TOEFLIELTS
Español
All Samples

TOEFL TPO 10 Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on economics. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

Envíos reales de usuarios con evaluación y retroalimentación impulsadas por IA

325 ejemplos enviados por usuarios disponibles

Comenzar Práctica Gratis

Resumen de la Tarea

Doctor Diaz

Our current unit looks at tourism and the benefit it has on a country’s economy. Many argue that while tourism can indeed be a money-making endeavor, it can do more harm than good, especially tourism to small, remote places that are not heavily populated. What is your opinion? Should local or national governments promote tourism to remote regions not typically visited by tourists before? Why?

Andrew

Tourism has always been a lucrative business. Improving the economies of these rural regions, especially if those regions are poor, can only have a positive effect. People can have a better quality of life by showcasing their food and traditions to the outside world. It’s a chance the people might not get without promotion from the government.

Claire

I don’t think governments should promote tourism to remote regions. The people are likely not asking for this kind of industry or for this kind of attention. Instead, governments should develop other means of improving a region's economic situation, like expanding agriculture or other industries. These efforts will have a stronger, more permanent impact on the region than bringing in groups of tourists.

Ejemplos de Usuarios y Resultados de Evaluación

1

Ejemplo de Usuario #1

I disagree that government promote tourists to remote regions not typically visited by tourists before. There are two reasons following the below. Fi...

Puntuación
25

Ejemplo de Usuario

I disagree that government promote tourists to remote regions not typically visited by tourists before. There are two reasons following the below. First of all, remote regions tend not to build refined infrastructure, such as transportation, hotels and restaurants so on. It’s too unconventional to enjoy traveling. And at same time, government must spend extra time and money rebuilding, but these area’s actually haven’t extra taxation to cost just for tourist. In addition, as Claire alluded, remote regions need to find unique and suitable way to improve their life quality. If government invest tourists blindly rather than chewing over how to formulate optimal developmental plan seriously, citizen’s life wouldn’t become better to great degree. For example, one of remote regions belongs to mountainous area which suits to grow tea trees, and their tea has been well-known. Government should broaden their marketing channels, instead of building totally unconnected big amusement park.

Resultado de la Evaluación

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0

  • Language Use and Grammar: 3.5

2. 预估分数

25. 3 任务完成度

整体来说,你的文章回答了问题并表达了观点。但是,有一些地方可以改进。首先,在表达观点时,可以更具体地说明为什么不支持政府推广旅游业。其次,文章中有一些语法错误和不太准确的词汇使用。

改进建议示例(英文):

  1. Instead of saying "remote regions tend not to build refined infrastructure," you could say, "remote regions often lack well-developed infrastructure."

  2. Instead of saying "government must spend extra time and money rebuilding," you could say, "governments would need to invest significant time and resources in developing infrastructure."

4. 文章结构与组织

文章的结构和组织方面还有待提高。虽然你的文章包括了引言、正文和结论,但是在段落划分和过渡方面可以做得更好。建议将不同观点分成不同段落,并在段落之间使用过渡词汇。

改进建议示例(英文):

  1. You can divide your essay into separate paragraphs for each point, such as one paragraph discussing the lack of infrastructure and another discussing the need for a unique development plan.

  2. Use transition words or phrases like "Furthermore" or "On the other hand" to connect your ideas and make your essay flow more smoothly.

5. 语法批改

I disagree that governmentgovernments should promote tourists totourism in remote regions not typically visited by tourists before. There are two reasons following the below. First of all,following: Firstly, remote regions tendusually do not to buildhave refined infrastructure, such as transportation, hotelshotels, and restaurants so on. It's toorestaurants. It is unconventional to enjoy traveling. And attraveling in such areas. At the same time, governmentgovernments must spend extra time and money rebuilding, but these area's actually haven'tareas do not have extra taxation to cost just for tourist. In addition,cover the costs. Furthermore, as Claire alluded, remote regions need to find unique and suitable wayways to improve their life quality.quality of life. If governmentgovernments invest tourists blindly rather than chewing overin tourism blindly, without carefully considering how to formulate optimal developmental plan seriously, citizen's life wouldn'tdevelopment plan, citizens' lives would not become better to great degree.significantly better. For example, one of remote regions belongs toregion is a mountainous area which suits to growthat is suitable for growing tea trees, and their tea has beenis well-known. GovernmentThe government should broaden their marketing channels,channels instead of building totally unconnected big amusement park.

Display title: 6 文章修订

I believe that promoting tourism to remote regions not typically visited by tourists is not the most effective approach for governments. There are two primary reasons for this stance. Firstly, remote regions often lack the necessary infrastructure, such as transportation, hotels, and restaurants, making it challenging for tourists to enjoy their visit. Consequently, governments would need to invest significant time and resources into developing these areas without any guarantee of a return on investment.

Moreover, as Claire mentioned, remote regions should focus on identifying unique and suitable ways to improve their quality of life. Blindly investing in tourism without carefully considering an optimal development plan may not lead to substantial improvements in the lives of local citizens. For instance, if a remote region is known for its high-quality tea production due to its mountainous terrain, the government should prioritize expanding marketing channels for this product rather than constructing an unrelated amusement park. (156 words)

Revised essay: Display title: 6 文章修订

I disagree believe that government promote tourists promoting tourism to remote regions not typically visited by tourists before. is not the most effective approach for governments (clarified the stance and improved sentence structure). There are two two primary reasons following the below. First of all, for this stance. Firstly, remote regions tend not to build refined often lack the necessary infrastructure, such as transportation, hotels hotels, and restaurants so on. It’s too unconventional (rephrased for clarity), making it challenging for tourists to enjoy traveling. And at same time, their visit. Consequently, governments would need to invest significant time and resources into developing these areas without any guarantee of a return on investment (explained the potential issue with government must spend extra time and money rebuilding, but these area’s actually haven’t extra taxation to cost just for tourist. In addition, investment).

Moreover, as Claire alluded, mentioned, remote regions need to find should focus on identifying unique and suitable way ways to improve their quality of life quality. If (rephrased for clarity). Blindly investing in tourism without carefully considering an optimal development plan may not lead to substantial improvements in the lives of local citizens (explained the potential negative outcome). For instance, if a remote region is known for its high-quality tea production due to its mountainous terrain, the government invest tourists blindly should prioritize expanding marketing channels for this product rather than chewing over how to formulate optimal developmental plan seriously, citizen’s life wouldn’t become better to great degree. For example, one of remote regions belongs to mountainous area which suits to grow tea trees, and their tea has been well-known. Government should broaden their marketing channels, instead of building totally unconnected big constructing an unrelated amusement park.park (provided a specific example to support the argument).

Display title: 8 思维导图


1. Introduction
   - Thesis statement: Promoting tourism in remote regions is not the most effective approach for governments

2. Lack of infrastructure
   - Transportation
   - Hotels
   - Restaurants
   - Challenging for tourists to enjoy their visit

3. Government investment
   - Time and resources needed for development
   - No guarantee of return on investment

4. Focus on unique and suitable ways to improve quality of life
   - Claire's argument mentioned

5. Example: High-quality tea production in a remote region
   - Prioritize expanding marketing channels for the product rather than constructing an unrelated amusement park.

6. Conclusion 
   - Reiterate thesis statement and main points 

Display title: 9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish definitionSimplified Chinese translationSample sentences
Infrastructure/ˈɪnfrəˌstrʌktʃər/NounThe basic physical and organizational structures and facilities needed for the operation of a society or enterprise基础设施The lack of infrastructure in remote regions makes it difficult for tourists to enjoy their visit.
Investment/ɪnˈvɛstmənt/NounThe action or process of investing money for profit or material result投资Governments would need to invest significant time and resources into developing these areas.
Return on investment/rɪˈtɜrn ɒn ɪnˈvɛstmənt/NounA performance measure used to evaluate the efficiency of an investment or compare the efficiency of a number of different investments投资回报率There is no guarantee of a return on investment when promoting tourism in remote regions.
Quality of life/ˈkwɒlɪti əv laɪf/NounThe standard of health, comfort, and happiness experienced by an individual or group生活质量Remote regions should focus on identifying unique and suitable ways to improve their quality of life.
Optimal/ˈɒptɪməl/AdjectiveBest or most favorable; optimum最佳的Blindly investing in tourism without carefully considering an optimal development plan may not be effective.
Development/dɪˈvɛləpmənt/NounThe process of developing or being developed发展An optimal development plan is necessary for improving the lives of local citizens in remote regions.
Marketing channels/ˈmɑrkɪtɪŋ ˈʧænəlz/NounA set of intermediaries or middlemen that help move a product from the producer to the end consumer营销渠道The government should prioritize expanding marketing channels for high-quality tea production.
Amusement park/əˈmjuzmənt pɑrk/NounA large outdoor area with fairground rides, shows, refreshments, games of chance or skill, and other entertainments游乐园Constructing an unrelated amusement park may not lead to substantial improvements in the lives of local citizens.
Mountainous/ˈmaʊntənəs/AdjectiveHaving many mountains or consisting mainly of mountains多山的The remote region is known for its high-quality tea production due to its mountainous terrain.
2

Ejemplo de Usuario #2

I agree with Andrew's viewpoint and believe that governments give support to remote regions to develop their tourism can yield significant benefits. P...

Puntuación
27

Ejemplo de Usuario

I agree with Andrew's viewpoint and believe that governments give support to remote regions to develop their tourism can yield significant benefits. People tend to be drawn towards the novel and cost-effective things, which may influence their choices. Compared to famous sights, remote areas have some advantages such as lower consumption and cheaper things, which will attract more people to visit. Once they make a good use of their strengths, they can earn more money. Consequently, government can develop the characteristics of the remote regions through publicizing and increase the economic growth. For instance, I know someone who are in a tight budget but enjoy traveling. He must pay expensive tuitions and cover his living expenses. He travels to the remote regions which benenfit both the people in the remote places and him.

Resultado de la Evaluación

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0

  • Language Use and Grammar: 4.0

2. 预估分数

  • 27

3. 任务完成度

整体来说,这篇文章回答了问题并提供了一定程度的论据。但是,可以在以下方面进行改进:

  1. 提供更具体的例子来支持观点。

  2. 更深入地讨论远离旅游热点地区的优势。

  3. 对于反对意见(如Claire的观点)进行简要回应。

示例1: 例如,政府可以通过宣传当地独特的自然景观和文化遗产,吸引游客前来参观。

示例2: 然而,我们也需要考虑到过度开发旅游业可能对当地环境和文化造成的负面影响,并采取相应措施加以限制。

4. 文章结构与组织

文章结构基本清晰,但可以在以下方面进行改进:

  1. 在开头部分简要介绍文章将讨论的主题。

  2. 在结尾部分总结观点并提出建议。

示例1: 开头部分:在本文中,我将讨论为什么我认为政府应该支持偏远地区发展旅游业,并提供一些论据支持我的观点。

示例2: 结尾部分:总之,我认为政府应该支持偏远地区发展旅游业,因为这将有助于提高当地经济水平和居民生活质量。然而,在推动旅游业发展的同时,我们也需要关注可能带来的负面影响,并采取相应措施加以限制。

5. 语法批改

I agree with Andrew's viewpoint and believe that governments giveto give(This rule identifies whether the preposition 'to' is missing in a sentence.) support to remote regions to develop their tourism can yield significant benefits. People tend to be drawn towards the novel and cost-effective things, which may influence their choices. Compared to famous sights, remote areas have some advantages such as lower consumption and cheaper things, which will attract more people to visit. Once they make a good use of their strengths, they can earn more money. Consequently, government can develop the characteristics of the remote regions through publicizing and increase the economic growth. For instance, I know someone who are in a tight budget but enjoy traveling. He must pay expensive tuitionstuition(misspelling) and cover his living expenses. He travels to the remote regionsregions,(This rule identifies whether commas are missing in a sentence.) which benenfitbenefit(misspelling) both the people in the remote places and him.

Title: 6 文章修订

In my opinion, promoting tourism in remote regions, as Andrew suggests, can indeed yield significant benefits. People are often drawn to novel and cost-effective experiences, which can influence their travel choices. Remote areas may offer advantages such as lower costs and unique attractions, potentially attracting more visitors. By capitalizing on these strengths and receiving government support for publicity and development, remote regions can experience economic growth. For example, I know someone who has a tight budget but enjoys traveling. He must pay expensive tuition fees and cover living expenses; therefore, he opts to visit remote regions where his money goes further. This benefits both the traveler and the local communities in these lesser-known destinations. (117 words)

I agree with In my opinion, promoting tourism in remote regions, as Andrew suggests (clarifying the connection to Andrew's viewpoint and believe that governments give support to remote regions to develop their tourism viewpoint), can indeed yield significant benefits. People tend are often drawn to be drawn towards the novel and cost-effective things, experiences (rephrasing for clarity and natural tone), which may can influence their travel choices. Compared to famous sights, remote Remote areas have some may offer advantages such as lower consumption costs and cheaper things, which will attract unique attractions (rephrasing for clarity), potentially attracting more people to visit. Once they make a good use of their strengths, they can earn more money. Consequently, visitors. By capitalizing on these strengths and receiving government can develop the characteristics of the support for publicity and development (adding context about government support), remote regions through publicizing and increase the can experience economic growth. For instance, example, I know someone who are in has a tight budget but enjoy traveling. enjoys traveling (correcting grammar). He must pay expensive tuitions tuition fees and cover his living expenses. He travels expenses; therefore, he opts to the visit remote regions which benenfit where his money goes further (rephrasing for clarity). This benefits both the people traveler and the local communities in these lesser-known destinations (summarizing the remote places and him.mutual benefits).

8 思维导图

graph TD
A[Promoting Tourism in Remote Regions]
B[Novel and Cost-effective Experiences]
C[Lower Costs and Unique Attractions]
D[Government Support for Publicity and Development]
E[Economic Growth for Remote Regions]
F[Tight Budget Travelers]
G[Benefits for Travelers and Local Communities]

A --> B
A --> C
A --> D
A --> E
E --> F
E --> G

9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
Promoting/prəˈmoʊtɪŋ/VerbEncouraging the popularity, sale, development, or existence of something.推广Promoting tourism in remote regions can yield significant benefits.
Remote/rɪˈmoʊt/AdjectiveSituated far from the main centers of population; distant.偏远的Remote areas may offer advantages such as lower costs and unique attractions.
Novel/ˈnɒvəl/AdjectiveNew or unusual in an interesting way.新颖的People are often drawn to novel and cost-effective experiences.
Cost-effective/kɒst ɪˈfektɪv/Adjective- Economical in terms of the goods or services received for the money spent.- 划算的- He opts to visit remote regions where his money goes further.
Attractions/əˈtrækʃənz/NounPlaces or things that people visit or see for pleasure.景点Unique attractions in remote regions can potentially attract more visitors.
Capitalizing/ˈkæpɪtəˌlaɪzɪŋ/VerbTaking advantage of a situation.利用By capitalizing on these strengths, remote regions can experience economic growth.
Publicity/pʌˈblɪsɪti/Noun- Notice or attention given to someone or something by the media.- 宣传- The government should provide support for publicity and development in remote regions.
Economic Growth/ɪˌkɒnəmɪk ˈgroʊθ/Noun- An increase in the amount of goods and services produced per head of the population over a period of time.- 经济增长- Promoting tourism can lead to economic growth for remote regions.
Local Communities/ˈloʊkəl kəˈmjunətiz/Noun- Groups of people living in the same area, sharing common interests, values, and resources.- 当地社区- This benefits both the traveler and the local communities in these lesser-known destinations.

Cómo se Evalúa la Academic Discussion

La tarea TOEFL Academic Discussion se evalúa según la rúbrica oficial de ETS. La evaluación con IA analiza cada respuesta en varias dimensiones.

Relevancia y Contribución

¿La respuesta aborda la pregunta y aporta de manera significativa a la discusión?

Uso del Idioma

Precisión gramatical, variedad de vocabulario y calidad de la estructura de las oraciones.

Desarrollo y Fundamentación

¿Las ideas están bien desarrolladas con ejemplos específicos y un razonamiento claro?

Patrones Comunes en las Respuestas

Según el análisis de los envíos de usuarios para esta tarea, estos son los patrones comunes observados en las respuestas de los estudiantes.

Muchos estudiantes expresan opiniones claras, pero carecen de ejemplos específicos que las respalden.

Las respuestas sólidas hacen referencia directa al texto de lectura y a los puntos de vista de los demás participantes.

Las respuestas con mejor puntuación usan estructuras de oraciones variadas y vocabulario académico.

La gestión del tiempo es un factor clave — las respuestas que parecen apresuradas tienden a puntuar más bajo en desarrollo.

Consejos de Aprendizaje

1

Lee el enunciado con atención e identifica todas las partes de la pregunta antes de escribir.

2

Haz referencia al texto de lectura y a las opiniones de los otros estudiantes en tu respuesta.

3

Usa ejemplos específicos para respaldar tu idea principal — evita afirmaciones genéricas.

4

Apunta a 120-150 palabras. Las respuestas más largas no siempre son mejores; la claridad y el enfoque importan más.

5

Practica respuestas cronometradas (10 minutos) para ganar fluidez en condiciones de examen.

Preguntas frecuentes

¿Qué es la tarea de Discusión Académica del TOEFL?
La tarea de Discusión Académica del TOEFL requiere que participes en un debate de clase en línea. Leerás la pregunta de un profesor y las respuestas de otros estudiantes, y luego escribirás tu propia publicación expresando y respaldando tu opinión en aproximadamente 10 minutos.
¿Cómo se califica la tarea de Discusión Académica?
La tarea se califica en una escala de 0 a 5 según la relevancia con respecto a la discusión, la calidad del uso del idioma (gramática, vocabulario, estructura de las oraciones) y qué tan bien desarrollas y respaldas tus ideas con ejemplos y razonamientos específicos.
¿Qué son las muestras de usuarios en esta página?
Son respuestas reales enviadas por candidatos del TOEFL que practicaron esta pregunta en LingoLeap. Cada muestra ha sido evaluada por nuestro motor de calificación con IA, que proporciona una puntuación y comentarios detallados sobre fortalezas y áreas de mejora.
¿Qué tan precisa es la evaluación con IA?
El motor de evaluación con IA de LingoLeap está entrenado con las rúbricas oficiales de calificación de ETS y calibrado con puntuaciones de evaluadores humanos. Aunque ningún sistema automatizado es perfecto, ofrece comentarios confiables para fines de práctica y ayuda a identificar áreas específicas de mejora.
¿Cómo puedo practicar esta tarea de Discusión Académica?
Puedes practicar registrándote para obtener una cuenta gratuita de LingoLeap. Escribe tu propia respuesta a esta pregunta exacta, envíala y recibe una evaluación instantánea con IA con comentarios detallados sobre tu redacción.
¿Qué extensión debe tener mi respuesta de Discusión Académica?
Apunta a 120-150 palabras. La tarea te da 10 minutos para escribir tu respuesta. Concéntrate en la claridad, respalda tu opinión con ejemplos específicos y haz referencia al contexto de la discusión en lugar de escribir una respuesta más larga.

Rooting for Your Goal Score Today!

With LingoLeap, an expert in English exams

Get to Your Dream Score Faster

Try for free now