All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on city planning. Write a post responding to the professor's question.

Real user submissions with AI-powered evaluation and feedback

2 user-submitted samples available

Start Free Practice

Task Overview

Professor

According to needs of city development, the government would like to plan to have some certain places for citizens. The government now plans to establish some car-free zones in the center of the city. Some like this plan for they believe it can help eliminating traffic congestion, while others dislike it because they would not be able to reach places like stores and restaurants by car in a convenience way. What do you think of this plan and why?

Student A

As a resident of a big city, I can't imagine a car-free zone. Car as a means of transportation, is mainly in order to meet people's traffic requirements. Therefore, the car-free zone represents that the transportation in this area is not convenient compared to other places, which is bad for the life of local people

Student B

As a father of a kid, I love this idea. In my case, my children sometimes like to play on the road, but it is not safe. If there is a car-free zone, then my children and other children will have more places to play, which is good for their growth.

User Samples & Evaluation Results

User Sample

I

Evaluation Result

1. 子项得分

Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 0 Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 0 Language Use and Grammar: 0

2. 预估分数

0. 3 任务完成度

从任务完成度的角度来看,这篇文章没有达到要求。首先,文章只有一个字,完全没有表达和支持个人观点。其次,文章没有用自己的话对讨论做出贡献。建议同学重新审视题目要求,并尝试撰写一篇至少100字的回应。

示例1:我认为设立无车区是一个很好的想法,因为它可以减少交通拥堵和空气污染。此外,无车区可以为市民提供更多的休闲空间和娱乐场所。

示例2:然而,我也理解有些人担心无车区会给他们带来不便。政府可以考虑在无车区附近设置停车场,并提供便捷的公共交通工具,以缓解这些问题。

4. 文章结构与组织

由于文章仅包含一个字,因此无法对其结构和组织进行评价。建议同学在撰写文章时注意以下几点:确保文章有明确的结构(包括引言、正文和结论),每段落关注一个具体观点并提供支持细节,以及在观点和段落之间使用清晰的过渡。

示例1:首先,我认为设立无车区可以有效减少交通拥堵。在许多大城市中,交通拥堵已经成为一个严重的问题,影响了市民的生活质量和工作效率。(接下来详细阐述这一观点)

示例2:此外,无车区还可以提高城市的环境质量。汽车尾气是空气污染的主要来源之一,限制汽车进入市中心将有助于改善空气质量和减少噪音污染。(接下来详细阐述这一观点)

5. 语法批改

I

Title: 6 文章修订

In response to the proposed plan for car-free zones in the city center, I believe it presents both advantages and drawbacks. On one hand, such zones can significantly reduce traffic congestion and create safer spaces for children to play, promoting their overall well-being. Additionally, car-free areas may encourage the use of alternative transportation methods, such as walking or cycling, which can lead to a healthier lifestyle and reduced pollution. On the other hand, the absence of cars may hinder accessibility to essential services and businesses for some individuals. To strike a balance between these conflicting interests, I suggest implementing designated car-free hours or days rather than a complete ban on vehicles in specific areas. This approach would allow for increased safety and environmental benefits while still accommodating those who rely on cars for transportation. (137 words)

ITitle: 7 文章批改 (Revised for consistency with the original title)

In response to the proposed plan for car-free zones in the city center, I believe it presents both advantages and drawbacks. On one hand, such zones can significantly reduce traffic congestion (clarified "reduce" instead of "present") and create safer spaces for children to play, promoting their overall well-being. Additionally, car-free areas may encourage the use of alternative transportation methods, such as walking or cycling (added "or" for clarity), which can lead to a healthier lifestyle and reduced pollution. On the other hand, the absence of cars may hinder accessibility to essential services and businesses for some individuals (rephrased "for some individuals" for clarity). To strike a balance between these conflicting interests, I suggest implementing designated car-free hours or days rather than a complete ban on vehicles in specific areas (rephrased "in specific areas" for clarity). This approach would allow for increased safety and environmental benefits while still accommodating those who rely on cars for transportation (rephrased "for transportation" for clarity).

8 思维导图


- Car-free zones
  - Advantages
    - Reduced traffic congestion
    - Safer spaces for children
    - Encourages alternative transportation methods
      - Walking or cycling
      - Healthier lifestyle and reduced pollution
  - Drawbacks
    - Hindered accessibility to essential services and businesses
  - Suggested solution: Designated car-free hours or days
    - Increased safety and environmental benefits
    - Accommodates those who rely on cars for transportation 

9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish definitionSimplified Chinese translationSample sentences
congestion/kənˈdʒɛstʃən/nounA situation in which there is too much traffic交通拥堵The car-free zones can significantly reduce traffic congestion.
well-being/ˌwɛlˈbiɪŋ/nounThe state of being comfortable, healthy, or happy健康幸福Car-free zones promote the overall well-being of children.
alternative/ɔlˈtɝːnətɪv/adjectiveAvailable as another possibility or choice可替代的Car-free areas encourage the use of alternative transportation methods.
accessibility/əkˌsɛsəˈbɪləti/noun/the quality of being easy to obtain or use/易用性,可达性The absence of cars may hinder accessibility to essential services and businesses for some individuals.
designated/ˈdɛzɪɡneɪtəd/adjectiveChosen for a particular purpose指定的I suggest implementing designated car-free hours or days.
accommodate/əˈkɑmədeɪt/verb/to provide enough space for/容纳,适应This approach would accommodate those who rely on cars for transportation.
ban/bæn/noun/an official or legal prohibition/禁令I suggest not implementing a complete ban on vehicles in specific areas.
conflicting/kənˈflɪktɪŋ/adjective/incompatible or at variance; contradictory/相互矛盾的To strike a balance between these conflicting interests, we need a different approach.
environmental/ɪnˌvaɪrənˈmɛntl/adjective/relating to the natural world and the impact of human activity on its condition.环境的Designated car-free hours or days would allow for increased environmental benefits.

How Academic Discussion Is Scored

The TOEFL Academic Discussion task is evaluated based on the official ETS scoring rubric. AI evaluation analyzes each response across multiple dimensions.

Relevance & Contribution

Does the response address the question and contribute meaningfully to the discussion?

Language Use

Grammar accuracy, vocabulary range, and sentence structure quality.

Development & Support

Are ideas well-developed with specific examples and clear reasoning?

Common Patterns Across Responses

Based on analysis of user submissions for this task, here are common patterns observed in student responses.

Many students provide clear opinions but lack specific supporting examples.

Strong responses directly reference the reading passage and other speakers' viewpoints.

Higher-scoring responses use varied sentence structures and academic vocabulary.

Time management is a key factor — responses that feel rushed tend to score lower on development.

Learning Tips

1

Read the prompt carefully and identify all parts of the question before writing.

2

Reference the reading passage and the other students' opinions in your response.

3

Use specific examples to support your main point — avoid generic statements.

4

Aim for 120-150 words. Longer responses are not always better; clarity and focus matter more.

5

Practice timed responses (10 minutes) to build fluency under exam conditions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the TOEFL Academic Discussion task?
The TOEFL Academic Discussion task requires you to contribute to an online classroom discussion. You'll read a professor's question and other students' responses, then write your own post expressing and supporting your opinion in about 10 minutes.
How is the Academic Discussion task scored?
The task is scored on a scale of 0-5 based on relevance to the discussion, quality of language use (grammar, vocabulary, sentence structure), and how well you develop and support your ideas with specific examples and reasoning.
What are the user samples on this page?
These are real responses submitted by TOEFL test-takers who practiced this question on LingoLeap. Each sample has been evaluated by our AI scoring engine, which provides a score and detailed feedback on strengths and areas for improvement.
How accurate is the AI evaluation?
LingoLeap's AI evaluation engine is trained on official ETS scoring rubrics and calibrated against human rater scores. While no automated system is perfect, it provides reliable feedback for practice purposes and helps identify specific areas for improvement.
How can I practice this Academic Discussion task?
You can practice by signing up for a free LingoLeap account. Write your own response to this exact question, submit it, and receive instant AI evaluation with detailed feedback on your writing.
How long should my Academic Discussion response be?
Aim for 120-150 words. The task gives you 10 minutes to write your response. Focus on clarity, supporting your opinion with specific examples, and referencing the discussion context rather than writing a longer response.

Rooting for Your Goal Score Today!

With LingoLeap, an expert in English exams

Get to Your Dream Score Faster

Try for free now