TOEFLIELTS
Français
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on career readiness.Write a post responding to the professor's question.

Vraies réponses d'utilisateurs avec évaluation et retour propulsés par l'IA

1 exemples soumis par des utilisateurs disponibles

Commencer l'Entraînement Gratuit

Aperçu de la Tâche

Professor

When students are preparing to graduate from university,they need to make decisions about what kind of company they want to work for.They might consider large,older companies with an established reputation,or possibly new start-up companies,which tend to be small but very focused on the future.Consider the advantages of each.Would it generally be better for a new university graduate to begin working for a large, established company,or for a small start-up company?

Kelly

l think in general,the established company is the better choice.Because theyre already well-known,these companies have a certain amount of respect in the business community, so it would look good to have that job experience on your résumé.That advantage alone would be a great start for a recent graduate.

Andrew

I see your point,Kelly,but taking a position at a start-up company would offer so much excitement.They often have an energy that older companies can't match-everyone can be focused on new,innovative business practices and they would be more aggressive about getting new clients.That would be a much better experience for someone fresh out of university!

Exemples d'Utilisateurs et Résultats d'Évaluation

1

Exemple d'Utilisateur #1

This is a challenging topic, but I strongly concur with Andrew that working in a start-up company is more exciting. I would add that a start-up compan...

Score
26

Exemple d'Utilisateur

This is a challenging topic, but I strongly concur with Andrew that working in a start-up company is more exciting. I would add that a start-up company can benefit more to our promotion as well. It is well known that competition in most of the old, well-known companies are severe, thus left few opportunities for newly-minted graduates to challenge and show themselves out. Nevertheless, the lack of workforce is a common problem in start-up companies, so it increase the likelihood of a new employee participating in crucial, innovative subjects. Kelly raised a relevant point that a working experience in well-known company can polish our resume, but she did not mention that most of the graduates start as a trainee there, which in face of tedious, repetitive jobs, that are not desirable enough to be put on the resume.

Résultat de l'Évaluation

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0

  • Language Use and Grammar: 4.0

2. 预估分数

26. 3 任务完成度

这篇文章在完成任务方面做得很好,表达了对于在大公司和创业公司工作的看法,并给出了合理的论据。但是,为了更好地回应教授的问题,建议您可以进一步详细阐述创业公司为什么能为新毕业生提供更好的职业发展机会。此外,可以提供一些具体的例子来支持您的观点。

示例1:在创业公司中,新员工有更多机会参与关键项目,从而快速积累经验和技能。 示例2:与大公司相比,在创业公司中,新员工可能更容易获得管理层的关注和认可。

4. 文章结构与组织

文章结构清晰,包括引言、正文和结论。然而,在组织方面还有改进空间。建议您在段落之间使用过渡词或短语来使文章更连贯。此外,在正文部分可以尝试使用主题句来明确每个段落的核心观点。

示例1:首先,在创业公司中工作能够为新毕业生提供更多的职业发展机会。(过渡词+主题句) 示例2:相反,在大公司中,新员工可能面临激烈的竞争,这使得他们很难脱颖而出。(过渡词+主题句)

5. 语法批改

This is a challenging topic, but I strongly concur with Andrew that working in a start-up company is more exciting. I would add that a start-up company can benefit more to our promotion as well. It is well known that competition in most of the old, well-known companies are severe, thus left few opportunities for newly-minted graduates to challenge and show themselves out. Nevertheless, the lack of workforce is a common problem in start-up companies, so it increaseincreases('it' + non-3rd person verb) the likelihood of a new employee participating in crucial, innovative subjects. Kelly raised a relevant point that a working experience in well-known company can polish our resume, but she did not mention that most of the graduates start as a trainee there, which in face of tedious, repetitive jobs, that are not desirable enough to be put on the resume.

Display title: 6 文章修订

While this topic presents a challenge, I firmly agree with Andrew that joining a start-up company offers a more exhilarating experience for recent graduates. Furthermore, I believe that working in a start-up can significantly contribute to one's career advancement. It is widely acknowledged that competition within established companies is fierce, leaving limited opportunities for fresh graduates to showcase their skills and talents. Conversely, start-ups often face workforce shortages, which increases the likelihood of new employees participating in critical and innovative projects. Although Kelly highlights the prestige associated with having experience at a well-known company on one's resume, she fails to consider that many graduates begin as trainees in such organizations, performing mundane and repetitive tasks that may not necessarily enhance their resumes. (126 words)

This is While this topic presents a challenging topic, but challenge (revised for clarity and tone), I strongly concur firmly agree with Andrew that joining a start-up company offers a more exhilarating experience (rephrased for better flow) for recent graduates. Furthermore, I believe that working in a start-up company is more exciting. I would add that a start-up company can benefit more significantly contribute to our promotion as well. one's career advancement (rephrased for clarity). It is well known widely acknowledged (revised for better flow) that competition in most of the old, well-known within established companies are severe, thus left few is fierce, leaving limited opportunities for newly-minted fresh graduates to challenge showcase their skills and show themselves out. Nevertheless, the lack of talents (rephrased for clarity). Conversely, start-ups often face workforce is a common problem in start-up companies, so it increase shortages, which increases the likelihood of a new employee employees participating in crucial, critical and innovative subjects. projects (rephrased for better flow). Although Kelly raised highlights the prestige associated with having experience at a relevant point that a working experience in well-known company can polish our on one's resume, but she did fails to consider that many graduates begin as trainees in such organizations, performing mundane and repetitive tasks that may not mention that most of the graduates start as a trainee there, which in face of tedious, repetitive jobs, that are not desirable enough to be put on the resume.necessarily enhance their resumes (rephrased for clarity and tone).

Display title: 8 思维导图


1. Introduction
   - Agree with Andrew
   - Start-ups offer exhilarating experience
   - Contribute to career advancement

2. Competition in established companies
   - Fierce competition
   - Limited opportunities for fresh graduates

3. Workforce shortages in start-ups
   - Increased likelihood of participating in critical projects
   - Opportunity to showcase skills and talents

4. Prestige vs practical experience
   - Kelly's argument on prestige of well-known companies
   - Graduates often begin as trainees, performing mundane tasks

5. Benefits of start-up experience on resume
   - Involvement in innovative projects 
   - Demonstration of adaptability and problem-solving skills

6. Conclusion 
   - Start-ups provide better opportunities for recent graduates 

Display title: 9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
exhilarating/ɪgˈzɪləreɪtɪŋ/adjectivemaking one feel very happy, animated, or elated令人兴奋的Joining a start-up company offers a more exhilarating experience for recent graduates.
advancement/ədˈvænsmənt/nounthe process of promoting a cause or plan提升,进步Working in a start-up can significantly contribute to one's career advancement.
fierce/fɪərs/adjective/showing a heartfelt and powerful intensity/猛烈的,激烈的Competition within established companies is fierce.
showcase/ˈʃoʊkeɪs/verb/to exhibit or display/展示,陈列Start-ups provide opportunities for fresh graduates to showcase their skills and talents.
mundane/mʌnˈdeɪn/adjective/lacking interest or excitement; dull/平凡的,乏味的Graduates often perform mundane tasks in well-known companies.
repetitive/rɪˈpɛtətɪv/adjective/involving the repeating of the same actions/重复的,反复的Trainees in established companies often perform repetitive tasks.
innovative/ˈɪnəveɪtɪv/adjective/featuring new methods; advanced and original/创新的,革新性的Start-ups offer the chance to participate in innovative projects.
adaptability/ədæptəˈbɪləti/noun/the quality of being able to adjust to new conditions适应性Working in a start-up demonstrates one's adaptability.
problem-solving/ˈprɒbləm ˌsɒlvɪŋ/nounthe process of finding solutions to difficult or complex issues解决问题能力Start-up experience shows an individual's strong problem-solving skills.

Comment la Discussion Académique est Évaluée

La tâche TOEFL Discussion Académique est évaluée selon le barème officiel de l'ETS. L'évaluation par IA analyse chaque réponse selon plusieurs dimensions.

Pertinence et Contribution

La réponse traite-t-elle la question et contribue-t-elle de façon pertinente à la discussion ?

Utilisation de la Langue

Précision grammaticale, richesse du vocabulaire et qualité de la structure des phrases.

Développement et Argumentation

Les idées sont-elles bien développées avec des exemples précis et un raisonnement clair ?

Tendances Communes dans les Réponses

D'après l'analyse des réponses soumises par les utilisateurs pour cette tâche, voici les tendances courantes observées dans les réponses des étudiants.

De nombreux étudiants expriment des opinions claires mais manquent d'exemples précis à l'appui.

Les réponses solides font directement référence au texte de lecture et aux points de vue des autres participants.

Les réponses les mieux notées utilisent des structures de phrases variées et un vocabulaire académique.

La gestion du temps est un facteur clé — les réponses qui semblent précipitées ont tendance à obtenir un score plus faible en développement.

Conseils d'Apprentissage

1

Lisez attentivement la consigne et identifiez toutes les parties de la question avant d'écrire.

2

Faites référence au texte de lecture et aux opinions des autres étudiants dans votre réponse.

3

Utilisez des exemples précis pour appuyer votre idée principale — évitez les affirmations génériques.

4

Visez 120 à 150 mots. Une réponse plus longue n'est pas toujours meilleure ; la clarté et la précision comptent davantage.

5

Entraînez-vous à répondre en temps limité (10 minutes) pour gagner en aisance dans les conditions de l'examen.

Questions fréquentes

Qu'est-ce que la tâche TOEFL Academic Discussion ?
La tâche TOEFL Academic Discussion vous demande de contribuer à une discussion de classe en ligne. Vous lirez la question d'un professeur ainsi que les réponses d'autres étudiants, puis vous rédigerez votre propre contribution exprimant et justifiant votre opinion en environ 10 minutes.
Comment la tâche Academic Discussion est-elle notée ?
La tâche est notée sur une échelle de 0 à 5 en fonction de la pertinence par rapport à la discussion, de la qualité de l'usage de la langue (grammaire, vocabulaire, structure des phrases), et de la manière dont vous développez et étayez vos idées à l'aide d'exemples précis et d'un raisonnement solide.
Que sont les exemples d'utilisateurs sur cette page ?
Il s'agit de véritables réponses soumises par des candidats au TOEFL qui se sont entraînés sur cette question sur LingoLeap. Chaque exemple a été évalué par notre moteur de notation par IA, qui fournit une note ainsi qu'un retour détaillé sur les points forts et les axes d'amélioration.
Quelle est la fiabilité de l'évaluation par IA ?
Le moteur d'évaluation par IA de LingoLeap est entraîné sur les grilles de notation officielles de l'ETS et calibré par rapport aux notes attribuées par des correcteurs humains. Bien qu'aucun système automatisé ne soit parfait, il fournit un retour fiable à des fins d'entraînement et aide à identifier des axes d'amélioration précis.
Comment puis-je m'entraîner à cette tâche Academic Discussion ?
Vous pouvez vous entraîner en créant un compte LingoLeap gratuit. Rédigez votre propre réponse à cette question précise, soumettez-la, et recevez une évaluation par IA instantanée accompagnée d'un retour détaillé sur votre rédaction.
Quelle longueur ma réponse Academic Discussion doit-elle avoir ?
Visez 120 à 150 mots. La tâche vous laisse 10 minutes pour rédiger votre réponse. Concentrez-vous sur la clarté, appuyez votre opinion avec des exemples précis, et faites référence au contexte de la discussion plutôt que d'écrire une réponse plus longue.

Atteignez votre score cible dès aujourd'hui !

Avec LingoLeap, l'expert en préparation aux examens d'anglais

Préparez-vous efficacement et atteignez votre score idéal au TOEFL plus rapidement

Essayez gratuitement maintenant