TOEFLIELTS
Türkçe
☰
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on economics. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

Yapay zeka destekli değerlendirme ve geri bildirimle gerçek kullanıcı gönderileri

7 kullanıcı tarafından gönderilmiş örnek mevcut

Ücretsiz Pratiğe Başla

Görev Genel Bakışı

Doctor Diaz

Our current unit looks at tourism and the benefit it has on a country’s economy. Many argue that while tourism can indeed be a money-making endeavor, it can do more harm than good, especially tourism to small, remote places that are not heavily populated. What is your opinion? Should local or national governments promote tourism to remote regions not typically visited by tourists before? Why?

Andrew

Tourism has always been a lucrative business. Improving the economies of these rural regions, especially if those regions are poor, can only have a positive effect. People can have a better quality of life by showcasing their food and traditions to the outside world. It’s a chance the people might not get without promotion from the government.

Claire

I don’t think governments should promote tourism to remote regions. The people are likely not asking for this kind of industry or for this kind of attention. Instead, governments should develop other means of improving a region's economic situation, like expanding agriculture or other industries. These efforts will have a stronger, more permanent impact on the region than bringing in groups of tourists.

Kullanıcı Örnekleri ve Değerlendirme Sonuçları

Practise TOEFL writing questions like this one →

Opens the writing question list in the LingoLeap app, not this exact question. Practising needs a free account. AI scoring uses credits, except 3 free scores a day on Practice Test 1 (PQ26-1) questions.

1

Kullanıcı Örneği #1

Claire makes a persuasive case challenging that government shouldn't promote tourism to remote regions. Definitely, the government can choose other wa...

Puan
27

Kullanıcı Örneği

Claire makes a persuasive case challenging that government shouldn't promote tourism to remote regions. Definitely, the government can choose other ways to improve the economic situation such as agriculture. Nonetheless, considering the government's mission in fostering advancement and motivation, I am inclined to support the government should promote tourism to remote regions. Additionally, as society progresses at a rapid pace, the government is increasingly prioritizing the importance of the development of tourism, which enhances local people's growth and overall well-being. In this context, the development of tourism is as vital as air and water, which play a key role in all creatures. Furthermore, nowadays lots of places are influx people, government promoting the new place is a great chance, which not only brings a good environment for visitors but also supplies more jobs for local residents. Indeed, if the government promotes tourism, it can improve local conditions, such as roads and transportation. Overall, I firmly back this idea.

Değerlendirme Sonucu

1.子项得分

Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5 Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0 Language Use and Grammar: 4.0

2.预估分数

27. 3.任务完成度

整体来说,这篇文章较好地回答了问题,表达了对于政府是否应该推广偏远地区旅游的观点。但在论证过程中,可以更加具体地提供一些例子或数据来支持观点。此外,在引用阅读材料中的观点时,可以更加明确地指出是哪位作者的观点,并对其进行分析和评价。

改进示例1: 例如,在支持政府推广偏远地区旅游的论述中,可以提供一些成功案例,如某个国家或地区通过发展旅游业实现了经济增长和当地居民生活水平的提高。

改进示例2: 在引用阅读材料中的观点时,可以这样写:“正如Andrew所提到的,旅游业有助于提高当地居民的生活质量,并展示他们的食物和传统文化。”

4.文章结构与组织

文章结构方面基本合理,包括了引言、主体和结论。然而,在段落之间可以使用更明确的过渡词或短语来连接各个观点,使文章更加流畅。此外,可以在文章开头更明确地提出自己的观点,以便读者一开始就能了解作者的立场。

改进示例1: 在引言部分,可以这样写:“在这个问题上,我倾向于支持政府应该推广偏远地区的旅游业。”

改进示例2: 在段落之间使用过渡词,如:“然而,在考虑到政府在促进发展和激励方面的使命时,我认为政府应该推广偏远地区的旅游业。”

  1. 语法批改

Claire makes a persuasive case challenging that government shouldn't promote tourism to remote regions. Definitely, the government can choose other ways to improve the economic situationsituation,(This rule identifies whether commas are missing in a sentence.) such as agriculture. Nonetheless, considering the government's mission in fostering advancement and motivation, I am inclined to support the government should promote tourism to remote regions. Additionally, as society progresses at a rapid pace, the government is increasingly prioritizing the importance of the development of tourism, which enhances local people's growth and overall well-being. In this context, the development of tourism is as vital as air and water, which play a key role in all creatures. Furthermore, nowadays lots of places are influx peopleof people(This rule identifies whether the preposition 'of' is missing in a sentence.), government promoting the new place is a great chance, which not only brings a good environment for visitors but also supplies more jobs for local residents. Indeed, if the government promotes tourism, it can improve local conditions, such as roads and transportation. Overall, I firmly back this idea.

6.文章修订

Claire presents a compelling argument against promoting tourism in remote regions, suggesting that governments should focus on alternative economic development strategies such as agriculture. However, considering the government's role in fostering growth and motivation, I believe that promoting tourism in remote areas is a viable option. As society progresses rapidly, the importance of tourism development for local communities' growth and well-being is increasingly recognized.

In light of Andrew's perspective, tourism can improve the quality of life for local residents by showcasing their culinary and cultural traditions. Moreover, promoting lesser-known destinations not only provides a refreshing experience for visitors but also generates employment opportunities for locals. Indeed, government-backed tourism initiatives can lead to infrastructural improvements such as better roads and transportation systems.

In summary, while Claire's concerns are valid, I maintain that the potential benefits of promoting tourism in remote regions outweigh the drawbacks. By carefully managing the impact on local communities and environments, governments can harness the power of tourism to drive economic growth and improve living standards. (169 words)

7.文章批改

Claire makes a persuasive presents a compelling argument against promoting tourism in remote regions (Changed "persuasive case challenging challenging" to "compelling argument against" for clarity and conciseness), suggesting that government shouldn't promote tourism to remote regions. Definitely, the government can choose other ways to improve the governments should focus on alternative economic situation development strategies such as agriculture. Nonetheless, However, considering the government's role in fostering growth and motivation (Rephrased "government's mission in fostering advancement and motivation, motivation" for better word choice), I am inclined to support the government should promote tourism to believe that promoting tourism in remote regions. Additionally, areas is a viable option. As society progresses rapidly, the importance of tourism development for local communities' growth and well-being is increasingly recognized (Reworded to improve sentence structure).

In light of Andrew's perspective (Changed "Additionally, as society progresses at a rapid pace, the government is increasingly prioritizing the importance of the development of tourism, which enhances pace" to "In light of Andrew's perspective" to connect the paragraph with the reading passage), tourism can improve the quality of life for local people's growth and overall well-being. In this context, the development of tourism is as vital as air and water, which play a key role in all creatures. Furthermore, nowadays lots of places are influx people, government promoting the new place is a great chance, which residents by showcasing their culinary and cultural traditions. Moreover, promoting lesser-known destinations not only brings a good environment provides a refreshing experience for visitors but also supplies more jobs for local residents. generates employment opportunities for locals (Rephrased to improve sentence structure). Indeed, if the government promotes tourism, it government-backed tourism initiatives can improve local conditions, lead to infrastructural improvements such as better roads and transportation. Overall, transportation systems.

In summary (Changed "Overall" to "In summary" for better transition), while Claire's concerns are valid, I firmly back this idea.maintain that the potential benefits of promoting tourism in remote regions outweigh the drawbacks (Rephrased to improve clarity). By carefully managing the impact on local communities and environments, governments can harness the power of tourism to drive economic growth and improve living standards (Reworded to enhance sentence structure).

8.思维导图

  • Introduction

    • Claire's argument against promoting tourism
    • Government's role in fostering growth
  • Tourism benefits

    • Andrew's perspective on improving quality of life
    • Showcasing culinary and cultural traditions
  • Additional benefits of promoting remote regions

    • Refreshing experience for visitors
    • Employment opportunities for locals
    • Infrastructural improvements (roads, transportation)
  • Conclusion

    • Potential benefits outweigh drawbacks
    • Careful management of impact on communities and environments

9.关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
compelling/kəmˈpɛlɪŋ/adjectiveevoking interest, attention, or admiration in a powerfully irresistible way引人注目的The speaker made a compelling argument for environmental conservation.
viable/ˈvaɪəbəl/adjectivecapable of working successfully; feasible可行的Promoting tourism in remote areas is a viable option for economic development.
showcase/ˈʃoʊkeɪs/verbto present something in an attractive or effective way展示The festival will showcase local artists and their work.
infrastructural/ˌɪnfrəˈstrʌktʃərəl/adjective-relating to the basic systems and services that a country or organization needs in order to function properly-基础设施的-Government-backed tourism initiatives can lead to infrastructural improvements.
drawbacks/ˈdrɔːbæk/nouna feature that makes something less acceptable; a disadvantage缺点The potential benefits of promoting tourism in remote regions outweigh the drawbacks.
harness/ˈhɑrnɪs/verbto control and make use of (natural resources), especially to produce energy-利用-Governments can harness the power of tourism to drive economic growth.
culinary/ˈkʌlɪnəri/adjective-connected with cooking or kitchens-烹饪的-Tourism can improve the quality of life by showcasing their culinary traditions.
employment/ɪmˈplɔɪmənt/noun-the condition of having paid work-就业-Promoting lesser-known destinations generates employment opportunities for locals.
managing/ˈmænɪdʒɪŋ/verb-to succeed in doing or dealing with something, especially something difficult-管理,应对-By carefully managing the impact on local communities, governments can promote tourism.
rapid/ˈræpɪd/adjective-happening in a short time or at a great rate-迅速的-As society progresses rapidly, the importance of tourism development is increasingly recognized.
Practise TOEFL writing questions like this one →

Opens the writing question list in the LingoLeap app, not this exact question. Practising needs a free account. AI scoring uses credits, except 3 free scores a day on Practice Test 1 (PQ26-1) questions.

Akademik Tartışma Nasıl Puanlanır

TOEFL Akademik Tartışma görevi, resmi ETS puanlama rubriğine göre değerlendirilir. Yapay zeka değerlendirmesi her yanıtı birden fazla boyutta analiz eder.

İlgi ve Katkı

Yanıt soruyu ele alıyor mu ve tartışmaya anlamlı bir katkı sağlıyor mu?

Dil Kullanımı

Dil bilgisi doğruluğu, kelime dağarcığı çeşitliliği ve cümle yapısı kalitesi.

Geliştirme ve Destekleme

Fikirler belirli örnekler ve net bir mantıkla iyi geliştirilmiş mi?

Yanıtlardaki Ortak Örüntüler

Bu görev için kullanıcı gönderilerinin analizine dayanarak, öğrenci yanıtlarında gözlemlenen ortak örüntüler şunlardır.

Birçok öğrenci net görüşler sunar ancak belirli destekleyici örneklerden yoksundur.

Güçlü yanıtlar, okuma parçasına ve diğer katılımcıların bakış açılarına doğrudan atıfta bulunur.

Daha yüksek puan alan yanıtlar, çeşitli cümle yapıları ve akademik kelime dağarcığı kullanır.

Zaman yönetimi önemli bir faktördür — aceleye getirilmiş görünen yanıtlar genellikle geliştirme açısından daha düşük puan alır.

Öğrenme İpuçları

1

Yazmaya başlamadan önce soruyu dikkatlice okuyun ve sorunun tüm bölümlerini belirleyin.

2

Yanıtınızda okuma parçasına ve diğer öğrencilerin görüşlerine atıfta bulunun.

3

Ana fikrinizi desteklemek için belirli örnekler kullanın — genel ifadelerden kaçının.

4

120-150 kelimeyi hedefleyin. Daha uzun yanıtlar her zaman daha iyi değildir; açıklık ve odak daha önemlidir.

5

Sınav koşullarında akıcılık kazanmak için süreli yanıtlar (10 dakika) üzerinde pratik yapın.

Sıkça Sorulan Sorular

TOEFL Academic Discussion görevi nedir?
TOEFL Academic Discussion görevi, çevrimiçi bir sınıf tartışmasına katkıda bulunmanızı gerektirir. Bir profesörün sorusunu ve diğer öğrencilerin yanıtlarını okuduktan sonra, yaklaşık 10 dakika içinde kendi görüşünüzü ifade eden ve destekleyen bir gönderi yazarsınız.
Academic Discussion görevi nasıl puanlanır?
Görev, tartışmayla ilgililik, dil kullanım kalitesi (dilbilgisi, kelime dağarcığı, cümle yapısı) ve fikirlerinizi somut örnekler ve akıl yürütmeyle ne kadar iyi geliştirip desteklediğinize bağlı olarak 0-5 ölçeğinde puanlanır.
Bu sayfadaki kullanıcı örnekleri nedir?
Bunlar, LingoLeap üzerinde bu soruyu çalışan gerçek TOEFL adaylarının gönderdiği yanıtlardır. Her örnek, güçlü yönler ve geliştirilmesi gereken alanlar hakkında ayrıntılı geri bildirim ile bir puan sağlayan yapay zeka puanlama motorumuz tarafından değerlendirilmiştir.
Yapay zeka değerlendirmesi ne kadar doğru?
LingoLeap'in yapay zeka değerlendirme motoru, resmi ETS puanlama kriterleri üzerinde eğitilmiş ve insan değerlendiricilerin puanlarına göre kalibre edilmiştir. Hiçbir otomatik sistem mükemmel olmasa da, pratik amaçlar için güvenilir geri bildirim sağlar ve geliştirilmesi gereken belirli alanları belirlemeye yardımcı olur.
Bu Academic Discussion görevini nasıl pratik edebilirim?
Ücretsiz bir LingoLeap hesabına kaydolarak pratik yapabilirsiniz. Tam olarak bu soruya kendi yanıtınızı yazın, gönderin ve yazınız hakkında ayrıntılı geri bildirim içeren anında yapay zeka değerlendirmesi alın.
Academic Discussion yanıtım ne kadar uzun olmalı?
120-150 kelime hedefleyin. Görev, yanıtınızı yazmanız için size 10 dakika verir. Daha uzun bir yanıt yazmak yerine açıklığa, fikrinizi somut örneklerle desteklemeye ve tartışma bağlamına atıfta bulunmaya odaklanın.

Hedef Puanına Ulaşmak İçin Yanındayız!

İngilizce sınavları konusunda uzman LingoLeap ile

Hayalindeki Puana Daha Hızlı Ulaş

Şimdi ücretsiz dene