TOEFLIELTS
Deutsch
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on governments’ strategies. Write a post responding to the professor’s question. In your response you should: • express and support your opinion • make a contribution to the discussion An effective response will contain at least 100 words. You will have 10 minutes to write it.

Echte Nutzereinsendungen mit KI-gestützter Bewertung und Feedback

1 nutzereingereichte Beispiele verfügbar

Kostenlos üben starten

Aufgabenübersicht

Professor

Over the next few weeks , we ' ll begin discussing communication strategies in the workplace . These days there are many options for workplace communications . Sometimes people choose to communicate in writing through email or through messaging apps , while at other times they prefer talking to others face - to - face or by phone . What is the most important factor to consider when deciding whether to communicate in writing or by speaking in the workplace ? Why ?

Student A

I think privacy is the biggest factor in choosing to communicate in writing or speaking at work . If it ' s personal or confidential , it ' s better to email or message instead of talking out loud where everyone can hear. My dad always emails his boss private stuff rather than discussing it in the open office . Written communication lets you control who sees what you say.

Student B

I think the main factor in deciding to speak or write at work is how well you know someone . If you don ' t know a coworker that well , randomly showing up in their office to chat can interrupt their workflow . It ' s better to email new coworkers at first until you build more of a rapport . Once you ' re more familiar with each other , face - to - face talks are easier and less disruptive .

Nutzerbeispiele & Bewertungsergebnisse

1

Nutzerbeispiel #1

As Kelly and Andrew presented, privacy and how well you know someone are indeed two important factors in terms of choosing the medium of communication...

Punktzahl
27

Nutzerbeispiel

As Kelly and Andrew presented, privacy and how well you know someone are indeed two important factors in terms of choosing the medium of communication. However, considering that all kinds of communication strategies are all tools of work, I am inclined to take the efficiency of work as the most important factor. For instance, when planning marketing strategy, employees in one group have to meet together and communicate face-to-face so that different ideas can be proposed and modified quickly. While for those less complicated events, such as daily report, it may be more efficient for workers to just send it to their leader by e-mail or message. That will help save both the leader and the workers’ time. Therefore, I firmly believe that giving priority to improving work efficiency would be the most worthy of consideration when choosing communication strategies.

Bewertungsergebnis

1. 子项得分

Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 5 Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.5 Language Use and Grammar: 4.5

2. 预估分数

27. 3 任务完成度

这篇文章在任务完成度方面表现较好,有效地回应了教授的问题,并提出了自己的观点。但是,可以在论据方面进行一些改进,例如添加更多具体的例子来支持观点。此外,在文章中使用更多的连接词和短语也有助于提高连贯性。

示例1(英文): For instance, when planning marketing strategy, employees in one group have to meet together and communicate face-to-face so that different ideas can be proposed and modified quickly. In this case, a team working on a new product launch might benefit from brainstorming sessions where everyone can contribute their thoughts in real-time.

示例2(英文): While for those less complicated events, such as daily report, it may be more efficient for workers to just send it to their leader by e-mail or message. To improve the flow of the essay, you could add a transition phrase like "On the other hand" at the beginning of this sentence.

4. 文章结构与组织

文章结构和组织方面基本符合要求,包括引言、正文和结论。每个段落都集中讨论了一个特定的观点,并提供了支持细节。但是,在段落之间增加一些过渡词或短语可以使文章更加连贯。

建议1(简体中文): 在段落开头使用过渡词,如“然而”、“此外”等,可以使文章更加流畅。

示例1(英文): However, considering that all kinds of communication strategies are all tools of work, I am inclined to take the efficiency of work as the most important factor.

建议2(简体中文): 在正文部分,可以尝试使用对比或举例的方式来进一步阐述观点,使文章更具说服力。

示例2(英文): For example, when discussing a sensitive issue with a colleague, it might be more appropriate to have a private conversation rather than sending an email that could be easily forwarded or misunderstood.

5. 语法批改

As Kelly and Andrew presented, privacy and how well you know someone are indeed two important factors in terms of choosing the medium of communication. However, considering that all kinds of communication strategies are all tools of work, I am inclined to take the efficiency of work as the most important factor. For instance, when planning marketing strategy, employees in one group have to meet together and communicate face-to-face so that different ideas can be proposed and modified quickly. While for those less complicated events, such as daily report, it may be more efficient for workers to just send it to their leader by e-mail or message. That will help save both the leader and the workers’ time. Therefore, I firmly believe that giving priority to improving work efficiency would be the most worthy of consideration when choosing communication strategies.

Section Title: 6 Article Revision

In response to Kelly and Andrew's perspectives, privacy and familiarity with colleagues are indeed significant factors when determining the appropriate mode of communication. However, I believe that the efficiency of work should be considered as the most crucial factor in selecting communication strategies within the workplace. For example, when devising a marketing plan, team members must engage in face-to-face discussions to promptly propose and refine various ideas. Conversely, for less complex tasks such as daily reports, employees can efficiently submit these to their supervisors via email or messaging platforms, ultimately saving time for all parties involved. Consequently, prioritizing work efficiency should be at the forefront when deciding on communication methods in a professional setting. (119 words)

As In response to Kelly and Andrew presented, Andrew's perspectives (clarifying the context), privacy and how well you know someone familiarity with colleagues (rephrasing for clarity) are indeed two important significant factors in terms of choosing when determining the medium appropriate mode of communication. However, considering I believe that all kinds of communication strategies are all tools of work, I am inclined to take the efficiency of work (emphasizing the main argument) should be considered as the most important factor. crucial factor in selecting communication strategies within the workplace. For instance, example, when planning devising a marketing strategy, employees plan (providing a specific instance), team members must engage in one group have face-to-face discussions (clarifying the mode of communication) to meet together promptly propose and communicate face-to-face so that different ideas can be proposed and modified quickly. While refine various ideas. Conversely, for those less complicated events, complex tasks such as daily report, it may be more efficient for workers to just send it reports (introducing another example), employees can efficiently submit these to their leader by e-mail supervisors via email or message. That will help save both the leader and the workers’ time. Therefore, I firmly believe that giving priority to improving messaging platforms (explaining how this method saves time), ultimately saving time for all parties involved. Consequently, prioritizing work efficiency would should be at the most worthy of consideration forefront when choosing deciding on communication strategies.methods in a professional setting (restating the main argument).

Display title: 8 思维导图


1. Introduction
   - Privacy
   - Familiarity with colleagues

2. Efficiency of work
   a. Crucial factor in selecting communication strategies

3. Examples
   a. Marketing plan
      i. Face-to-face discussions for idea proposal and refinement
   b. Daily reports
      i. Email or messaging platforms for efficient submission

4. Conclusion
   - Prioritizing work efficiency in communication methods

Display title: 9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
perspective/pərˈspɛktɪv/nounA particular attitude or way of considering a matter观点Kelly and Andrew's perspectives on communication were considered in the essay.
efficiency/ɪˈfɪʃənsi/nounThe state of achieving maximum productivity效率Work efficiency should be the most crucial factor in selecting communication strategies.
marketing plan/ˈmɑrkətɪŋ plæn/nounA comprehensive strategy for promoting products营销计划When devising a marketing plan, team members must engage in face-to-face discussions.
refine/rɪˈfaɪn/verb/to improve something by making small changes/改进,提炼/Team members refined their ideas during the discussion.
complex/kəmˈplɛks//adjective/consisting of many different and connected parts/复杂的/Marketing plans are complex tasks that require collaboration.
submit/səbˈmɪt/verbTo present for consideration or judgment提交Employees can efficiently submit daily reports via email or messaging platforms.
supervisor/ˈsuːpərvaɪzər/nounA person who oversees the work of others主管Employees submit their daily reports to their supervisors.
prioritize/praɪˈɒrətaɪz/verbTo treat something as more important than others优先考虑Prioritizing work efficiency should be at the forefront when deciding on communication methods.
professional setting/prəˈfɛʃənəl ˈsɛtɪŋ/nounA workplace or environment related to one's occupation/职业环境Communication methods in a professional setting should focus on efficiency.

Wie die Academic Discussion bewertet wird

Die TOEFL Academic Discussion-Aufgabe wird anhand des offiziellen ETS-Bewertungsrasters bewertet. Die KI-Bewertung analysiert jede Antwort anhand mehrerer Dimensionen.

Relevanz & Beitrag

Geht die Antwort auf die Frage ein und leistet sie einen sinnvollen Beitrag zur Diskussion?

Sprachgebrauch

Grammatikalische Genauigkeit, Wortschatzbreite und Qualität des Satzbaus.

Ausarbeitung & Begründung

Sind die Ideen mit konkreten Beispielen und klarer Argumentation gut ausgearbeitet?

Häufige Muster in den Antworten

Basierend auf der Analyse von Nutzereinsendungen zu dieser Aufgabe sind hier häufige Muster in den Antworten der Lernenden.

Viele Lernende äußern eine klare Meinung, liefern aber keine konkreten Beispiele zur Unterstützung.

Starke Antworten beziehen sich direkt auf den Lesetext und die Standpunkte der anderen Sprecher.

Höher bewertete Antworten nutzen abwechslungsreiche Satzstrukturen und akademischen Wortschatz.

Zeitmanagement ist entscheidend – wirkt eine Antwort gehetzt, fällt die Bewertung der Ausarbeitung meist niedriger aus.

Lerntipps

1

Lies die Aufgabenstellung sorgfältig und erfasse alle Teile der Frage, bevor du zu schreiben beginnst.

2

Beziehe dich in deiner Antwort auf den Lesetext und die Meinungen der anderen Studierenden.

3

Nutze konkrete Beispiele, um deinen Hauptpunkt zu untermauern – vermeide allgemeine Aussagen.

4

Ziele auf 120–150 Wörter. Längere Antworten sind nicht automatisch besser; Klarheit und Fokus zählen mehr.

5

Übe zeitlich begrenzte Antworten (10 Minuten), um unter Prüfungsbedingungen Sicherheit zu gewinnen.

Häufig gestellte Fragen

Was ist die TOEFL Academic Discussion-Aufgabe?
Bei der TOEFL Academic Discussion-Aufgabe musst du dich an einer Online-Klassendiskussion beteiligen. Du liest die Frage eines Professors sowie die Antworten anderer Studierender und schreibst dann in etwa 10 Minuten deinen eigenen Beitrag, in dem du deine Meinung äußerst und begründest.
Wie wird die Academic Discussion-Aufgabe bewertet?
Die Aufgabe wird auf einer Skala von 0 bis 5 bewertet, basierend auf der Relevanz für die Diskussion, der Qualität der Sprachverwendung (Grammatik, Wortschatz, Satzbau) und wie gut du deine Ideen mit konkreten Beispielen und Argumenten entwickelst und stützt.
Was sind die Nutzerbeispiele auf dieser Seite?
Dies sind echte Antworten, die von TOEFL-Prüflingen eingereicht wurden, die diese Frage auf LingoLeap geübt haben. Jedes Beispiel wurde von unserer KI-Bewertungs-Engine ausgewertet, die eine Punktzahl sowie detailliertes Feedback zu Stärken und Verbesserungsbereichen liefert.
Wie genau ist die KI-Bewertung?
Die KI-Bewertungs-Engine von LingoLeap wurde anhand offizieller ETS-Bewertungskriterien trainiert und anhand menschlicher Prüferbewertungen kalibriert. Kein automatisiertes System ist perfekt, aber sie liefert zuverlässiges Feedback zu Übungszwecken und hilft dabei, konkrete Verbesserungsbereiche zu erkennen.
Wie kann ich diese Academic Discussion-Aufgabe üben?
Du kannst üben, indem du dich für ein kostenloses LingoLeap-Konto anmeldest. Schreibe deine eigene Antwort auf genau diese Frage, reiche sie ein und erhalte sofortiges KI-Feedback mit detaillierten Anmerkungen zu deinem Text.
Wie lang sollte meine Academic Discussion-Antwort sein?
Strebe 120–150 Wörter an. Für die Aufgabe hast du 10 Minuten Zeit. Konzentriere dich auf Klarheit, stütze deine Meinung mit konkreten Beispielen und beziehe dich auf den Diskussionskontext, anstatt eine längere Antwort zu schreiben.

Erreich deinen Wunsch-Score – wir sind an deiner Seite!

Mit LingoLeap, deinem Experten für TOEFL und andere Englischprüfungen

Schneller zu deinem Traumscore

Jetzt kostenlos ausprobieren