TOEFLIELTS
Nederlands
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on energy usage. Write a post responding to the professor's question.

Echte inzendingen van gebruikers met AI-gestuurde beoordeling en feedback

1 door gebruikers ingediende voorbeelden beschikbaar

Start Gratis Oefenen

Overzicht van de Taak

Professor

Energy source is vital for society's development. Some argue that we should use cleaner energy sources to protect the environment, while others believe traditional energy sources like coal and oil are better because they are less expensive. What is your opinion?

Student A

I think traditional resources are better than cleaner energy sources, because the price of traditional energy is low, which is conducive to the development of large-scale production. In addition, the technology for traditional energy is highly developed, and the use of traditional energy for production is profitable for improving production efficiency.

Student B

I prefer to think that we should develop new energy, which is good for improving the environment. Faced with severe environmental problems, the government must take environmental factors into account when making decisions. In addition, as technology improves, energy conversion becomes more efficient and less costly. Then new energy will have more advantages.

Gebruikersvoorbeelden & Beoordelingsresultaten

1

Gebruikersvoorbeeld #1

I believe that using cleaner energy is the better choice, since it does less harm to environment and able to provide a sustainable development. To ela...

Score
26

Gebruikersvoorbeeld

I believe that using cleaner energy is the better choice, since it does less harm to environment and able to provide a sustainable development. To elaborate, many scientists today are devoted in enhancing the quality of new-clear energy which is highly promoted to be utilized in advanced cars, manufactory industries. These effort has significant positive impact on mitigating air pollution and raising people's awareness of environmental protection. Contrarily, those traditional energy will not only does harm to air-quality but also contribute nothing to a sustainable energy industry since it will run out one day. Some argues that using traditional energy is more profitable. However, he doesn't put environment factors into consideration.

Beoordelingsresultaat

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0

  • Language Use and Grammar: 4.0

2. 预估分数

26. 3 任务完成度

这篇文章在任务完成度方面表现良好,对于问题提出了明确的观点,并且给出了合理的论据。但是,可以在论据方面进行更多的拓展和细化。此外,尝试使用更多的例子来支持你的观点。

示例1: 原文:These effort has significant positive impact on mitigating air pollution and raising people's awareness of environmental protection. 修改:The adoption of cleaner energy sources, such as solar and wind power, has significantly reduced air pollution levels in many countries, leading to improved public health and increased awareness of the importance of environmental protection.

示例2: 原文:Some argues that using traditional energy is more profitable. 修改:While some argue that traditional energy sources like coal and oil are more profitable due to their lower costs, it is important to consider the long-term environmental impacts and potential financial savings from investing in cleaner energy technologies.

4. 文章结构与组织

文章结构方面可以进一步改进。虽然文章包含了引言、主体和结论,但段落之间的过渡不够流畅。建议在段落之间添加过渡句子,使文章更具连贯性。

示例1: 原文:To elaborate, many scientists today are devoted in enhancing the quality of new-clear energy which is highly promoted to be utilized in advanced cars, manufactory industries. 修改:To elaborate, many scientists today are devoted to enhancing the quality of cleaner energy sources, such as solar and wind power. These renewable energy sources are increasingly being utilized in advanced cars and manufacturing industries, demonstrating their potential for widespread adoption.

示例2: 原文:Contrarily, those traditional energy will not only does harm to air-quality but also contribute nothing to a sustainable energy industry since it will run out one day. 修改:In contrast, the continued reliance on traditional energy sources like coal and oil not only harms air quality but also hinders the development of a sustainable energy industry. As these finite resources become depleted, it is crucial to invest in cleaner alternatives for the future.

5. 语法批改

I believe that using cleaner energy is the better choice, since it does less harm to environment and able to provide a sustainable development. To elaborate, many scientists today are devoted into(This rule identifies wrong preposition usage.) enhancing the quality of new-clear energy which is highly promoted to be utilized in advanced cars, manufactorymanufacture(misspelling) industries. These effortThis effort('this' vs. 'these') has significant positive impact on mitigating air pollution and raising people's awareness of environmental protection. Contrarily, those traditional energythis traditional energy('this' vs. 'these') will not only doesdo(Non-infinitive verb after modal verbs) harm to air-quality but also contribute nothing to a sustainable energy industry since it will run out one day. Some argues that using traditional energy is more profitable. However, he doesn't put environment factors into consideration.

Section Title: 6 Article Revision

In my opinion, cleaner energy sources are the superior choice, as they cause less environmental damage and promote sustainable development. Numerous scientists are currently working to improve the efficiency of renewable energy, which is increasingly being utilized in advanced vehicles and manufacturing industries. These efforts have a considerable positive impact on reducing air pollution and raising public awareness of environmental protection. In contrast, traditional energy sources not only harm air quality but also fail to contribute to a sustainable energy industry, as they will eventually be depleted. While some argue that traditional energy is more profitable, they often overlook the importance of considering environmental factors in their assessments. (113 words)

I believe that using In my opinion, cleaner energy is sources are the better choice, since it does superior choice (revised for clarity and natural tone), as they cause less harm to environment environmental damage (revised for clarity) and able to provide a promote sustainable development. To elaborate, many Numerous scientists today are devoted in enhancing currently working to improve the quality efficiency of new-clear renewable energy (revised for clarity and natural tone), which is highly promoted to be increasingly being utilized in advanced cars, manufactory vehicles and manufacturing industries. These effort has significant efforts have a considerable positive impact on mitigating reducing air pollution (revised for clarity) and raising people's public awareness of environmental protection. Contrarily, those In contrast, traditional energy will sources not only does harm to air-quality air quality but also fail to contribute nothing to a sustainable energy industry since it (revised for clarity), as they will run out one day. Some argues eventually be depleted. While some argue that using traditional energy is more profitable. However, he doesn't put environment profitable, they often overlook the importance of considering environmental factors into consideration.in their assessments (revised for clarity and natural tone).

8 思维导图


- Cleaner energy sources
    - Less environmental damage
    - Promote sustainable development

- Renewable energy efficiency
    - Advanced vehicles
    - Manufacturing industries

- Reducing air pollution

- Raising public awareness of environmental protection

- Traditional energy sources
    - Harm air quality
    - Unsustainable energy industry
        - Depletion of resources

- Profitability vs. environmental factors in assessments

9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
cleaner/ˈkliːnər/adjectivecausing little or no harm to the environment更清洁的Cleaner energy sources cause less environmental damage.
sustainable/səˈsteɪnəbl/adjectiveable to be maintained at a certain rate可持续的Sustainable development is crucial for our future.
efficiency/ɪˈfɪʃənsi/nounthe state of achieving maximum productivity with minimum wasted effort or expense效率Scientists are working to improve the efficiency of renewable energy.
manufacturing/ˌmænjuˈfæktʃərɪŋ/nounthe production of goods on a large scale using machinery制造业Renewable energy is increasingly being utilized in manufacturing industries.
depletion/dɪˈpliʃən/ │ noun │ reduction in the number or quantity of something耗竭Traditional energy sources will eventually be depleted.
profitability/ˌprɒfɪtəˈbɪlɪti/ │ noun │ the degree to which a business or activity yields profit or financial gain盈利能力Some argue that traditional energy is more profitable.
environmental/ɪnˌvaɪrənˈmentl/ │ adjective │ relating to the natural world and the impact of human activity on its condition环境的They often overlook the importance of considering environmental factors in their assessments.
awareness/əˈweərnəs/ │ noun │ knowledge or perception of a situation or fact意识Raising public awareness of environmental protection is essential.
renewable/rɪˈnuːəbl/ │ adjective │ (of a resource) not depleted when used可再生的Renewable energy sources are becoming more popular in advanced vehicles.
air pollution/eə pəˈluːʃ(ə)n/ │ noun │ harmful substances released into the Earth's atmosphere空气污染Reducing air pollution is one of the main goals of cleaner energy sources.

Section Title: 6 Article Revision

In my opinion, cleaner energy sources are the superior choice, as they cause less environmental damage and promote sustainable development. Numerous scientists are currently working to improve the efficiency of renewable energy, which is increasingly being utilized in advanced vehicles and manufacturing industries. These efforts have a considerable positive impact on reducing air pollution and raising public awareness of environmental protection. In contrast, traditional energy sources not only harm air quality but also fail to contribute to a sustainable energy industry, as they will eventually be depleted. While some argue that traditional energy is more profitable, they often overlook the importance of considering environmental factors in their assessments.

Hoe Academic Discussion Wordt Beoordeeld

De TOEFL Academic Discussion-taak wordt beoordeeld aan de hand van de officiële ETS-beoordelingsrubriek. AI-beoordeling analyseert elk antwoord op meerdere dimensies.

Relevantie & Bijdrage

Gaat het antwoord in op de vraag en levert het een zinvolle bijdrage aan de discussie?

Taalgebruik

Grammaticale nauwkeurigheid, woordenschat en kwaliteit van de zinsbouw.

Uitwerking & Onderbouwing

Zijn de ideeën goed uitgewerkt met specifieke voorbeelden en duidelijke redenering?

Veelvoorkomende Patronen in Antwoorden

Op basis van analyse van gebruikersinzendingen voor deze taak, hier zijn veelvoorkomende patronen die zijn waargenomen in antwoorden van studenten.

Veel studenten geven een duidelijke mening, maar missen specifieke onderbouwende voorbeelden.

Sterke antwoorden verwijzen direct naar de leestekst en de standpunten van andere deelnemers.

Hoger scorende antwoorden gebruiken gevarieerde zinsstructuren en academisch vocabulaire.

Timemanagement is een belangrijke factor — antwoorden die gehaast aanvoelen scoren doorgaans lager op uitwerking.

Leertips

1

Lees de opdracht zorgvuldig en identificeer alle onderdelen van de vraag voordat je begint te schrijven.

2

Verwijs in je antwoord naar de leestekst en de meningen van de andere studenten.

3

Gebruik specifieke voorbeelden om je hoofdpunt te onderbouwen — vermijd algemene uitspraken.

4

Streef naar 120-150 woorden. Langere antwoorden zijn niet altijd beter; duidelijkheid en focus zijn belangrijker.

5

Oefen met getimede antwoorden (10 minuten) om vlotheid op te bouwen onder examenomstandigheden.

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat is de TOEFL Academic Discussion-taak?
Bij de TOEFL Academic Discussion-taak moet je bijdragen aan een online klassikale discussie. Je leest de vraag van een professor en de reacties van andere studenten, en schrijft vervolgens binnen ongeveer 10 minuten je eigen bijdrage waarin je jouw mening verwoordt en onderbouwt.
Hoe wordt de Academic Discussion-taak beoordeeld?
De taak wordt beoordeeld op een schaal van 0-5, gebaseerd op de relevantie voor de discussie, de kwaliteit van het taalgebruik (grammatica, woordenschat, zinsbouw) en hoe goed je jouw ideeën ontwikkelt en onderbouwt met concrete voorbeelden en redenering.
Wat zijn de gebruikersvoorbeelden op deze pagina?
Dit zijn echte antwoorden die zijn ingediend door TOEFL-kandidaten die deze vraag hebben geoefend op LingoLeap. Elk voorbeeld is beoordeeld door onze AI-beoordelingsengine, die een score geeft en gedetailleerde feedback over sterke punten en verbeterpunten.
Hoe nauwkeurig is de AI-beoordeling?
De AI-beoordelingsengine van LingoLeap is getraind op officiële ETS-beoordelingsrubrieken en gekalibreerd aan de hand van scores van menselijke beoordelaars. Hoewel geen enkel geautomatiseerd systeem perfect is, biedt het betrouwbare feedback voor oefendoeleinden en helpt het specifieke verbeterpunten te identificeren.
Hoe kan ik deze Academic Discussion-taak oefenen?
Je kunt oefenen door je aan te melden voor een gratis LingoLeap-account. Schrijf je eigen antwoord op precies deze vraag, dien het in en ontvang direct AI-feedback met gedetailleerd commentaar op je tekst.
Hoe lang moet mijn Academic Discussion-antwoord zijn?
Streef naar 120-150 woorden. De taak geeft je 10 minuten om je antwoord te schrijven. Focus op duidelijkheid, onderbouw je mening met concrete voorbeelden en verwijs naar de discussiecontext in plaats van een langer antwoord te schrijven.

Behaal vandaag nog je doelscore!

Met LingoLeap, dé expert in Engelse taalexamens

Bereik je droombeoordeling sneller

Probeer nu gratis