TOEFLIELTS
Français
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on pedagogy. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

Vraies réponses d'utilisateurs avec évaluation et retour propulsés par l'IA

1 exemples soumis par des utilisateurs disponibles

Commencer l'Entraînement Gratuit

Aperçu de la Tâche

Professor

Which is better, assigned reading tasks, or the things students choose to read for themselves

Adam

assigned reading

Jack

voluntary reading

Exemples d'Utilisateurs et Résultats d'Évaluation

1

Exemple d'Utilisateur #1

As far as I am concerned, I tend to be in favor of the argument that students should select what to read actively, as Jack mentioned, due to its contr...

Score
25

Exemple d'Utilisateur

As far as I am concerned, I tend to be in favor of the argument that students should select what to read actively, as Jack mentioned, due to its contribution to stimulating students to learn better. To begin with, since every student has his own interest in certain subject, rather the same descipline, they may feel boring in some fields. If they are required to accomplish a specific aspect of subjects, they will have difficulty in completing it efficiently and distribute a large amount of spare time, achieving an unsatisfying academic learning effect. However, never should we overlook the significance in students' learning enthusiasm. If the student have the opportunity to choose what to read, with no doubt, the learning efficiency will be promoted. For example, in China, students before senior high school have to learn all the subjects including geography, chemistry as well as history. Most of them are inclined to learn several of them achieving a supreme grade, instead of all of them. In this case, every student should choose his learning interest, which inspire them learn better.

Résultat de l'Évaluation

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0

  • Language Use and Grammar: 3.5

2. 预估分数

  • 25

3. 任务完成度

整体来说,这篇文章较好地回答了教授的问题,并提出了自己的观点。但是,有一些地方可以改进以更好地满足任务要求。首先,文章中的一些句子略显冗长,建议简化句子结构,使表达更为清晰。其次,在论述观点时可以加入更多具体的例子来支持观点。

示例1(改进前):If they are required to accomplish a specific aspect of subjects, they will have difficulty in completing it efficiently and distribute a large amount of spare time, achieving an unsatisfying academic learning effect. 示例1(改进后):If students are required to study specific subjects, they may struggle to complete them efficiently, leading to a less satisfying academic experience.

示例2(改进前):Most of them are inclined to learn several of them achieving a supreme grade, instead of all of them. 示例2(改进后):Most students prefer to focus on a few subjects in which they excel rather than trying to master all subjects.

4. 文章结构与组织

文章的结构和组织方面基本合理,包括引言、正文和结论。然而,在段落之间的过渡可以加强。建议使用一些过渡词和短语来使文章更连贯。此外,正文部分可以进一步细分,每个段落只讨论一个观点。

示例1(改进前):To begin with, since every student has his own interest in certain subject, rather the same descipline, they may feel boring in some fields. 示例1(改进后):To begin with, since every student has their own interests in certain subjects, they may find some fields boring.

示例2(改进前):However, never should we overlook the significance in students' learning enthusiasm. 示例2(改进后):However, we should not overlook the importance of students' learning enthusiasm.

5. Grammar

As far as I am concerned, I tend to be in favor of the argument that students should select what to read actively, as Jack mentioned, due to its contribution to stimulating students to learn better. To begin with, since every student has his own interest in certain subject, rather the same desciplinediscipline(misspelling), they may feel boring in some fields. If they are required to accomplish a specific aspect of subjects, they will have difficulty in completing it efficiently and distribute a large amount of spare time, achieving an unsatisfying academic learning effect. However, never should we overlook the significance inof(This rule identifies wrong preposition usage.) students' learning enthusiasm. If the student have the opportunity to choose what to read, with no doubt, the learning efficiency will be promoted. For example, in China, students before senior high school have to learn all the subjects including geography, chemistry as well as history. Most of them are inclined to learn several of them achieving a supreme grade, instead of all of them. In this case, every student should choose his learning interest, which inspire them learnto learn(This rule identifies whether the preposition 'to' is missing in a sentence.) better.

Display title: 6 文章修订

In response to the professor's question, I firmly believe that allowing students to choose their own reading materials, as Jack suggested, fosters greater engagement and more effective learning. Individual interests vary greatly among students, and being forced to focus on a specific subject may lead to boredom and decreased motivation. Consequently, students may struggle to complete assigned tasks efficiently and may waste valuable time, resulting in suboptimal academic outcomes.

On the other hand, nurturing students' enthusiasm for learning is of paramount importance. When given the freedom to select their own reading materials, students are more likely to be invested in their studies and experience enhanced learning efficiency. For instance, in China, students are required to study a wide range of subjects before entering senior high school, including geography, chemistry, and history. However, most students naturally excel in only a few areas rather than all subjects. In such cases, empowering students to pursue their interests can inspire them to achieve greater success in their chosen fields. (169 words)

As far as In response to the professor's question, I am concerned, I tend to be in favor of the argument firmly believe that students should select what to read actively, allowing students to choose their own reading materials, as Jack mentioned, due to its contribution to stimulating students to learn better. To begin with, since every student has his suggested (clarified the reference to Jack's suggestion), fosters greater engagement and more effective learning (improved phrasing for clarity). Individual interests vary greatly among students, and being forced to focus on a specific subject may lead to boredom and decreased motivation (rephrased for clarity and conciseness). Consequently, students may struggle to complete assigned tasks efficiently and may waste valuable time, resulting in suboptimal academic outcomes (revised for better flow).

On the other hand, nurturing students' enthusiasm for learning is of paramount importance (rephrased for emphasis). When given the freedom to select their own interest in certain subject, rather the same descipline, they may feel boring in some fields. If they reading materials, students are more likely to be invested in their studies and experience enhanced learning efficiency (improved phrasing for clarity). For instance, in China, students are required to accomplish study a specific aspect wide range of subjects, they will have difficulty in completing it efficiently and distribute a large amount of spare time, achieving an unsatisfying academic learning effect. However, never should we overlook the significance in students' learning enthusiasm. If the student have the opportunity to choose what to read, with no doubt, the learning efficiency will be promoted. For example, in China, students subjects before entering senior high school have to learn all the subjects school, including geography, chemistry as well as history. Most of them are inclined to learn several of them achieving chemistry, and history (added context). However, most students naturally excel in only a supreme grade, instead of few areas rather than all of them. subjects (clarified point). In this case, every student should choose his learning interest, which such cases, empowering students to pursue their interests can inspire them learn better.to achieve greater success in their chosen fields (rephrased for better flow).

8 思维导图


- 引言
  - 学生选择阅读材料
  - 提高学习效果

- 不同兴趣
  - 学生兴趣差异大
  - 强制关注特定主题可能导致厌倦和动力减弱

- 学习效率
  - 完成任务困难
  - 浪费宝贵时间
  - 学术成果不理想

- 培养学习热情
  - 自由选择阅读材料的重要性
  - 更投入学习,提高学习效率

- 中国教育案例分析
  - 初中阶段需学习多门科目,如地理、化学、历史等。
  - 大多数学生只擅长其中一部分科目。

- 结论
  - 赋予学生追求兴趣的权利,激发他们在所选领域取得更大成功。

9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish definitionSimplified Chinese translationSample sentences
engagement/ɪnˈɡeɪdʒmənt/nounemotional involvement or commitment投入;参与Allowing students to choose their own reading materials fosters greater engagement.
motivation/ˌməʊtɪˈveɪʃn/nounthe reason or reasons for acting a way动力;积极性Being forced to focus on a specific subject may lead to decreased motivation.
efficiency/ɪˈfɪʃənsi/nounthe state of achieving maximum output效率Students experience enhanced learning efficiency when they are more invested in their studies.
empowerment/ɪmˈpaʊərmənt/noungiving someone more control or power赋权;授权Empowering students to pursue their interests can inspire them to achieve greater success.
paramount/ˈpærəmaʊnt/adjective/of chief concern or importance/首要的,最重要的/Nurturing students' enthusiasm for learning is of paramount importance.
boredom/ˈbɔːrdəm//noun/the state of being weary and restless/无聊,厌倦/Being forced to focus on a specific subject may lead to boredom.
suboptimal/sʌbˈɒptɪməl//adjective/less than the highest standard or level/次优的,不够理想的/Students may struggle to complete assigned tasks efficiently, resulting in suboptimal academic outcomes.
excel/ɪkˈsel//verb/to be exceptionally good at something/擅长,突出/Most students naturally excel in only a few areas rather than all subjects.
wide range/waɪd reɪndʒ//noun/a large variety of something/广泛的范围/In China, students are required to study a wide range of subjects before entering senior high school.
chosen fields/ˈtʃəʊzn fiːldz//noun/the specific areas someone has selected/所选领域/Empowering students to pursue their interests can inspire them to achieve greater success in their chosen fields.

Comment la Discussion Académique est Évaluée

La tâche TOEFL Discussion Académique est évaluée selon le barème officiel de l'ETS. L'évaluation par IA analyse chaque réponse selon plusieurs dimensions.

Pertinence et Contribution

La réponse traite-t-elle la question et contribue-t-elle de façon pertinente à la discussion ?

Utilisation de la Langue

Précision grammaticale, richesse du vocabulaire et qualité de la structure des phrases.

Développement et Argumentation

Les idées sont-elles bien développées avec des exemples précis et un raisonnement clair ?

Tendances Communes dans les Réponses

D'après l'analyse des réponses soumises par les utilisateurs pour cette tâche, voici les tendances courantes observées dans les réponses des étudiants.

De nombreux étudiants expriment des opinions claires mais manquent d'exemples précis à l'appui.

Les réponses solides font directement référence au texte de lecture et aux points de vue des autres participants.

Les réponses les mieux notées utilisent des structures de phrases variées et un vocabulaire académique.

La gestion du temps est un facteur clé — les réponses qui semblent précipitées ont tendance à obtenir un score plus faible en développement.

Conseils d'Apprentissage

1

Lisez attentivement la consigne et identifiez toutes les parties de la question avant d'écrire.

2

Faites référence au texte de lecture et aux opinions des autres étudiants dans votre réponse.

3

Utilisez des exemples précis pour appuyer votre idée principale — évitez les affirmations génériques.

4

Visez 120 à 150 mots. Une réponse plus longue n'est pas toujours meilleure ; la clarté et la précision comptent davantage.

5

Entraînez-vous à répondre en temps limité (10 minutes) pour gagner en aisance dans les conditions de l'examen.

Questions fréquentes

Qu'est-ce que la tâche TOEFL Academic Discussion ?
La tâche TOEFL Academic Discussion vous demande de contribuer à une discussion de classe en ligne. Vous lirez la question d'un professeur ainsi que les réponses d'autres étudiants, puis vous rédigerez votre propre contribution exprimant et justifiant votre opinion en environ 10 minutes.
Comment la tâche Academic Discussion est-elle notée ?
La tâche est notée sur une échelle de 0 à 5 en fonction de la pertinence par rapport à la discussion, de la qualité de l'usage de la langue (grammaire, vocabulaire, structure des phrases), et de la manière dont vous développez et étayez vos idées à l'aide d'exemples précis et d'un raisonnement solide.
Que sont les exemples d'utilisateurs sur cette page ?
Il s'agit de véritables réponses soumises par des candidats au TOEFL qui se sont entraînés sur cette question sur LingoLeap. Chaque exemple a été évalué par notre moteur de notation par IA, qui fournit une note ainsi qu'un retour détaillé sur les points forts et les axes d'amélioration.
Quelle est la fiabilité de l'évaluation par IA ?
Le moteur d'évaluation par IA de LingoLeap est entraîné sur les grilles de notation officielles de l'ETS et calibré par rapport aux notes attribuées par des correcteurs humains. Bien qu'aucun système automatisé ne soit parfait, il fournit un retour fiable à des fins d'entraînement et aide à identifier des axes d'amélioration précis.
Comment puis-je m'entraîner à cette tâche Academic Discussion ?
Vous pouvez vous entraîner en créant un compte LingoLeap gratuit. Rédigez votre propre réponse à cette question précise, soumettez-la, et recevez une évaluation par IA instantanée accompagnée d'un retour détaillé sur votre rédaction.
Quelle longueur ma réponse Academic Discussion doit-elle avoir ?
Visez 120 à 150 mots. La tâche vous laisse 10 minutes pour rédiger votre réponse. Concentrez-vous sur la clarté, appuyez votre opinion avec des exemples précis, et faites référence au contexte de la discussion plutôt que d'écrire une réponse plus longue.

Atteignez votre score cible dès aujourd'hui !

Avec LingoLeap, l'expert en préparation aux examens d'anglais

Préparez-vous efficacement et atteignez votre score idéal au TOEFL plus rapidement

Essayez gratuitement maintenant