participation from all parties.

For example, each student and teacher could be provided with a document listing every student's name. When an individual demonstrates a soft skill—such as assisting with schoolwork or responding to an emergency situation—witnesses can award points by noting it on the document. Ultimately, the educator can tally these points to gain insight into the development of each student's soft skills. This method not only measures progress but also fosters a supportive learning environment where students recognize and appreciate one another's growth in both academic and non-academic areas. (173 words)

I agree with the argument concur with the notion [changed "agree with the argument" to "concur with the notion" for a more natural tone] that school courses educational curricula should incorporate some encompass [changed "incorporate" to "encompass" for better word choice] soft skills like empathetic, responsibility and so on. Admittedly, the student A's such as empathy, responsibility, and the like. While Student A raises a valid concern regarding the measurement assessment of these intangible abilities [rephrased for clarity], I maintain that there are viable methods to address this issue. Specifically, educators can employ a multi-faceted evaluation system [rephrased for clarity] that involves both teachers and students in assessing one another's behavior. This collaborative approach not only allows for a fair and comprehensive assessment but also encourages active participation from all parties.

For example, each student and teacher could be provided with a document listing every student's name. When an individual demonstrates a soft skill—such as assisting with schoolwork or responding to an emergency situation—witnesses can award points by noting it on the document. Ultimately, the educator can tally these points to gain insight into the development of each student's soft skills is valid to some extent. Nevertheless, I believe there are some effective methods that can reassure A' confuse. To be more specific, teachers can device a [rephrased for clarity]. This method to evaluate students behavior by a multi-aspect system. By using such a system, not only the teacher can give a scores to each students' behaviors, measures progress but also all the fosters a supportive learning environment where students can take part recognize and appreciate one another's growth in this marking process, undoutedly ensure it's fairness. For instance, every students and teachers can own a paper that already printed every students name. If one student help another like help other students schoolwork or sent someone to hospital in a emergent situation, these student who provide aids can earn one point and writen down on the papers by other witnesses. Finally, all the points can be culculated by the teacher and then teacher will totall and deep understand what kinds of soft skills the student have learned now.both academic and non-academic areas [added context for better understanding].

8 思维导图


- Educational curricula
    - Soft skills
        - Empathy
        - Responsibility
    - Assessment concerns
        - Intangible abilities
    - Multi-faceted evaluation system
        - Teacher involvement
        - Student involvement
    - Collaborative approach
        - Fair assessment
        - Comprehensive assessment
        - Active participation
    - Example: point-based system
        - Document listing students' names
        - Awarding points for soft skill demonstration
            - Assisting with schoolwork 
            - Responding to emergencies 
    - Benefits of the method 
        - Measuring progress 
        - Fostering supportive learning environment 

9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish definitionSimplified Chinese translationSample sentences
curriculum/kəˈrɪkjʊləm/nounthe subjects comprising a course of study课程The school's curriculum includes both academic and non-academic subjects.
empathy/ˈɛmpəθi/nounthe ability to understand and share others' feelings同理心Empathy is an important soft skill that helps people connect with one another.
responsibility/rɪˌspɒnsəˈbɪlɪti/nounthe state or fact of having a duty to deal with something责任Students should learn responsibility in order to become successful adults.
intangible/ɪnˈtændʒəb(ə)l/adjectiveunable to be touched or grasped; not having physical presence无形的Assessing intangible abilities like soft skills can be challenging for educators.
evaluation/ɪˌvæljʊˈeɪʃ(ə)n/nounthe making of a judgment about the amount, number, or value of something评估The evaluation system should include both academic and non-academic aspects.
collaborative/kəˈlabərətɪv/adjectiveproduced or conducted by two or more parties working together合作的A collaborative approach to assessment can help ensure fairness and accuracy.
comprehensive/ˌkɒmprɪˈhensɪv/adjectivecomplete; including all or nearly all elements or aspects of something全面的The comprehensive assessment should cover both academic and soft skills.
foster/ˈfɒstər/verbencourage or promote the development of (something, typically something regarded as good)培养The school aims to foster a supportive learning environment for all students.
supportive/səˈpɔrtɪv/introduction noun an encouraging and helpful environment 助益的,支持的 A supportive learning environment is essential for students' growth and development.

Come Viene Valutata l'Academic Discussion

L'esercizio TOEFL Academic Discussion viene valutato in base alla griglia di valutazione ufficiale ETS. La valutazione IA analizza ogni risposta secondo più dimensioni.

Pertinenza e Contributo

La risposta affronta la domanda e contribuisce in modo significativo alla discussione?

Uso della Lingua

Correttezza grammaticale, varietà lessicale e qualità della struttura delle frasi.

Sviluppo e Argomentazione

Le idee sono ben sviluppate con esempi specifici e un ragionamento chiaro?

Schemi Comuni nelle Risposte

In base all'analisi delle risposte degli utenti per questo esercizio, ecco gli schemi comuni osservati nelle risposte degli studenti.

Molti studenti esprimono opinioni chiare ma mancano di esempi specifici a supporto.

Le risposte migliori fanno riferimento diretto al testo di lettura e ai punti di vista degli altri partecipanti.

Le risposte con punteggi più alti usano strutture di frase variate e un lessico accademico.

La gestione del tempo è un fattore chiave — le risposte che sembrano affrettate tendono a ottenere un punteggio più basso nello sviluppo.

Consigli per lo Studio

1

Leggi attentamente la traccia e individua tutte le parti della domanda prima di scrivere.

2

Fai riferimento al testo di lettura e alle opinioni degli altri studenti nella tua risposta.

3

Usa esempi specifici per sostenere la tua idea principale — evita affermazioni generiche.

4

Punta a 120-150 parole. Le risposte più lunghe non sono sempre migliori; chiarezza e concentrazione contano di più.

5

Esercitati con risposte a tempo (10 minuti) per acquisire scioltezza nelle condizioni d'esame.

Domande frequenti

Che cos'è il task TOEFL Academic Discussion?
Il task TOEFL Academic Discussion richiede di contribuire a una discussione online in aula. Leggerai la domanda di un professore e le risposte di altri studenti, poi scriverai il tuo intervento esprimendo e sostenendo la tua opinione in circa 10 minuti.
Come viene valutato il task Academic Discussion?
Il task viene valutato su una scala da 0 a 5 in base alla pertinenza rispetto alla discussione, alla qualità dell'uso della lingua (grammatica, vocabolario, struttura delle frasi) e a quanto bene sviluppi e sostieni le tue idee con esempi specifici e argomentazioni.
Cosa sono gli esempi degli utenti in questa pagina?
Si tratta di risposte reali inviate da candidati TOEFL che si sono esercitati su questa domanda su LingoLeap. Ogni esempio è stato valutato dal nostro motore di valutazione basato sull'IA, che fornisce un punteggio e un feedback dettagliato su punti di forza e aree di miglioramento.
Quanto è accurata la valutazione dell'IA?
Il motore di valutazione IA di LingoLeap è addestrato sulle griglie di valutazione ufficiali ETS e calibrato rispetto ai punteggi di valutatori umani. Anche se nessun sistema automatico è perfetto, fornisce un feedback affidabile a scopo di esercitazione e aiuta a individuare aree specifiche di miglioramento.
Come posso esercitarmi su questo task Academic Discussion?
Puoi esercitarti registrando un account LingoLeap gratuito. Scrivi la tua risposta a questa esatta domanda, invia e ricevi una valutazione IA istantanea con feedback dettagliato sulla tua scrittura.
Quanto dovrebbe essere lunga la mia risposta Academic Discussion?
Punta a 120-150 parole. Il task ti dà 10 minuti per scrivere la risposta. Concentrati sulla chiarezza, sostieni la tua opinione con esempi specifici e fai riferimento al contesto della discussione invece di scrivere una risposta più lunga.

Raggiungi il Punteggio che Desideri!

Con LingoLeap, il tuo esperto nella preparazione agli esami di inglese

Ottieni il Punteggio dei Tuoi Sogni in Meno Tempo

Provalo gratis ora