TOEFL TPO -1 Writing Task 1 Sample: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they chAllenge the specific points made in the reading passage.

legacy_task_page.hero_subtitle

legacy_task_page.sample_count

legacy_task_page.legacy_notice_title

legacy_task_page.legacy_notice_body

legacy_task_page.task_overview_title

legacy_task_page.reading_passage

The United States currently has high-speed railway lines on the East Coast of the country.The East Coast high-speed trains have been very successful,and some experts believe that a similar high-speed rail system to connect the cities of San Francisco and Los Angeles in the state of California on the West Coast would have many benefits as well. First,maintaining roads is expensive,and because of budget constraints,the state of California has had great difficulty in ensuring that the repairs needed to keep the roads in top condition are made.Advocates of the high-speed rail proposal point out that when people who would have driven to their destination take the train instead,there will be less damage to the roads.The amount of maintenance needed on roads will therefore decrease. In addition,traffic congestion on one of the major roads between San Francisco and Los Angeles is already at record levels,and transportation experts predict that it will double over the next 25 years;clearly,this problem must be addressed.In some areas of the East Coast where traffic congestion has been a problem, high-speed trains have helped relieve the congestion,and they have become the most popular way to travel between some East Coast cities.A high-speed train between San Francisco and Los Angeles could become just as popular and could play a major role in helping to lower traffic congestion. Finally,high-speed trains are one of the most environmentally friendly forms of transportation.Trains running at a high rate of speed are very fuel efficient:about five times more fuel efficient than cars and twice as efficient as regular trains.A high-speed rail line between San Francisco and Los Angeles could eliminate many billions of pounds of harmful fuel emissions produced by car engines and regular trains every year.

legacy_task_page.question

Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they chAllenge the specific points made in the reading passage.

legacy_task_page.user_samples_title

task_page.user_sample

The author of the reading passage presents a series of potential benefits from constructing high-speed rail system to connect the cities of San Francisco and Los Angeles in the state of California on the West Coast. However, the professor in the lecture provides compelling counterpoints, defuting these arguments with well-structured reasoning. Firstly, while the professor acknowledge that building high-speed rail system possibly does save the maintenance money needed on roads, she notes that the huge expenses to construct it is unaffordable for the local government. She stresses that the estimated cost to build such a system require 75% of the annual tax revenue of the local government, making it unlikely to get loans to build such a expensive system. Secondly, the professor casts doubt on whether the high-speed rail system will really alleviate the traffic congestion. She points that only when people can conveniently access to the train station, they will choose to take this rail system. However, unlike the public transportation system on the East coast, the system on the West cost is relatively under developed, so people unlikely to choose the rail system to travel. Lastly, the professor disputes the author's third proposed argument that building high-speed rail system will significantly reduce the harmful fuel emissions. She highlights that the high-speed trains will share many same routes with regular trains, and in such condition, the high-speed train cannot run as faster as it was designed, so the the amount of eliminated fuel emissions will not as significant as the author hopes.

task_page.evaluation_result

1.Sub Scores

Task fulfillment: 4
Organization: 4
Coherence and Cohesion: 4
Language Use: 3

2.Estimated Scores

Estimated Score: 25

3.Task completeness The essay does a good job of summarizing the points made in the lecture and explaining how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage. However, there is room for improvement in terms of language use and clarity. To enhance task fulfillment, consider using more precise vocabulary and varied sentence structures.

Example 1: Original: "However, unlike the public transportation system on the East coast, the system on the West cost is relatively under developed, so people unlikely to choose the rail system to travel." Improved: "However, unlike the well-developed public transportation system on the East Coast, the West Coast's system is relatively underdeveloped, making it less likely for people to choose rail travel."

Example 2: Original: "She highlights that the high-speed trains will share many same routes with regular trains..." Improved: "She emphasizes that high-speed trains will share numerous routes with regular trains..."

4.Essay structure and organization The essay has a clear structure with an introduction, body paragraphs addressing each point made in the lecture, and a conclusion. The organization is logical and each paragraph focuses on a specific point. However, there could be better transitions between ideas and paragraphs to improve coherence and cohesion.

Example 1: Original: "Firstly... Secondly... Lastly..." Improved: "Firstly... In addition... Furthermore..."

Example 2: Original (no transition): "She stresses that... making it unlikely to get loans to build such an expensive system." Improved (with transition): "She stresses that... Consequently, obtaining loans for such an expensive project would be highly improbable."

5. Grammar

The author of the reading passage presents a series of potential benefits from constructing high-speed rail system to connect the cities of San Francisco and Los Angeles in the state of California on the West Coast. However, the professor in the lecture provides compelling counterpoints, ~~defuting~~refuting these arguments with well-structured reasoning. Firstly, while the professor ~~acknowledge~~acknowledges that building high-speed rail system possibly does save the maintenance money needed on roads, she notes that the huge expenses to construct it isare unaffordable for the local government. She stresses that the estimated cost to build such a system ~~require~~requires 75% of the annual tax revenue of the local government, making it unlikely to get loans to build such aan expensive system. Secondly, the professor casts doubt on whether the high-speed rail system will really alleviate the traffic congestion. She points that only when people can conveniently access to the train station, they will choose to take this rail system. However, unlike the public transportation system on the East coast, the system on the West ~~cost~~coast is relatively ~~under developed,~~underdeveloped, so people unlikely to choose the rail system to travel. Lastly, the professor disputes the author's third proposed argument that building high-speed rail system will significantly reduce the harmful fuel emissions. She highlights that the high-speed trains will share many same routes with regular trains, and in such condition, the high-speed train cannot run as ~~faster~~fast as it was designed, so the the amount of eliminated fuel emissions will not as significant as the author hopes.

Revised Essay

The author of the reading passage presents a series of potential benefits from constructing a high-speed rail system to connect the cities of San Francisco and Los Angeles in the state of California on the West Coast. However, the professor in the lecture provides compelling counterpoints, refuting these arguments with well-structured reasoning.

Firstly, while the professor acknowledges that building a high-speed rail system may save money needed for road maintenance, she notes that the huge expenses to construct it are unaffordable for the local government. She stresses that the estimated cost to build such a system requires 75% of the annual tax revenue of the local government, making it unlikely to secure loans for such an expensive project.

Secondly, the professor casts doubt on whether the high-speed rail system will genuinely alleviate traffic congestion. She points out that only when people can conveniently access train stations will they choose to take this rail system. However, unlike public transportation systems on the East Coast, those on the West Coast are relatively underdeveloped, making it unlikely for people to choose rail travel.

Lastly, the professor disputes the author's third proposed argument that building a high-speed rail system will significantly reduce harmful fuel emissions. She highlights that high-speed trains will share many routes with regular trains; in such conditions, high-speed trains cannot run as fast as designed. Consequently, the amount of eliminated fuel emissions will not be as significant as initially hoped by proponents of this project. (247 words)

The author of the reading passage presents a series of potential benefits from constructing a high-speed rail system to connect the cities of San Francisco and Los Angeles in the state of California on the West Coast. However, the professor in the lecture provides compelling counterpoints, ~~defuting~~ refuting (changed "defuting" to "refuting" for correct word usage) these arguments with well-structured reasoning.

Firstly, while the professor ~~acknowledge~~ acknowledges (changed "acknowledge" to "acknowledges" for subject-verb agreement) that building ~~high-speed rail system possibly does~~ a high-speed rail system may (changed "possibly does" to "may" for better word choice) save ~~the maintenance~~ money needed ~~on roads,~~ for road maintenance, she notes that the huge expenses to construct it is are unaffordable for the local government. She stresses that the estimated cost to build such a system ~~require~~ requires 75% of the annual tax revenue of the local government, making it unlikely to ~~get~~ secure loans ~~to build~~ (changed "get loans" to "secure loans" for better word choice) for such a an expensive ~~system.~~ project (changed "system" to "project" for variety).

Secondly, the professor casts doubt on whether the high-speed rail system will ~~really~~ genuinely (changed "really" to "genuinely" for better word choice) alleviate ~~the~~ traffic congestion. She points out (added "out" after "points") that only when people can conveniently access ~~to the~~ train ~~station,~~ stations will they ~~will~~ choose to take this rail system. However, unlike ~~the~~ public transportation ~~system~~ systems on the East ~~coast, the system~~ Coast, those on the West ~~cost is~~ Coast are relatively ~~under developed, so~~ underdeveloped (changed "the system on...under developed," to ", those on...underdeveloped," for clarity and correct word usage), making it unlikely for people ~~unlikely~~ to choose ~~the rail system to~~ rail travel.

Lastly, the professor disputes the author's third proposed argument that building a high-speed rail system will significantly reduce ~~the~~ harmful fuel emissions. She highlights that ~~the~~ high-speed trains will share many ~~same~~ routes with regular ~~trains, and~~ trains; in such ~~condition, the high-speed train~~ conditions, high-speed trains cannot run as ~~faster~~ fast as ~~it was designed, so the~~ designed. Consequently (changed "so" to "Consequently" for better word choice), the amount of eliminated fuel emissions will not be as significant as ~~the~~ initially hoped (changed "the author ~~hopes.~~hopes" to "initially hoped" for clarity) by proponents of this project.

Mind Map

Introduction
- Reading passage: potential benefits of high-speed rail system
- Lecture: counterpoints and refutations
Point 1: Cost savings
- Reading passage: saves money on road maintenance
- Lecture: unaffordable construction costs, large portion of tax revenue
Point 2: Traffic congestion
- Reading passage: alleviates traffic congestion
- Lecture: underdeveloped public transportation, unlikely to choose rail travel
Point 3: Fuel emissions reduction
- Reading passage: reduces harmful fuel emissions
- Lecture: shared routes with regular trains, reduced speed, less emission reduction

Key Words

Word	Phonetic Symbol	Part of Speech	English Definition	Sample Sentence
counterpoint	/ˈkaʊntərˌpɔɪnt/	noun	an argument or fact that opposes or disagrees with another	The professor provided compelling counterpoints to the author's arguments.
unaffordable	/ʌnəˈfɔːrdəbəl/	adjective	too expensive for someone to be able to buy or pay for	The construction costs of the high-speed rail system are unaffordable.
congestion	/kənˈdʒɛstʃən/	noun	a situation in which there is too much traffic and movement is difficult	The professor doubts that the rail system will genuinely alleviate traffic congestion.
underdeveloped	/ˌʌndərˈdɛvələpt/	adjective	not as advanced or complex as others in terms of infrastructure or economy	Public transportation systems on the West Coast are relatively underdeveloped.
proponents	/prəˈpoʊnənts/	noun	people who support an idea, plan, or cause	Proponents of the project hoped for significant emission reductions.
eliminate	/ɪˈlɪmɪneɪt/	verb	to remove or get rid of something	The high-speed rail system will not eliminate as much fuel emissions as expected.
revenue	/ˈrɛvənjuː/	noun	money that a government receives from taxes or other sources	The project requires 75% of the annual tax revenue of the local government.
routes	/ruːts/	noun	paths or courses that are taken by vehicles or people	High-speed trains will share many routes with regular trains.
significant	/sɪgˈnɪfɪkənt/	adjective	important, large, or great enough to be noticed or have an effect	The amount of eliminated fuel emissions will not be as significant as initially hoped.
access	/ˈæksɛs/	verb/noun	to be able to use, enter, or get near something	People need convenient access to train stations in order to choose rail travel.