TOEFLIELTS
Nederlands
☰
All Samples

TOEFL TPO 25 Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on business management. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

Echte inzendingen van gebruikers met AI-gestuurde beoordeling en feedback

248 door gebruikers ingediende voorbeelden beschikbaar

Start Gratis Oefenen

Overzicht van de Taak

Doctor Achebe

This week, we will be discussing leadership; more specifically, we will be examining the various qualities found in all successful business leaders. To get you thinking about this topic, I’d like you to consider the following question: What is more important for being an effective leader of a business—excellent communication skills or a strong technical background in a particular industry?

Andrew

The best leaders are the ones who are good communicators. If employees clearly understand what is expected of them—if their leader can articulate clearly and concisely what they need to do to achieve their goals—they will be more productive and efficient in their work.

Kelly

It doesn’t matter how well a company’s leader communicates if they don’t have a deep understanding of the business itself. Employees aren’t going to be motivated by a company president who gives a great speech if it’s evident that the president doesn’t know what they do in their day-to-day work.

Gebruikersvoorbeelden & Beoordelingsresultaten

Practise TOEFL writing questions like this one →

Opens the writing question list in the LingoLeap app, not this exact question. Practising needs a free account. AI scoring uses credits, except 3 free scores a day on Practice Test 1 (PQ26-1) questions.

1

Gebruikersvoorbeeld #1

The debate surrounding important factors for being an effective leader of a business has elicited opinions from both Andrew and Kelly. While Andrew's ...

Score
26

Gebruikersvoorbeeld

The debate surrounding important factors for being an effective leader of a business has elicited opinions from both Andrew and Kelly. While Andrew's viewpoint has its merit, I personally concur with Kelly's perspective, believing that having a strong technical background in a specific industry is most valuable for the success of a leader. Apart from imparting their deep understanding of the business to the employees, as mentioned by Kelly, leaders who have a unique perspective of the industry will deter employees from doing extra and unnecessary works, alleviating their workloads.. For instance, the CEO of "360", a successful coporation in China, never require his employees to write journals or records of their work progress, since he believes it is useless for workers'' daily jobs. Also, he provides training by himself about basic skills in computer science, which benefit the employees a lot.

Beoordelingsresultaat

1. 子项得分

Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5 Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0 Language Use and Grammar: 4.0

2. 预估分数

26. 3 任务完成度

总体来说,这篇文章在完成任务方面做得很好。然而,有一些地方可以改进。首先,在支持观点时,可以提供更多具体的例子和详细信息。其次,虽然文章表达了作者的观点,但可以更加深入地讨论为什么技术背景对于领导者的成功更为重要。

示例1(改进支持观点):具有强大技术背景的领导者能够更好地理解公司的产品和服务,从而为客户提供更好的解决方案。 示例2(深入讨论):在某些行业中,如科技或制造业,拥有专业知识和技能的领导者可能比那些擅长沟通但缺乏行业经验的领导者更能带领公司取得成功。

4. 文章结构与组织

文章结构基本合理,包括引言、正文和结尾。然而,在组织上还有一些需要改进的地方。首先,在正文部分中,建议将每个主要观点放在一个单独的段落中,并使用过渡词来连接不同的观点。其次,结尾部分可以更加明确地总结文章的主要观点。

示例1(改进段落组织):首先,具有强大技术背景的领导者能够更好地理解公司的产品和服务。其次,这些领导者还可以为员工提供有针对性的培训和指导。 示例2(改进结尾):综上所述,虽然沟通技巧对于领导者来说很重要,但在我看来,拥有特定行业的强大技术背景对于领导者的成功更为关键。

5. 语法批改

The debate surrounding important factors for being an effective leader of a business has elicited opinions from both Andrew and Kelly. While Andrew's viewpoint has its merit, I personally concur with Kelly's perspective, believing that having a strong technical background in a specific industry is most valuable for the success of a leader. Apart from imparting their deep understanding of the business to the employees, as mentioned by Kelly, leaders who have a unique perspective of the industry will deter employees from doing extra and unnecessary works,work, alleviating their workloads..workloads. For instance, the CEO of "360","360," a successful coporationcorporation in China, never requirerequires his employees to write journals or records of their work progress, since heprogress. He believes it is useless for workers''workers' daily jobs. Also, he provides training by himself abouton basic skills in computer science, which benefitbenefits the employees a lot.

Title: 6 Article Revision

The debate surrounding the essential qualities for an effective business leader has elicited diverse opinions from both Andrew and Kelly. While Andrew's viewpoint holds merit, I personally align with Kelly's perspective, believing that possessing a strong technical background in a specific industry is crucial for a leader's success.

Not only does this expertise enable leaders to impart their deep understanding of the business to employees, as mentioned by Kelly, but it also allows them to streamline operations by eliminating extraneous tasks and reducing workloads. For instance, the CEO of "360," a successful corporation in China, refrains from requiring his employees to write journals or records of their work progress, as he believes it is irrelevant to their daily tasks. Furthermore, he personally provides training on fundamental computer science skills, which greatly benefits his employees. (138 words)

The debate surrounding important factors for being the essential qualities for an effective business leader of a business has elicited diverse opinions from both Andrew and Kelly. Kelly (changed "important factors" to "essential qualities" for better clarity and phrasing). While Andrew's viewpoint has its holds merit, I personally concur align with Kelly's perspective, believing that having possessing a strong technical background in a specific industry is most valuable for the crucial for a leader's success of a leader. (rephrased "most valuable" to "crucial" for emphasis).

Apart from imparting Not only does this expertise enable leaders to impart their deep understanding of the business to the employees, as mentioned by Kelly, leaders who have a unique perspective of the industry will deter but it also allows them to streamline operations by eliminating extraneous tasks and reducing workloads (rephrased "deter employees from doing extra and unnecessary works, alleviating their workloads.. workloads" for better clarity). For instance, the CEO of "360", "360," a successful coporation corporation in China, never require refrains from requiring his employees to write journals or records of their work progress, since as he believes it is useless irrelevant to their daily tasks (rephrased "never require" to "refrains from requiring" and changed "useless for workers'' daily jobs. Also, jobs" to "irrelevant to their daily tasks"). Furthermore, he personally provides training by himself about basic on fundamental computer science skills, which greatly benefits his employees (changed "basic skills in computer science, which benefit the employees a lot.science" to "fundamental computer science skills" and added "greatly benefits").

Title: 8 思维导图


1. Introduction
   - Debate on essential qualities for effective business leaders
   - Andrew and Kelly's opinions
   - Personal alignment with Kelly's perspective

2. Technical Background Importance
   - Deep understanding of the business
   - Streamlining operations
   - Eliminating extraneous tasks

3. Real-life Example: CEO of "360"
   - No requirement for journals or records
   - Personal training on computer science skills

4. Conclusion
   - Importance of technical background for a leader's success

Title: 9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
elicit/ɪˈlɪsɪt/verbto draw out or bring forth (information, a response, etc.)引出,诱发The debate surrounding the essential qualities for an effective business leader has elicited diverse opinions.
streamline/ˈstriːmlaɪn/verbto make (an organization or system) more efficient精简,使效率更高This expertise allows leaders to streamline operations by eliminating extraneous tasks and reducing workloads.
extraneous/ɪkˈstreɪniəs/adjectiveirrelevant or unrelated to the subject being dealt with无关的,不相干的The CEO refrains from requiring his employees to write journals, as he believes it is extraneous to their daily tasks.
fundamental/ˌfʌndəˈmɛntl/adjectiveforming a necessary base or core; of central importance基本的,根本的He personally provides training on fundamental computer science skills, which greatly benefits his employees.
expertise/ˌɛkspərˈtiːz/nounexpert skill or knowledge in a particular field专业知识,专长Possessing a strong technical background is crucial for a leader's success.
operations/ˌɒpəˈreɪʃənz/nounthe activities involved in running a business运营,经营活动This expertise allows leaders to streamline operations by eliminating extraneous tasks and reducing workloads.
perspective/pərˈspɛktɪv/nouna particular attitude towards or way of regarding something观点,看法I personally align with Kelly's perspective, believing that possessing a strong technical background is crucial for a leader's success.
corporation/ˌkɔrpəˈreɪʃən/nouna large company or group of companies authorized to act as a single entity and recognized as such in law |大公司,集团 | The CEO of "360," a successful corporation in China, refrains from requiring his employees to write journals.
workload/ˈwɜrkloʊd/--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Practise TOEFL writing questions like this one →

Opens the writing question list in the LingoLeap app, not this exact question. Practising needs a free account. AI scoring uses credits, except 3 free scores a day on Practice Test 1 (PQ26-1) questions.

Hoe Academic Discussion Wordt Beoordeeld

De TOEFL Academic Discussion-taak wordt beoordeeld aan de hand van de officiële ETS-beoordelingsrubriek. AI-beoordeling analyseert elk antwoord op meerdere dimensies.

Relevantie & Bijdrage

Gaat het antwoord in op de vraag en levert het een zinvolle bijdrage aan de discussie?

Taalgebruik

Grammaticale nauwkeurigheid, woordenschat en kwaliteit van de zinsbouw.

Uitwerking & Onderbouwing

Zijn de ideeën goed uitgewerkt met specifieke voorbeelden en duidelijke redenering?

Veelvoorkomende Patronen in Antwoorden

Op basis van analyse van gebruikersinzendingen voor deze taak, hier zijn veelvoorkomende patronen die zijn waargenomen in antwoorden van studenten.

Veel studenten geven een duidelijke mening, maar missen specifieke onderbouwende voorbeelden.

Sterke antwoorden verwijzen direct naar de leestekst en de standpunten van andere deelnemers.

Hoger scorende antwoorden gebruiken gevarieerde zinsstructuren en academisch vocabulaire.

Timemanagement is een belangrijke factor — antwoorden die gehaast aanvoelen scoren doorgaans lager op uitwerking.

Leertips

1

Lees de opdracht zorgvuldig en identificeer alle onderdelen van de vraag voordat je begint te schrijven.

2

Verwijs in je antwoord naar de leestekst en de meningen van de andere studenten.

3

Gebruik specifieke voorbeelden om je hoofdpunt te onderbouwen — vermijd algemene uitspraken.

4

Streef naar 120-150 woorden. Langere antwoorden zijn niet altijd beter; duidelijkheid en focus zijn belangrijker.

5

Oefen met getimede antwoorden (10 minuten) om vlotheid op te bouwen onder examenomstandigheden.

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat is de TOEFL Academic Discussion-taak?
Bij de TOEFL Academic Discussion-taak moet je bijdragen aan een online klassikale discussie. Je leest de vraag van een professor en de reacties van andere studenten, en schrijft vervolgens binnen ongeveer 10 minuten je eigen bijdrage waarin je jouw mening verwoordt en onderbouwt.
Hoe wordt de Academic Discussion-taak beoordeeld?
De taak wordt beoordeeld op een schaal van 0-5, gebaseerd op de relevantie voor de discussie, de kwaliteit van het taalgebruik (grammatica, woordenschat, zinsbouw) en hoe goed je jouw ideeën ontwikkelt en onderbouwt met concrete voorbeelden en redenering.
Wat zijn de gebruikersvoorbeelden op deze pagina?
Dit zijn echte antwoorden die zijn ingediend door TOEFL-kandidaten die deze vraag hebben geoefend op LingoLeap. Elk voorbeeld is beoordeeld door onze AI-beoordelingsengine, die een score geeft en gedetailleerde feedback over sterke punten en verbeterpunten.
Hoe nauwkeurig is de AI-beoordeling?
De AI-beoordelingsengine van LingoLeap is getraind op officiële ETS-beoordelingsrubrieken en gekalibreerd aan de hand van scores van menselijke beoordelaars. Hoewel geen enkel geautomatiseerd systeem perfect is, biedt het betrouwbare feedback voor oefendoeleinden en helpt het specifieke verbeterpunten te identificeren.
Hoe kan ik deze Academic Discussion-taak oefenen?
Je kunt oefenen door je aan te melden voor een gratis LingoLeap-account. Schrijf je eigen antwoord op precies deze vraag, dien het in en ontvang direct AI-feedback met gedetailleerd commentaar op je tekst.
Hoe lang moet mijn Academic Discussion-antwoord zijn?
Streef naar 120-150 woorden. De taak geeft je 10 minuten om je antwoord te schrijven. Focus op duidelijkheid, onderbouw je mening met concrete voorbeelden en verwijs naar de discussiecontext in plaats van een langer antwoord te schrijven.

Behaal vandaag nog je doelscore!

Met LingoLeap, dé expert in Engelse taalexamens

Bereik je droombeoordeling sneller

Probeer nu gratis