TOEFLIELTS
Français
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on friendship. Write a post responding to the professor's question.

Vraies réponses d'utilisateurs avec évaluation et retour propulsés par l'IA

1 exemples soumis par des utilisateurs disponibles

Commencer l'Entraînement Gratuit

Aperçu de la Tâche

Doctor Achebe:

Let's explore the dynamics of social interactions and their impact on our well-being. Socializing in smaller groups versus larger circles can have varying effects on one's health and happiness. Some argue that smaller groups foster deeper connections, allowing for more meaningful interactions and a sense of closeness. Conversely, larger friend circles offer diversity and exposure to different perspectives. Which do you think contributes more to a person's health and happiness: spending time with a close-knit few or a larger group of friends?

Andrew

Developing strong bonds with a few close friends fosters deeper connections and enhances emotional support. These intimate relationships often lead to increased trust and understanding, allowing for genuine empathy and shared experiences. Small friend groups offer a sense of security and authenticity in interactions, promoting mental well-being.

Claire

Having a wide circle of friends offers diverse perspectives and experiences, enriching one's social life. Numerous friendships provide a larger support network, creating opportunities for various activities and interests. Engaging with a larger group cultivates adaptability, social skills, and exposure to different cultures or ideas, contributing to personal growth.

Exemples d'Utilisateurs et Résultats d'Évaluation

1

Exemple d'Utilisateur #1

Although Andrew’s statement has some merits when he clearly presents the advantages of keeping close-knit circle of friends, he fails to consider the ...

Score
26

Exemple d'Utilisateur

Although Andrew’s statement has some merits when he clearly presents the advantages of keeping close-knit circle of friends, he fails to consider the drawbacks along with it. Being with a small cricle of people for a long time means having same kind of interests, talking same kind of subjects and even having samilar ideas about social events, which may make one become narrow minded, not willing to accept new ideas or think out of the box. Due to the reason mentioned above, I agree with Claire that having a wide range of friends is the better choice, since numerous friendships can often provide the kind of help not possible in a small circle. For instance, there was a big lay-off in finance industry several years ago, many laid-off people found it hard to find a new job due to the flood of people looking for new jobs in finance field. As my friend Tomy have a wide range of friends in industries outside of financing, like technology and medicine, he easily got a job in as a financial manager in a medicine company due to the reference of his friend in medicine industry even when his former colleague were struggling to obtain a position in a bank or a security company.

Résultat de l'Évaluation

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0

  • Language Use and Grammar: 4.0

2. 预估分数

26. 3 任务完成度

你的文章在回答问题和表达观点方面做得很好,但还有一些地方可以改进。首先,在提到Andrew的观点时,你可以给出更具体的例子来说明小圈子朋友的缺点。其次,在支持Claire观点时,你给出了一个很好的例子,但可以进一步阐述如何在不同行业中建立广泛的人际关系对个人成长和快乐有益。

改进建议示例:

  1. 在提到Andrew观点时,可以举例说明过于依赖小圈子朋友可能导致人际交往能力下降,从而影响在更广泛社交场合中建立联系的能力。

  2. 在支持Claire观点时,可以讨论如何通过参加各种活动、加入社团或参与志愿者项目等方式结识不同行业和背景的朋友。

4. 文章结构与组织

文章整体结构清晰,包括引言、正文和结论。然而,在正文部分,你可以尝试使用更明确的段落划分,以便更清楚地表达你的观点。此外,可以在段落之间加入过渡性词语,使文章更连贯。

改进建议示例:

  1. 在讨论Andrew和Claire观点时,可以使用如“然而”、“相反”等过渡词语来引导读者从一个观点转向另一个观点。

  2. 在正文部分,可以使用主题句来明确每个段落的中心思想,例如:“尽管与少数亲密朋友保持紧密联系有其优势,但这种关系也存在一定的局限性。”

5. 语法批改

Although Andrew’s statement has some merits when he clearly presents the advantages of keeping closea close(This rule identifies whether the article 'a' is missing in a sentence.)-knit circle of friends, he fails to consider the drawbacks along with it. Being with a small criclecircle(misspelling) of people for a long time means having same kind of interests, talking same kind of subjects and even having samilarsimilar(misspelling) ideas about social events, which may make one become narrow mindednarrow-minded(Hyphenated words: narrow minded), not willing to accept new ideas or think out of the box. Due to the reason mentioned above, I agree with Claire that having a wide range of friends is the better choice, since numerous friendships can often provide the kind of help not possible in a small circle. For instance, there was a big lay-off in finance industry several years ago, many laid-off people found it hard to find a new job due to the flood of people looking for new jobs in finance field. As my friend TomyTom(misspelling) have a wide range of friends in industries outside of financing, like technology and medicine, he easily got a job in as a financial manager in a medicine company due to the reference of his friend in medicine industry even when his former colleague were struggling to obtain a position in a bank or a security company.

Section Title: 6 文章修订

While Andrew's argument holds some merit in highlighting the benefits of maintaining a close-knit circle of friends, it overlooks the potential drawbacks associated with limiting oneself to a small group. Spending extended periods with the same individuals may lead to sharing similar interests, discussing familiar topics, and adopting comparable perspectives on social events. Consequently, this could result in becoming narrow-minded and resistant to embracing new ideas or thinking outside the box.

For this reason, I concur with Claire that cultivating a diverse range of friendships is a more advantageous approach. Numerous connections often provide support and opportunities that may not be available within a smaller circle. For example, during a significant layoff in the finance industry several years ago, many affected individuals struggled to secure new employment due to the influx of job seekers within their field. However, my friend Tomy, who had established connections across various industries such as technology and medicine, quickly landed a position as a financial manager in a pharmaceutical company. This opportunity arose through his friend's referral within the medical sector while his former colleagues continued their fruitless search for positions in banks or security firms. (195 words)

Although Andrew’s statement has Revised essay: Section Title: 7 文章批改

While Andrew's argument holds some merits when he clearly presents the advantages of keeping merit (revised for clarity) in highlighting the benefits of maintaining a close-knit circle of friends, he fails to consider the it overlooks (revised for conciseness) the potential drawbacks along associated with it. Being limiting oneself to a small group. Spending extended periods with a small cricle of people for a long time means having the same kind of individuals may lead to sharing similar interests, talking same kind of subjects and even having samilar ideas about discussing familiar topics, and adopting comparable perspectives on social events, which may make one become narrow minded, not willing to accept events (revised for parallelism). Consequently, this could result in becoming narrow-minded and resistant to embracing new ideas or think out of the box. thinking outside the box (revised for clarity).

Due to the reason mentioned above, For this reason, I agree concur with Claire that having a wide cultivating a diverse range of friends friendships is the better choice, since numerous friendships can a more advantageous approach (revised for clarity). Numerous connections often provide the kind of help support and opportunities that may not possible in a small circle. be available within a smaller circle (revised for conciseness). For instance, there was a big lay-off in example, during a significant layoff in the finance industry several years ago, many laid-off people found it hard to find a affected individuals struggled to secure new employment due to the influx of job due to the flood of people looking for new jobs in finance field. As seekers within their field (revised for clarity). However, my friend Tomy have a wide range of friends in Tomy, who had established connections across various industries outside of financing, like such as technology and medicine, he easily got a job in quickly landed a position as a financial manager in a medicine pharmaceutical company due to the reference of (revised for specificity). This opportunity arose through his friend in medicine industry even when friend's referral within the medical sector while his former colleague were struggling to obtain a position in a bank colleagues continued their fruitless search for positions in banks or a security company.firms (revised for clarity and conciseness).

8 思维导图


1. 引言
   - Andrew的观点
   - Claire的观点

2. 局限性
   - 交往相同的人群
   - 共享相似兴趣和话题
   - 变得狭隘和抗拒新观念

3. 多元化友谊的优势
   - 提供支持和机会
   - 跨行业联系的例子:Tomy

4. 结论
   - 同意Claire的看法

9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish definitionSimplified Chinese translationSample sentences
close-knit/ˈkloʊsˌnɪt/adjectiveclosely united or connected紧密相连Andrew believes in maintaining a close-knit circle of friends.
drawbacks/ˈdrɔːbæk/nouna disadvantage or problem缺点The essay discusses the potential drawbacks of limiting oneself to a small group of friends.
narrow-minded/ˈnæroʊˈmaɪndɪd/adjectiveunwilling to accept or try to understand new ideas心胸狭窄Spending extended periods with the same individuals may result in becoming narrow-minded.
diverse/daɪˈvɜrs, dɪ-/adjectiveshowing a great deal of variety; very different多样的Cultivating a diverse range of friendships is a more advantageous approach.
connections/kəˈnɛkʃənz/nounpeople with whom one has social or professional contact人脉关系Numerous connections often provide support and opportunities that may not be available within a smaller circle.
layoff/ˈleɪˌɔf/nounthe act of ending the employment of a worker or group of workers temporarily or permanently裁员During a significant layoff in the finance industry, many affected individuals struggled to secure new employment.
influx/ˈɪnflʌks/nounan arrival or entry of large numbers of people or things涌入Many individuals struggled to secure new employment due to the influx of job seekers within their field.
referral/rɪˈfɜrəl/nounan act of referring someone or something for consultation, review, or further action推荐Tomy quickly landed a position as a financial manager through his friend's referral within the medical sector.
pharmaceutical/ˌfɑrməˈsu:tikəl/adjectiverelating to medicinal drugs, or their preparation, use, or sale制药的Tomy found a position as a financial manager in a pharmaceutical company.

Comment la Discussion Académique est Évaluée

La tâche TOEFL Discussion Académique est évaluée selon le barème officiel de l'ETS. L'évaluation par IA analyse chaque réponse selon plusieurs dimensions.

Pertinence et Contribution

La réponse traite-t-elle la question et contribue-t-elle de façon pertinente à la discussion ?

Utilisation de la Langue

Précision grammaticale, richesse du vocabulaire et qualité de la structure des phrases.

Développement et Argumentation

Les idées sont-elles bien développées avec des exemples précis et un raisonnement clair ?

Tendances Communes dans les Réponses

D'après l'analyse des réponses soumises par les utilisateurs pour cette tâche, voici les tendances courantes observées dans les réponses des étudiants.

De nombreux étudiants expriment des opinions claires mais manquent d'exemples précis à l'appui.

Les réponses solides font directement référence au texte de lecture et aux points de vue des autres participants.

Les réponses les mieux notées utilisent des structures de phrases variées et un vocabulaire académique.

La gestion du temps est un facteur clé — les réponses qui semblent précipitées ont tendance à obtenir un score plus faible en développement.

Conseils d'Apprentissage

1

Lisez attentivement la consigne et identifiez toutes les parties de la question avant d'écrire.

2

Faites référence au texte de lecture et aux opinions des autres étudiants dans votre réponse.

3

Utilisez des exemples précis pour appuyer votre idée principale — évitez les affirmations génériques.

4

Visez 120 à 150 mots. Une réponse plus longue n'est pas toujours meilleure ; la clarté et la précision comptent davantage.

5

Entraînez-vous à répondre en temps limité (10 minutes) pour gagner en aisance dans les conditions de l'examen.

Questions fréquentes

Qu'est-ce que la tâche TOEFL Academic Discussion ?
La tâche TOEFL Academic Discussion vous demande de contribuer à une discussion de classe en ligne. Vous lirez la question d'un professeur ainsi que les réponses d'autres étudiants, puis vous rédigerez votre propre contribution exprimant et justifiant votre opinion en environ 10 minutes.
Comment la tâche Academic Discussion est-elle notée ?
La tâche est notée sur une échelle de 0 à 5 en fonction de la pertinence par rapport à la discussion, de la qualité de l'usage de la langue (grammaire, vocabulaire, structure des phrases), et de la manière dont vous développez et étayez vos idées à l'aide d'exemples précis et d'un raisonnement solide.
Que sont les exemples d'utilisateurs sur cette page ?
Il s'agit de véritables réponses soumises par des candidats au TOEFL qui se sont entraînés sur cette question sur LingoLeap. Chaque exemple a été évalué par notre moteur de notation par IA, qui fournit une note ainsi qu'un retour détaillé sur les points forts et les axes d'amélioration.
Quelle est la fiabilité de l'évaluation par IA ?
Le moteur d'évaluation par IA de LingoLeap est entraîné sur les grilles de notation officielles de l'ETS et calibré par rapport aux notes attribuées par des correcteurs humains. Bien qu'aucun système automatisé ne soit parfait, il fournit un retour fiable à des fins d'entraînement et aide à identifier des axes d'amélioration précis.
Comment puis-je m'entraîner à cette tâche Academic Discussion ?
Vous pouvez vous entraîner en créant un compte LingoLeap gratuit. Rédigez votre propre réponse à cette question précise, soumettez-la, et recevez une évaluation par IA instantanée accompagnée d'un retour détaillé sur votre rédaction.
Quelle longueur ma réponse Academic Discussion doit-elle avoir ?
Visez 120 à 150 mots. La tâche vous laisse 10 minutes pour rédiger votre réponse. Concentrez-vous sur la clarté, appuyez votre opinion avec des exemples précis, et faites référence au contexte de la discussion plutôt que d'écrire une réponse plus longue.

Atteignez votre score cible dès aujourd'hui !

Avec LingoLeap, l'expert en préparation aux examens d'anglais

Préparez-vous efficacement et atteignez votre score idéal au TOEFL plus rapidement

Essayez gratuitement maintenant