TOEFL TPO 60 Writing Task 1 Sample: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific theories mentions in the reading passage.

1.子项得分 任务完成度：4 组织：3 连贯与衔接：3 语言使用：3

2.预估分数

22. 3.任务完成度

你的文章基本上完成了任务要求，但是在对听力部分的总结方面还有待提高。建议你更详细地阐述听力中的观点，并解释这些观点是如何对阅读中的理论产生质疑的。此外，注意避免重复提及阅读材料中的信息。

例1： 原文：Furthermore, the reading passage asserts that we should educate consumers about the function of Keratin. Contrary to this assertion, the professor thinks that this kind of idea is too ancient. 改进：Furthermore, the reading passage asserts that we should educate consumers about the function of Keratin. However, the professor argues that educating consumers is unlikely to be effective due to their strong cultural beliefs and ancient traditions regarding the healing powers of rhino horn.

例2： 原文：Lastly, despite the reading passage condemns that government should legalize their sales of rhino horn, the professor holds an opposing ideas. 改进：Lastly, although the reading passage suggests legalizing government sales of rhino horn as a solution, the professor opposes this idea by explaining its potential negative consequences.

4.文章结构与组织 文章的结构需要改进。虽然你包括了引言、正文和结论，但是正文部分缺乏清晰的段落划分。建议将每个观点单独成段，并使用恰当的过渡词来衔接段落。此外，注意在引言和结论中避免重复提及阅读材料中的信息。

例1： 原文：To begin with, although the reading passage states that we could dehorn the rhinoceros to make them less attractive, the professor disproves it. 改进：Firstly, the professor challenges the idea of dehorning rhinos as a solution to protect them from poachers.

例2： 原文：In conclusion, through the arguments against each ideas presented in the reading passage, the professor highlights their weaknesses and casts doubt on the validity of the three ideas. 改进：In conclusion, the lecture effectively casts doubt on each of the proposed solutions in the reading passage by presenting counterarguments and highlighting their weaknesses.

5. 语法批改

The reading passage presents (Two consecutive spaces)three ideas to explain the measures to save rhinoceros. However, the professor in the lectures challenges each of the idea by specific point.

To begin with, although the reading passage states that we could dehorn the rhinoceros to make them less attractive, the professor disproves it. Firstly, it will cost a lot of time and money to find them in the wild, prepare the drugs and remove the horn. What’s more, it will also reduce the chances frofor(fro (for)) rhinoceros to survive in the wild. They need horns to dig water, find food and guide predators. If we remove their horns, they are not likely to survive.

Furthermore, the reading passage asserts that we should educate consumers about the function of Keratin. Contrary to this assertion, the professor thinks that this kind of idea is too ancient. What’s more, if there are some old people stronlystrongly(misspelling) believe this idea, it is not easy to change their mind.

Lastly, despite the reading passage condemns that government should legalize their sales of rhino horn, the professor holds an opposing ideasan opposing idea(Agreement: 'a' + plural word). That is because currently, people who don’t buy horns due to it is illegal. However, if government makes buying horns acceptable, people will start to buy them and the demand offor(This rule identifies wrong preposition usage.) horns will increase dramatically. As a result, the priseprice(the + verb) of horns will be higher and attract more poachers to kill rhinoceros consistently because government makes the marker larger and more lucrative.

In conclusion, through the arguments against each ideasall ideas('each' or 'every' with plural nouns) presented in the reading passage, the professor highlights their weaknesses and casts doubt on the validity of the three ideas.

Section Title: 6.文章修订

The reading passage presents three ideas to explain the measures to save rhinoceroses. However, the professor in the lecture challenges each of these ideas with specific points.

To begin with, although the reading passage states that we could dehorn rhinoceroses to make them less attractive to poachers, the professor disputes this claim. Firstly, it would require a significant amount of time and money to locate them in the wild, prepare the necessary drugs, and remove their horns. Moreover, dehorning would reduce the chances of rhinoceroses surviving in the wild. They need their horns for various purposes such as digging for water, finding food, and protecting themselves from predators. Removing their horns would likely hinder their ability to survive.

Furthermore, the reading passage asserts that we should educate consumers about the function of keratin found in rhino horns. Contrary to this assertion, the professor believes that changing people's ancient beliefs about rhino horn's healing powers is challenging. Educating consumers works best when they do not already have strong preconceived notions about something. However, when consumers hold deeply ingrained beliefs based on centuries-old traditions, new scientific evidence is unlikely to easily change their minds.

Lastly, despite the reading passage suggesting that governments should legalize sales of rhino horn, the professor holds an opposing view. This is because currently, many people who might want rhino horn do not buy it due to its illegality. If governments were to make buying horns acceptable by legalizing sales, demand for horns could increase dramatically. Consequently, prices would rise and attract more poachers who would continue killing rhinoceroses because government sales might create a larger and more lucrative market.

Through these counterarguments against each idea presented in the reading passage, the professor highlights their weaknesses and casts doubt on the validity of all three proposals. (301 words)

Revised essay: The reading passage presents presents three ideas to explain the measures to save rhinoceros. rhinoceroses. However, the professor in the lectures lecture challenges each of the idea by these ideas with specific point. points (Changed "idea" to "ideas" and "point" to "points" for grammatical accuracy).

To begin with, although the reading passage states that we could dehorn the rhinoceros rhinoceroses to make them less attractive, attractive to poachers, the professor disproves it. disputes this claim (Changed "disproves it" to "disputes this claim" for a more accurate description). Firstly, it will cost would require a lot significant amount of time and money to find locate them in the wild, prepare the drugs necessary drugs, and remove the horn. What’s more, it will also their horns. Moreover, dehorning would reduce the chances fro rhinoceros to survive of rhinoceroses surviving in the wild. They need their horns to dig for various purposes such as digging for water, find food and guide finding food, and protecting themselves from predators. If we remove their horns, they are not Removing their horns would likely to survive. hinder their ability to survive (Clarified that removing horns would hinder survival).

Furthermore, the reading passage asserts that we should educate consumers about the function of Keratin. keratin found in rhino horns. Contrary to this assertion, the professor thinks believes that this changing people's ancient beliefs about rhino horn's healing powers is challenging (Changed "this kind of idea is too ancient. What’s more, if there are some old people stronly believe this idea, it ancient" to better convey what is challenging). Educating consumers works best when they do not easy to already have strong preconceived notions about something. However, when consumers hold deeply ingrained beliefs based on centuries-old traditions, new scientific evidence is unlikely to easily change their mind. minds (Clarified why changing minds might be difficult).

Lastly, despite the reading passage condemns suggesting that government governments should legalize their sales of rhino horn, the professor holds an opposing ideas. That view (Changed "condemns" to "suggesting" for clarity). This is because currently, many people who don’t might want rhino horn do not buy horns it due to it is illegal. However, if government makes its illegality. If governments were to make buying horns acceptable, people will start to buy them and the acceptable by legalizing sales, demand of for horns will could increase dramatically. As a result, the prise of horns will be higher Consequently, prices would rise and attract more poachers to kill rhinoceros consistently who would continue killing rhinoceroses because government makes the marker sales might create a larger and more lucrative. lucrative market (Clarified the potential consequences of legalizing sales).

In conclusion, through the arguments Through these counterarguments against each ideas idea presented in the reading passage, the professor highlights their weaknesses and casts doubt on the validity of the all three ideas.proposals (Changed "ideas" to "proposals" for better word choice).

8. Mind Map

1. Introduction
   - Reading passage ideas
   - Professor's challenge

2. Dehorning Rhinoceroses
   - Time and money required
   - Reduced survival chances

3. Educating Consumers
   - Difficulty in changing ancient beliefs
   - Ineffectiveness with strong preconceived notions

4. Legalizing Rhino Horn Sales
   - Increased demand and prices
   - Attracting more poachers

5. Conclusion
   - Counterarguments against reading passage ideas

9. Keywords

Section Title: 6. Article Revision

The reading passage presents three ideas to explain the measures to save rhinoceroses. However, the professor in the lecture challenges each of these ideas with specific points.

To begin with, although the reading passage states that we could dehorn rhinoceroses to make them less attractive to poachers, the professor disputes this claim. Firstly, it would require a significant amount of time and money to locate them in the wild, prepare the necessary drugs, and remove their horns. Moreover, dehorning would reduce the chances of rhinoceroses surviving in the wild. They need their horns for various purposes such as digging for water, finding food, and protecting themselves from predators. Removing their horns would likely hinder their ability to survive.

Furthermore, the reading passage asserts that we should educate consumers about the function of keratin found in rhino horns. Contrary to this assertion, the professor believes that changing people's ancient beliefs about rhino horn's healing powers is challenging. Educating consumers works best when they do not already have strong preconceived notions about something. However, when consumers hold deeply ingrained beliefs based on centuries-old traditions, new scientific evidence is unlikely to easily change their minds.

Lastly, despite the reading passage suggesting that governments should legalize sales of rhino horn, the professor holds an opposing view. This is because currently, many people who might want rhino horn do not buy it due to its illegality. If governments were to make buying horns acceptable by legalizing sales, demand for horns could increase dramatically. Consequently, prices would rise and attract more poachers who would continue killing rhinoceroses because government sales might create a larger and more lucrative market.

Through these counterarguments against each idea presented in the reading passage, the professor highlights their weaknesses and casts doubt on the validity of all three proposals.

1.子项得分 任务完成度: 4 组织: 3 连贯与衔接: 3 语言使用: 3

2.预估分数

22. 3.任务完成度

这篇文章在任务完成度方面表现不错，基本上涵盖了阅读和听力中的观点。但是，有一些地方可以改进。首先，在总结听力中反驳阅读观点的论据时，应更加简洁明了地表达。其次，在解释听力部分如何对阅读提出质疑时，可以更具体地说明。

示例1： 原文：The professor refutes it by saying that dehorning is neither practical nor good. 修改：The professor argues that dehorning is impractical and harmful to rhinos.

示例2： 原文：Unfortunately, consumers have strong belief and do not change their mind. 修改：Unfortunately, consumers' deeply ingrained beliefs make it difficult for them to change their minds.

4.文章结构与组织 文章的结构和组织方面有待提高。首先，引言部分可以更明确地指出文章将讨论的三个观点。其次，在正文段落中，建议使用更清晰的过渡词或短语来连接不同的想法。最后，在结尾部分总结全文，并指出听力对阅读观点产生的质疑。

示例1： 引言改进：The reading passage suggests three solutions to prevent rhinos from becoming extinct, while the lecture casts doubt on each of these proposals.

示例2： 过渡词改进：Firstly, the reading passage claims that... However, the professor contends that... Secondly, the reading passage points out that... In contrast, the professor argues that...

5. 语法批改

The reading passage provides three ways to prevent rhinos from becoming extinct. However, the professor refutes each of the ideas proposed in the reading passage. First, the reading passage claims that wildlife experts can dehorn rhinos living in the wild.The The(Missing space between sentences) professor refutes it by saying that dehorning is neither practical nor good. The professor states that experts should find rhinos in the wild and prepare for surgeries. Even if experts have time and money to do these things, it reduces rhinos ' ' (Use of whitespace before comma and before/after parentheses)chances to survive in the wild. Rhinos need horns to drink water, break branches, and guide the young and territories. AlougthLough(misspelling) dehorning lets rhinos unattractive to poachers, but it also threatens rhinos living in the wild. Second, the reading passage points that we can educate consumers. However, the professor says that consumers have a strong culture belief that horns have healing power. The belief is very ancient for more than a hundred years. Education works best when consumers do not have very strong belief. Unfortunately, consumers have strong belief and do not change their mind. Third, the reading passage indicates that we can legalize government sales of rhino horn. The professor opposes this point by saying that legalizing government sales may have unpredictable results. To be specific, people do not want rhino horns because sales of rhino horn are illegal. If we legalize government sales of rhino horn, more people want to buy horns. The rising demand of rhino horns leads to a large market. Economy rules show that a large market causes the price of rhinonrhino(misspelling) horns to go up. The rising price will let poachers continue to kill rhinos for sales, because there is a large market for rhino sales. (Whitespace repetition (bad formatting))

Section Title: 6.文章修订

The reading passage presents three potential solutions to prevent rhinoceroses from becoming extinct. However, the professor in the lecture casts doubt on each of these ideas, highlighting their shortcomings.

Firstly, the reading passage suggests that wildlife experts could dehorn rhinos living in the wild to make them less attractive to poachers. The professor counters this by arguing that dehorning is neither practical nor beneficial for rhino survival. He explains that locating and preparing rhinos for surgery would be challenging and time-consuming. Moreover, removing their horns would hinder their ability to find water, break branches for food, guide their young, and protect their territory. Although dehorning may deter poachers, it could also jeopardize the rhinos' chances of survival in the wild.

Secondly, the reading passage proposes educating consumers about the lack of health benefits associated with rhino horn consumption. The professor disagrees with this approach, stating that many consumers have deeply ingrained cultural beliefs about the healing powers of rhino horns that date back thousands of years. He asserts that education is most effective when consumers do not already possess strong convictions; thus, it is unlikely to change their minds in this case.

Lastly, the reading passage recommends legalizing government sales of rhino horns as a means to reduce poaching by lowering prices. The professor challenges this idea by pointing out that such a move could have unpredictable consequences. Specifically, he explains that if governments were to legalize sales of rhino horns, it might become socially acceptable to purchase them and lead to increased demand. This surge in demand could create a larger market for horns and subsequently drive up prices due to economic principles. As a result, poaching might not cease but rather continue or even intensify as higher prices would attract more poachers seeking profits from this expanded market. (303 words)

The reading passage provides presents three ways potential solutions to prevent rhinos rhinoceroses from becoming extinct. However, the professor refutes in the lecture casts doubt on each of the ideas proposed in the reading passage. these ideas, highlighting their shortcomings (Changed "provides" to "presents" and "ideas proposed" to "ideas" for better clarity and conciseness).

First, Firstly, the reading passage claims suggests that wildlife experts can could dehorn rhinos living in the wild.The wild to make them less attractive to poachers. The professor refutes it counters this by saying arguing that dehorning is neither practical nor good. beneficial for rhino survival (Rephrased "refutes it by saying that dehorning is neither practical nor good" for better clarity). He explains that locating and preparing rhinos for surgery would be challenging and time-consuming. Moreover, removing their horns would hinder their ability to find water, break branches for food, guide their young, and protect their territory (Revised sentence structure for better flow). Although dehorning may deter poachers, it could also jeopardize the rhinos' chances of survival in the wild (Rephrased "threatens rhinos living in the wild" for better clarity).

Secondly, the reading passage proposes educating consumers about the lack of health benefits associated with rhino horn consumption. The professor states that experts should find rhinos in the wild and prepare for surgeries. Even if experts have time and money to do these things, it reduces rhinos ' chances to survive in the wild. Rhinos need horns to drink water, break branches, and guide the young and territories. Alougth dehorning lets rhinos unattractive to poachers, but it also threatens rhinos living in the wild. ¶ Second, the reading passage points that we can educate consumers. However, the professor says that disagrees with this approach, stating that many consumers have a strong culture belief that deeply ingrained cultural beliefs about the healing powers of rhino horns have healing power. The belief that date back thousands of years (Revised sentence structure for better flow). He asserts that education is very ancient for more than a hundred years. Education works best most effective when consumers do not have very already possess strong belief. Unfortunately, consumers convictions; thus, it is unlikely to change their minds in this case (Rephrased "consumers have strong belief and do not change their mind. mind" for better clarity).

Third, Lastly, the reading passage indicates that we can legalize recommends legalizing government sales of rhino horn. horns as a means to reduce poaching by lowering prices. The professor opposes challenges this idea by pointing out that such a move could have unpredictable consequences (Rephrased "opposes this point by saying that legalizing government sales may have unpredictable results. To be specific, people do results" for better clarity). Specifically, he explains that if governments were to legalize sales of rhino horns, it might become socially acceptable to purchase them and lead to increased demand (Revised sentence structure for better flow). This surge in demand could create a larger market for horns and subsequently drive up prices due to economic principles (Changed "Economy rules" to "economic principles" for better word choice). As a result, poaching might not want rhino horns because sales of rhino horn are illegal. If we legalize government sales of rhino horn, cease but rather continue or even intensify as higher prices would attract more people want to buy horns. The rising demand of rhino horns leads to a large market. Economy rules show that a large poachers seeking profits from this expanded market causes the price of rhinon horns to go up. The rising price will (Rephrased "will let poachers continue to kill rhinos for sales, because there is a large market for rhino sales.sales" for better clarity).

8. Mind Map

Mind Map:

- Introduction
  - Reading passage: three solutions to prevent rhino extinction
  - Lecture: professor doubts these solutions

- Dehorning Rhinos
  - Reading passage: make rhinos less attractive to poachers
  - Lecture: impractical, harmful to rhino survival

- Educating Consumers
  - Reading passage: inform about lack of health benefits of rhino horns
  - Lecture: deeply ingrained cultural beliefs, education unlikely to change minds

- Legalizing Government Sales of Rhino Horns
  - Reading passage: reduce poaching by lowering prices
  - Lecture: unpredictable consequences, increased demand, higher prices, more poaching

9. Keywords

1.子项得分 任务完成度: 4 组织: 3 连贯与衔接: 3 语言使用: 3

2.预估分数

22. 3.任务完成度

你的文章在任务完成度方面做得不错，基本上涵盖了阅读和听力材料中的主要观点。但是，可以在引用听力材料时更加具体和详细，以便更好地解释它们是如何对阅读材料提出质疑的。

建议改进：

• 在引用听力材料时，尽量使用更具体的例子和细节。

• 更明确地说明听力材料是如何质疑阅读材料中的理论的。

示例：

1. Instead of "the professor states that it costs a lot and put them at a disadvantage situation," you could write, "the professor argues that dehorning rhinos is not only expensive and time-consuming but also reduces their chances of survival in the wild due to their reliance on their horns for various purposes."

2. Instead of "meaning that we cannot easily change people's old belief about rhinoceros' horns is beneficial to our health," you could write, "thus, changing consumers' long-held beliefs about the health benefits of rhino horns would be challenging despite presenting new scientific evidence."

4.文章结构与组织 文章结构方面需要改进。虽然你的文章有一个简单的结构，但可以通过增加一个明确的引言和结论来提高整体组织。此外，确保每个段落都集中在一个特定的观点上，并使用清晰的过渡词来连接不同的想法和段落。

建议改进：

• 添加一个明确的引言和结论。

• 在段落之间使用清晰的过渡词和短语。

示例：

1. For the introduction, you could write, "The reading passage and the lecture both discuss potential solutions to save rhinoceroses from extinction. However, the lecture casts doubt on the effectiveness of these solutions presented in the reading."

2. To improve transitions between paragraphs, you could use phrases like "Firstly," "Secondly," and "Lastly" at the beginning of each paragraph to indicate a new point being discussed.

5. 语法批改

The methods of saving the rhinoceros are the focus of both the writer and the professor. In the writing, methods of saving the rhinoceros are proposed, including "dehorning" Rhinoceros, educating the customers, legalizing the horn sales. The professor, however, claims these methods are impractical and realistic. As opposed to the writer's idea that it is helpful to dehorn these rhinoceros by using the medical equipment and drugs, which will make them unattractive to poachers, the professor states that it costs a lot and put them at a disadvantage situation. She advances the theory that finding the rhinoceros in the wild costs a lot of money and time, and it will reduce the chance for rhinoceros to survive, because they rely on their horn to eat food and raise the youth and protect their territory, losing which will put them at a disadvantaged situation. The professor continues to discredit the writer's assertion that we can educate the consumers that rhinoceros' horn isn't beneficial to our health, by examining the fact that people's ancient and original belief is hard to change. In detail, people's relatively new idea and belief are easy to change while old idea and belief are difficult to change, meaning that we cannot easily change people's old belief about rhinoceros' horns is beneficial to our health. It is the professor's third argument that legalizing these horns will expand the market and raise the horn's price, encouraging more poaching, which contradicts the view of the writer that legalizing will lead to a lower price because of cheap rhino horn provided by government. To explore deeper, she contends that more people who want the rhinoceros' horn will buy theto(Detects potentially wrong usage of "the") them while they don't dare to buy before legalizing, raising the demand and expand the market, which will result in higher price and encourage poaching the horns.

Section Title: 6.文章修订

The essay discusses the contrasting viewpoints of the author and the professor regarding methods to save rhinoceroses from extinction. The author proposes three solutions: dehorning rhinos, educating consumers, and legalizing government sales of rhino horns. However, the professor argues that these methods are impractical and unrealistic.

Contrary to the author's suggestion that dehorning rhinos using medical equipment and drugs would make them unattractive to poachers, the professor asserts that this approach is costly and puts rhinos at a disadvantage. She explains that locating rhinos in the wild requires significant time and money, and removing their horns reduces their chances of survival since they rely on them for finding food, raising their young, and protecting their territory.

The professor also disputes the author's claim that educating consumers about the lack of health benefits associated with rhino horns would be effective. She points out that people's ancient beliefs are difficult to change; therefore, it is unlikely that new information would easily alter long-held convictions about the supposed healing properties of rhino horns.

Lastly, the professor challenges the author's view that legalizing government sales of rhino horns would lead to lower prices due to an increased supply of cheap horns. Instead, she contends that legalization could expand the market and raise horn prices by making it socially acceptable for more people to purchase them. This increased demand could result in higher prices, which would ultimately encourage further poaching.

In conclusion, while both parties agree on the importance of saving rhinoceroses from extinction, they differ significantly in their proposed solutions. The professor's arguments cast doubt on each of the author's suggestions by highlighting their potential negative consequences or questioning their effectiveness in addressing this pressing issue. (285 words)

The essay discusses the contrasting viewpoints of the author and the professor regarding methods of saving the rhinoceros are the focus of both the writer and the professor. In the writing, methods of saving the rhinoceros are proposed, including "dehorning" Rhinoceros, to save rhinoceroses from extinction (changed for clarity and conciseness). The author proposes three solutions: dehorning rhinos, educating the customers, consumers, and legalizing the horn sales. The professor, however, claims government sales of rhino horns (rephrased for better flow). However, the professor argues that these methods are impractical and realistic. unrealistic (corrected grammar).

As opposed to the writer's idea that it is helpful to dehorn these rhinoceros by Contrary to the author's suggestion that dehorning rhinos using the medical equipment and drugs, which will drugs would make them unattractive to poachers, the professor states that it costs a lot and put them asserts that this approach is costly and puts rhinos at a disadvantage situation. (improved sentence structure). She advances the theory that finding the rhinoceros explains that locating rhinos in the wild costs a lot of money and time, and it will reduce the chance for rhinoceros to survive, because requires significant time and money, and removing their horns reduces their chances of survival since they rely on their horn to eat food and raise the youth and protect their territory, losing which will put them at a disadvantaged situation. for finding food, raising their young, and protecting their territory (clarified explanation).

The professor continues to discredit the writer's assertion that we can educate the also disputes the author's claim that educating consumers that rhinoceros' horn isn't beneficial to our health, by examining the fact about the lack of health benefits associated with rhino horns would be effective (corrected grammar). She points out that people's ancient and original belief is hard to change. In detail, people's relatively new idea and belief are easy to change while old idea and belief beliefs are difficult to change, meaning that we cannot change; therefore, it is unlikely that new information would easily change people's old belief alter long-held convictions about rhinoceros' horns is beneficial to our health. the supposed healing properties of rhino horns (improved sentence structure).

It is the professor's third argument Lastly, the professor challenges the author's view that legalizing these horns will expand the market and raise the horn's price, encouraging more poaching, which contradicts the view of the writer that legalizing will government sales of rhino horns would lead to a lower price because prices due to an increased supply of cheap rhino horn provided by government. To explore deeper, horns (rephrased for better flow). Instead, she contends that legalization could expand the market and raise horn prices by making it socially acceptable for more people who want the rhinoceros' horn will buy the to purchase them while they don't dare to buy before legalizing, raising the (clarified explanation). This increased demand and expand the market, which will could result in higher price and prices, which would ultimately encourage further poaching the horns.(improved sentence structure).

In conclusion, while both parties agree on the importance of saving rhinoceroses from extinction, they differ significantly in their proposed solutions (rephrased for better flow). The professor's arguments cast doubt on each of the author's suggestions by highlighting their potential negative consequences or questioning their effectiveness in addressing this pressing issue (clarified explanation).

---

Section Title: 8. Mind Map

Below is a mind map in English containing keywords for the essay's structure and points of lecture:

- Introduction
    - Contrasting viewpoints
    - Author's solutions
    - Professor's objections

- Dehorning Rhinos
    - Author: Prevent poaching
    - Professor: Costly, disadvantages for rhinos

- Educating Consumers
    - Author: Change beliefs about health benefits
    - Professor: Difficult to change ancient beliefs

- Legalizing Government Sales of Rhino Horns
    - Author: Lower prices, reduce poaching
    - Professor: Expand market, raise prices, encourage poaching

- Conclusion
    - Importance of saving rhinoceroses
    - Differences in proposed solutions

---

Section Title: 9. Keywords

---