TOEFL TPO -1 Writing Task 1 Sample: summerize

1.子项得分 任务完成度：4 组织：3 连贯与衔接：3 语言使用：3

2.预估分数

22. 3.任务完成度

整体来说，文章回答了题目的要求，但在某些方面还有改进的空间。首先，在引用阅读和听力材料的例子时，需要更详细地解释这些例子以支持论点。其次，在对比阅读和听力观点时，应更明确地表达出不同之处。

示例1（改进）： 原文：“For example, a beverage company makes change in its recognizable soft drink's ingredients and advertises this new version of an old favorite, but still sells the old version.” 改进后：“For example, the reading passage mentions that a beverage company changes its recognizable soft drink's ingredients and advertises this new version of an old favorite while still selling the old version. However, the listening passage argues that this method might offend long-time customers who prefer the original taste.”

示例2（改进）： 原文：“In fact, people may try the related product, but it doesn't mean those are the same quality as the famous products.” 改进后：“In fact, people may try the related product due to the company's reputation for making high-quality tractors; however, it doesn't guarantee that their new line of work boots will have the same quality as their famous tractors.”

4.文章结构与组织 从组织方面来看，文章具有基本的结构，包括引言、正文和结论。然而，在段落划分和过渡方面还有待改进。建议在每个段落中明确地提出一个论点，并使用恰当的过渡词汇来连接不同的观点和段落。

建议1（简体中文）： 在每个段落开头使用主题句，明确提出该段落的论点。这将有助于读者更好地理解文章的结构和逻辑。

示例1（改进）： 原文：“Firstly, the reading passage points out that company can introduce a new version of an existing product.” 改进后：“Firstly, the reading passage suggests that introducing a new version of an existing product is a viable method for company growth.”

建议2（简体中文）： 使用过渡词汇和短语来连接不同的观点和段落，使文章更加连贯。

示例2（改进）： 原文：“Moreover, the reading material maintains that company capitalizes on its good name by selling a new but related type of product.” 改进后：“In addition to the first method, the reading material maintains that companies can capitalize on their good name by selling a new but related type of product.”

5. 语法批改

Both the reading passage and listening talk about the way that companya company(This rule identifies whether the article 'a' is missing in a sentence.) with one product or one line of products use toused to(Missing past tense for 'used to...') continue to grow. In general, the reading passage proposed three methods are commonly used but, but(comma between independent clauses) the lecturer refuses to believe it for three reasons. Firstly, the reading passage points out that company can introduce a new version of an existing product. For example, a beverage company makes changea change(This rule identifies whether the article 'a' is missing in a sentence.) in its recognizable soft drink's ingredients and advertises this new version of an old favorite, but still sells the old version. However, the speaker casts doubt on it and claims that this method will offenceoffense(misspelling) long-time costumers. To be specific, the new version may make those who drink oldthe old(This rule identifies whether the article 'the' is missing in a sentence.) version look like old-fashion. Plus, the long-time costumers probably don't like the new version and if they stop buying, it can lead to decrease in selling. Moreover, the reading material maintains that company capitalizes on its good name by selling a new but related type of product. By contrast, the listening contradicts this idea and argues that this method is backfire. In fact, people may try the related product, but it doesn't mean those are the same quality as the famous products. And the low quality brings bad reputation for the companycompany,(This rule identifies whether commas are missing in a sentence.) thus the buyers will decline. Finally, the reading considers that two or more companies make a new product under the name that indicates that this was made by both companies. On the contrary, the speaker rejects this statement by pointing out that this method works as long as the company don't start to make same product that other company already has. For instance, if a chocolate company startstarts(punctuation + singular noun + plural verb) to make ice-cream, this may cause it become a priditorpredator(misspelling) of its partner.

Section Title: 6.文章修订

Both the reading passage and listening discuss ways in which a company with one product or one line of products can continue to grow. Generally, the reading passage proposes three commonly used methods, but the lecturer disagrees with them for three reasons.

Firstly, the reading passage suggests that a company can introduce a new version of an existing product. For example, a beverage company modifies its recognizable soft drink's ingredients and advertises this new version as an updated favorite while still selling the old version. However, the speaker casts doubt on this approach, claiming that it may alienate long-time customers. Specifically, the new version might make those who drink the old version appear old-fashioned. Furthermore, long-time customers probably won't like the new version and if they stop purchasing it, sales could decrease.

Secondly, the reading material asserts that a company can capitalize on its good name by selling a new but related type of product. In contrast, the listening challenges this idea and argues that this method could backfire. Indeed, people may try the related product due to brand loyalty; however, it doesn't guarantee that these products will have the same quality as their famous counterparts. Consequently, low-quality products could tarnish the company's reputation and lead to declining sales.

Lastly, the reading posits that two or more companies can collaborate to create a new product under a name indicating joint production. Contrarily, the speaker refutes this statement by pointing out that this method works only as long as neither company starts producing products similar to those of their partner. For instance, if a chocolate company begins making ice cream - which was previously made exclusively by its partner - it may become a competitor rather than an ally. (291 words)

Revised essay: Section Title: 7.文章批改

Both the reading passage and listening talk about the way that discuss ways in which a company with one product or one line of products use to can continue to grow. In general, Generally, the reading passage proposed proposes three methods are commonly used methods, but the lecturer refuses to believe it disagrees with them for three reasons.

Firstly, the reading passage points out that suggests that a company can introduce a new version of an existing product. product (changed "points out" to "suggests" for better clarity). For example, a beverage company makes change in modifies its recognizable soft drink's ingredients and advertises this new version of as an updated favorite while still selling the old favorite, but still sells the old version. version (rephrased for better flow). However, the speaker casts doubt on this approach, claiming that it and claims that this method will offence may alienate long-time costumers. To be specific, the new version may customers (changed "offence" to "alienate" for proper word usage). Specifically, the new version might make those who drink the old version look like old-fashion. Plus, the appear old-fashioned (clarified meaning). Furthermore, long-time costumers customers probably don't won't like the new version and if they stop buying, it purchasing it, sales could decrease (rephrased for better flow).

Secondly, the reading material asserts that a company can lead to decrease in selling. Moreover, the reading material maintains that company capitalizes capitalize on its good name by selling a new but related type of product. By In contrast, the listening contradicts challenges this idea and argues that this method is backfire. In fact, could backfire (clarified meaning). Indeed, people may try the related product, but product due to brand loyalty; however, it doesn't mean those are guarantee that these products will have the same quality as the their famous products. And the low quality brings bad counterparts (rephrased for better flow). Consequently, low-quality products could tarnish the company's reputation for the company thus the buyers will decline. Finally, the reading considers and lead to declining sales.

Lastly, the reading posits that two or more companies make can collaborate to create a new product under the a name that indicates that this was made by both companies. On the contrary, indicating joint production (clarified meaning). Contrarily, the speaker rejects refutes this statement by pointing out that this method works only as long as the company don't start to make same product that other company already has. neither company starts producing products similar to those of their partner (rephrased for better flow). For instance, if a chocolate company start to make ice-cream, this begins making ice cream - which was previously made exclusively by its partner - it may cause it become a priditor of its partner.competitor rather than an ally (corrected "priditor" to "competitor" and rephrased for clarity).

---

Section Title: 8. Mind Map

Mind Map:

- Introduction
  - Reading passage and listening discussion
  - Company growth with one product or line of products

- Point 1: Introducing a new version of an existing product
  - Reading passage: Positive view
    - Example: Beverage company modifying ingredients
  - Listening: Negative view
    - Alienating long-time customers
    - Sales decrease possibility

- Point 2: Capitalizing on the company's good name with a related product
  - Reading passage: Positive view
    - Brand loyalty and new products
  - Listening: Negative view
    - Quality concerns and reputation damage
    - Potential decline in sales 

- Point 3: Collaboration between companies for joint production 
  - Reading passage: Positive view 
    - Joint production benefits 
  - Listening: Negative view 
    - Competition risks if companies produce similar products 

---

Section Title: 9. Keywords