TOEFL TPO -1 Writing Task 1 Sample: summarize the points in the listening, be sure to explain how they opposed the specific points Made in the reading

1.子项得分 任务完成度: 4 组织: 4 连贯性和衔接: 4 语言使用: 3

2.预估分数

25. 3.任务完成度

整体来说，你的文章较好地完成了任务要求，概括了听力中的观点，并对阅读中的论点进行了反驳。但是，有一些地方可以改进。首先，在引用听力内容时，尽量确保准确无误。例如，在描述隧道解决方案时，你提到了"UPS to room in the tunnels above the water elevated platforms for walkways"，这部分表述不够清晰。另外，在写作过程中注意避免重复表述。

改进建议举例：

1. 在描述隧道解决方案时，可以写成："The Australian government has utilized existing water tunnels under roads, adding elevated platforms for walkways above the water level, allowing koalas to move safely through the tunnels without getting wet."

2. 避免重复表述：将 "Koalas need to travel in search of food, water and mates." 改为 "Koalas need to travel in search of resources and mates."

4.文章结构与组织 你的文章结构基本上是清晰的，包括引言、正文和结论。每个段落都集中在一个特定的观点和支持细节上。然而，在段落之间加入更明确的过渡词或短语可以使文章更连贯。此外，尝试使用更多的同义词和不同的表达方式，以增加文章的多样性。

改进建议举例：

1. 在第二个观点与第三个观点之间加入过渡词： "Secondly, the reading asserts that automobile collisions are a big threat for koalas. In contrast, the speaker maintains an opposite opinion. Thirdly, the author of the reading passage believes that fencing leads to the decrease of koalas."

2. 使用同义词和不同表达方式：将 "However, the speaker opposes this idea" 改为 "Nonetheless, the lecturer contradicts this notion."

5. 语法批改

The reading mainly talks about three threats that cause the decrease of population of wild koalas. However, the listening challenges what is stated in the reading passage by presenting compelling solutions. Firstly, the reading claims that loss of habitatehabitat(misspelling) is a main threat since it force koalas into segregated patches of forest where surroundings are threeless ground, which makes koalas suffer from food competition. Conversely, the speaker refutes this point by stating that this problem can be solved via building vegatationvegetation(misspelling) corridor between fragmented patches to reconnect them. Koalas can move from one patch to another through the corridor. Secondly, the reading asserts that the automobile collisions are also a big threat for koalas. Koalas need to travel in search of food, water and mates. Because they are difficult to be seen on the road, especially at night, they are easily to be hit by passing vehicles. In contrast, the speaker maintains an opposite opinion, arguing that wildlife crossings can be constructed to allow animals passto pass(This rule identifies whether the preposition 'to' is missing in a sentence.) safely. To state it more clearly, Australian government has used existing structures that carry water under roads. UPS to room in the tunnels above the waterwater,(This rule identifies whether commas are missing in a sentence.) elevated platforms for walkways. As a result, koalas are safe on tunnels. Finally, the author of the reading passage believes that fencing leads to the decrease of koalas. Many koalas are injured in dog attacksattacks,(This rule identifies whether commas are missing in a sentence.) as they are not fast enough to climb over fences to escape from dogs. However, the speaker opposes this idea by mentioning that it may be an effective way to plant threes near fences or put wood pole,leaning, leaning(Use of whitespace before comma and before/after parentheses) agianstagainst(misspelling) the tree. In this way, koalas can climb up the trees to escape from dog attacks. In summary, each point made in the reading in support of threats led to the decrease of koalas are effectively solved by methods presented in the listening.

Section Title: 6.文章修订

The reading passage discusses three primary threats contributing to the decline of wild koala populations. However, the listening passage counters these points by offering effective solutions to each problem.

Firstly, the reading claims that habitat loss is a significant threat to koalas, as it forces them into fragmented patches of forest with treeless ground, leading to increased competition for food. In contrast, the speaker suggests that this issue can be addressed by constructing vegetation corridors between these fragmented patches, allowing koalas to move from one area to another with ease.

Secondly, the reading asserts that automobile collisions pose a considerable danger to koalas as they travel in search of food, water, and mates. Due to their difficulty being seen on roads at night, they are often hit by passing vehicles. The speaker refutes this point by proposing the construction of wildlife crossings that enable animals to pass safely. Specifically, the Australian government has utilized existing structures carrying water under roads and created elevated platforms for walkways within these tunnels. Consequently, koalas can safely navigate through tunnels without encountering vehicular traffic.

Lastly, the author of the reading passage contends that fencing contributes to the decline of koalas since many are injured in dog attacks when they cannot climb over fences quickly enough to escape. The speaker counters this argument by suggesting effective measures such as planting trees near fences or placing tall wooden poles leaning against them. These solutions allow koalas to climb up and evade potential dog attacks more efficiently.

In summary, each threat highlighted in the reading passage regarding the decrease of wild koala populations is effectively addressed through practical solutions presented in the listening passage. (280 words)

Revised essay with explanations inline:

The reading mainly passage discusses three primary threats contributing to the decline of wild koala populations. However, the listening passage counters these points by offering effective solutions to each problem. (Changed "mainly talks about three threats that cause the decrease of population of wild koalas. However, the listening challenges what is stated in the reading passage by presenting about" to "discusses" and "presenting compelling solutions. solutions" to "offering effective solutions" for clarity and conciseness.)

Firstly, the reading claims that habitat loss of habitate is a main significant threat since to koalas, as it force koalas forces them into segregated fragmented patches of forest where surroundings with treeless ground, leading to increased competition for food. In contrast, the speaker suggests that this issue can be addressed by constructing vegetation corridors between these fragmented patches, allowing koalas to move from one area to another with ease. (Changed "loss of habitate" to "habitat loss," "threeless ground" to "treeless ground," and "via building vegatation corridor" to "by constructing vegetation corridors" for grammatical accuracy and clarity.)

Secondly, the reading asserts that automobile collisions pose a considerable danger to koalas as they travel in search of food, water, and mates. Due to their difficulty being seen on roads at night, they are threeless ground, which makes koalas suffer from food competition. Conversely, the often hit by passing vehicles. The speaker refutes this point by stating that this problem proposing the construction of wildlife crossings that enable animals to pass safely. Specifically, the Australian government has utilized existing structures carrying water under roads and created elevated platforms for walkways within these tunnels. Consequently, koalas can be solved via building vegatation corridor between fragmented patches to reconnect them. Koalas can move from one patch to another safely navigate through the corridor. ¶ Secondly, the reading asserts that the automobile collisions are tunnels without encountering vehicular traffic. (Changed "are also a big threat for koalas. Koalas need to travel in search of food, water and mates. Because they are difficult to be seen on the road, especially at night, they are easily to be hit by passing vehicles. In contrast, the speaker maintains an opposite opinion, arguing that wildlife crossings can be constructed to allow animals pass safely. To state it more clearly, Australian government has used existing structures that carry water under roads. UPS to room in the tunnels above the water elevated platforms for walkways. As koalas" to "pose a result, koalas are safe on tunnels. ¶ Finally, considerable danger," and rephrased some sentences for clarity.)

Lastly, the author of the reading passage believes contends that fencing leads to the decrease of koalas. Many koalas contributes to the decline of koalas since many are injured in dog attacks as when they are not fast enough to cannot climb over fences to escape from dogs. However, the quickly enough to escape. The speaker opposes counters this idea by mentioning that it may be an argument by suggesting effective way to plant threes measures such as planting trees near fences or put wood pole,leaning agianst the tree. In this way, koalas can placing tall wooden poles leaning against them. These solutions allow koalas to climb up the trees to escape from and evade potential dog attacks. attacks more efficiently. (Changed "fencing leads to the decrease of koalas" to "fencing contributes to the decline of koalas," and rephrased some sentences for clarity.)

In summary, each point made threat highlighted in the reading in support of threats led to passage regarding the decrease of koalas are wild koala populations is effectively solved by methods addressed through practical solutions presented in the listening.listening passage. (Changed "threats led to" to "threats contributing to" for grammatical accuracy.)

---

8. Mind Map

1. Introduction
   - Reading passage: threats to koalas
   - Listening passage: solutions to threats

2. Habitat Loss
   - Reading: fragmented patches, competition for food
   - Listening: vegetation corridors

3. Automobile Collisions
   - Reading: difficulty being seen, hit by vehicles
   - Listening: wildlife crossings, tunnels, elevated platforms

4. Fencing and Dog Attacks
   - Reading: injured in dog attacks, slow climbing over fences
   - Listening: planting trees near fences, tall wooden poles

5. Conclusion
   - Summary of solutions to threats from listening passage

9. Keywords