TOEFL TPO 9 Writing Task 1 Sample: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
legacy_task_page.hero_subtitle
legacy_task_page.sample_count
legacy_task_page.legacy_notice_title
legacy_task_page.legacy_notice_body
legacy_task_page.task_overview_title
legacy_task_page.reading_passage
Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile's main source of power, the internal-combustion engine. By far the most promising alternative source of energy for cars is the hydrogen-based fuel-cell engine, which uses hydrogen to create electricity that, in turn, powers the car. Fuel-cell engines have several advantages over internal-combustion engines and will probably soon replace them.One of the main problems with the internal-combustion engine is that it relies on petroleum, either in the form of gasoline or diesel fuel. Petroleum is a finite resource; someday, we will run out of oil. The hydrogen needed for fuel-cell engines cannot easily be depleted. Hydrogen can be derived from various plentiful sources, including natural gas and even water. The fact that fuel-cell engines utilize easily available, renewable resources makes them particularly attractive.Second, hydrogen-based fuel cells are attractive because they will solve many of the world's pollution problems. An unavoidable by-product of burning oil is carbon dioxide, and carbon dioxide harms the environment. On the other hand, the only byproduct of fuel-cell engines is water.Third, fuel-cell engines will soon be economically competitive because people will spend less money to operate a fuel-cell engine than they will to operate an internal-combustion engine. This is true for one simple reason: a fuel-cell automobile is nearly twice as efficient in using its fuel as an automobile powered by an internal-combustion engine is. In other words, the fuel-cell powered car requires only half the fuel energy that the internal-combustion powered car does to go the same distance.
legacy_task_page.question
Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
legacy_task_page.user_samples_title
task_page.user_sample
The reading argues that
task_page.evaluation_result
1.Sub Scores:
-
Task fulfillment: 0
-
Organization: 0
-
Coherence and Cohesion: 0
-
Language Use: 0
2.Estimated Scores:
0. 3.Task completeness:
The essay does not address the specific requirements of the task. It is incomplete and does not summarize the points made in the lecture or explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. To improve, you should:
-
Begin with an introduction that briefly introduces the topic and states that the lecture casts doubt on the reading passage's claims.
-
Write a body paragraph for each point made in the lecture, explaining how it contradicts or challenges a corresponding point from the reading passage.
-
Conclude by summarizing how the lecture casts doubt on the reading passage's claims.
Example 1: Introduction: The reading passage discusses the potential benefits of hydrogen-based fuel-cell engines as an alternative to internal-combustion engines. However, the lecture casts doubt on these claims by presenting several counterarguments.
Example 2: Body Paragraph: The first point made in the lecture is that hydrogen is not as easily available as claimed in the reading passage. Producing pure liquid hydrogen requires complex technology and energy-intensive processes, which contradicts the assertion that hydrogen is a practical and easily available substance.
4.Essay structure and organization: The essay lacks structure and organization. To improve, you should:
-
Follow a clear structure with an introduction, body paragraphs for each point discussed, and a conclusion.
-
Ensure each paragraph focuses on one specific point from either the reading or listening passages.
-
Use clear transitions between ideas and paragraphs to guide readers through your essay.
Example 1: Transition between paragraphs: While the reading passage claims that hydrogen-based fuel cells will solve pollution problems, this idea is challenged by the lecture. (Begin discussing pollution-related counterargument from lecture)
Example 2: Conclusion: In conclusion, the lecture presents several counterarguments that cast doubt on the reading passage's claims about the benefits of hydrogen-based fuel-cell engines. By addressing issues related to hydrogen availability, pollution, and cost, the lecture effectively challenges the optimistic view presented in the reading passage.
5. Grammar
The reading argues that
- Revised Essay
The reading argues that hydrogen-based fuel-cell engines are a promising alternative to internal-combustion engines, offering advantages such as renewable resources, reduced pollution, and economic competitiveness. However, the lecture casts doubt on these claims by presenting counterarguments that highlight the challenges and limitations of fuel-cell technology.
Firstly, the reading states that hydrogen is an easily available and renewable resource, derived from sources like natural gas and water. In contrast, the lecture contends that obtaining pure liquid hydrogen for fuel-cell engines is a complex process. It requires advanced technology to produce and store liquid hydrogen at extremely low temperatures (minus 253 degrees Celsius). This suggests that hydrogen may not be as practical or readily accessible as the reading implies.
Secondly, the reading claims that hydrogen-based fuel cells will help solve pollution problems since their only byproduct is water. However, the lecture points out that producing pure hydrogen generates significant pollution. The purification process necessitates large amounts of energy obtained from burning coal or oil, which in turn creates pollution. Thus, while fuel-cell cars themselves may not pollute directly, the production of hydrogen for these vehicles would still contribute to environmental degradation.
Lastly, the reading asserts that fuel-cell engines will soon be economically competitive due to their higher efficiency compared to internal-combustion engines. The lecture challenges this assertion by highlighting the high manufacturing costs associated with fuel-cell technology. Fuel-cell engines require platinum components for the chemical reaction needed to generate electricity. Platinum is a rare and expensive metal; efforts to find a cheaper alternative have been unsuccessful thus far. Consequently, any potential cost savings from increased efficiency could be offset by these high production costs.
In conclusion, although hydrogen-based fuel cells appear promising in theory as an alternative energy source for automobiles, the lecture raises valid concerns regarding their practicality, environmental impact, and economic feasibility—effectively casting doubt on the optimistic claims presented in the reading passage. (316 words)
6. Revised Essay
The reading argues thatthat hydrogen-based fuel-cell engines are a promising alternative to internal-combustion engines, offering advantages such as renewable resources, reduced pollution, and economic competitiveness (revised for clarity and cohesion). However, the lecture casts doubt on these claims by presenting counterarguments that highlight the challenges and limitations of fuel-cell technology (revised to emphasize the contrasting viewpoints).
Firstly, the reading states that hydrogen is an easily available and renewable resource, derived from sources like natural gas and water (revised for conciseness). In contrast, the lecture contends that obtaining pure liquid hydrogen for fuel-cell engines is a complex process (revised to emphasize contrast). It requires advanced technology to produce and store liquid hydrogen at extremely low temperatures (minus 253 degrees Celsius) (added specific detail). This suggests that hydrogen may not be as practical or readily accessible as the reading implies (clarified conclusion).
Secondly, the reading claims that hydrogen-based fuel cells will help solve pollution problems since their only byproduct is water (revised for clarity). However, the lecture points out that producing pure hydrogen generates significant pollution (emphasized contrast). The purification process necessitates large amounts of energy obtained from burning coal or oil, which in turn creates pollution (added specific details). Thus, while fuel-cell cars themselves may not pollute directly, the production of hydrogen for these vehicles would still contribute to environmental degradation (clarified conclusion).
Lastly, the reading asserts that fuel-cell engines will soon be economically competitive due to their higher efficiency compared to internal-combustion engines (revised for clarity). The lecture challenges this assertion by highlighting the high manufacturing costs associated with fuel-cell technology (emphasized contrast). Fuel-cell engines require platinum components for the chemical reaction needed to generate electricity. Platinum is a rare and expensive metal; efforts to find a cheaper alternative have been unsuccessful thus far (added specific details). Consequently, any potential cost savings from increased efficiency could be offset by these high production costs (clarified conclusion).
In conclusion, although hydrogen-based fuel cells appear promising in theory as an alternative energy source for automobiles, the lecture raises valid concerns regarding their practicality, environmental impact, and economic feasibility—effectively casting doubt on the optimistic claims presented in the reading passage (revised for clarity and cohesion).
8. Mind Map
- Introduction
- Reading: Hydrogen fuel cells as a promising alternative
- Lecture: Challenges and limitations of fuel-cell technology
- Availability and Renewability
- Reading: Hydrogen from natural gas and water
- Lecture: Complex process to produce and store liquid hydrogen
- Pollution Reduction
- Reading: Fuel cells only produce water as a byproduct
- Lecture: Pollution generated during hydrogen production
- Economic Competitiveness
- Reading: Higher efficiency compared to internal-combustion engines
- Lecture: High manufacturing costs due to platinum components
- Conclusion
- Lecture casts doubt on the optimistic claims in the reading passage
9. Key Words
| Word | Phonetic Symbol | Part of Speech | English Definition | English Translation | Sample Sentence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| alternative | /ɔːlˈtɜːrnətɪv/ | adjective | Available as another possibility or choice | N/A | Hydrogen-based fuel cells are a promising alternative to internal-combustion engines. |
| renewable | /rɪˈnjuːəbl/ | adjective | Capable of being replaced by natural ecological cycles or sound management practices | N/A | Hydrogen is an easily available and renewable resource. |
| purification | /p(j)ʊrɪfɪˈkeɪʃ(ə)n/ | noun | The process of making something pure by removing impurities or contaminants | N/A | Producing pure hydrogen generates significant pollution during the purification process. |
| degradation | /dɛɡrəˈdeɪʃ(ə)n/ | noun | The process of something being broken down or reduced in quality | N/A | The production of hydrogen for fuel-cell vehicles would still contribute to environmental degradation. |
| economically | /iːkəˈnɒmɪk(ə)li/ | adverb | In a way that relates to economics or finance; with regard to efficiency and cost-effectiveness | N/A | Fuel-cell engines will soon be economically competitive due to their higher efficiency. |
| competitiveness | /kəmˈpɛtɪtɪvnəs/ | noun | The ability of a company, country, or product to compete with others | N/A | The lecture challenges the assertion that fuel-cell engines will have economic competitiveness. |
| feasibility | /ˌfiːzəˈbɪlɪti/ | noun | The state or degree of being easily or conveniently done; practicability | N/A | The lecture raises valid concerns regarding the practicality, environmental impact, and economic feasibility of hydrogen fuel cells. |
| platinum | /ˈplatɪnəm/ | noun | A precious silvery-white metal, the chemical element of atomic number 78 | N/A | _Fuel-cell engines require platinum components for the chemical reaction needed to generate electricity. |
| counterargument | /ˈkaʊntərˌɑrɡjʊmənt/ | noun | An argument or set of reasons put forward to oppose an idea or theory developed in another argument. | N/A | The lecture presents counterarguments that highlight the challenges and limitations of fuel-cell technology. |
| environmental impact | /ɪnˌvaɪrənˈmɛntl ˈɪmpækt/ | noun | The effect of human activity on the environment | N/A | The lecture questions the true environmental impact of hydrogen-based fuel cells. |
legacy_task_page.current_toefl_title
legacy_task_page.current_toefl_desc
Rooting for Your Goal Score Today!
With LingoLeap, an expert in English exams
Get to Your Dream Score Faster