TOEFL TPO -1 Writing Task 1 Sample: You have 20 minutes to plan and write your response.Your response will be judged on the basis of the quality of your writing and on how well your response presents the points in the lecture and their relationship to the reading passage.Typically,an effective response will be 150 to 225 words.
legacy_task_page.hero_subtitle
legacy_task_page.sample_count
legacy_task_page.legacy_notice_title
legacy_task_page.legacy_notice_body
legacy_task_page.task_overview_title
legacy_task_page.reading_passage
To meet growing international demand for energy,scientists and politicians are looking beyond the traditional energy sources of oil and coal to other less developed technologies.One such technology is nuclear power,which uses radioactive fuels such as uranium to generate energy.Although some people believe that nuclear power plants should be built on a large scale to supply some of the world's energy needs,critics argue that nuclear power is unsafe and too costly.In addition,there are better alterative technologies. First,nuclear power plants present safety concerns.Radioactive materials that are used to generate energy in nuclear reactors (where the energy-generating reactions take place)pose a potential threat to human health.The risk of radioactive material escaping from the reactor into the environment increases greatly if the core of a reactor overheats.The public is uneasy about the safeguards presently in place to prevent reactors from becoming too hot. Second,it is more expensive to build nuclear power plants than other types of plants.The construction of a typical nuclear power plant costs at least $2 billion and can be up to $5 billion.Nuclear plants are so much more expensive than conventional coal and oil plants because the specialized safety equipment they currently use to safeguard against accidents is expensive,and they may become still more expensive in the future if the public continues to demand even greater safety. Third. there are other technologies that are better and cheaper than nuclear power. Wind turbines. for instance, are completely safe and. according to recent analyses, cost less than nuclear power. Further, turbines run on a renewable source of energy (wind), so their energy source will never be depleted.
legacy_task_page.question
You have 20 minutes to plan and write your response.Your response will be judged on the basis of the quality of your writing and on how well your response presents the points in the lecture and their relationship to the reading passage.Typically,an effective response will be 150 to 225 words.
legacy_task_page.user_samples_title
task_page.user_sample
The reading passage presents three pieces of evidence about the disadvantages of nuclear power plants. The lecture contends that all the criticisms are unconvincing and respectively refutes each of the points made in the passage. Firstly, the reading passage makes clear that the nuclear power plants present safety concerns as radioactive materials used to generate energy pose a potential threat to human health. And the overheating of the core of a reactor can be risky and unable to predict. The lecturer, however, opines that people needn't worry about the safety of overheating, because as the temperature becomes higher, the reactor will slow down. When building up the energy, the nuclear power plants will control the heating on a safe level. Secondly, according to the reading passage, it is more expensive to build nuclear power plants than other types of plants because of the specialized safety equipment and the public concern demands. Nonetheless, the lecturer rebuts this by arguing that people often assume the expense of such plants is high in the term of the equipment, but there is not only thing to consider. When it comes to the other factors, the expenses of nuclear power plants are comparatively cheap. Overtime, the nuclear power plants will save more than conventional plants in terms of financial sense. Thirdly, the reading passage maintains that there are other technologies that are better and cheaper than nuclear power, such as wind turbines. Casting doubt on the claim, the lecturer floats the idea that the wind energy is unpredictable. She suggests that the wind energy may be strong on one day, but weak the other day. As a result, it is reliable. Every country which chooses the wind turbines as energy sources will definitely have another way to generate energy as backup. So wind energy cannot be a comprehensive energy solution.
task_page.evaluation_result
1.子项得分 任务完成度: 4 组织: 4 连贯与衔接: 4 语言使用: 3
2.预估分数
25. 3.任务完成度
整体来说,文章较好地完成了任务要求,阐述了阅读材料中的观点并对其进行了反驳。但在语言表达方面还有待提高,部分句子存在语法错误和表达不清晰的问题。建议在练习中注意提高英语语法和词汇运用能力。
示例1: 原文:When building up the energy, the nuclear power plants will control the heating on a safe level. 修改:When the energy builds up, nuclear power plants can control the heat at a safe level.
示例2: 原文:As a result, it is reliable. 修改:As a result, it is not reliable.
4.文章结构与组织 文章的结构和组织基本合理,包括引言、正文和结论。每段都集中讨论一个特定的观点,并提供支持细节。然而,在段落之间的过渡方面还有待加强。建议在段落之间使用更多的过渡词或短语来增强连贯性。
示例1: 原文:Firstly, the reading passage makes clear that... 修改:Firstly, as stated in the reading passage,...
示例2: 原文:Thirdly, the reading passage maintains that... 修改:Lastly, the reading passage argues that...
5. 语法批改
The reading passage presents three pieces of evidence about the disadvantages of nuclear power plants. The lecture contends that all the criticisms are unconvincing and respectively refutes each of the points made in the passage.
Firstly, the reading passage makes clear that the nuclear power plants present safety concernsconcerns,(This rule identifies whether commas are missing in a sentence.) as radioactive materials used to generate energy pose a potential threat to human health. And the overheating of the core of a reactor can be risky and unable to predict. The lecturer, however, opines that people needn't worry about the safety of overheating, because as the temperature becomes higher, the reactor will slow down. When building up the energy, the nuclear power plants will control the heating on a safe level.
Secondly, according to the reading passage, it is more expensive to build nuclear power plants than other types of plants because of the specialized safety equipment and the public concern demands. Nonetheless, the lecturer rebuts this by arguing that people often assume the expense of such plants is high in the term of the equipment, but there is not only thing to consider. When it comes to the other factors, the expenses of nuclear power plants are comparatively cheap. Overtime, the nuclear power plants will save more than conventional plants in terms of financial sense.
Thirdly, the reading passage maintains that there are other technologies that are better and cheaper than nuclear power, such as wind turbines. Casting doubt on the claim, the lecturer floats the idea that the wind energy is unpredictable. She suggests that the wind energy may be strong on one day, but weak the other day. As a result, it is reliable. Every country which chooses the wind turbines as energy sources will definitely have another way to generate energy as backup. So wind energy cannot be a comprehensive energy solution.
Section Title: 6.文章修订
The reading passage presents three arguments against the use of nuclear power plants, while the lecture counters each of these points, asserting that the criticisms are unconvincing.
Firstly, the reading passage highlights safety concerns surrounding nuclear power plants, specifically the potential threat to human health posed by radioactive materials and the risk of reactor core overheating. In contrast, the lecturer argues that overheating is not a significant concern due to new reactor designs called pebble bed reactors. These reactors self-regulate their temperature; as the core temperature rises above normal operating levels, nuclear reactions slow down, preventing excessive heat buildup and maintaining a safe temperature.
Secondly, the reading passage asserts that constructing nuclear power plants is more expensive than other types of plants due to specialized safety equipment and public demand for increased safety measures. The lecturer refutes this by emphasizing that while initial construction costs may be high, uranium—the radioactive fuel required for nuclear energy production—is comparatively cheap compared to traditional fuels like coal and oil. Over time, savings on nuclear fuel offset high construction costs, making nuclear power plants financially viable when considering long-term expenses.
Lastly, the reading passage suggests that alternative technologies such as wind turbines are better and cheaper than nuclear power. However, the lecturer disputes this claim by pointing out that wind energy is unpredictable and unreliable. Wind strength can vary greatly from day to day; consequently, countries relying on wind power typically require backup energy sources to ensure consistent power generation. In contrast, nuclear power provides a steady output without needing backup sources—making it a more comprehensive energy solution than wind energy alone. (271 words)
Section Title: 7.文章批改
The reading passage presents three pieces arguments against the use of evidence about the disadvantages nuclear power plants, while the lecture counters each of nuclear power plants. The lecture contends that all these points, asserting that the criticisms are unconvincing and respectively refutes each of the points made in the passage. (Changed "unconvincing" to "asserting that the criticisms are unconvincing" for better flow and clarity).
Firstly, the reading passage makes clear that the nuclear power plants present highlights safety concerns as surrounding nuclear power plants, specifically the potential threat to human health posed by radioactive materials used to generate energy pose and the risk of reactor core overheating. In contrast, the lecturer argues that overheating is not a potential threat to human health. And the overheating of significant concern due to new reactor designs called pebble bed reactors (Added "called pebble bed reactors" for specificity). These reactors self-regulate their temperature; as the core of a reactor can be risky and unable to predict. The lecturer, however, opines that people needn't worry about the safety of overheating, because as the temperature becomes higher, the reactor will rises above normal operating levels, nuclear reactions slow down. When building up the energy, the nuclear power plants will control the heating on down, preventing excessive heat buildup and maintaining a safe level. temperature (Rephrased for clarity).
Secondly, according to the reading passage, it passage asserts that constructing nuclear power plants is more expensive to build nuclear power plants than other types of plants because of the due to specialized safety equipment and the public concern demands. Nonetheless, the demand for increased safety measures. The lecturer rebuts refutes this by arguing that people often assume the expense of such emphasizing that while initial construction costs may be high, uranium—the radioactive fuel required for nuclear energy production—is comparatively cheap compared to traditional fuels like coal and oil (Rephrased for clarity). Over time, savings on nuclear fuel offset high construction costs, making nuclear power plants is high in the term of the equipment, but there is not only thing to consider. When it comes to the other factors, the financially viable when considering long-term expenses of nuclear power plants are comparatively cheap. Overtime, the nuclear power plants will save more than conventional plants in terms of financial sense. (Reworded for better flow).
Thirdly, Lastly, the reading passage maintains that there are other suggests that alternative technologies that are better and cheaper than nuclear power, such as wind turbines. Casting doubt turbines are better and cheaper than nuclear power. However, the lecturer disputes this claim by pointing out that wind energy is unpredictable and unreliable (Changed "unpredictable" to "unpredictable and unreliable" for emphasis). Wind strength can vary greatly from day to day; consequently, countries relying on the claim, the lecturer floats the idea that the wind energy is unpredictable. She suggests that the power typically require backup energy sources to ensure consistent power generation (Rephrased for clarity). In contrast, nuclear power provides a steady output without needing backup sources—making it a more comprehensive energy solution than wind energy may be strong on one day, but weak the other day. As a result, it is reliable. Every country which chooses the wind turbines as energy sources will definitely have another way to generate energy as backup. So wind energy cannot be a comprehensive energy solution.alone (Rephrased for better flow and emphasis).
8. Mind Map
1. Introduction
- Reading passage arguments
- Lecture counterarguments
2. Safety Concerns
- Reading: Radioactive materials, reactor core overheating
- Lecture: Pebble bed reactors, self-regulating temperature
3. Construction Costs
- Reading: High initial costs, specialized safety equipment
- Lecture: Cheap uranium fuel, long-term financial viability
4. Alternative Technologies
- Reading: Wind turbines better and cheaper
- Lecture: Unpredictable wind energy, nuclear power's steady output
5. Conclusion
- Summary of lecture's counterarguments to reading passage points
9. Keywords
| Word | Phonetic Symbol | Part of Speech | English Definition | Simplified Chinese Translation | Sample Sentence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| radioactive | ˌreɪdiˈoʊæktɪv | adjective | Emitting or relating to the emission of ionizing radiation or particles | 放射性的 | The radioactive materials must be handled with care to avoid contamination. |
| pebble bed | ˈpɛbəl bɛd | noun | A type of nuclear reactor design that uses small spherical fuel elements | 碎石床 | Pebble bed reactors are considered safer than traditional nuclear reactors. |
| self-regulate | sɛlf-ˈrɛgjəˌleɪt | verb | To control oneself or itself without external intervention | 自我调节 | The pebble bed reactor can self-regulate its temperature to prevent overheating. |
| uranium | jʊˈreɪniəm | noun | A heavy, silvery-white metallic element used as a fuel in nuclear reactors | 铀 | Uranium is a key component in the production of nuclear energy. |
| financially | fəˈnænʃəli | adverb | In terms of finance or economics | 在财务上 | The project is financially viable due to its long-term savings. |
| viable | ˈvaɪəbəl | adjective | Capable of working successfully; feasible | 可行的 | The new business plan is more viable than the previous one. |
| wind turbine | wɪnd ˈtɜrbaɪn | noun | A device that converts the wind's kinetic energy into electrical power | 风力涡轮机 | Wind turbines are becoming a popular alternative energy source. |
| unpredictable | _ʌnpriˈdɪktəbəl | _adjective | _Not able to be predicted; changeable | _无法预测的 | _The weather in this region is quite unpredictable, so it's best to be prepared for anything. |
| unreliable | _ʌnrɪˈlaɪəbəl | _adjective | _Not able to be relied upon | _不可靠的 | _This old car has become increasingly unreliable, so I'm considering buying a new one. |
| comprehensive | _kɒmprɪˈhensiv | _adjective | _Complete; including all or nearly all elements or aspects of something _ | 全面的 | _The report provides a comprehensive analysis of the company's financial situation. |
legacy_task_page.current_toefl_title
legacy_task_page.current_toefl_desc
Rooting for Your Goal Score Today!
With LingoLeap, an expert in English exams
Get to Your Dream Score Faster