All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on public policies. Write a post responding to the professor's question.

Real user submissions with AI-powered evaluation and feedback

3 user-submitted samples available

Start Free Practice

Task Overview

Doctor Smith

Local governments have limited budgets to spend on enriching residents' lives. Supporting arts programs like concerts and museums offers cultural engagement, while funding outdoor activities like building hiking trails and playgrounds promotes healthy lifestyles. Now, let's discuss whether local funding should support arts programs or outdoor activities more. Which do you think better serves the community and why?

Amy

I think local governments should prioritize spending on trails and playgrounds rather than arts programs like museums and concerts. More people would use and benefit from improved outdoors recreational facilities than arts venues. Since many residents probably aren't even that interested in the arts, they won't go to museums or concerts even if government funds them.

Rory

I believe local governments should actually prioritize spending on arts programs. Precisely because fewer residents are inherently interested in the arts, public funding is essential to sustain these cultural institutions for the minority who appreciate them. Without support, access to the arts will decline and society will lose these enriching, enduring outlets for creative expression.

User Samples & Evaluation Results

User Sample

Amy presents a compelling argument in favor of prioritizing financial allocation on outdoor activities. Admittedly, for many, outdoor recreational facilities potentially promote physical health and community engagement. However, I am inclined to prioritize the construction of arts programs. In my view, arts stimulate intellectual and emotional growth, foster creativity, and encourage diversity of thought for humans. In addition, arts are not just catering to the majority, so a vibrant society needs to value and support its cultural diversity, including those who have a deep appreciation for arts. For instance, local public fundings for museums, concerts, and other arts events ensures accessibility to all residents, irrespective of their economic status. These arts institutions significantly serve as hubs for communal interaction, sparking dialogue, and a sense of belonging. In other words, only by nurturing arts, can local government foster a unique identity and vitality that attracts more visitors and business investments. Therefore, allocating financial resources on arts enriches the community in ways that extend far beyond physical gratification.

Evaluation Result

1. 子项得分

Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 5 Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.5 Language Use and Grammar: 4.5

2. 预估分数

28. 3 任务完成度

整体而言,这篇文章在任务完成度方面表现良好。作者明确表达了自己的观点,并提供了有力的论据来支持观点。然而,为了进一步提高文章质量,可以在以下方面进行改进:

  1. 在论证观点时,可以提供更具体的例子和数据来增强说服力。

  2. 在讨论艺术节目和户外活动之间的权衡时,可以尝试探讨两者之间的互补性,以展示更全面的思考。

示例1:在讨论艺术节目对社区的影响时,可以引用具体的研究数据来证明艺术节目如何提高社区居民的生活质量和幸福感。 示例2:在探讨两者之间的权衡时,可以提出一种可能性:将部分资金用于支持跨领域项目,例如在公园或其他户外场所举办艺术展览和音乐会等活动。

4. 文章结构与组织

文章结构清晰,包括引言、主体和结论。文章逻辑组织良好,每段都集中讨论一个特定的观点和支持细节。在段落和观点之间也有明确的过渡。但为了进一步提高文章的组织结构,可以在以下方面进行改进:

  1. 在引言部分简要概述两种观点,以便读者更好地理解后文的讨论。

  2. 在结论部分对文章进行总结,并强调自己观点的优势。

示例1:在引言部分,可以这样写:“在本文中,我们将探讨两种不同的观点:一是支持资助艺术节目,二是支持资助户外活动。” 示例2:在结论部分,可以这样写:“综上所述,尽管户外活动对居民的身体健康有益,但我认为资助艺术节目更能丰富社区生活,并为当地带来独特的文化特色。”

5. 语法批改

Amy presents a compelling argument in favor of prioritizing financial allocation on outdoor activities. Admittedly, for many, outdoor recreational facilities potentially promote physical health and community engagement. However, I am inclined to prioritize the construction of arts programs. In my view, arts stimulate intellectual and emotional growth, foster creativity, and encourage diversity of thought forin(This rule identifies wrong preposition usage.) humans. In addition, arts are not just catering to the majority, so a vibrant society needs to value and support its cultural diversity, including those who have a deep appreciation for arts. For instance, local public fundingsfunding(misspelling) for museums, concerts, and other arts events ensures accessibility to all residents, irrespective of their economic status. These arts institutions significantly serve as hubs for communal interaction, sparking dialogue, and a sense of belonging. In other words, only by nurturing arts, can local government foster a unique identity and vitality that attracts more visitors and business investments. Therefore, allocating financial resources onto(This rule identifies wrong preposition usage.) arts enriches the community in ways that extend far beyond physical gratification.

Section Title: 6 文章修订

Amy presents a compelling argument in favor of prioritizing financial allocation on outdoor activities. Admittedly, for many, outdoor recreational facilities potentially promote physical health and community engagement. However, I am inclined to prioritize the construction of arts programs. In my view, arts stimulate intellectual and emotional growth, foster creativity, and encourage diversity of thought for humans. In addition, arts are not just catering to the majority, so a vibrant society needs to value and support its cultural diversity, including those who have a deep appreciation for arts. For instance, local public fundings for museums, concerts, and other arts events ensures accessibility to all residents, irrespective of their economic status. These arts institutions significantly serve as hubs for communal interaction, sparking dialogue, and a sense of belonging. In other words, only by nurturing arts can local government foster a unique identity and vitality that attracts more visitors and business investments. Therefore, allocating financial resources on arts enriches the community in ways that extend far beyond physical gratification. (170 words)

Amy presents a compelling argument in favor of prioritizing financial allocation on outdoor activities. activities (revised for clarity: "prioritizing financial resources for outdoor activities"). Admittedly, for many, outdoor recreational facilities potentially promote physical health and community engagement. However, I am inclined to prioritize the construction of arts programs. In my view, arts stimulate intellectual and emotional growth, foster creativity, and encourage diversity of thought for humans. humans (revised for conciseness: "encourage diverse thinking"). In addition, arts are not just catering to the majority, majority (revised for clarity: "arts do not only cater to the majority"), so a vibrant society needs to value and support its cultural diversity, including those who have a deep appreciation for arts. For instance, local public fundings (revised for grammar: "local public funding") for museums, concerts, and other arts events ensures accessibility to all residents, irrespective of their economic status. These arts institutions significantly serve as hubs for communal interaction, sparking dialogue, dialogue (revised for consistency: "sparking conversations"), and a sense of belonging. In other words, only by nurturing arts, arts can local government foster a unique identity and vitality that attracts more visitors and business investments. Therefore, allocating financial resources on arts enriches the community in ways that extend far beyond physical gratification.gratification (revised for clarity: "physical benefits").

8 思维导图


- Prioritizing financial allocation
    - Outdoor activities
        - Physical health
        - Community engagement
    - Arts programs
        - Intellectual growth
        - Emotional growth
        - Creativity
        - Diversity of thought

- Cultural diversity
    - Appreciation for arts
    - Public fundings for arts institutions
        - Museums, concerts, events, etc.

- Accessibility and communal interaction
    - Dialogue and sense of belonging 

- Unique identity and vitality 
    - Attracting visitors and business investments 

- Enriching the community 
    - Beyond physical gratification 

9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish definitionSimplified Chinese translationSample sentences
prioritize/praɪˈɒrətaɪz/verbTo arrange or deal with in order of importance优先考虑Allocating financial resources on arts should be prioritized.
intellectual/ˌɪntəˈlɛktʃuəl/adjectiveRelating to the intellect智力的Arts stimulate intellectual growth.
emotional/ɪˈmoʊʃənəl/adjectiveRelating to a person's emotions情感的Arts foster emotional growth.
creativity/kriːeɪˈtɪvəti/nounThe use of imagination or original ideas to create something创造力Arts programs foster creativity.
diversity/daɪˈvɜrsəti/nounThe state of being diverse; variety多样性Arts encourage diversity of thought.
accessibility/əkˌsɛsəˈbɪləti/nounThe quality of being easy to obtain or use可及性Public fundings for arts institutions ensure accessibility to all residents.
communal/kəˈmjunəl/adjectiveShared by all members of a community公共的Arts institutions serve as hubs for communal interaction.
vitality/vaɪˈtæləti/nounThe state of being strong, active, and full of energy活力Nurturing arts can foster a unique identity and vitality that attracts more visitors and business investments.
gratification/ˌgrætɪfɪˈkeɪʃn/nounPleasure, especially when gained from the satisfaction of a desire满足Allocating financial resources on arts enriches the community in ways that extend far beyond physical gratification.

How Academic Discussion Is Scored

The TOEFL Academic Discussion task is evaluated based on the official ETS scoring rubric. AI evaluation analyzes each response across multiple dimensions.

Relevance & Contribution

Does the response address the question and contribute meaningfully to the discussion?

Language Use

Grammar accuracy, vocabulary range, and sentence structure quality.

Development & Support

Are ideas well-developed with specific examples and clear reasoning?

Common Patterns Across Responses

Based on analysis of user submissions for this task, here are common patterns observed in student responses.

Many students provide clear opinions but lack specific supporting examples.

Strong responses directly reference the reading passage and other speakers' viewpoints.

Higher-scoring responses use varied sentence structures and academic vocabulary.

Time management is a key factor — responses that feel rushed tend to score lower on development.

Learning Tips

1

Read the prompt carefully and identify all parts of the question before writing.

2

Reference the reading passage and the other students' opinions in your response.

3

Use specific examples to support your main point — avoid generic statements.

4

Aim for 120-150 words. Longer responses are not always better; clarity and focus matter more.

5

Practice timed responses (10 minutes) to build fluency under exam conditions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the TOEFL Academic Discussion task?
The TOEFL Academic Discussion task requires you to contribute to an online classroom discussion. You'll read a professor's question and other students' responses, then write your own post expressing and supporting your opinion in about 10 minutes.
How is the Academic Discussion task scored?
The task is scored on a scale of 0-5 based on relevance to the discussion, quality of language use (grammar, vocabulary, sentence structure), and how well you develop and support your ideas with specific examples and reasoning.
What are the user samples on this page?
These are real responses submitted by TOEFL test-takers who practiced this question on LingoLeap. Each sample has been evaluated by our AI scoring engine, which provides a score and detailed feedback on strengths and areas for improvement.
How accurate is the AI evaluation?
LingoLeap's AI evaluation engine is trained on official ETS scoring rubrics and calibrated against human rater scores. While no automated system is perfect, it provides reliable feedback for practice purposes and helps identify specific areas for improvement.
How can I practice this Academic Discussion task?
You can practice by signing up for a free LingoLeap account. Write your own response to this exact question, submit it, and receive instant AI evaluation with detailed feedback on your writing.
How long should my Academic Discussion response be?
Aim for 120-150 words. The task gives you 10 minutes to write your response. Focus on clarity, supporting your opinion with specific examples, and referencing the discussion context rather than writing a longer response.

Rooting for Your Goal Score Today!

With LingoLeap, an expert in English exams

Get to Your Dream Score Faster

Try for free now