TOEFL TPO -1 Writing Task 1 Sample: write a paper about it, thank you

legacy_task_page.hero_subtitle

legacy_task_page.sample_count

legacy_task_page.legacy_notice_title

legacy_task_page.legacy_notice_body

legacy_task_page.task_overview_title

legacy_task_page.reading_passage

Argeniavis magnificens, the largest bird to have ever inhabited Earth, lived six million years ago in the southern pan of South America that roughly corresponds to modern-day Argentina. The bird, which is known only through fossil remains, weighed up to 68 kilograms. There is some debate about whether this bird was able to fly or whether it had lost its ability to fly at some point during its evolution. First, there is the problem of lifting off into the air. Based on its skeleton, the bird's total wing span was nearly seven meters. Wings this long would have hit the ground if the bird had tried to lift off from a standing position. Modern flying birds have a wing-to-body proportion that allows them to take off without biting the ground with their wings. Second. even if the bird had managed to lift off, it doe not appear to have had enough muscle strength to make continuous flight possible. As large as it was, the Argentavis does not appear to have had sufficient muscles to keep its huge wings moving. It is highly improbable that its muscles could move its wings fast enough to keep it in the air for extended periods. Third, according to the theory of evolution, animals only have abilities that give them an advantage in their struggle to survive. Flying would not have given this giant bird any advantage. It did not need to fly in order to escape predators, because of its size it had no predators. It could hunt because it would have been such a clumsy and ineffticient flier that it could not possibly have captured enough food The bird, therefore, probably lost the ability to fly during its evolution.

legacy_task_page.question

write a paper about it, thank you

legacy_task_page.user_samples_title

task_page.user_sample

The reading passage explores the issue of there is some opinions about whether the birds lived in the southern pan of South America could be able to fly. The professor’s lecture deals with the same issue. However, he thinks that there is a high possibility that this bird has the ability to fly, which contradicts what the reading states. And in the lecture, he/she uses three specific points to support his idea.

task_page.evaluation_result

1.子项得分任务完成度：3 组织：2 连贯性和衔接：3 语言使用：3

2.预估分数

20. 3.任务完成度

从任务完成度的角度来看，文章对阅读和听力材料的主要观点进行了总结，但没有详细解释这些观点。为了提高任务完成度，建议在文章中加入更多关于阅读和听力材料的具体信息，并对这些信息进行比较和对比。此外，文章中的字数较少，只有72个单词，建议将字数增加到至少150个单词。

示例1：改进前：The reading passage explores the issue of there is some opinions about whether the birds lived in the southern pan of South America could be able to fly. 改进后：The reading passage argues that Argeniavis magnificens, a large bird that lived in South America, might not have been able to fly due to several reasons such as its size, wing-to-body proportion, and lack of evolutionary advantage.

示例2：改进前：However, he thinks that there is a high possibility that this bird has the ability to fly, which contradicts what the reading states. 改进后：However, the lecture refutes these points by providing evidence that suggests Argeniavis magnificens could have flown by using a running start, gliding on thermals, and benefiting from flight as a scavenger.

4.文章结构与组织从文章结构与组织的角度来看，文章缺乏清晰的结构。建议在文章开头加入引言，简要介绍阅读和听力材料的主题和观点。接下来，分段讨论阅读和听力材料中的不同观点，并对这些观点进行比较和对比。最后，总结文章并指出阅读和听力材料之间的关系。

示例1：改进前：The reading passage explores the issue of there is some opinions about whether the birds lived in the southern pan of South America could be able to fly. 改进后：The reading passage and the lecture both discuss the flying ability of Argeniavis magnificens, a large bird that lived in South America. While the reading passage presents arguments against its ability to fly, the lecture refutes these points by providing evidence to support its flying capability.

示例2：改进前：And in the lecture, he/she uses three specific points to support his idea. 改进后：In this essay, I will compare and contrast the arguments presented in both the reading passage and the lecture, focusing on three main points: how Argeniavis magnificens could take off, maintain flight, and benefit from flying as a scavenger.

5. 语法批改

Section Title: 6.文章修订

The reading passage delves into the debate surrounding the flight capabilities of Argeniavis magnificens, a prehistoric bird that inhabited the southern region of South America. Contrary to the doubts expressed in the reading, the professor in the listening passage asserts that it is highly probable that this enormous bird was indeed capable of flight, providing three compelling arguments to support this claim.

Firstly, the professor addresses the issue of taking off from a standing position by suggesting an alternative method for achieving flight. Rather than attempting to lift off from a stationary stance, Argeniavis magnificens could have utilized a running start, sprinting down a hill with its wings outstretched before catching air and ascending. This theory is supported by the geographical features of the region where its fossils were discovered, which contains numerous hills suitable for such takeoffs. Additionally, evidence from its strong thigh bones and large feet indicates that this bird was well-equipped for running.

Secondly, regarding concerns about muscle strength and continuous flight, the professor posits that Argeniavis magnificens may not have needed to constantly flap its wings to remain airborne. Instead, it could have relied on thermals - warm air currents rising into the atmosphere - to glide effortlessly for extended periods without expending significant energy. This method of utilizing thermals is employed by many large birds today, such as condors and eagles.

Lastly, contrary to claims in the reading passage that flight would not have conferred any evolutionary advantage upon Argeniavis magnificens due to its size and lack of predators, the professor argues that flying would have been highly beneficial for this bird as it was likely a scavenger. Scavengers often need to cover vast distances in search of carcasses for sustenance; therefore, being able to fly would have enabled Argeniavis magnificens to efficiently locate and reach its food sources.

In light of the professor's arguments, it becomes evident that Argeniavis magnificens was not only capable of flight but also benefited from this ability in its ecological niche as a scavenger. The evidence presented in the lecture effectively challenges and refutes the doubts expressed in the reading passage. (355 words)

The reading passage ~~explores~~ delves into the debate surrounding the flight capabilities of Argeniavis magnificens (clarification of the subject), a prehistoric bird that inhabited the southern region of South America. Contrary to the doubts expressed in the reading, the professor in the listening passage asserts that it is highly probable that this enormous bird was indeed capable of flight (clearer expression), providing three compelling arguments to support this claim.

Firstly, the professor addresses the issue of ~~there~~ taking off from a standing position by suggesting an alternative method for achieving flight (more specific). Rather than attempting to lift off from a stationary stance, Argeniavis magnificens could have utilized a running start, sprinting down a hill with its wings outstretched before catching air and ascending (clearer explanation). This theory is some opinions about whether the birds lived in the southern pan of South America could be able to fly. The professor’s lecture deals with the same issue. However, he thinks that there is a high possibility supported by the geographical features of the region where its fossils were discovered, which contains numerous hills suitable for such takeoffs (additional evidence). Additionally, evidence from its strong thigh bones and large feet indicates that this bird ~~has the~~ was well-equipped for running (supporting detail).

Secondly, regarding concerns about muscle strength and continuous flight, the professor posits that Argeniavis magnificens may not have needed to constantly flap its wings to remain airborne (clearer expression). Instead, it could have relied on thermals - warm air currents rising into the atmosphere - to glide effortlessly for extended periods without expending significant energy (explanation of concept). This method of utilizing thermals is employed by many large birds today, such as condors and eagles (supporting example).

Lastly, contrary to claims in the reading passage that flight would not have conferred any evolutionary advantage upon Argeniavis magnificens due to its size and lack of predators, the professor argues that flying would have been highly beneficial for this bird as it was likely a scavenger (addressing counterargument). Scavengers often need to cover vast distances in search of carcasses for sustenance; therefore, being able to fly would have enabled Argeniavis magnificens to efficiently locate and reach its food sources (explanation of advantage).

In light of the professor's arguments, it becomes evident that Argeniavis magnificens was not only capable of flight but also benefited from this ability ~~to fly, which contradicts what~~ in its ecological niche as a scavenger (conclusion). The evidence presented in the lecture effectively challenges and refutes the doubts expressed in the reading ~~states. And in the lecture, he/she uses three specific points to support his idea.~~passage (summary of main point).

8. Mind Map


1. Introduction
   - Debate on Argeniavis magnificens flight capabilities

2. Taking off from a standing position
   - Alternative method: running start
   - Geographical features support this theory
   - Strong thigh bones and large feet for running

3. Muscle strength and continuous flight
   - Utilizing thermals for gliding
   - Similar to condors and eagles

4. Evolutionary advantage of flight
   - Scavenger lifestyle benefits from flying
   - Efficiently locate and reach food sources

5. Conclusion
   - Argeniavis magnificens likely capable of flight

9. Keywords

Word	Phonetic Symbol	Part of Speech	English Definition	Simplified Chinese Translation (if needed)	Sample Sentence
Argeniavis magnificens	/ˌɑrˌdʒɛniˈeɪvɪs mægˈnɪfɪsənz/	Noun	A prehistoric bird species that inhabited South America	阿根廷巨鸟 (史前鸟类)	The debate surrounding the flight capabilities of Argeniavis magnificens is still ongoing.
Geographical features	/dʒiəˈgræfɪkəl ˈfiːtʃərz/	Noun phrase	Natural aspects of a region's landscape, such as hills or valleys	地理特征	The geographical features of the region where its fossils were discovered support the theory that it could fly.
Thermals	/ˈθɜrməlz/	Noun	Warm air currents rising into the atmosphere	上升热气流	Thermals can help large birds glide effortlessly for extended periods.
Scavenger	/ˈskævɪndʒər/	Noun	An animal that feeds on dead organisms or waste materials	食腐动物	Scavengers often need to cover vast distances in search of carcasses for sustenance.
Ecological niche	/ˌiːkəˈlɒdʒɪkəl niʃ/	Noun phrase	The role and position a species has in its environment, including how it interacts with other species and resources	生态位 (生态环境中的角色和地位)	Argeniavis magnificens benefited from its flight ability in its ecological niche as a scavenger.
Fossils	/ˈfɒsəlz/	Noun	Remains or traces of prehistoric organisms preserved in rock formations or other materials	化石	The fossils of Argeniavis magnificens were discovered in the southern region of South America.
Carcasses	/ˈkɑrkəsɪz/	Noun	Dead bodies of animals	动物尸体	- Scavengers often need to cover vast distances in search of carcasses for sustenance.
Ascending	/əˈsɛndɪŋ/	Verb	- Moving upward; rising	- 上升的	- Argeniavis magnificens could have sprinted down a hill with its wings outstretched before catching air and ascending.
Airborne	/ˈɛrˌbɔrn/	Adjective	- Supported by or suspended in the air; capable of flying	- 飞行中的，空中的	- Argeniavis magnificens may not have needed to constantly flap its wings to remain airborne.
Predators	/ˈprɛdətərz/	Noun	- Animals that hunt and kill other animals for food	- 捕食者	- The reading passage claims that flight would not have conferred any evolutionary advantage upon Argeniavis magnificens due to its size and lack of predators.