TOEFL TPO -1 Writing Task 1 Sample: Directions: Give yourself 20 minutes to plan and write your response. Your response is judged on the quality of the writing and on how well it presents the points in the lecture and their relationship to the reading passage.Typically, an effective response will be 150 to 225 words. You may view the reading passage while you respond. Response time: 20 minutes

1.子项得分 任务完成度: 4 组织: 4 连贯性和衔接: 4 语言使用: 3

2.预估分数

25. 3.任务完成度

整体来说，你的文章较好地完成了任务要求，有效地呈现了阅读材料和听力材料中的观点。然而，为了更好地完成任务，建议你在描述听力部分时提供更多具体细节。此外，在讨论每个观点时，请确保清楚地表达阅读和听力材料之间的关系。

示例1: 不足：According to him, the sailing stones tend to root deeply into the ground. 改进：According to him, the sailing stones tend to leave deep grooves in the ground, which indicates that they meet a lot of resistance when moving.

示例2: 不足：He further explains that the temperature is hardly below zero and it only drops below zero during the evening while it rises on the day, making it hard to form the ice. 改进：He further explains that although the temperature may drop below freezing at night, it rises during the day, which makes it difficult for large-scale ice formation to occur.

4.文章结构与组织 你的文章结构清晰，包括引言、正文和结论。每段都集中讨论一个特定观点，并提供支持细节。然而，在段落之间加入更明确的过渡词或短语可以使文章更连贯。

建议1： 在引言部分，可以使用过渡词汇，如“然而”或“相反”，以更清楚地表达阅读和听力材料之间的对立关系。

示例1: 不足：The author gives three explanations, however, the speaker doesn’t find these convincing. 改进：The author gives three explanations; however, the speaker refutes each of these theories.

建议2： 在正文段落中，使用过渡词汇，如“此外”或“同样地”，以更清楚地连接各个观点。

示例2: 不足：In contrast, the speaker refutes this idea, arguing that forming ice is really difficult in the desert. 改进：In contrast, the speaker refutes this idea and argues that forming large and thick ice sheets is highly unlikely in a desert environment.

5. 语法批改

The reading and the lecturer both delve into the topic of explanations of the formation of sailing stones. The author gives three explanations, however, the speaker doesn’t find these convincing.

First of allFirst(first of all (first)), the writer believebelieves(punctuation + singular noun + plural verb) that these stones are pushed by the wind, especially under the condition when the muddy floor areis(punctuation + singular noun + plural verb) slick with reduced friction after the rain. On the contrary, the professor holdholds(punctuation + singular noun + plural verb) the opinion that it is impossible for the wind to push the wind. According to him, the sailing stones tend to root deeply into the ground. If there is not enough force to push them, it is impossible to manage thatthat,(This rule identifies whether commas are missing in a sentence.) let alone the wind.

Secondly, another possible formation of sailing stones involves ice formations. In contrast, the speaker refutes this idea, arguing that forming ice is really difficult in the desert. He further explains that the temperature is hardly below zero and, and(comma between independent clauses) it only drops below zero during the evening while it rises on the day, making it hard to form the ice.

Thirdly, the author states that it is people who move the stones due to the unusual phenomenon like crop circles. Instead, the lecturer believes that this explanation is impossible. In others words, there are no foot printfootprint(foot print (footprint)) around those sailing stones. It is hardly for people to move those stones without leaving any physical remarks like foot printsfootprints(foot print (footprint)).

Section Title: 6.文章修订

The reading passage and the lecture both discuss the mysterious phenomenon of sailing stones in Death Valley. The author presents three possible explanations for this occurrence, but the lecturer refutes each of them, providing counterarguments to support his stance.

Firstly, the author suggests that strong winds might be responsible for moving the stones, especially when the muddy ground becomes slippery after rainfall. However, the lecturer disagrees with this theory, stating that the stones create deep grooves in the ground as they move, indicating significant resistance. He argues that even powerful winds would not generate enough force to push such heavy stones through the playa's muddy floor.

Secondly, the reading passage proposes that ice formations could play a role in transporting these stones. The lecturer counters this idea by highlighting the challenges of forming large-scale ice sheets in a desert environment. He explains that not only is there limited groundwater available, but also temperature fluctuations between day and night make it difficult for ice sheets to grow and thicken enough to trap and carry the stones.

Lastly, the author posits that people might be moving these stones as part of an elaborate prank, similar to crop circles. The lecturer refutes this explanation as well by pointing out that no human or animal footprints have been found near the sailing stones. Furthermore, he emphasizes that it would be nearly impossible for individuals to move these heavy stones during muddy periods without leaving any traces behind.

In conclusion, none of these explanations provided by the author are convincing enough according to lecturer's perspective on sailing stone phenomenon in Death Valley. (270 words)

The reading and the lecturer passage and the lecture both delve into the discuss the mysterious phenomenon of sailing stones in Death Valley (the original text says "the topic of explanations of the formation of sailing stones" which is not as clear). The author presents three possible explanations for this occurrence, but the lecturer refutes each of them, providing counterarguments to support his stance (clarifies that the lecturer is providing counterarguments).

Firstly, the author suggests that strong winds might be responsible for moving the stones, especially when the muddy ground becomes slippery after rainfall (rephrased for clarity). However, the lecturer disagrees with this theory, stating that the stones create deep grooves in the ground as they move, indicating significant resistance (added details to support lecturer's argument). He argues that even powerful winds would not generate enough force to push such heavy stones through the playa's muddy floor (clarified and simplified language).

Secondly, the reading passage proposes that ice formations could play a role in transporting these stones. The lecturer counters this idea by highlighting the challenges of forming large-scale ice sheets in a desert environment (rephrased for clarity). He explains that not only is there limited groundwater available, but also temperature fluctuations between day and night make it difficult for ice sheets to grow and thicken enough to trap and carry the stones (added details to support lecturer's argument).

Lastly, the author gives three explanations, however, the speaker doesn’t find posits that people might be moving these convincing. ¶ First of all, the writer believe that these stones are pushed by the wind, especially under the condition when the muddy floor are slick with reduced friction after the rain. On the contrary, the professor hold the opinion that it is impossible for the wind to push the wind. According to him, the sailing stones tend to root deeply into the ground. If there is not enough force to push them, it is impossible to manage that let alone the wind. ¶ Secondly, another possible formation of sailing stones involves ice formations. In contrast, the speaker stones as part of an elaborate prank, similar to crop circles. The lecturer refutes this idea, arguing that forming ice is really difficult in the desert. He further explains that the temperature is hardly below zero and explanation as well by pointing out that no human or animal footprints have been found near the sailing stones (clarified and simplified language). Furthermore, he emphasizes that it only drops below zero would be nearly impossible for individuals to move these heavy stones during the evening while it rises on the day, making it hard to form the ice. ¶ Thirdly, the author states that it is people who move the stones due to the unusual phenomenon like crop circles. Instead, the lecturer believes that this explanation is impossible. In others words, there are no foot print around those sailing stones. It is hardly for people to move those stones muddy periods without leaving any physical remarks like foot prints.traces behind (added details to support lecturer's argument).

In conclusion, none of these explanations provided by the author are convincing enough according to lecturer's perspective on sailing stone phenomenon in Death Valley (clarified and simplified language).

8. Mind Map

1. Introduction
   - Sailing stones in Death Valley
   - Reading passage explanations
   - Lecture counterarguments

2. Strong Winds Theory
   - Author's explanation: strong winds, slippery ground
   - Lecturer's counterargument: deep grooves, resistance, insufficient force

3. Ice Formations Theory
   - Author's explanation: ice sheets transporting stones
   - Lecturer's counterargument: limited groundwater, temperature fluctuations, insufficient ice growth

4. Human Prank Theory
   - Author's explanation: elaborate prank, like crop circles
   - Lecturer's counterargument: no footprints, impossible to move without traces

5. Conclusion
   - None of the author's explanations are convincing according to the lecturer.

9. Keywords