TOEFL TPO 44 Writing Task 1 Sample: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific arguments presented in the reading passage.

1.子项得分 任务完成度：4 组织：3 连贯与衔接：3 语言使用：3

2.预估分数

22. 3.任务完成度

整体来说，文章回应了阅读材料中的观点，并对听力材料中的论点进行了概括。但在解释听力材料中的观点时，有些地方需要更详细地说明。为了提高任务完成度，可以尝试更深入地探讨听力材料中的论据，并详细解释它们是如何反驳阅读材料中的观点的。

示例1： 原文：On the contrary, the professor challenges this reason by claiming that it is not necessary. 改进：On the contrary, the professor challenges this reason by explaining that the Norse might have taken all their silver coins back to Europe when they left North America, which is why no other coins were found at their settlements.

示例2： 原文：As a reasult, the silver coin may be a kind of decoration. 改进：As a result, the Norse could have used silver coins as a means of trade with Native Americans, who might have valued them for their decorative purposes.

4.文章结构与组织 文章具有基本的结构，包括引言、正文和结论。然而，在组织上还有待提高。建议在引言部分简要介绍阅读和听力材料的主题，并明确指出它们之间存在分歧。正文部分可以更明确地分段，每段专注于一个论点，并提供支持细节。此外，需要在段落之间加入更清晰的过渡。

示例1： 原文：In the reading passage, the author gives three reasons that the European silver coin at a Native American archaeological site is fake not genuine one. 改进：The reading passage presents three arguments to support the idea that the European silver coin found at a Native American archaeological site is not genuine. However, the lecture contradicts these arguments and provides evidence to support its claim.

示例2： 原文：Therefore, the great distance between the two places is not a problem. 改进：Therefore, despite the great distance between the two places, it is still possible that Native Americans traveled to Norse settlements and brought back the silver coin.

5. 语法批改

In the reading passage, the author gives three reasons that the European silver coin at a Native American archaeological site is fakefake,(This rule identifies whether commas are missing in a sentence.) not genuinea genuine(This rule identifies whether the article 'a' is missing in a sentence.) one. However, the professor in the lecture thinks these reasons are unreasonable.

The first reason stated in the reading is that the distance between Norse Settlements and Native American site is too long. Norse Settlements are the places where the coin may come from. This is disputed by the professor ,,(Use of whitespace before comma and before/after parentheses) who points out that people living in the Native American site like travelling. They have the interest to travel to the Norse Settlements although, although(comma between independent clauses) they are so far. Therefore, the great distance between the two places is not a problem.

Secondly, the author proposes that only this silver coin are found. There are notno(no vs not) other coins can be found in the North American settlements. On the contrary, the professor challenges this reason by claiming that it is not necessary. Other silver coins perhaps are used to deal with Europeans because silver coins are not functional in the North American settlements. In this way, this reason is not convinced.

The final reason indicates that silver coins do not have any value in the North America. Although it is the turthtruth(misspelling), the professto profess(a infinitive) reveals that silver has other functions, not only the money function. Silver can be used to decoratedecorate,(This rule identifies whether commas are missing in a sentence.) such as neckless. As a reasultresult(misspelling), the silver coin may be a kind of decoration. So the final reason is also unreasonable.

Section Title: 6.文章修订

The reading passage presents three arguments suggesting that the European silver coin found at a Native American archaeological site is not genuine. However, the lecture counters each of these points, providing alternative explanations for the coin's presence.

Firstly, the reading claims that the significant distance between Norse settlements and the Native American site makes it unlikely for the coin to have originated from there. The lecturer disputes this by explaining that inhabitants of the Native American site were known to travel long distances and had an interest in acquiring objects from faraway places. Thus, it is plausible that they could have reached Norse settlements during their travels and brought back the silver coin to Maine.

Secondly, the author argues that no other coins have been discovered at Norse-inhabited sites in North America, implying that they did not bring any silver coins with them. In contrast, the professor contends that this absence of coins does not necessarily mean they were never present. The Norse did not establish permanent settlements in North America and eventually returned to Europe, taking their valuable possessions—including any silver coins—with them.

Lastly, the reading states that European silver coins would have been useless in North America as native inhabitants did not recognize them as currency. While acknowledging this fact, the lecturer highlights that silver could serve other purposes beyond monetary value. For instance, its aesthetic appeal could make it desirable for use in jewelry or decorations. Consequently, Norse explorers might have used such coins for trading with Native Americans who found them interesting and beautiful.

In conclusion, while there are arguments against considering this European silver coin as genuine historical evidence of contact between Norse explorers and Native Americans, alternative explanations provided by the lecture challenge these assertions and suggest its authenticity is still a possibility. (302 words)

In the reading passage, the author gives three reasons that the European silver coin at a Native American archaeological site is fake not genuine one. ¶ one (a better phrasing would be "not a genuine artifact"). However, the professor in the lecture thinks these reasons are unreasonable. unreasonable (a more appropriate term would be "unconvincing").

The first reason stated in the reading is that the distance between Norse Settlements and Native American site is too long. Norse Settlements are the places where the coin may come from. This is disputed by the professor , who points out that people living in the Native American site like travelling. travelling (it would be clearer to say "were known to travel long distances"). They have the interest to travel to the Norse Settlements although they are so far. far (a more natural phrasing would be "had an interest in acquiring objects from faraway places"). Therefore, the great distance between the two places is not a problem.

Secondly, the author proposes that only this silver coin are found. found (it should be "has been found" for grammatical correctness). There are not other coins can be found in the North American settlements. settlements (a clearer way to phrase this would be "no other coins have been discovered at Norse-inhabited sites in North America"). On the contrary, the professor challenges this reason by claiming that it is not necessary. necessary (it would be better to say "this absence of coins does not necessarily mean they were never present"). Other silver coins perhaps are used to deal with Europeans because silver coins are not functional in the North American settlements. settlements (a more coherent explanation would be "The Norse did not establish permanent settlements in North America and eventually returned to Europe, taking their valuable possessions—including any silver coins—with them"). In this way, this reason is not convinced. convinced (the correct term here should be "convincing").

The final reason indicates that silver coins do not have any value in the North America. Although it is the turth, turth (the correct spelling is "truth"), the profess (the correct term is "professor") reveals that silver has other functions, not only the money function. function (a more natural phrasing would be "silver could serve other purposes beyond monetary value"). Silver can be used to decorate such as neckless. neckless (the correct spelling is "necklace"). As a reasult, reasult (the correct spelling is "result"), the silver coin may be a kind of decoration. So the final reason is also unreasonable.unreasonable (again, a more appropriate term would be "unconvincing").

---

Section Title: 8. Mind Map

Use the following mind map to help structure your essay and points from the lecture:

1. Introduction
   - European silver coin found at Native American site
   - Reading argues it's not genuine, lecture counters

2. Distance between settlements
   - Reading: Unlikely for coin to come from Norse settlements
   - Lecture: Native Americans traveled long distances, could have acquired coin

3. Absence of coins at Norse sites
   - Reading: No other coins found, implies Norse didn't bring them
   - Lecture: Norse didn't establish permanent settlements, took valuables back to Europe

4. Uselessness of silver coins as currency
   - Reading: Coins not recognized as currency by natives
   - Lecture: Silver had other uses (jewelry, decorations), could be traded for its aesthetic appeal

5. Conclusion
   - Alternative explanations challenge reading's arguments
   - Authenticity of the coin still a possibility

Section Title: 9. Keywords

1.子项得分 任务完成度: 5 组织: 4 连贯性和衔接: 4 语言运用: 4

2.预估分数

27. 3.任务完成度

这篇文章在任务完成度方面表现优秀，成功地总结了听力材料中的观点，并针对阅读材料中的论点进行了反驳。为了进一步提高，可以尝试更深入地探讨听力和阅读材料之间的关系，以及它们如何相互影响。

示例1: 原文：The lecture challenges this view, pointing out that while the coins may not have been used as currency in North America, they could have been brought for use after the voyage. 改进：The lecture challenges this view by explaining that although the coins might not have been used as currency in North America, they could have been brought for use after the voyage, which would explain why no other coins were found at Norse settlements.

示例2: 原文：In contrast, the professor argues that the coins' aesthetic value, not their monetary function, could have appealed to Native Americans. 改进：In contrast, the professor argues that it was the coins' aesthetic value rather than their monetary function that could have appealed to Native Americans, thus providing a plausible reason for Norse settlers to bring such items with them.

4.文章结构与组织 文章的结构和组织方面表现良好，包括引言、正文和结论。每段都集中讨论一个特定的观点，并提供支持细节。然而，可以通过使用更明确的过渡词和短语来进一步改善段落之间的衔接。

建议1：在引言部分，可以更明确地提出文章将讨论的三个论点。 示例：The reading presents three arguments against the coin's authenticity, while the lecture refutes each one by providing alternative explanations.

建议2：在正文部分，使用过渡词或短语来引导读者从一个观点转向另一个观点。 示例：Firstly, the reading argues that... However, the lecture counters this by suggesting... Moreover, the reading suggests that... On the other hand, the lecture challenges this view by pointing out that...

5. 语法批改

The reading passage and the lecture both discuss the potential connection between a silver coin found at a Native American site and Norse settlers. The reading presents three hypotheses, while the lecture refutes each one.

Firstly, the reading argues that the Maine site, where the coin was discovered, is over a thousand kilometers away from Norse settlements, making it highly impractical for Native Americans to have interacted with Norse people or to have acquired their silver coins. However, the lecture counters this by suggesting the possibility of Native Americans traveling to Norse areas. It notes that, in addition to silver coins, many objects found at Native American sites originated from other distant locations, demonstrating their propensity for long-distance travel and interest in foreign objects.

Secondly, the reading suggests that the absence of silver coins in Norse sites in Canada implies that Norse explorers did not bring coins to North America. The lecture challenges this view, pointing out that while the coins may not have been used as currency in North America, they could have been brought for use after the voyage. This suggests that Norse explorers might have carried the coins with them, potentially to bring back to Europe, thereby indicating possible interactions between Norse settlers and Native Americans.

Lastly, the reading posits that Norse settlers, being experienced, would have known that Native Americans would not recognize silver coins as money, making it pointless to bring such non-functional items. In contrast, the professor argues that the coins' aesthetic value, not their monetary function, could have appealed to Native Americans. The silver coins, possibly fashioned into jewelry like necklaces and rings, could have been attractive for trade with Native Americans, thus enabling interactions between the two groups.

Section Title: 6.文章修订

The reading passage and the lecture both discuss the potential connection between a silver coin found at a Native American site and Norse settlers. The reading presents three hypotheses, while the lecture refutes each one.

Firstly, the reading argues that the Maine site, where the coin was discovered, is over a thousand kilometers away from Norse settlements, making it highly impractical for Native Americans to have interacted with Norse people or to have acquired their silver coins. However, the lecture counters this by suggesting the possibility of Native Americans traveling to Norse areas. It notes that, in addition to silver coins, many objects found at Native American sites originated from other distant locations, demonstrating their propensity for long-distance travel and interest in foreign objects.

Secondly, the reading suggests that the absence of silver coins in Norse sites in Canada implies that Norse explorers did not bring coins to North America. The lecture challenges this view, pointing out that while the coins may not have been used as currency in North America, they could have been brought for use after the voyage. This suggests that Norse explorers might have carried the coins with them, potentially to bring back to Europe, thereby indicating possible interactions between Norse settlers and Native Americans.

Lastly, the reading posits that Norse settlers, being experienced, would have known that Native Americans would not recognize silver coins as money, making it pointless to bring such non-functional items. In contrast, the professor argues that the coins' aesthetic value, not their monetary function, could have appealed to Native Americans. The silver coins, possibly fashioned into jewelry like necklaces and rings, could have been attractive for trade with Native Americans, thus enabling interactions between the two groups. (289 words)

Revised essay: Section Title: 7. Article Revision

The reading passage and the lecture both discuss the potential connection between a silver coin found at a Native American site and Norse settlers. The reading presents three hypotheses, while the lecture refutes each one.

Firstly, the reading argues that the Maine site, where the coin was discovered, is over a thousand kilometers away from Norse settlements, making it highly impractical for Native Americans to have interacted with Norse people or to have acquired their silver coins. However, the lecture counters this by suggesting the possibility of Native Americans traveling to Norse areas. areas (change "areas" to "settlements" for consistency). It notes that, in addition to silver coins, many objects found at Native American sites originated from other distant locations, demonstrating their propensity for long-distance travel and interest in foreign objects.

Secondly, the reading suggests that the absence of silver coins in Norse sites in Canada implies that Norse explorers did not bring coins to North America. The lecture challenges this view, pointing out that while the coins may not have been used as currency in North America, they could have been brought for use after the voyage. voyage (change "after" to "during or after" for clarity). This suggests that Norse explorers might have carried the coins with them, potentially to bring back to Europe, Europe (add "or use them during their travels" for completeness), thereby indicating possible interactions between Norse settlers and Native Americans.

Lastly, the reading posits that Norse settlers, being experienced, experienced (change "experienced" to "knowledgeable about trade"), would have known that Native Americans would not recognize silver coins as money, money (change "money" to "currency"), making it pointless to bring such non-functional items. In contrast, the professor argues that the coins' aesthetic value, not value (add ", rather than their monetary function, function," for clarity), could have appealed to Native Americans. The silver coins, possibly fashioned into jewelry like necklaces and rings, could have been attractive for trade with Native Americans, thus enabling interactions between the two groups.

8. Mind Map

Mind Map:

- Introduction
  - Connection between silver coin and Norse settlers
  - Reading: three hypotheses
  - Lecture: refutes each hypothesis

- Point 1: Distance between Maine site and Norse settlements
  - Reading: impractical for interaction
  - Lecture: Native Americans' long-distance travel and interest in foreign objects

- Point 2: Absence of silver coins in Norse sites in Canada
  - Reading: Norse explorers did not bring coins to North America
  - Lecture: Coins could have been brought for use after the voyage, indicating possible interactions

- Point 3: Native Americans not recognizing silver coins as money
  - Reading: pointless to bring non-functional items
  - Lecture: aesthetic value and potential trade with Native Americans, enabling interactions

9. Keywords

1.Sub Scores

• Task fulfillment: 4

• Organization: 4

• Coherence and Cohesion: 4

• Language Use: 4

2.Estimated Scores

• Estimated Score: 25

3.Task completeness The essay does a good job of addressing the specific requirements of the task, summarizing the points made in the lecture and explaining how they respond to the arguments presented in the reading passage. However, there is room for improvement in terms of providing more detailed explanations and examples from both the reading and listening materials. Additionally, try to avoid repetition in your writing.

Suggestions for improvement:

• Provide more specific examples from both the reading and listening materials to support your points.

• Avoid repetition by using synonyms or rephrasing your sentences.

Examples:

1. Instead of writing "the coins, which are pretty and made of silver," you could write "the visually appealing silver coins."

2. Instead of repeating "the Norse" multiple times, you could use alternative phrases like "these European explorers" or "the settlers from Scandinavia."

4.Essay structure and organization The essay has a clear structure with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Each paragraph focuses on a specific point with supporting details. However, there is room for improvement in terms of creating smoother transitions between ideas and paragraphs.

Suggestions for improvement:

• Use transition words or phrases to connect ideas within paragraphs.

• Create clearer connections between paragraphs by referring back to previous points or introducing new ones.

Examples:

1. In your second body paragraph, you could use a transition phrase like "Furthermore" or "In addition" to connect it with the previous paragraph.

2. To create a clearer connection between your first and second body paragraphs, you could write something like "While the author argues that the distance between Maine and Norse settlements is too great for any connection, another piece of evidence suggests otherwise."

5. Grammar

Both the reading and listening materials talk about the credibility of the theory of whether the coin found in Maine is historical evidence or not. While the writer believes that the coin is a historical fake, the speaker holds an opposite opinion that the coin is evidence of Norse history, based on the following statements.

First of allFirst(first of all (first)), it is the author's first argument that the coin is not related to the Norse settlements due to the long distance, which contradicts the viewpoint of the lecturer that the coin might have been carried to Maine from Norse settlements by Native Americans. To explain it more deeply, the lecturer points out the theory that Americans from Maine could travel to Canada and go back with the coin that they got from the Norse. Besides, there are a great number of objects in the Maine site that are brought to Maine in the same way, which makes the theory more comprehensive.

In addition, the professor continues to discredit the assertion of the article that we can not find similar coins at Norse settlements in Canada. In detail, the Norse, who did not build permanent settlements in Canada, might move to the Maine site with the coins and then go back to Europe with all their valuable objects packaged, including the silver coins, which leads to the fact that there are no such coins left in the Canada settlements built by Norse nowadays.

Thirdly, as opposed to the last theory in the passage that silver coins are useless in North America dating to the eleventh century, two facts are brought up in the lecture. For one thing, Native Americans enjoyed attractive and unusual objects, like necklaces and jewelry. For another, the coins, which are pretty and made of silver, could be used by the Norse to trade with the Native Americans in Maine, who were interested in the beautiful coins, to exchange other materials.

Section Title: 6. Revised Essay

Both the reading and listening materials discuss the credibility of the theory concerning whether the coin found in Maine is historical evidence or not. While the author believes that the coin is a historical fake, the speaker holds an opposing opinion that the coin is evidence of Norse history, based on the following statements.

Firstly, the author's initial argument states that the coin is not related to Norse settlements due to its considerable distance from them. However, this contradicts the lecturer's viewpoint that Native Americans might have carried the coin to Maine from Norse settlements. To elaborate further, the lecturer posits that Native Americans from Maine could have traveled to Canada and returned with the coin obtained from Norse settlers. Moreover, numerous objects at the Maine site were brought there in a similar manner, lending credence to this theory.

Secondly, the professor disputes the article's assertion that no similar coins have been found at Norse settlements in Canada. The lecturer explains that since Norse settlers did not establish permanent settlements in Canada, they may have moved to Maine with their coins and subsequently returned to Europe with all their valuable possessions packed up – including silver coins. This would account for why no such coins remain at Canadian sites previously inhabited by Norse settlers.

Lastly, contrary to the passage's final theory stating silver coins would be useless in eleventh-century North America, two points are raised in support of their potential value during this time period. Firstly, Native Americans appreciated attractive and unusual objects such as necklaces and jewelry. Secondly, these aesthetically pleasing silver coins could have been used by Norse settlers for trading purposes with Native Americans in Maine who were interested in acquiring beautiful items in exchange for other materials. (296 words)

Section Title: 7. Essay Grading

Both the reading and listening materials talk about discuss the credibility of the theory of concerning whether the coin found in Maine is historical evidence or not. not (revised for clarity and conciseness). While the writer author believes that the coin is a historical fake, the speaker holds an opposite opposing opinion that the coin is evidence of Norse history, based on the following statements. statements (revised for clarity).

First of all, it is Firstly (revised for formality), the author's first initial argument states that the coin is not related to the Norse settlements due to the long distance, which its considerable distance from them (revised for clarity). However, this contradicts the lecturer's viewpoint of that Native Americans might have carried the coin to Maine from Norse settlements. To elaborate further (revised for clarity), the lecturer that the coin might have been carried to Maine from Norse settlements by posits that Native Americans. To explain it more deeply, the lecturer points out the theory that Americans from Maine could travel have traveled to Canada and go back returned with the coin that they got obtained from the Norse. Besides, Norse settlers. Moreover, numerous objects at the Maine site were brought there are in a great number of objects in the Maine site that are brought to Maine in the same way, which makes the similar manner, lending credence to this theory more comprehensive. (revised for clarity).

In addition, Secondly (revised for formality), the professor continues to discredit the disputes the article's assertion of the article that we can not find that no similar coins have been found at Norse settlements in Canada. In detail, the Norse, who The lecturer explains that since Norse settlers did not build establish permanent settlements in Canada, might move to the Maine site they may have moved to Maine with the coins and then go back their coins and subsequently returned to Europe with all their valuable objects packaged, possessions packed up – including the silver coins, which leads to the fact that there are coins. This would account for why no such coins left in the Canada settlements built remain at Canadian sites previously inhabited by Norse nowadays. settlers (revised for clarity).

Thirdly, as opposed to the last Lastly (revised for formality), contrary to the passage's final theory in the passage that stating silver coins would be useless in eleventh-century North America, two points are useless in North America dating to the eleventh century, two facts are brought up in the lecture. For one thing, raised in support of their potential value during this time period (revised for clarity). Firstly, Native Americans enjoyed appreciated attractive and unusual objects, like objects such as necklaces and jewelry. For another, the coins, which are pretty and made of silver, Secondly, these aesthetically pleasing silver coins could be have been used by the Norse to trade Norse settlers for trading purposes with the Native Americans in Maine, Maine who were interested in the acquiring beautiful coins, to items in exchange for other materials.materials (revised for clarity).

8. Mind Map

- Introduction
  - Credibility of the coin theory
  - Author's view: historical fake
  - Speaker's view: Norse history evidence

- Point 1: Coin's distance from Norse settlements
  - Author: not related to Norse settlements
  - Speaker: Native Americans carried the coin to Maine
    - Possible travel to Canada and return with the coin

- Point 2: No similar coins found at Norse settlements in Canada
  - Author: supports the fake theory
  - Speaker: Norse settlers might have moved to Maine with their coins
    - Returned to Europe with valuable possessions, including silver coins

- Point 3: Usefulness of silver coins in eleventh-century North America
  - Author: silver coins would be useless
  - Speaker: two points supporting potential value during this time period
    - Native Americans appreciated attractive objects (necklaces, jewelry)
    - Coins could be used for trading purposes with Native Americans in Maine

9. Key Words

6. Revised Essay

Both the reading and listening materials discuss the credibility of the theory concerning whether the coin found in Maine is historical evidence or not. While the author believes that the coin is a historical fake, the speaker holds an opposing opinion that the coin is evidence of Norse history, based on the following statements.

Firstly, the author's initial argument states that the coin is not related to Norse settlements due to its considerable distance from them. However, this contradicts the lecturer's viewpoint that Native Americans might have carried the coin to Maine from Norse settlements. To elaborate further, the lecturer posits that Native Americans from Maine could have traveled to Canada and returned with the coin obtained from Norse settlers. Moreover, numerous objects at the Maine site were brought there in a similar manner, lending credence to this theory.

Secondly, the professor disputes the article's assertion that no similar coins have been found at Norse settlements in Canada. The lecturer explains that since Norse settlers did not establish permanent settlements in Canada, they may have moved to Maine with their coins and subsequently returned to Europe with all their valuable possessions packed up – including silver coins. This would account for why no such coins remain at Canadian sites previously inhabited by Norse settlers.

Lastly, contrary to the passage's final theory stating silver coins would be useless in eleventh-century North America, two points are raised in support of their potential value during this time period. Firstly, Native Americans appreciated attractive and unusual objects such as necklaces and jewelry. Secondly, these aesthetically pleasing silver coins could have been used by Norse settlers for trading purposes with Native Americans in Maine who were interested in acquiring beautiful items in exchange for other materials.