TOEFL TPO 16 Writing Task 1 Sample: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how the new guidelines adopted in the United Kingdom helped to address the specific problems discussed in the reading passage.

1.子项得分 任务完成度: 4 组织: 4 连贯与衔接: 4 语言使用: 3

2.预估分数

25. 3.任务完成度

总体来说，你的文章较好地完成了任务要求，概括了听力材料中的观点，并解释了新指南如何解决阅读材料中提到的问题。然而，有一些建议可以帮助你更好地完成任务：

• 避免在文章开头直接否定阅读材料的观点。你可以在介绍听力观点时强调它们是对阅读材料的补充或反驳。

• 注意确保文章中所有听力和阅读观点都被清晰地概括和解释。

例如：

• 在文章开头，避免使用 "refutes" 或 "contradicts" 等词汇。可以改为："The listening material provides additional information and addresses the problems mentioned in the reading passage."

• 在第一个主题段落中，更详细地描述新指南如何确保考古遗址得到保护："The professor explains that the new guidelines require construction sites to be examined by archaeologists before any work begins, ensuring that valuable artifacts are not destroyed during construction."

4.文章结构与组织 你的文章结构基本上是清晰的，包括引言、主体和结论。每个段落都集中在一个特定的观点和支持细节上。然而，有一些建议可以帮助你改进文章的结构和组织：

• 在引言中简要介绍听力和阅读材料的主题，以便为读者提供背景信息。

• 在段落之间使用更清晰的过渡词或短语，以帮助读者更好地理解你的观点。

例如：

• 在引言中添加背景信息："The reading passage discusses the challenges faced by archaeology in the United Kingdom, while the listening material provides information on how new guidelines have addressed these issues."

• 在段落之间使用过渡词汇，如 "In addition" 或 "Moreover"。例如，在第二个主题段落开头："In addition, the reading passage argues that there is insufficient funding for archaeological research, while the listening material presents a different perspective."

5. 语法批改

The reading passage presents several problems and limitations faced by the science of archaeology in the twentieth century of British, while the listening material refutes these points and points out that actually the situation is more positive.

The article first claims that when construcitonsconstructions(misspelling) are built with the development of population, many builders who uncover some artifacts may not preseverepersevere(misspelling) and only discard them. However, the instructor objects it with a new proof. The professor says that every construction must be examined whether or notwhether(the question whether (whether) etc.) it has archaeology value, and if it has, builders and government will work together to write a plan about the preseverationperseveration(misspelling) of old history things and about the construction that aviodavoid(misspelling) damage to the sites. As a result, what concern written in the passage totally will not occur in reality. Thus, the argument made in the article is effectively chanllengedchallenged(misspelling).

Furthermore, the article posits that there are not sufficient funds supportof support(This rule identifies whether the preposition 'of' is missing in a sentence.) for archaeological research. In contrast, the speaker asserts that the examination work and planning work carried out by professional experts are all paid by construction companies. With new source of money given, researchers have larger opportunities to discover far great range in archaeology field. So, the point made by the speaker contradicts the argument presented in the reading passage.

Lastly, while the article claims that becuasebecause(misspelling) it's difficult to find jobs related to archaelolgyarchaeology(misspelling), few people are pursing, the listening material maintains that given experts who help to draw the plan and implement the process paid well by companies, more and more job careers are possibly created. In fact, increasing people are working as professional archaeologists in Britain now, a number that reaches the highest point over years. Therefore, the point in the lecture differs totally from the reading.

Overall, it is evident that the lecture departs significantly from opinions expressed in the passage. Rather than causing problems and limitations, the reality situation is beneficial to archaeology development.

6.文章修订

The reading passage discusses the challenges faced by archaeology in the United Kingdom, while the listening material provides information on how new guidelines have addressed these issues. The lecture offers insights into how these guidelines have effectively tackled the problems mentioned in the reading passage.

Initially, the reading passage asserts that valuable artifacts are often lost during construction projects due to a lack of preservation efforts by builders. In contrast, the professor explains that the new guidelines require construction sites to be examined by archaeologists before any work begins, ensuring that valuable artifacts are not destroyed during construction. If a site is deemed archaeologically significant, builders and government officials must collaborate to create a preservation plan that either builds around the artifacts or properly excavates and documents them before proceeding with construction.

In addition, the reading passage argues that there is insufficient funding for archaeological research, which hinders progress in this field. However, the listening material presents a different perspective by stating that construction companies are now responsible for financing any archaeological work conducted on their sites. This includes initial site examinations and all subsequent work carried out under an approved preservation plan. This new source of funding has allowed researchers to study a far greater range of archaeological sites than was previously possible.

Moreover, while the reading passage claims that it is difficult to find jobs related to archaeology and thus few people pursue careers in this field, the listening material maintains that increased job opportunities have arisen due to these new guidelines. Expert archaeologists are now hired at all stages of construction projects to assess sites for archaeological value, develop preservation plans, conduct research professionally and scientifically, and process data for reports and articles. Consequently, there has been a significant increase in professional archaeologists working in Britain – reaching its highest point ever.

In summary, it is evident that the lecture offers valuable insights into how new guidelines adopted in the United Kingdom have effectively addressed specific problems faced by archaeology as discussed in the reading passage. These guidelines have led to better preservation of artifacts, increased funding for research, and more job opportunities for archaeologists, ultimately contributing to the growth and development of archaeology in Britain. (370 words)

7.文章批改

The reading passage presents several problems and limitations discusses the challenges faced by the science of archaeology in the twentieth century of British, United Kingdom, while the listening material refutes provides information on how new guidelines have addressed these points and points out that actually the situation is issues. (Revised for clarity and to provide background information) The lecture offers insights into how these guidelines have effectively tackled the problems mentioned in the reading passage. (Revised for a more positive. formal tone)

The article first claims that when construcitons Initially, the reading passage asserts that valuable artifacts are built with the development of population, many builders who uncover some artifacts may not presevere and only discard them. However, the instructor objects it with a often lost during construction projects due to a lack of preservation efforts by builders. In contrast, the professor explains that the new proof. The professor says that every guidelines require construction must sites to be examined whether or not it has archaeology value, and if it has, builders and government will by archaeologists before any work together to write a plan about the preseveration of old history things and about the construction that aviod damage to the sites. As a result, what concern written in the passage totally will not occur in reality. Thus, the argument made in the article is effectively chanllenged. ¶ Furthermore, the article posits that there begins, ensuring that valuable artifacts are not sufficient funds support destroyed during construction. (Revised for clarity and coherence) If a site is deemed archaeologically significant, builders and government officials must collaborate to create a preservation plan that either builds around the artifacts or properly excavates and documents them before proceeding with construction. (Revised for smoother transitions)

In addition, the reading passage argues that there is insufficient funding for archaeological research. In contrast, the speaker asserts that the examination research, which hinders progress in this field. However, the listening material presents a different perspective by stating that construction companies are now responsible for financing any archaeological work and planning conducted on their sites. (Revised for coherence and to emphasize contrast) This includes initial site examinations and all subsequent work carried out by professional experts are all paid by construction companies. With under an approved preservation plan. This new source of money given, funding has allowed researchers have larger opportunities to discover to study a far great greater range in archaeology field. So, the point made by the speaker contradicts the argument presented in the reading passage. of archaeological sites than was previously possible. (Revised for clarity)

Lastly, Moreover, while the article reading passage claims that becuase it's it is difficult to find jobs related to archaelolgy, archaeology and thus few people are pursing, pursue careers in this field, the listening material maintains that given experts who help to draw the plan and implement the increased job opportunities have arisen due to these new guidelines. (Revised for smoother transitions) Expert archaeologists are now hired at all stages of construction projects to assess sites for archaeological value, develop preservation plans, conduct research professionally and scientifically, and process paid well by companies, more and more job careers are possibly created. In fact, increasing people are working as data for reports and articles. Consequently, there has been a significant increase in professional archaeologists working in Britain now, a number that reaches the – reaching its highest point over years. Therefore, the point in the lecture differs totally from the reading. ever. (Revised for clarity and to emphasize the result)

Overall, In summary, it is evident that the lecture departs significantly from opinions expressed in the offers valuable insights into how new guidelines adopted in the United Kingdom have effectively addressed specific problems faced by archaeology as discussed in the reading passage. Rather than causing problems and limitations, the reality situation is beneficial to (Revised for a more formal tone) These guidelines have led to better preservation of artifacts, increased funding for research, and more job opportunities for archaeologists, ultimately contributing to the growth and development of archaeology development.in Britain. (Revised for clarity and strong conclusion)

8.思维导图

• Introduction

  • Challenges faced by archaeology in the UK
  • New guidelines addressing these issues

• Preservation of artifacts

  • Construction projects destroying artifacts
  • New guidelines requiring site examination and preservation plans

• Funding for research

  • Insufficient funding hindering progress
  • Construction companies financing archaeological work on their sites

• Job opportunities in archaeology

  • Difficulty finding jobs in the field
  • Increased job opportunities due to new guidelines and preservation plans

9.关键词