TOEFLIELTS
English
☰
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People who cannot accept criticism from others will not be successful at working in a group.

Real user submissions with AI-powered evaluation and feedback

1 user-submitted samples available

Start Free Practice

Task Overview

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People who cannot accept criticism from others will not be successful at working in a group.

User Samples & Evaluation Results

Practise TOEFL writing questions like this one →

Opens the writing question list in the LingoLeap app, not this exact question. Practising needs a free account. AI scoring uses credits, except 3 free scores a day on Practice Test 1 (PQ26-1) questions.

1

User Sample #1

From my perspective, I agree with the view that people who cannot accept the criticism will more likely to away from the success in a group. Admittedl...

Score
22

User Sample

From my perspective, I agree with the view that people who cannot accept the criticism will more likely to away from the success in a group. Admittedly, the people who refuse the criticism from others are independence to some degree. Maintaining independence is the way to develop individual creativity and may bring unique ideas to the team. However, upon further consideration, criticism means that other team members find some shortcomings in you. Accepting these advises can improve one’s ability and get personal growth in the group, which makes the whole team closer to the success. In addition, criticism is also an important part of communication. After exchanging the criticism with other people, team members can much easier to get along with each other. In short, I put all my thumbs that people who cannot accept criticism from others will not be successful.

Evaluation Result

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.0

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 3.5

  • Language Use and Grammar: 3.5

2. 预估分数

22. 3 任务完成度

这篇文章在回答问题方面做得还不错,但仍有改进的空间。首先,你需要更详细地解释为什么不能接受批评的人在团队中无法取得成功。其次,你可以提供一些具体的例子来支持你的观点。最后,注意避免使用不准确或不清楚的表达。

改进示例:

  1. 在文章中加入具体例子,如:“例如,在一个项目中,如果某人不能接受同事关于他工作效率低下的批评,他可能无法改进自己的工作方法,从而影响整个团队的进度。”

  2. 对观点进行更详细的解释:“批评意味着其他团队成员发现了你的一些不足之处。接受这些建议可以提高个人能力并在团队中获得个人成长,这将使整个团队更接近成功。”

4. 文章结构与组织

文章结构方面还有待加强。首先,在引言部分简要介绍文章主题和论点。然后,在正文部分逐一阐述论点,并为每个论点提供支持细节。最后,在结论部分总结文章的主要观点。此外,注意在段落之间使用清晰的过渡词或短语。

改进示例:

  1. 引言部分:“在团队合作中,批评是一个不可或缺的环节。本文将探讨为什么不能接受批评的人在团队中无法取得成功。”

  2. 过渡词和短语:“首先,接受批评有助于个人成长;其次,批评是沟通的重要组成部分。”

5. 语法批改

From my perspective, I agree with the view that people who cannot accept the criticism will more likely to away from the success in a group. Admittedly, the people who refuse the criticism from others are independence to some degree. Maintaining independence is the way to develop individual creativity and may bring unique ideas to the team. However, upon further consideration, criticism means that other team members find some shortcomings in you. Accepting these advisesthis advises(Singular verb after 'these' or 'those') can improve one’s ability and get personal growth in the group, which makes the whole team closer to the success. In addition, criticism is also an important part of communication. After exchanging the criticism with other people, team members can much easier to get along with each other. In short, I put all my thumbs that people who cannot accept criticism from others will not be successful.

Section Title: 6 文章修订

Revised Essay:

I concur with the assertion that individuals who are unable to accept criticism are less likely to achieve success within a group setting. While it is true that those who resist criticism may exhibit a certain level of independence, which can foster individual creativity and contribute unique ideas to the team, it is crucial to recognize the value of constructive feedback. Embracing criticism signifies an acknowledgement of one's shortcomings, allowing for personal growth and improvement within the group dynamic, ultimately bringing the team closer to success. Furthermore, exchanging critiques serves as a vital component of effective communication among team members, facilitating stronger interpersonal relationships and fostering a more cohesive working environment. Thus, it is evident that an inability to accept criticism from others can significantly hinder one's potential for success in collaborative endeavors. (139 words)

From my perspective, I agree concur with the view assertion that people individuals who cannot are unable to accept the criticism will more (rephrased for clarity and conciseness) are less likely to away from the achieve success in within a group. Admittedly, the people group setting. While it is true that those who refuse the resist criticism from others are may exhibit a certain level of independence to some degree. Maintaining independence is the way to develop (revised for smoother sentence flow), which can foster individual creativity and may bring contribute unique ideas to the team. However, upon further consideration, team, it is crucial to recognize the value of constructive feedback (rephrased for better emphasis on the importance of feedback). Embracing criticism means that other team members find some signifies an acknowledgement of one's shortcomings in you. Accepting these advises can improve one’s ability and get (revised for clarity), allowing for personal growth in and improvement within the group, which makes group dynamic, ultimately bringing the whole team closer to the success. In addition, criticism is also an important part Furthermore, exchanging critiques serves as a vital component of communication. After exchanging the criticism with other people, effective communication among team members can much easier (rephrased for better emphasis on communication), facilitating stronger interpersonal relationships and fostering a more cohesive working environment. Thus, it is evident that an inability to get along with each other. In short, I put all my thumbs that people who cannot accept criticism from others will not be successful.can significantly hinder one's potential for success in collaborative endeavors (rephrased for a stronger conclusion).

8 思维导图


- 主题:接受批评与团队成功
  - 独立性
    - 有助于创造力
    - 提供独特想法
  - 接受批评的价值
    - 承认自己的不足
    - 促进个人成长和改进
  - 团队动态中的改进
    - 带领团队走向成功
  - 批评交流的重要性
    - 有效沟通的关键组成部分
    - 加强人际关系和团队凝聚力

9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish definitionSimplified Chinese translationSample sentences
concur/kənˈkɜr/verbagree; be of the same opinion同意,一致意见I concur with the assertion that individuals who are unable to accept criticism are less likely to achieve success within a group setting.
independence/ˌɪndɪˈpɛndəns/nounnot depending on another for livelihood or subsistence独立,自主Those who resist criticism may exhibit a certain level of independence.
creativity/ˌkri.eɪˈtɪv.ə.ti/nounthe ability to produce original and unusual ideas创造力Independence can foster individual creativity.
constructive/kənˈstrʌktɪv/adjectivehaving a positive effect; helpful建设性的It is crucial to recognize the value of constructive feedback.
shortcomings/ˈʃɔrtˌkʌmɪŋz/nouna fault or failure to meet a certain standard缺点,不足Embracing criticism signifies an acknowledgement of one's shortcomings.
interpersonal/ˌɪntərˈpɜrsənl/adjectiverelating to relationships or communication between people人际的Exchanging critiques serves as a vital component of effective communication among team members, facilitating stronger interpersonal relationships.
cohesive/koʊˈhi sɪv/adjective/causing people or things to become united/有凝聚力的/Fostering a more cohesive working environment.
collaborative/kəˈlæb ər ə tɪv//adjective/involving two or more people working together for a special purpose协作的/An inability to accept criticism from others can significantly hinder one's potential for success in collaborative endeavors.
Practise TOEFL writing questions like this one →

Opens the writing question list in the LingoLeap app, not this exact question. Practising needs a free account. AI scoring uses credits, except 3 free scores a day on Practice Test 1 (PQ26-1) questions.

How Academic Discussion Is Scored

The TOEFL Academic Discussion task is evaluated based on the official ETS scoring rubric. AI evaluation analyzes each response across multiple dimensions.

Relevance & Contribution

Does the response address the question and contribute meaningfully to the discussion?

Language Use

Grammar accuracy, vocabulary range, and sentence structure quality.

Development & Support

Are ideas well-developed with specific examples and clear reasoning?

Common Patterns Across Responses

Based on analysis of user submissions for this task, here are common patterns observed in student responses.

Many students provide clear opinions but lack specific supporting examples.

Strong responses directly reference the reading passage and other speakers' viewpoints.

Higher-scoring responses use varied sentence structures and academic vocabulary.

Time management is a key factor — responses that feel rushed tend to score lower on development.

Learning Tips

1

Read the prompt carefully and identify all parts of the question before writing.

2

Reference the reading passage and the other students' opinions in your response.

3

Use specific examples to support your main point — avoid generic statements.

4

Aim for 120-150 words. Longer responses are not always better; clarity and focus matter more.

5

Practice timed responses (10 minutes) to build fluency under exam conditions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the TOEFL Academic Discussion task?
The TOEFL Academic Discussion task requires you to contribute to an online classroom discussion. You'll read a professor's question and other students' responses, then write your own post expressing and supporting your opinion in about 10 minutes.
How is the Academic Discussion task scored?
The task is scored on a scale of 0-5 based on relevance to the discussion, quality of language use (grammar, vocabulary, sentence structure), and how well you develop and support your ideas with specific examples and reasoning.
What are the user samples on this page?
These are real responses submitted by TOEFL test-takers who practiced this question on LingoLeap. Each sample has been evaluated by our AI scoring engine, which provides a score and detailed feedback on strengths and areas for improvement.
How accurate is the AI evaluation?
LingoLeap's AI evaluation engine is trained on official ETS scoring rubrics and calibrated against human rater scores. While no automated system is perfect, it provides reliable feedback for practice purposes and helps identify specific areas for improvement.
How can I practice this Academic Discussion task?
You can practice by signing up for a free LingoLeap account. Write your own response to this exact question, submit it, and receive instant AI evaluation with detailed feedback on your writing.
How long should my Academic Discussion response be?
Aim for 120-150 words. The task gives you 10 minutes to write your response. Focus on clarity, supporting your opinion with specific examples, and referencing the discussion context rather than writing a longer response.

Rooting for Your Goal Score Today!

With LingoLeap, an expert in English exams

Get to Your Dream Score Faster

Try for free now